from year-end 2006 to year-end 2007, including approximately
140 full-time equivalent employees added in new banking
centers. The increase in incentive compensation was primarily
due to increased incentives tied to peer-based comparisons of
corporate results. Severance included $2 million in 2007
related to the relocation of the Corporations headquarters
to Dallas, Texas. The increase in 2006 was primarily due to
increases in regular salaries of $37 million and
shared-based compensation of $14 million. The increase in
regular salaries in 2006 was primarily the result of annual
merit increases of approximately $17 million and increased
contract labor costs associated with technology-related
projects. In addition, staff size from continuing operations
increased approximately 65 full-time equivalent employees
from year-end 2005 to year-end 2006. Shared-based compensation
expense increased in 2006 primarily as a result of adopting the
requisite service period provisions of SFAS 123 (revised
2004) (SFAS 123(R)), Shared-Based Payment,
effective January 1, 2006, as discussed in Notes 1 and
15 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 72 and 95,
respectively. These increases were partially offset by a
$16 million decline in incentives.
Employee benefits expense increased $9 million, or five
percent, in 2007, compared to an increase of $6 million, or
three percent, in 2006. The increase in 2007 resulted primarily
from an increase in defined contribution plan expense, mostly
from a change in the Corporations core matching
contribution rate effective January 1, 2007. The increase
in 2006 resulted primarily from an increase in pension expense.
For a further discussion of pension and defined contribution
plan expense, refer to the Critical Accounting
Policies on page 62 of this financial review and
Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements on
page 97.
Net occupancy and equipment expense increased $18 million,
or ten percent, to $198 million in 2007, compared to an
increase of $9 million, or six percent, in 2006. Net
occupancy and equipment expense increased $9 million and
$7 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to the
addition of 30 new banking centers in 2007, 25 in 2006 and 18 in
2005.
Outside processing fee expense increased $6 million, or
seven percent, to $91 million in 2007, from
$85 million in 2006, compared to an increase of
$8 million, or 10 percent, in 2006. The 2007 increase
is from higher volume in activity-based processing charges, in
part related to outsourcing. The 2006 increase in outside
processing fees resulted primarily from the outsourcing of
certain trust and retirement services processing and a new
electronic bill payment service marketed to corporate customers
in 2006.
Software expense increased $7 million, or 12 percent,
in 2007, compared to an increase of $7 million, or
15 percent in 2006. The increases in both 2007 and 2006
were primarily due to increased investments in technology and
the implementation of several systems, including tools for a
sales tracking system in the banking centers, anti-money
laundering initiatives and a corporate banking portal,
increasing both amortization and maintenance costs.
Customer services expense decreased $4 million, or seven
percent, to $43 million in 2007, from $47 million in
2006, and decreased $22 million, or 33 percent, in
2006, from $69 million in 2005. Customer services expense
represents compensation provided to customers, and is one method
to attract and retain title and escrow deposits in the Financial
Services Division. The amount of customer services expense
varies from period to period as a result of changes in the level
of noninterest-bearing deposits and low-rate loans in the
Financial Services Division and the earnings credit allowances
provided on these deposits, as well as a competitive environment.
Litigation and operational losses increased $7 million, or
55 percent, to $18 million in 2007, from
$11 million in 2006, and decreased $3 million, or
17 percent, in 2006, compared to $14 million in 2005.
Litigation and operational losses include traditionally defined
operating losses, such as fraud or processing problems, as well
as uninsured losses and litigation losses. These expenses are
subject to fluctuation due to timing of authorized and actual
litigation settlements as well as insurance settlements. The
increase in 2007 reflected $13 million to record an
estimated liability related to membership in Visa, partially
offset by a litigation-related insurance settlement of
$8 million received in the second quarter 2007. Members of
the Visa card association participate in a loss sharing
arrangement to allocate financial responsibilities arising from
any potential adverse resolution of certain antitrust lawsuits
challenging the practices of the association. The Corporation
believes that its share of the proceeds from an expected initial
public offering of Visa, anticipated in early 2008, will exceed
its share of recorded losses.
The provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments
was a negative provision of $1 million in 2007, compared to
provisions of $5 million and $18 million in 2006 and
2005, respectively. For additional
30
information on the provision for credit losses on
lending-related commitments, refer to Notes 1 and 20 to the
consolidated financial statements on pages 72 and 107,
respectively, and the Provision for Credit Losses
section on page 26 of this financial review.
Other noninterest expenses decreased $41 million, or
14 percent, in 2007, compared to an increase of
$32 million, or 13 percent, in 2006. The decrease in
2007 was primarily the result of the prospective change in
classification of interest on tax liabilities to provision
for income taxes in 2007. The following table illustrates
the fluctuations in certain categories included in other
noninterest expenses on the consolidated statements of
income. For a further discussion of interest on tax liabilities,
refer to Income Taxes and Tax-Related Items below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Other noninterest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Charitable Foundation Contribution
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other real estate expenses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
N/A- Not Applicable
Management expects a low single-digit decline in noninterest
expenses in 2008 compared to 2007 levels, excluding the
provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments and
including the impact of a 2008 change in the application of
FAS 91 discussed in the 2008 guidance provided on
page 22 of this financial review.
The Corporations efficiency ratio (total noninterest
expenses as a percentage of total revenue (FTE) excluding net
securities gains) decreased to 58.58 percent in 2007,
compared to 58.92 percent in 2006 and 58.01 percent in
2005. The efficiency ratio declined in 2007 primarily due to
increased income levels and increased in 2006 primarily due to
higher expense levels.
