This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the consolidated operating results, financial condition and liquidity of Del Monte during the three-year period ended June 30, 2000. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Del Monte for the three-year period ended June 30, 2000 and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


General

Del Monte reports its financial results on a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year basis to coincide with its inventory production cycle, which is highly seasonal. Raw product is harvested and packed primarily in the months of June through October, during which time inventories rise to their highest levels. At the same time, consumption of canned products declines, reflecting, in part, lower levels of promotional activity, the availability of fresh alternatives and other factors. This situation impacts operating results as sales volumes, revenues and profitability decline during this period. Results over the remainder of the fiscal year are affected by many factors including industry supply and Del Monte’s share of that supply. See “—Seasonality

In 1997, in connection with Del Monte’s recapitalization, Del Monte began implementing a new business strategy designed to improve sales and operating margins by: (1) increasing market share and distribution of high margin value-added products; (2) introducing new products and packaging; (3) increasing penetration of high growth distribution channels, such as supercenters and warehouse clubs; (4) achieving cost savings through operating efficiencies, plant consolidations and investments in new and upgraded equipment; and (5) completing strategic acquisitions.

Consistent with Del Monte’s strategy to generate growth through acquisitions, Del Monte consummated the Contadina Acquisition in December 1997. The Contadina Acquisition contributes another established brand and positions Del Monte as the branded market leader in the high margin canned solid tomato category. The Contadina Acquisition also establishes a strong presence for Del Monte in the branded paste-based tomato products category, which includes tomato paste, tomato sauce and pizza sauce. Del Monte believes that Contadina’s strong brand recognition, particularly in paste-based tomato products, complements Del Monte’s brand leadership in canned solid tomato products and enhances Del Monte’s market share and household penetration. Del Monte also reacquired the rights to the Del Monte brand in South America in August 1998. That acquisition has opened a new geographic market for Del Monte.

In addition to diversifying further Del Monte’s revenue base, the Contadina Acquisition expanded Del Monte’s processing scale, which has resulted in production cost efficiencies. Moreover, among the facilities acquired by Del Monte was a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility at Hanford, California. In the third quarter of fiscal 1998, Del Monte committed to a plan to consolidate processing operations over a three-year period. As part of these efforts, Del Monte transferred tomato production at its Modesto, California facility to Hanford following the summer 1998 pack. Del Monte converted its Modesto facility to a fruit processing facility that has assumed the production previously conducted at Del Monte’s San Jose, California facility and will assume the production currently conducted at the Stockton, California facility. Del Monte closed its San Jose facility in December 1999 and will close its Stockton facility after the production season in 2000. In connection with these actions, Del Monte recorded charges of $6.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 1998, principally relating to severance. Del Monte incurred additional charges as a result of these plant closures. These charges included accelerated depreciation resulting from the effects of adjusting the tomato and fruit processing assets’ remaining useful lives to match the period of use prior to the closure of these plants. Accelerated depreciation totaling $4.3 million and $9.4 million was recorded in fiscal 2000 and 1999, respectively, and $3.0 million of such depreciation was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998. In addition, Del Monte incurred costs to remove and dispose of those assets, as well as ongoing fixed costs during the Modesto plant reconfiguration and until the sale of the San Jose and Stockton properties. These costs totaled $6.6 million in fiscal 2000 and $4.3 million in fiscal 1999. Del Monte’s results over the next three-year period are expected to be affected by related plant consolidation charges as follows: $2.9 million in fiscal 2001, $0.7 million in fiscal 2002, and $0.3 million in fiscal 2003. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2000. In addition, Del Monte’s vegetable processing plant located in Arlington, Wisconsin was closed in August 1998. Total costs incurred in connection with this closure were $3.5 million primarily relating to asset write-offs. Del Monte recorded this expense in the first quarter of fiscal 1999.

The plant consolidation plan is a major component of a capital investment program of approximately $100.0 million started by Del Monte a little over three years ago. A total of $94.0 million has been spent on this program as of June 30, 2000. Del Monte’s goal for this program is to achieve cumulative cost savings by the end of the fifth year estimated at approximately $170.0 million. As of June 30, 2000, Del Monte estimates that approximately $68.0 million in cumulative cost savings have been generated by this capital investment program.


Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from Del Monte’s consolidated statements of income, expressed as percentages of Del Monte’s net sales for such periods:


Fiscal Year Ended June 30,

2000 1999 1998

Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of products sold 63.0 66.4 68.4
Selling, administrative and general expense 26.3 24.9 24.1
Special charges related to plant consolidation 0.7 1.1 0.7
Acquisition expenses 0.1 0.5

   Operating income 10.0% 7.5% 6.3%

Interest expense 4.6% 5.2% 5.9%


The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, Del Monte’s net sales by product categories, expressed in dollar amounts and as percentages of Del Monte’s total net sales for such periods:

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,

(In millions) 2000 1999 1998

Net Sales:
Canned vegetables(a) $ 507.7 $ 508.0 $ 466.2
Canned fruit(a) 564.6 562.3 526.5
Tomato products(a) 377.4 423.8 320.6

Subtotal domestic 1,449.7 1,494.1 1,313.3
South America 12.9 10.4
Intercompany sales (0.5)

Total net sales $ 1,462.1 $ 1,504.5 $ 1,313.3

As a Percentage of Net Sales:
Canned vegetables(a) 34.7% 33.7% 35.5%
Canned fruit(a) 38.6 37.4 40.1
Tomato products(a) 25.8 28.2 24.4

Subtotal domestic 99.1 99.3 100.0
South America 0.9 0.7
Intercompany sales

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


(a) Includes sales of the entire product line across each channel of distribution, including sales to grocery chains, warehouse clubs, supercenters, mass merchandisers and other grocery retailers, as well as Del Monte’s foodservice, food ingredients, export and vegetable private label businesses and military sales.



Seasonality

Del Monte’s quarterly operating results have varied in the past and are likely to vary in the future based upon a number of factors. Del Monte’s historical net sales have exhibited seasonality, with the second and third fiscal quarters having the highest net sales. These two quarters reflect increased sales of Del Monte’s products during the holiday period in the United States extending from late November through December, as well as sales associated with the Easter holiday. Lower levels of promotional activity, the availability of fresh produce and other factors have historically affected net sales in the first fiscal quarter. Quarterly gross profit primarily reflects fluctuations in sales volumes and is also affected by the overall product mix. Del Monte’s fruit operations have a greater percentage of annual sales and cost of products sold in the first fiscal quarter, as compared to its vegetable and tomato operations, due principally to increased sales of fruit cups during the “back to school” period. Del Monte’s vegetable and fruit operations have a greater percentage of annual sales and cost of products sold in the second and third fiscal quarters, principally due to the year-end holiday season, and sales of ketchup and related cost of products sold typically increase in the fourth fiscal quarter. Selling, administrative and general expense tends to be greater in the first half of the fiscal year, reflecting promotional expenses relating to the “back to school” period and the year-end holiday season, while Easter is the only major holiday in the second half of the fiscal year.

The annual production volume of vegetable, fruit and tomatoes is driven by projected demand in the following year. Annual production is also influenced by general seasonal fluctuations primarily due to weather and overall growing conditions.

Del Monte ended fiscal 2000 with higher than desired inventory levels. In order to reduce certain inventory levels, production volumes will be lower during the 2000 production season. This lower pack will result in higher fixed costs per case. These higher costs are expected to increase costs of products sold as expressed as a percentage of net sales, but are not expected to significantly impact overall profitability.



FISCAL 2000 VS. FISCAL 1999


Net Sales

Consolidated net sales for fiscal 2000 decreased by $42.4 million, or 2.8%, from fiscal 1999. (Approximately 0.9% of consolidated net sales were generated by Del Monte’s South American business in fiscal 2000.) The decrease in sales in the current year primarily reflects the Company’s strategy to shift emphasis towards sales of higher margin products and to reduce emphasis on lower margin commodity items. This resulted in a decrease in sales in the foodservice/food ingredients channel. Excluding the foodservice/food ingredients channel, net sales for the year increased approximately one percent over last year, primarily reflecting continued growth in the club and mass merchandisers channel and growth from new products (Fruit-to-Go and continued expansion of Orchard Select) offset by lower sales in the retail tomato business. Ketchup sales declined due to strong competitive activity; additionally, tomato sauce sales declined due to less aggressive merchandising.

Although net sales were down as compared to prior year, the Company’s market share increased in all three major processed food categories. In fiscal 2000, Del Monte’s market share for Del Monte branded vegetables, based on case volume, was 23.7% versus 21.3% in the previous year, while Del Monte’s market share for Del Monte branded fruit products was 44.2% compared to 42.8% for the previous year. Del Monte’s market share for solid tomato products was 17.5% in fiscal 2000 compared to 17.0% in the fiscal 1999.


Cost of Products Sold

Costs decreased by $77.8 million in fiscal 2000 as compared to fiscal 1999, with cost of products sold expressed as a percentage of net sales of 63.0% in fiscal 2000 and 66.4% in fiscal 1999. The decrease in costs in fiscal 2000 was primarily due to lower sales. In addition, the decrease in cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales was due to lower costs as a result of capital spending initiatives and other favorable cost reductions, as well as a favorable sales mix of higher margin products.