Income
Taxes And Tax-Related Items
The provision for income taxes was $306 million in 2007,
compared to $345 million in 2006 and $393 million in
2005. The provision for income tax in 2007 included a
$9 million reduction ($6 million after-tax) of
interest resulting from a settlement with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) on a refund claim. The provision for income taxes
in 2006 was impacted by the completion of an IRS audit of
federal tax returns for years 1996 through 2000, the settlement
of various refund claims and an adjustment to tax reserves. In
the first quarter 2006, tax reserves, which include the
provision for income taxes and interest expense on tax
liabilities (included in other noninterest expenses
in 2006 and 2005) were adjusted to reflect the resolution
of those tax years and to reflect an updated assessment of
reserves on certain types of structured lease transactions and a
series of loans to foreign borrowers. Interest on tax
liabilities was also reduced by $6 million in the second
quarter 2006, upon settlement of various refund claims with the
IRS. As previously disclosed in quarterly and annual SEC filings
under the heading Tax Contingency, the IRS
disallowed the benefits related to a series of loans to foreign
borrowers. The Corporation has had ongoing discussions with the
IRS related to the disallowance. In the fourth quarter 2006,
based on settlements discussed, the Corporation recorded a
charge to its tax reserves for the disallowed loan benefits. The
following table summarizes the impact of the items described
above on the Corporations consolidated statement of income
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Interest on Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
Provision for
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax
|
|
|
After-tax
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Completion of IRS audit of the Corporations federal income
tax returns for
1996-2000
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
Settlement of various refund claims
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Adjustment to tax reserves on a series of loans to foreign
borrowers
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax-related items
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
The effective tax rate, computed by dividing the provision for
income taxes by income from continuing operations before income
taxes, was 31.0 percent in 2007, 30.6 percent in 2006
and 32.5 percent in 2005. Changes in the effective tax rate
in 2007 from 2006, and 2006 from 2005, are disclosed in
Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements on
page 103. The Corporation had a net deferred tax liability
of $146 million at December 31, 2007. Included in net
deferred taxes at December 31, 2007 were deferred tax
assets of $514 million, net of a $2 million valuation
allowance established for certain state deferred tax assets. A
valuation allowance is provided when it is
more-likely-than-not that some portion of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets are
evaluated for realization based on available evidence and
assumptions made regarding future events. In the event that the
future taxable income does not occur in the manner anticipated,
other initiatives could be undertaken to preclude the need to
recognize a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset.
On January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions
of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). As a result,
the Corporation recognized an increase in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $18 million at
January 1, 2007, accounted for as a change in accounting
principle via a decrease to the opening balance of retained
earnings ($13 million net of tax). Prior disclosures on the
change in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from the adoption
of FIN 48 were adjusted to address an uncertain tax
position that was incorrectly assessed at the time of adoption.
The facts and circumstances surrounding this uncertain tax
position were unchanged since January 1, 2007. For further
discussion of FIN 48 refer to Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements on page 103.
In July, 2007, the State of Michigan replaced its current Single
Business Tax (SBT) with a new Michigan Business Tax (MBT).
Financial institutions are subject to an industry-specific tax
which is based on net capital, effective January 1, 2008.
Management believes the MBT will have an immaterial effect on
the Corporations financial condition and results of
operations when compared to the SBT. Both the SBT and MBT, when
effective, are recorded in Other noninterest
expenses on the consolidated statements of income.
Management expects an effective tax rate for the full-year 2008
of about 32 percent.
Income
From Discontinued Operations, Net Of Tax
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was
$4 million in 2007, compared to $111 million in 2006
and $45 million in 2005. Income from discontinued
operations in 2007 reflected an adjustment to the initial gain
recorded on the sale of the Corporations Munder subsidiary
in 2006. Included in 2006 was a $108 million after-tax gain
on the sale of Munder in the fourth quarter 2006. The Munder
sale agreement included an interest-bearing contingent note with
an initial principal amount of $70 million, which will be
realized if the Corporations client-related revenues
earned by Munder remain consistent with 2006 levels of
approximately $17 million per year for the five years
following the closing of the transaction
(2007-2011).
Future gains related to the contingent note are expected to be
recognized periodically as targets for the Corporations
client-related revenues earned by Munder are achieved. The
potential future gains are expected to be recorded between 2008
and the fourth quarter of 2011, unless fully earned prior to
that time. Included in 2005 was a $32 million after-tax
gain in the fourth quarter 2005 that resulted from Munders
sale of its minority interest in Framlington Group Limited
(Framlington) (a London, England based investment manager). For
further information on discontinued operations, refer to
Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements on
page 127.
32
STRATEGIC
LINES OF BUSINESS
Business
Segments
The Corporations operations are strategically aligned into
three major business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail
Bank and Wealth & Institutional Management. These
business segments are differentiated based upon the products and
services provided. In addition to the three major business
segments, the Finance Division is also reported as a segment.
The Other category includes discontinued operations and items
not directly associated with these business segments or the
Finance Division. Note 24 to the consolidated financial
statements on page 119 describes the business activities of
each business segment and the methodologies which form the basis
for these results, and presents financial results of these
business segments for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005.
The following table presents net income (loss) by business
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Business Bank
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
Retail Bank
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Wealth & Institutional Management
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Finance
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other*
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes discontinued operations and items not directly
associated with the three major business segments or the Finance
Division.
|
The Business Banks net income decreased $86 million,
or 15 percent, to $503 million in 2007, compared to a
decrease of $69 million, or 11 percent, to
$589 million in 2006. Net interest income (FTE) was
$1.3 billion in 2007, an increase of $11 million, or
one percent, compared to 2006. The increase in net interest
income (FTE) was primarily due to a $2.7 billion increase
in average loan balances (excluding Financial Services Division)
and a $524 million increase in average deposit balances
(excluding Financial Services Division), partially offset by a
decline in loan and deposit spreads. The provision for loan
losses increased $164 million in 2007, from
$14 million in 2006, primarily due to an increase in
reserves in 2007 for the residential real estate development
business, a reserve related to a single customer in the
Technology and Life Sciences business line and credit
improvements recognized in 2006, partially offset by a decrease
in reserves related to the automotive industry in 2007.
Excluding a $47 million Financial Services Division-related
lawsuit settlement recorded in 2006 and a $12 million loss
on the sale of the Mexican bank charter in 2006, noninterest
income increased $21 million from 2006. The increase was
primarily due to net securities gains of $7 million in 2007
and increases in commercial lending fees ($7 million) and
card fees ($4 million) in 2007, when compared to 2006.
Noninterest expenses of $708 million for 2007 decreased
$33 million from 2006, primarily due to a $16 million
decrease in allocated net corporate overhead expense, an
$8 million decrease in provision for credit losses on
lending-related commitments, and $8 million in legal fees
recorded in 2006 related to the Financial Services
Division-related lawsuit settlement noted previously. The
corporate overhead allocation rates used were six percent and
seven percent in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The one percentage
point decrease in rate in 2007, when compared to 2006, resulted
mostly from income tax related items.
The Retail Banks net income decreased $45 million, or
31 percent, to $99 million in 2007, compared to a
decrease of $30 million, or 18 percent, to
$144 million in 2006. Net interest income (FTE) of
$627 million decreased $10 million, or two percent, in
2007, primarily due to decreases in loan and deposit spreads,
partially offset by the benefit of a $349 million increase
in average deposit balances. The provision for loan losses
increased $18 million in 2007 primarily due to increases in
credit-related reserves for Small Business Administration (SBA)
loans and Small Business lending. Noninterest income of
$220 million increased $10 million from 2006,
primarily due to a $3 million increase in card fees and a
$2 million increase in income from the sale of SBA loans.
Noninterest expenses of
33
$655 million for 2007 increased $47 million from 2006,
partially due to increases in salaries and employee benefits
expense ($17 million), net occupancy expenses
($9 million) primarily related to the addition of new
banking centers, outside processing fees ($5 million) and a
charge related to the Corporations membership in Visa
($13 million). Partially offsetting these increases was an
$8 million decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. Refer to the Business Bank discussion above for an
explanation of the decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. The Corporation opened 30 new banking centers in 2007
and 25 new banking centers in 2006, contributing
$56 million to noninterest expenses in 2007, an increase of
$23 million compared to 2006.
Wealth & Institutional Managements net income
increased $9 million, or 14 percent, to
$70 million in 2007, compared to a decrease of
$2 million, or three percent, to $61 million in 2006.
Net interest income (FTE) of $145 million decreased
$2 million, or two percent, in 2007, compared to 2006, as
decreases in loan spreads and average deposit balances were
partially offset by an increase in average loan balances of
$403 million from 2006. The provision for loan losses
decreased $4 million, primarily due to an improvement from
one large customer in the Midwest market. Noninterest income of
$283 million increased $24 million, or
10 percent, in 2007, primarily due to a $19 million
increase in fiduciary income and a $3 million increase in
brokerage fees. Noninterest expenses of $322 million
increased $9 million from 2006, primarily due to a
$7 million increase in salaries and employee benefits
expense and a $3 million increase in outside processing fee
expense, partially offset by a $4 million decrease in
allocated net corporate overhead expenses. Refer to the Business
Bank discussion above for an explanation of the decrease in
allocated net corporate overhead expenses.
Net income in the Finance Division was $4 million in 2007,
compared to a net loss of $18 million in 2006. Contributing
to the increase in net income was a $31 million increase in
net interest income (FTE), primarily due to the rising rate
environment in the first three quarters of the year, during
which time interest income received from the lending-related
business units increased faster than the longer-term value
attributed to deposits generated by the business units, and the
maturity of swaps with negative spreads, partially offset by an
increase in wholesale funding.
Net income in the Other category was $10 million for 2007,
compared to $117 million for 2006. Income from discontinued
operations, net of tax, was $4 million in 2007, compared to
$111 million for 2006. Discontinued operations in 2006
included a $108 million after-tax gain on the sale of the
Corporations Munder subsidiary. Noninterest income
increased $12 million from 2006, primarily due to a
$4 million increase in net income from principal investing
and warrants and a $4 million increase in deferred
compensation asset returns. The remaining difference is due to
timing differences between when corporate overhead expenses are
reflected as a consolidated expense and when the expenses are
allocated to the business segments.
Geographic
Market Segments
The Corporations management accounting system also
produces market segment results for the Corporations four
primary geographic markets: Midwest, Western, Texas and Florida.
In addition to the four primary geographic markets, Other
Markets and International are also reported as market segments.