Selling, Administrative and General Expense

Selling, administrative and general expense as a percentage of net sales was 26.3% and 24.9% in fiscal 2000 and 1999, respectively. Selling, administrative and general expense for fiscal 2000 was higher due to an investment in new products and in order to support growth in the retail business.

Research and development costs of $6.6 million and $6.2 million in fiscal 2000 and 1999, respectively, were included in general and administrative expenses.


Special Charges Related to Plant Consolidation

Del Monte incurred special charges of $10.9 million in fiscal 2000 compared to special charges of $17.2 million in the prior year. These charges included accelerated depreciation expense of $4.3 million and $9.4 million in fiscal 2000 and fiscal 1999, respectively, resulting from the effects of adjusting the assets’ remaining useful lives to accelerate the depreciation thereof. Special charges for fiscal 2000 and 1999 also included $5.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of on-going fixed costs and other period costs primarily incurred at the Modesto facility while under reconfiguration. Costs incurred for removal of tomato and fruit processing equipment to be disposed of totaled $2.7 million and $1.9 million in fiscal 2000 and 1999, respectively. Also included in fiscal 2000 was a reduction of $1.3 million in the severance accrual established in fiscal 1998, and a reduction of the accrual related to the Arlington plant closure of $0.7 million as the proceeds of the sale of the plant exceeded original projections.


Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased 13.5% in fiscal 2000 compared to fiscal 1999. This decrease was due to the lower average outstanding debt balances.


Other (Income) Expense

Other expense for fiscal 2000 decreased as compared to fiscal 1999 due to the inclusion in 1999 of expenses related to the withdrawn July 1998 public equity offering.


Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

The income tax benefit of $53.6 million was primarily attributable to the release of the majority of the valuation allowance. Management evaluated the available evidence and concluded it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its net deferred tax assets. In reaching this conclusion, significant weight was given to the Company’s current, as well as recent cumulative profitability.


Net Income before Extraordinary Item

Net income for fiscal 2000 increased by $100.3 million compared to the same period of prior year. The increase in net income is primarily due to the recognition of the valuation allowance, a more profitable mix of products sold and reduced plant consolidation costs.


Extraordinary Item

In conjunction with the repayment of $31.0 million of senior subordinated notes, Del Monte recorded an extraordinary loss. The extraordinary item charge consisted of the write-off of $1.5 million of previously capitalized debt issue costs related to the redeemed notes and original issue discount and $3.7 million of redemption premiums, net of tax benefit.



FISCAL 1999 VS. FISCAL 1998


South America Acquisition

On July 10, 1998, Del Monte entered into an agreement with Nabisco Inc. (“Nabisco”) to reacquire rights to the Del Monte brand in South America from Nabisco, Inc. and to purchase Nabisco’s canned vegetable and tomato business in Venezuela, including a food processing plant in Venezuela. The transaction closed on August 28, 1998 for a cash purchase price of $31.8 million. In connection with this acquisition, Del Monte incurred approximately $0.9 million of indirect acquisition expenses. RJR Nabisco had retained ownership of the Del Monte brand in South America and the Del Monte business in Venezuela when it sold other Del Monte businesses in 1990. This transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The purchase price was allocated as $3.1 million to inventory, $0.5 million to property, plant and equipment and $28.2 million representing intangible assets.


Net Sales

Consolidated net sales for fiscal 1999 increased by $191.2 million, or 14.6%, compared to fiscal 1998, primarily due to higher volumes in the vegetable and fruit businesses, sales growth of 38% over prior year in the club and mass merchandisers channel and Contadina product sales (which accounted for $95.1 million of the increase in fiscal 2000 primarily due to a full year of Contadina versus six months in fiscal 1998). Approximately 0.7% of consolidated net sales were generated by Del Monte’s South American business. The following discusses the increases within Del Monte’s major product lines. Vegetable product sales increased due to the successful implementation of a new vegetable marketing strategy, which has resulted in merchandising efficiencies, the impact of improved packaging in club stores and a higher margin product mix. Fruit product sales increased in fiscal 1999 as compared to the prior year, primarily due to the introduction of new products (FruitRageous and Fruit Pleasures single-serve fruit products and the Orchard Select fruit-in-glass product), which began national distribution during the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Fruit product sales also increased due to growth in the higher margin categories of fruit cups, specialty fruit and buffet fruit. In fiscal 1999, Del Monte’s market share for Del Monte branded vegetables, based on case volume, was 21.3% versus 20.0% in the previous year, while Del Monte’s market share for Del Monte branded fruit products was 42.8% compared to 42.2% for the previous year. Del Monte’s market share for solid tomato products was 17.0% in fiscal 1999 compared to 16.5% in the previous year.