The Finance & Other Businesses category includes
discontinued operations. Note 24 to the consolidated
financial statements on page 119 presents a description of
each of these market segments as well as the financial results
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
34
The following table presents net income (loss) by market segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Midwest
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Western
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other Markets
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
International
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Finance & Other Businesses*
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes discontinued operations and items not directly
associated with the market segments.
|
The Midwest markets net income decreased $42 million,
or 14 percent, to $277 million in 2007, compared to a
decrease of $32 million, or nine percent, to
$319 million in 2006. Net interest income (FTE) of
$863 million decreased $45 million from 2006,
primarily due to a decrease in loan spreads. The provision for
loan losses increased $11 million, primarily due to an
increase in residential real estate development reserves in
2007, compared to 2006, partially offset by a decrease in
reserves related to the automotive industry in 2007. Noninterest
income of $471 million increased $19 million from 2006
due to a $10 million increase in fiduciary income, a
$6 million increase in card fees and a $3 million
increase in brokerage fees. Noninterest expenses of
$821 million increased $10 million from 2006,
primarily due to a $10 million charge related to the
Corporations membership in Visa allocated to the Midwest
market in 2007, a $5 million increase in salaries and
employee benefits expense and a $4 million increase in
litigation and operational losses, partially offset by a
$5 million decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. Refer to the Business Bank discussion above for an
explanation of the decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. The Corporation opened two new banking centers and
consolidated five banking centers in Michigan in 2007. In
addition, 22 banking centers in Michigan were refurbished in
2007.
The Western markets net income decreased
$103 million, or 38 percent, to $170 million in
2007, compared to a decrease of $65 million, or
19 percent, to $273 million in 2006. Net interest
income (FTE) of $706 million increased $5 million, or
one percent, in 2007. The increase in net interest income (FTE)
was primarily due to a $1.7 billion increase in average
loan balances (excluding Financial Services Division) and an
$823 million increase in average deposit balances
(excluding Financial Services Division), partially offset by a
decrease in net interest income from the Financial Services
Division and declining loan and deposit spreads. Average
low-rate Financial Services Division loan balances declined
$1.0 billion in 2007 and average Financial Services
Division deposits declined $2.1 billion. The provision for
loan losses increased $140 million, primarily due to an
increase in credit risk in the California residential real
estate development industry in 2007, compared to overall credit
improvements in 2006. Noninterest income was $131 million
in 2007, a decrease of $29 million from 2006, primarily due
to a $47 million Financial Services Division-related
lawsuit settlement in 2006, partially offset by a
$5 million increase in customer derivative income and a
$2 million increase in income from the sale of SBA loans.
Noninterest expenses of $455 million increased
$5 million, primarily due to a $12 million increase in
expenses related to the addition of new banking centers, mostly
salaries and employee benefits expense and net occupancy
expense. These increases were partially offset by an
$8 million decrease in legal fees related to the Financial
Services Division-related lawsuit settlement and an
$8 million decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. Refer to the Business Bank discussion above for an
explanation of the decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. The Corporation opened 16 new banking centers in the
Western market in 2007. In addition, two banking centers in the
Western market were relocated and two were refurbished in 2007.
The Texas markets net income decreased $3 million, or
three percent, to $79 million in 2007, compared to a
decrease of $7 million, to $82 million in 2006. Net
interest income (FTE) of $279 million increased
$18 million, or seven percent, in 2007, compared to 2006.
The increase in net interest income (FTE) was primarily due to
an increase in average loan and deposit balances, partially
offset by a decrease in loan spreads. The provision for loan
losses increased $10 million, primarily due to credit
improvements recognized in 2006. Noninterest income of
35
$86 million increased $10 million from 2006, primarily
due to a $4 million increase in commercial lending fees and
increases in various other fee categories. Noninterest expenses
of $235 million increased $19 million from 2006,
partially due to a $9 million increase in salaries and
employee benefits expense and a $2 million increase in net
occupancy expense, primarily related to the addition of new
banking centers. These increases were partially offset by a
$3 million decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. Refer to the Business Bank discussion above for an
explanation of the decrease in allocated net corporate overhead
expenses. The Corporation opened 12 new banking centers in the
Texas market in 2007, which resulted in a $7 million
increase in noninterest expenses. In addition, one banking
center in the Texas market was relocated and three were
refurbished in 2007.
The Florida markets net income decreased $7 million,
or 46 percent, to $7 million in 2007, compared to a
decrease of $1 million, to $14 million in 2006. Net
interest income (FTE) of $47 million increased
$4 million, or nine percent, from 2006, primarily due to a
$164 million increase in average loan balances. The
provision for loan losses increased $8 million, primarily
due to an increase in residential real estate development
industry reserves in 2007, compared to 2006. Noninterest income
of $14 million was unchanged from 2006. Noninterest
expenses of $39 million increased $5 million from the
comparable period in the prior year, partially due to a
$2 million increase in salaries and employee benefit
expenses.
The Other Markets net income increased $17 million to
$89 million in 2007, compared to 2006. Net interest income
(FTE) of $136 million increased $18 million from 2006,
primarily due to a $443 million increase in average loan
balances and a $133 million increase in average deposit
balances. The provision for loan losses increased
$10 million, primarily due to an increase in residential
real estate development industry reserves in 2007. Noninterest
income of $54 million increased $2 million in 2007
compared to 2006. Noninterest expenses of $92 million
decreased $9 million from the comparable period in the
prior year, primarily due to an $8 million decrease in the
provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments.
The International markets net income increased
$16 million, to $50 million in 2007, compared to 2006.
Net interest income (FTE) of $67 million decreased
$1 million from the comparable period in the prior year.
The provision for loan losses was negative in both 2007 and
2006, due to credit improvements. Noninterest income of
$38 million increased $18 million from 2006, primarily
due to a $12 million loss on the sale of the Mexican bank
charter in the third quarter 2006 and a $4 million increase
in net securities gains in 2007. Noninterest expenses of
$43 million decreased $7 million in 2007 compared to
2006, reflecting a decrease in salaries and employee benefit
expenses and nominal decreases in other expense categories.
Net income for the Finance & Other Business segment
was $14 million in 2007, compared to $99 million for
2006. Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was
$4 million in 2007, compared to $111 million for 2006.
Discontinued operations in 2006 included a $108 million
after-tax gain on the sale of the Corporations Munder
subsidiary. Net interest income (FTE) increased
$21 million, primarily due to the rising rate environment
in the first three quarters of the year, during which time
interest income received from the lending-related business units
increased faster than the longer-term value attributed to
deposits generated by the business units, and the maturity of
swaps with negative spreads, partially offset by an increase in
wholesale funding. Noninterest income increased
$13 million, primarily due to a $4 million increase in
net income from principal investing and warrants and a
$4 million increase in deferred compensation asset returns.
The remaining difference is due to timing differences between
when corporate overhead expenses are reflected as a consolidated
expense and when the expenses are allocated to the business
segments.
The following table lists the Corporations banking centers
by geographic market segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Midwest (Michigan)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Western:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
International
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
BALANCE
SHEET AND CAPITAL FUNDS ANALYSIS
Total assets were $62.3 billion at December 31, 2007,
an increase of $4.3 billion from $58.0 billion at
December 31, 2006. On an average basis, total assets
increased to $58.6 billion in 2007, from $56.6 billion
in 2006, an increase of $2.0 billion, resulting primarily
from a $2.4 billion increase in earning assets. The
Corporation also recorded a $140 million decrease in
average deposits, a $574 million decrease in average
short-term borrowings and a $2.8 billion increase in
average medium- and long-term debt in 2007, compared to 2006.
TABLE 4:
ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government agency securities
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
4,121
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
6,296
|
|
|
$
|
3,662
|
|
|
$
|
4,240
|
|
|
$
|
3,943
|
|
|
$
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
$
|
28,223
|
|
|
$
|
26,265
|
|
|
$
|
23,545
|
|
|
$
|
22,039
|
|
|
$
|
21,579
|
|
Real estate construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
4,089
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
2,461
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate construction loans
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
3,053
|
|
|
|
3,397
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
8,125
|
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
|
6,680
|
|
|
|
6,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
10,048
|
|
|
|
9,659
|
|
|
|
8,867
|
|
|
|
8,236
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
International loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government and official institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Banks and other financial institutions
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international loans
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
50,743
|
|
|
$
|
47,431
|
|
|
$
|
43,247
|
|
|
$
|
40,843
|
|
|
$
|
40,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
TABLE 5:
LOAN MATURITIES AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Loans Maturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
But Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year*
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
$
|
21,608
|
|
|
$
|
5,561
|
|
|
$
|
1,054
|
|
|
$
|
28,223
|
|
Real estate construction loans
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
10,048
|
|
International loans
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,151
|
|
|
$
|
10,950
|
|
|
$
|
2,912
|
|
|
$
|
45,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predetermined (fixed) interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,347
|
|
|
$
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,950
|
|
|
$
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Includes demand loans, loans having no stated repayment
schedule or maturity and overdrafts.
Earning
Assets
Total earning assets increased to $57.4 billion at
December 31, 2007, from $54.1 billion at
December 31, 2006. The Corporations average earning
assets balances are reflected in Table 2 on page 23.
The following table details the Corporations average loan
portfolio by loan type, business line and geographic market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Average Loans By Loan Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding Financial Services Division
|
|
$
|
26,814
|
|
|
$
|
24,978
|
|
|
$
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Financial Services Division*
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans
|
|
|
28,132
|
|
|
|
27,341
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Real estate construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate business line
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate construction loans
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
3,905
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate business line
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
8,381
|
|
|
|
7,774
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
9,771
|
|
|
|
9,278
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
International loans
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
49,821
|
|
|
$
|
47,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Average Loans By Business Line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market
|
|
$
|
16,185
|
|
|
$
|
15,386
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
6,717
|
|
|
|
6,397
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Global Corporate Banking
|
|
|
5,471
|
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
National Dealer Services
|
|
|
5,187
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Specialty Businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding Financial Services Division
|
|
|
4,843
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Financial Services Division*
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Specialty Businesses
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Business Bank
|
|
|
39,721
|
|
|
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Small Business
|
|
|
4,023
|
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Personal Financial Services
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail Bank
|
|
|
6,134
|
|
|
|
6,084
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Private Banking
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wealth & Institutional Management
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Finance/Other
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
49,821
|
|
|
$
|
47,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Loans By Geographic Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest
|
|
$
|
18,598
|
|
|
$
|
18,737
|
|
|
$
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Western:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding Financial Services Division
|
|
|
15,212
|
|
|
|
13,519
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Financial Services Division*
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Western
|
|
|
16,530
|
|
|
|
15,882
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
5,911
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other Markets
|
|
|
4,041
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
International
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Finance/Other
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
49,821
|
|
|
$
|
47,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Financial Services Division includes primarily low-rate
loans
Total loans were $50.7 billion at December 31, 2007,
an increase of $3.3 billion from $47.4 billion at
December 31, 2006. Total loans, on an average basis,
increased $2.0 billion, or four percent,
($3.1 billion, or seven percent, excluding Financial
Services Division loans), to $49.8 billion in 2007, from
$47.8 billion in 2006. Within average loans, most business
lines and geographic markets showed growth. The Corporation
continues to make progress toward the goal of achieving more
geographic balance, with markets outside of the Midwest
comprising 62 percent of average total loans (excluding
Financial Services Division loans and loans in the
Finance & Other Businesses category) in 2007, compared
to 59 percent in 2006.