Cost of Products Sold

Cost of products sold as a percent of net sales was 66.4% for fiscal 1999, compared to 68.4% for fiscal 1998. The decrease in cost of products sold as a percent of net sales was primarily due to manufacturing cost decreases, higher product pricing and a favorable product mix. Manufacturing costs were favorable in the current year period as compared to the prior year period due to more favorable raw product costs, cost savings from capital spending initiatives and increased production levels.


Selling, Administrative and General Expense

Selling, administrative and general expense increased by $58.9 million for fiscal 1999 compared to fiscal 1998. The increase in selling, administrative and general expense was primarily due to higher marketing costs associated with the introduction of new products, promotion cost increases resulting from higher volumes of product sold (including the increase due to the acquisition of Contadina) and increased spending resulting from higher levels of promotional activity.

Included in general and administrative expenses are research and development costs of $6.2 million and $5.3 million for fiscal 1999 and 1998. Research and development spending in fiscal 1999 and 1998 remained focused on strategic spending to maintain the existing business and to develop product line extensions.


Special Charges Related to Plant Consolidation

Del Monte incurred special charges of $17.2 million in fiscal 1999 compared to special charges of $9.6 million ($6.6 million severance accrual and $3.0 million accelerated depreciation) in fiscal 1998. Special charges for fiscal 1999 included $9.4 million of accelerated depreciation related to buildings and machinery and equipment that will no longer be needed following the consolidation of the operations of two fruit processing plants and two tomato processing plants as compared to $3.0 million in fiscal 1998 related to accelerated depreciation. The plant consolidation plan was not implemented until the end of fiscal 1998, therefore, only three months of accelerated depreciation was included in prior year’s special charges as compared to twelve months of accelerated depreciation in the current year. Special charges for fiscal 1999 also included $2.4 million of on-going fixed costs and other period costs incurred at the Modesto facility while under reconfiguration, as well as a $1.9 million charge, recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 1999, representing costs to be incurred for removal of tomato processing equipment to be disposed of. In addition, special charges for 1999 also included $3.5 million, representing primarily the write-down to fair value of assets held for sale related to the closure of the Arlington, Wisconsin plant, which was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 1999.


Interest Expense

Interest expense was relatively flat in fiscal 1999. Debt balances increased significantly in mid fiscal 1998 due to the Contadina Acquisition. However, after the February 1999 public equity offering, debt balances decreased in fiscal 1999 since the proceeds of the offering were used primarily to repay debt.


Other Expense

Other expense for fiscal 1999 represented expenses of the public equity offering that was withdrawn due to conditions in the equity securities market in July 1998. These expenses were charged to earnings during the first quarter of fiscal 1999 upon the withdrawal of that offering.


Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

As of June 30, 1999, Del Monte had $53.4 million in net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes, which will expire between 2009 and 2012.


Net Income before Extraordinary Item

Net income before extraordinary item for fiscal 1999 was $32.7 million compared to net income of $5.5 million in fiscal 1998. This increase was primarily due to an increase in operating income resulting from higher net sales and more favorable manufacturing and product costs in fiscal 1999 compared to fiscal 1998. The increase was somewhat offset by higher special charges related to plant consolidation and costs of the withdrawn July 1998 public equity offering.


Extraordinary Item

Proceeds of the February 1999 public equity offering were used to redeem preferred stock and a portion of the outstanding subordinated notes and to repay senior debt. The extraordinary item charge consisted of the write-off of $5.5 million of previously capitalized debt issue costs related to the redeemed notes and early debt retirement and $13.7 million of redemption premiums.



RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In fiscal 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”) (as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138). SFAS No. 133 is required to be adopted for all fiscal quarters and fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000 and relates to accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those instruments at fair value. Based on the Company’s current limited use of derivative instruments, Del Monte anticipates that adoption of SFAS No. 133 will not have a significant effect on its results of operations or its financial position.

In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB 101 is to be adopted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1999, which for the Company would be fiscal year 2001. SAB 101 addresses various topics in revenue recognition. The Company is currently analyzing SAB 101, however based on management’s current understanding and interpretation, SAB 101 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 44 (“FIN 44”), “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation—An Interpretation of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25.” FIN 44 clarifies the application of APB 25 and is effective July 1, 2000. The Company believes that its current accounting policies are in conformity with this interpretation, and does not believe that FIN 44 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on Issue 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs.” This issue addresses the income statement classification for shipping and handling fees and costs by companies. The Company believes that its current accounting policies are in conformity with this issue, and does not believe that EITF 00-10 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2000, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue 00-14, “Accounting for Certain Sales Incentives.” This issue addresses the recognition, measurement, and income statement classification for sales incentives offered voluntarily by a vendor without charge to customers that can be used in, or are exercisable by a customer as a result of, a single exchange transaction. The Company is currently analyzing EITF 00-14, however based on management’s current understanding and interpretation, EITF 00-14 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Del Monte’s primary cash requirements are to fund debt service, finance seasonal working capital needs and make capital expenditures. Internally generated funds and amounts available under its revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) are Del Monte’s primary sources of liquidity.