Average commercial real estate loans, consisting of real estate
construction and commercial mortgage loans, increased
$1.1 billion, or nine percent, to $14.3 billion in
2007, from $13.2 billion in 2006. Commercial mortgage loans
are loans where the primary collateral is a lien on any real
property. Real property is generally considered primary
collateral if the value of that collateral represents more than
50 percent of the commitment at loan approval. Average
loans to borrowers in the Commercial Real Estate business line,
which include loans to residential real estate developers,
represented $5.2 billion, or 36 percent, of average
total commercial real estate loans in 2007, compared to
$4.7 billion, or 36 percent, of average total
commercial real estate loans in 2006. The increase in average
commercial real estate loans to borrowers in the Commercial Real
Estate business line in 2007 largely included draws on
previously approved lines of credit for residential real estate
and commercial
39
development projects and new loans for commercial development
projects. The remaining $9.1 billion and $8.5 billion
of commercial real estate loans in other business lines in 2007
and 2006, respectively, were primarily owner-occupied commercial
mortgages. In addition to the $14.3 billion of average 2007
commercial real estate loans discussed above, the Commercial
Real Estate business line also had $1.5 billion of average
2007 loans not classified as commercial real estate on the
consolidated balance sheet. Refer to page 52 under
Commercial Real Estate Lending in the Risk Management section
for more information.
Average residential mortgage loans increased $244 million,
or 16 percent, from 2006, and primarily include mortgages
originated and retained for certain relationship customers.
Average home equity loans decreased $125 million, or seven
percent, from 2006, as a result of a decrease in draws on
commitments extended.
Loans classified as Shared National Credit (SNC) loans totaled
$10.9 billion (approximately 1,090 borrowers) at
December 31, 2007, compared to $8.8 billion
(approximately 1,000 borrowers) at December 31, 2006. SNC
loans are facilities greater than $20 million shared by
three or more federally supervised financial institutions which
are reviewed by regulatory authorities at the agent bank level.
The Corporation generally seeks to obtain ancillary business at
origination of the SNC relationship, or within two years
thereafter. These loans, diversified by both line of business
and geography, comprised approximately 21 percent and
19 percent of total loans at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Management currently expects average loan growth for 2008 to be
in the mid to high single-digit range, excluding Financial
Services Division loans, with flat growth in the Midwest market,
high single-digit growth in the Western market and low
double-digit growth in the Texas market, compared to 2007.
TABLE 6:
ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
(Fully Taxable Equivalent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Maturity*
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Within 1 Year
|
|
|
1 - 5 Years
|
|
|
5 - 10 Years
|
|
|
After 10 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Yrs./Mos.
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government agency securities
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
%
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
0/10
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
12/0
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9.52
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
|
|
2/9
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other bonds, notes and debentures
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
0/2
|
|
Other investments**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
11/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Based on final contractual maturity. |
|
** |
|
Balances are excluded from the calculation of total yield. |
Investment securities available-for-sale increased
$2.6 billion to $6.3 billion at December 31,
2007, from $3.7 billion at December 31, 2006. Average
investment securities available-for-sale increased
$455 million to $4.4 billion in 2007, compared to
$4.0 billion in 2006, primarily due to a $470 million
increase in average U.S. Treasury, Government agency, and
Government-sponsored enterprise securities. Changes in
U.S. Treasury, Government agency, and Government-sponsored
enterprise securities resulted from balance sheet management
40
decisions to reduce interest rate sensitivity. Average other
securities decreased $15 million to $131 million in
2007, and consisted largely of money market and other fund
investments at December 31, 2007.
Short-term investments include federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell, and other short-term
investments. Federal funds sold offer supplemental earning
opportunities and serve correspondent banks. Average federal
funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
declined $119 million to $164 million during 2007,
compared to 2006. Other short-term investments include
interest-bearing deposits with banks, trading securities, and
loans held-for-sale. Interest-bearing deposits with banks are
investments with banks in developed countries or foreign
banks international banking facilities located in the
United States. Loans held-for-sale typically represent
residential mortgage loans, student loans and Small Business
Administration loans that have been originated and which
management has decided to sell. Average other short-term
investments decreased $10 million to $256 million
during 2007, compared to 2006. Short-term investments, other
than loans held-for-sale, provide a range of maturities less
than one year and are mostly used to manage short-term
investment requirements of the Corporation.