Management believes that cash flow from operations and availability under the Revolver will provide adequate funds for Del Monte’s working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and debt service obligations for at least the next 12 months.

Del Monte’s ability to fund its cash requirements and to remain in compliance with all of the financial covenants under its debt agreements depends on its future operating performance and cash flow. These are in turn subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond Del Monte’s control.

As part of its business strategy, Del Monte continuously reviews acquisition opportunities. Del Monte believes that any acquisition would likely require the incurrence of additional debt, which could exceed amounts available under the Bank Financing (as defined in “Financing Activities—2000 Activity”). As a result, completion of any such acquisition could require the consent of the lenders under the Bank Financing and the amendment and restatement of the terms thereof, including to permit Del Monte’s compliance with its covenants. Del Monte cannot predict whether, or the terms on which, the lenders under the Bank Financing would grant their consent.


Operating Activities

The working capital position of Del Monte is seasonally affected by the growing cycle of the vegetables, fruit and tomatoes it processes. Substantially all inventories are produced during the harvesting and packing months of June through October and depleted through the remaining seven months. Accordingly, working capital requirements fluctuate significantly. Del Monte uses funds from its Revolver, which provides for a $350.0 million line of credit, to finance the seasonal working capital needs of its operations.

In fiscal 2000, cash used in operating activities was $7.1 million, primarily due to an increase in inventories. In fiscal 1999, cash provided by operations was $96.1 million, primarily due to a significant increase in sales.


Investing Activities

In fiscal 2000, cash used in investing decreased by $20.3 million as compared to fiscal 1999, primarily due to the purchase of the South American business in fiscal 1999. In fiscal 1999, cash used in investing decreased by $135.8 million as compared to fiscal 1998 due to the purchase of Contadina in fiscal 1998.

Capital expenditures for fiscal 2000 were $67.8 million, including $11.0 million for the purchase of the Cambria, Wisconsin plant and approximately $0.6 million for domestic environmental compliance, as Del Monte continued its implementation of a program which is intended to generate cost savings by introducing new equipment that would result in general production efficiencies. Of the remaining $56.2 million of capital expenditures for fiscal 2000, Del Monte spent approximately $21.5 million in connection with its plans to consolidate processing operations and $34.7 million for general manufacturing improvements. Del Monte plans an aggregate of approximately $50.0 million in capital expenditures for fiscal 2001 with approximately $5.5 million of those expenditures to be incurred in connection with the Company’s continuing program to consolidate processing operations. Del Monte continually evaluates its capital expenditure requirements, and such plans are subject to change depending on market conditions, Del Monte’s cash position, the availability of alternate means of financing and other factors.

Del Monte expects to fund capital expenditures from internally generated cash flows and by borrowing from available financing sources.


Financing Activities—2000 Activity

Credit Agreement Amendment and Repayment of a Portion of 12 1/4% Notes. 
On January 14, 2000, the Company amended its senior credit agreement with respect to its Revolver and term loan facility (Term A Loan and Term B Loan, collectively the “Term Loan,” and together with Revolver, the “Bank Financing”). The amendment provided for additional borrowing capacity (up to $100.0 million) under either the Revolver or Term B Loan. The proceeds of this borrowing were used to reduce the Revolver balance. Under this provision, the Company increased its Term B borrowings by $100.0 million in August 2000. The amendment also adjusted certain financial covenants to reflect changes in the Company’s recent financial performance. The amendment did not change the Revolver’s expiration date, the Term Loan maturity dates or the terms of the pricing schedule.

The amendment allowed the prepayment of up to $35.0 million of senior subordinated notes. During February 2000, the Company repurchased $31.0 million of 12 1/4% notes through the use of funds that carry a lower interest rate. In conjunction with this early debt prepayment, an extraordinary loss of $5.2 million ($4.3 million net of tax benefit of $0.9 million) was recorded, consisting of prepayment premiums and a write-off of capitalized deferred debt issue costs and original issue discount.


Financing Activities—1999 Activity

Public Equity Offering. 
On February 10, 1999, the public equity offering, consisting of 16,667,000 shares of common stock sold by Del Monte and 3,333,000 shares of common stock sold by certain stockholders of Del Monte, was consummated at an initial offering price of $15.00 per share. Del Monte received net proceeds of $229.7 million. Total common shares outstanding after the offering were 52,163,943. Del Monte used a portion of the net proceeds from the public equity offering to redeem $45.6 million of its redeemable preferred stock, including $2.3 million of unamortized discount, $10.0 million of accreted dividends and $0.7 million of redemption premium. Del Monte also used $57.4 million of the net proceeds to redeem a portion of its senior discount notes, including $1.5 million of accrued interest and $6.4 million of redemption premium. Del Monte contributed the remainder of the net proceeds to DMC, its principal subsidiary. DMC used the contribution to prepay $63.3 million of its indebtedness under its bank term loans, to redeem $61.8 million of its senior subordinated notes, including $0.9 million of accelerated amortization of original issue discount, $2.7 million of accrued interest and $6.6 million of redemption premium, and to repay $1.6 million of indebtedness under the Revolver.


Financing Activities—1998 Activity

Contadina Acquisition. 
In connection with the $194.9 million Contadina Acquisition, Del Monte issued the senior discount notes (the “Del Monte Notes”) with an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $230.0 million and received gross proceeds of $125.5 million. The Del Monte Notes accrue interest at 12.50% which accretes on each June 15 and December 15 through December 15, 2002, after which time interest is required to be paid in cash until maturity. The Del Monte Notes mature on December 15, 2007. A portion of the net proceeds from the February 1999 public equity offering was used to redeem 35% of the Del Monte Notes.

In connection with the Contadina Acquisition, Del Monte also amended the Bank Financing and certain related debt covenants to permit additional funding under the existing Term B Loan in an amount of $50.0 million, thus increasing the aggregate amount outstanding at that time under the Term Loan to $430.0 million.


Restrictive Covenants

The DMC Notes, the Del Monte Notes, Term Loan and Revolver agreements contain restrictive covenants which require Del Monte to meet certain financial tests, including minimum fixed charge coverage, minimum adjusted net worth and maximum leverage ratios. These requirements and ratios generally become more restrictive over time, subject to allowances for seasonal fluctuations. Del Monte was in compliance with all debt covenants at June 30, 2000. The credit agreements applicable to DMC generally limit through restricted payment covenants the ability of DMC to make cash payments to Del Monte, thereby limiting Del Monte’s ability to pay monetary dividends.


Pension Funding

As described more fully in Note 8 of the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2000, Del Monte’s defined benefit retirement plans were previously determined to be underfunded under federal ERISA guidelines. It had been Del Monte’s policy to fund Del Monte’s retirement plans in an amount consistent with the funding requirements of federal law and regulations and not to exceed an amount that would be deductible for federal income tax purposes. In connection with Del Monte’s recapitalization, Del Monte entered into an agreement with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation dated April 7, 1997 whereby Del Monte contributed $15.0 million within 30 days after the consummation of the recapitalization. Del Monte contributed $15.0 million in calendar 1998 and $9.0 million in calendar 1999. Del Monte will contribute a minimum of $8.0 million in calendar 2000, of which $4.0 million has been paid by June 30, 2000. Del Monte will also contribute a minimum of $8.0 million in calendar 2001, for a total of $55.0 million. The contributions required to be made in 2000 and 2001 have been secured by a $14.0 million letter of credit. This letter of credit is subject to periodic reduction as contributions are made in accordance with the agreement.


Environmental Matters

Del Monte spent approximately $1.8 million on domestic environmental expenditures from fiscal 1998 through fiscal 2000, primarily related to UST remediation activities and upgrades to boilers and wastewater treatment systems. Del Monte projects that it will spend an aggregate of approximately $3.1 million in fiscal 2001 and 2002 on capital projects and other expenditures in connection with environmental compliance, primarily for boiler upgrades, compliance costs related to the consolidation of its fruit and tomato processing operations and continued UST remediation activities. Del Monte believes that its liabilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), and other environmental liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on Del Monte’s financial position or results of operations. See “Business—Environmental Compliance.”


Tax Net Operating Loss Carryforwards

As of June 30, 2000, Del Monte had $37.5 million in net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes, which will expire in 2012. Applicable laws may limit Del Monte’s use of these net operating loss carryforwards in any year.


Inflation

Del Monte’s costs are affected by inflation and Del Monte may experience the effects of inflation in future periods. However, Del Monte has historically mitigated the inflationary impact of increases in its costs by controlling its overall cost structure.



FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES

Del Monte’s primary market risk exposure is that of interest rate risk. Del Monte has entered into interest-rate cap agreements limiting Del Monte’s exposure to interest rate increases, thus limiting the impact of interest-rate increases on future income. Del Monte uses derivatives only for purposes of managing risk associated with the underlying exposures. Del Monte does not trade or use instruments with the objective of earning financial gains on interest rate fluctuations alone, nor does it use instruments where there are not underlying exposures. Complex instruments involving leverage or multipliers are not used. Management believes that its use of these instruments to manage risk is in Del Monte’s best interest and that any resulting market risk exposure would not materially effect Del Monte’s operating results. (Market risk exposure has been defined as the change in fair value of a derivative financial instrument assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in market rates.)