TABLE 7:
INTERNATIONAL CROSS-BORDER OUTSTANDINGS
(year-end outstandings exceeding 1% of total assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
Banks and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Official
|
|
|
Other Financial
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutions
|
|
|
Institutions
|
|
|
and Industrial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
915
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
2005
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
653
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
Risk management practices minimize risk inherent in
international lending arrangements. These practices include
structuring bilateral agreements or participating in bank
facilities, which secure repayment from sources external to the
borrowers country. Accordingly, such international
outstandings are excluded from the cross-border risk of that
country. Mexico, with cross-border outstandings of
$915 million, or 1.47 percent of total assets at
December 31, 2007, was the only country with outstandings
exceeding 1.00 percent of total assets at year-end 2007.
There were no countries with cross-border outstandings between
0.75 and 1.00 percent of total assets at year-end 2007.
Additional information on the Corporations Mexican
cross-border risk is provided in Table 7 above.
41
Deposits
And Borrowed Funds
The Corporations average deposits and borrowed funds
balances are detailed in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Money market and NOW deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding Financial Services Division
|
|
$
|
13,735
|
|
|
$
|
13,663
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Financial Services Division
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market and NOW deposits
|
|
|
14,937
|
|
|
|
15,373
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Customer certificates of deposit
|
|
|
7,687
|
|
|
|
6,505
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Institutional certificates of deposit
|
|
|
5,563
|
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Foreign office time deposits
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
30,647
|
|
|
|
28,939
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding Financial Services Division
|
|
|
8,451
|
|
|
|
8,761
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Financial Services Division
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
11,287
|
|
|
|
13,135
|
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
41,934
|
|
|
$
|
42,074
|
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
2,080
|
|
|
$
|
2,654
|
|
|
$
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
Medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
8,197
|
|
|
|
5,407
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
$
|
10,277
|
|
|
$
|
8,061
|
|
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average deposits were $41.9 billion during 2007, a decrease
of $140 million, or less than one percent, from 2006.
Excluding Financial Services Division, average deposits
increased of $1.9 billion, or five percent, from 2006. The
$1.7 billion, or six percent, increase in average
interest-bearing deposits in 2007, when compared to 2006,
resulted primarily from an increase in average customer and
institutional certificates of deposit. Institutional
certificates of deposit represent certificates of deposit issued
to institutional investors in denominations in excess of
$100,000 and are an alternative to other sources of purchased
funds. The increases in certificates of deposit were partially
offset by decreases in average money market, NOW and savings
deposits reflecting movement toward higher cost deposits as
customers sought higher returns. Average noninterest-bearing
deposits decreased $1.8 billion, or 14 percent, from
2006. Noninterest-bearing deposits include title and escrow
deposits in the Corporations Financial Services Division,
which benefit from home mortgage financing and refinancing
activity. Financial Services Division deposit levels may change
with the direction of mortgage activity changes, and the
desirability of and competition for such deposits. Average
Financial Services Division noninterest-bearing deposits
decreased $1.5 billion, to $2.8 billion in 2007.
Average short-term borrowings decreased $574 million, to
$2.1 billion in 2007, compared to $2.7 billion in
2006. Short-term borrowings include federal funds purchased,
securities sold under agreements to repurchase and treasury tax
and loan notes.
The Corporation uses medium-term debt (both domestic and
European) and long-term debt to provide funding to support
earning assets while providing liquidity that mirrors the
estimated duration of deposits. Long-term subordinated notes
further help maintain the Corporations and subsidiary
banks total capital ratios at a level that qualifies for
the lowest FDIC risk-based insurance premium. Medium- and
long-term debt increased, on an average basis, by
$2.8 billion. Further information on medium- and long-term
debt is provided in Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements on page 89.
42
Capital
Common shareholders equity was $5.1 billion at
December 31, 2007, compared to $5.2 billion at
December 31, 2006. The following table presents a summary
of changes in common shareholders equity in 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,153
|
|
FSP 13-2
transition adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
FIN 48 transition adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
Retention of earnings (net income less cash dividends declared)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit and other postretirement plans adjustment
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Repurchase of approximately 10 million common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
Net issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Recognition of share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further information on the change in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) is provided in Note 13 to the
consolidated financial statements on page 92.
The Corporation declared common dividends totaling
$393 million, or $2.56 per share, on net income applicable
to common stock of $686 million. The dividend payout ratio
calculated on a per share basis was 58 percent in 2007 and
43 percent in 2006 and 2005.
The Corporation assesses capital adequacy against the risk
inherent in the balance sheet, recognizing that unexpected loss
is the common denominator of risk and that common equity has the
greatest capacity to absorb unexpected loss. Appropriate
capitalization is therefore defined through the use of a target
capital range. The Corporation targets to maintain a Tier 1
common capital ratio of between 6.5 percent and
7.5 percent and a Tier 1 capital ratio of between
7.25 percent and 8.25 percent. The Tier 1 common
capital ratio is the regulatory Tier 1 capital ratio
excluding preferred equity. Based on an interim decision issued
by the banking regulators issued in 2006, the after-tax charge
associated with a recent accounting standard
(SFAS 158) on pension and post-retirement plan
accounting was excluded from the calculation of regulatory
capital ratios. Therefore, for the purposes of calculating
regulatory capital ratios, shareholders equity was
increased by $170 million and $215 million on
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Refer to
Note 19 on page 106 for further discussion of
regulatory capital requirements and capital ratio calculations.