Del Monte also has an insignificant degree of market risk exposure in regards to currency risk. Except for sales within South America by Del Monte’s subsidiaries in Columbia and Venezuela, Del Monte requires payment in United States currency. If non-United States domiciled customers’ local currency devalues significantly against the United States dollar, the customers could potentially encounter difficulty in making the United States dollar-denominated payments.

Del Monte does not believe it has any material commodity risk since Del Monte purchases most of its raw product requirements under arrangements whereby pricing has not fluctuated significantly in recent years. See “Business—Supply and Production” and Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2000.



FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

The future operating results of Del Monte may be materially affected by a number of factors, including, among others, those factors discussed below.

This annual report also contains forward-looking statements, including those in the sections captioned “Business,” “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about Del Monte’s beliefs or expectations, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on plans, estimates and projections at the time Del Monte makes the statements, and you should not place undue reliance on them. Del Monte does not undertake to update any of these statements in light of new information or future events.

Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Del Monte cautions you that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. These factors include, among others: general economic and business conditions; weather conditions; crop yields; competition; raw material costs and availability; the loss of significant customers; market acceptance of new products; successful integration of acquired businesses; consolidation of processing plants; changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; changes in, or the failure or inability to comply with, governmental regulations, including, without limitation, environmental regulations; industry trends and capacity and other factors discussed below.


Our High Leverage Could Adversely Affect Our Business

Del Monte is highly leveraged. Del Monte can incur additional indebtedness, even though its principal credit facility imposes some limits on the ability to do so. Because its business is seasonal, Del Monte’s borrowings fluctuate significantly during the year, generally peaking in September and October. Del Monte’s high degree of leverage can have important adverse consequences, such as:

  • Limiting Del Monte’s ability to obtain additional financing;
  • Limiting Del Monte’s ability to invest operating cash flow in its business;
  • Limiting Del Monte’s ability to compete with companies that are not as highly leveraged;
  • Increasing Del Monte’s vulnerability to economic downturns and changing market conditions; and
  • Increasing Del Monte’s vulnerability to fluctuations in market interest rates.

Del Monte’s ability to pay its debt service depends partly on its performance. Del Monte’s financial position could also prevent it from obtaining necessary financing at favorable rates, including at times when it must refinance maturing debt. If Del Monte cannot pay its debt service and meet its other liquidity needs from operating cash flow, it could have substantial liquidity problems. If Del Monte defaults on any of its debt, the relevant lenders could accelerate the maturity of the debt and take other actions that could adversely affect Del Monte. For example, in the event of a default under Del Monte’s Bank Financing, the lenders could foreclose on the security for the facility, which includes virtually all of the assets of Del Monte.


Our Business is Highly Competitive

Many companies compete in the domestic canned vegetable, fruit and tomato product categories. However, only a few well-established companies operate on both a national and a regional basis with one or several branded product lines. Del Monte faces strong competition from these and other companies in all its product lines. Important competitive considerations include the following:

  • Some of Del Monte’s competitors have greater financial resources and operating flexibility;
  • Several of Del Monte’s product lines are sensitive to competition from regional brands, and many of Del Monte’s product lines compete with imports, private label products and fresh alternatives;
  • Del Monte cannot predict the pricing or promotional actions of its competitors or whether they will have a negative effect on Del Monte. Also, when Del Monte raises its prices, Del Monte may lose market share to its competitors; and
  • The canned food industry has in the past experienced processing over-capacity, which could create an imbalance in supply and demand that depresses sales volumes or prices.
  • Tri Valley Growers, a significant competitor in the canned fruit business, filed for bankruptcy on July 10, 2000. If Tri Valley, chooses to drop prices or increase discounts materially in order to generate cash due to its financial situation, that could negatively impact Del Monte’s fruit and tomato businesses.

Our Business Strategy Poses Special Risks Associated with Our Ability to Reduce Costs, Reach Targeted Customers and Complete Acquisitions Successfully

The success of Del Monte’s business strategy depends in part on its ability to reduce costs. Del Monte’s performance also depends on its ability to increase sales of its higher margin products and to increase product distribution through high volume warehouse clubs. Del Monte also plans to increase operating results through acquisitions. All of these plans involve risks, including the following:

  • Del Monte is converting its Modesto facility from tomato to fruit processing. Following its seasonal 2000 pack of fruit, Del Monte will shut down the Stockton facility for consolidation into Modesto. To assure production capacity for the 2001 fruit harvest, Del Monte must complete the conversion of the Modesto facility by June 2001. If Del Monte does not meet this timetable to any significant degree, fruit production could be materially reduced;
  • Del Monte may not complete capital projects on time or within budget;
  • Cost saving measures can sometimes impair a company’s ability to respond rapidly to changes in the industry;
  • Warehouse clubs and mass merchandisers do not enter into long-term contracts and purchase products based on their inventory levels. They can stop purchasing Del Monte’s products at any time;
  • Acquisitions could require the consent of Del Monte’s main bank lenders;
  • Del Monte may not be able to integrate successfully acquired businesses, including personnel, operating facilities and information systems, into its existing operations; and
  • In pursuing acquisitions, Del Monte could incur substantial additional debt and contingent liabilities.

Severe Weather Conditions and Natural Disasters Can Affect Crop Supplies and Reduce Our Operating Results

Severe weather conditions and natural disasters, such as floods, droughts, frosts, earthquakes or pestilence, may affect the supply of Del Monte’s products. These events can result in reduced supplies of raw materials, lower recoveries of usable raw materials, higher costs of cold storage if harvests are accelerated and processing capacity is unavailable or interruptions in Del Monte’s production schedules if harvests are delayed.


Our Operating Results Are Highly Seasonal

Del Monte does not manufacture the majority of its products continuously, but instead has a production period that is limited to approximately three to four months during the summer each year. Del Monte’s working capital requirements are also seasonal and are most significant in the first and second fiscal quarters. Del Monte’s sales tend to peak in the second and third fiscal quarters each year, mainly as a result of the holiday period in November and December and the Easter holiday. By contrast, in the first fiscal quarter of each year, sales generally decline, mainly due to less promotional activity and the availability of fresh produce.


Our Business is Subject to the Risk of Environmental Liability

As a result of its agricultural, food processing and canning activities, Del Monte is subject to various environmental laws and regulations. Del Monte has been named as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) and may be liable for environmental investigation and remediation costs at certain designated “Superfund Sites” under CERCLA or under similar state laws. Del Monte may in the future be named as a PRP at other currently or previously owned or operated sites, and additional remediation requirements could be imposed. Also, under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is involved in a series of regulatory actions relating to the evaluation and use of pesticides in the food industry. The effect of such actions and future actions on the availability and use of pesticides could have a material adverse impact on Del Monte’s financial position or results of operations.


TPG Continues to Control Del Monte

TPG Partners, L.P. and some of its affiliates (collectively, “TPG”) own 46.6% of the common stock. TPG’s large interest may also discourage, delay, deter or prevent a change in control of Del Monte or discourage bids for the common stock at a premium price. Del Monte also has contractual relationships with TPG, under which TPG provides it with financial advisory and other services. These arrangements could give rise to conflicts of interest.


Our Debt Covenants Can Restrict Our Operating Flexibility

Del Monte is subject to various financial and operating covenants under its principal credit facility, including limitations on asset sales, the amount of debt it can incur or repay and the amount and kind of distributions that it and its subsidiaries may make. Del Monte must also meet specified financial ratios and tests, including minimum net worth, minimum fixed charge coverage and maximum leverage ratios. Del Monte has pledged substantially all of its assets to secure its bank and other debt.


Our Brand Name Could Be Confused with Names of Other Companies

Del Monte has licensed the Del Monte brand name to various unaffiliated companies internationally and, for some of its products, in the United States. Acts or omissions by these unaffiliated companies may adversely affect the value of the Del Monte brand name, the trading prices for the common stock and demand for Del Monte’s products.


Fluctuation in Market Price of the Common Stock

The common stock has a limited trading history. Although the common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Exchange, an active trading market may not be sustained. The market price could also fluctuate substantially in response to various factors and events, including the liquidity of the market for the common stock, differences between Del Monte’s actual performance and that expected by investors and analysts, changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections, pricing and competition in Del Monte’s industry, new statutes or regulations and changes in general market conditions.

Our Anti-Takeover Defenses May Depress Our Stock Price or Discourage Premium-Generating Transactions

Anti-takeover provisions under state law and in Del Monte’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws may deter, delay or prevent hostile takeovers and other attempts to make changes in Del Monte’s Board of Directors or management. The fact that we have these provisions may depress our stock price and could discourage transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium over the market value of their shares. Under these provisions:

  • Members of Del Monte’s Board have staggered terms;
  • Stockholders are not entitled to cumulative voting rights;
  • Only a majority of the Board, and not stockholders, may call a meeting of stockholders;
  • Certain matters must be approved by a supermajority vote of stockholders;
  • Del Monte can issue preferred stock on any terms it decides without the approval of common stockholders; and
  • Del Monte can implement, without stockholder approval, a “rights” or “poison pill” plan without the approval of common stockholders.