When capital exceeds necessary levels, the Corporations
common stock can be repurchased as a way to return excess
capital to shareholders. Repurchasing common stock offers a
flexible way to control capital levels by adjusting the capital
deployed in reaction to core balance sheet growth. In November
2006 and again in November 2007, the Board of Directors of the
Corporation (the Board) authorized the purchase of up to
10 million shares of Comerica Incorporated outstanding
common stock in the open market. In addition to limits that
result from the Board authorizations, the share repurchase
program is constrained by holding company liquidity and capital
levels relative to internal targets and regulatory minimums. The
Corporation repurchased 10.0 million shares in the open
market in 2007 for $580 million, compared to
6.6 million shares in 2006 for $383 million. Comerica
Incorporated common stock available for repurchase under Board
authority totaled 12.6 million shares at December 31,
2007. Share repurchases combined with dividends returned
142 percent of earnings to shareholders in 2007. Refer to
Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements on
page 91 for additional information on the
Corporations share repurchase program.
At December 31, 2007, the Corporation and its
U.S. banking subsidiaries exceeded the capital ratios
required for an institution to be considered well
capitalized by the standards developed under the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991.
43
RISK
MANAGEMENT
The Corporation assumes various types of risk in the normal
course of business. Management classifies the risk exposures
into five areas: (1) credit, (2) market and liquidity,
(3) operational, (4) compliance and (5) business
risks and considers credit risk as the most significant risk.
The Corporation employs and is continuously enhancing various
risk management processes to identify, measure, monitor and
control these risks, as described below.
The Corporation continues to enhance its risk management
capabilities with additional processes, tools and systems
designed to provide management with deeper insight into the
Corporations various risks, enhance the Corporations
ability to control those risks and ensure that appropriate
compensation is received for the risks taken.
Specialized risk managers, along with the risk management
committees in credit, market and liquidity, and operational and
compliance are responsible for the day-to-day management of
those respective risks. The Corporations Enterprise-Wide
Risk Management Committee is responsible for establishing the
governance over the risk management process as well as providing
oversight in managing the Corporations aggregate risk
position. The Enterprise-Wide Risk Management Committee is
principally made up of the various managers from the different
risk areas and business units and has reporting responsibility
to the Enterprise Risk Committee of the Board.
Credit
Risk
Credit risk represents the risk of loss due to failure of a
customer or counterparty to meet its financial obligations in
accordance with contractual terms. The Corporation manages
credit risk through underwriting, periodically reviewing and
approving its credit exposures using Board committee approved
credit policies and guidelines. Additionally, the Corporation
manages credit risk through loan sales and loan portfolio
diversification, limiting exposure to any single industry,
customer or guarantor, and selling participations
and/or
syndicating to third parties credit exposures above those levels
it deems prudent.
During 2007, the Corporation continued its focus on the credit
components of the previously described enterprise-wide risk
management processes. A two-factor risk rating system was
initiated in 2005 and was extended to all portfolios in 2006.
Enhancements to the analytics related to capital modeling,
migration, credit loss forecasting, stress testing analysis and
validation and testing continued in 2007. The evaluation of the
Corporations loan portfolios with the new tools is
anticipated to provide improved measurement of the potential
risks within the loan portfolios.
44
TABLE 8:
ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
Loan charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan charge-offs
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans at end
of year
|
|
|
1.10
|
%
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
|
1.65
|
%
|
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
Net loans charged-off during the year as a percentage of average
loans outstanding during the year
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
The following table provides an analysis of the changes in the
allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Less: Charge-offs on lending-related commitments *
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Provision for credit losses on lending-relatedcommitments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Charge-offs result from the sale of unfunded lending-related
commitments. |
45
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for
loan losses and the allowance for credit losses on
lending-related commitments. The allowance for loan losses
represents managements assessment of probable losses
inherent in the Corporations loan portfolio. The allowance
for loan losses provides for probable losses that have been
identified with specific customer relationships and for probable
losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio, but that
have not been specifically identified. Internal risk ratings are
assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and are
subject to subsequent periodic reviews by the Corporations
senior management. The Corporation performs a detailed credit
quality review quarterly on both large business and certain
large personal purpose consumer and residential mortgage loans
that have deteriorated below certain levels of credit risk and
may allocate a specific portion of the allowance to such loans
based upon this review. The Corporation defines business loans
as those belonging to the commercial, real estate construction,
commercial mortgage, lease financing and international loan
portfolios. A portion of the allowance is allocated to the
remaining business loans by applying estimated loss ratios,
based on numerous factors identified below, to the loans within
each risk rating. In addition, a portion of the allowance is
allocated to these remaining loans based on industry specific
risks inherent in certain portfolios that have experienced above
average losses, including portfolio exposures to
technology-related industries, Michigan and California
residential real estate development and Small Business
Administration loans. Furthermore, a portion of the allowance is
allocated to these remaining loans based on industry specific
risks inherent in certain portfolios that have not yet
manifested themselves in the risk ratings, including portfolio
exposures to the automotive industry and California residential
real estate development. The portion of the allowance allocated
to all other consumer and residential mortgage loans is
determined by applying estimated loss ratios to various segments
of the loan portfolio. Estimated loss ratios for all portfolios
incorporate factors such as recent charge-off experience,
current economic conditions and trends, and trends with respect
to past due and nonaccrual amounts, and are supported by
underlying analysis, including information on migration and loss
given default studies from each of the three largest domestic
geographic markets (Midwest, Western and Texas), as well as
mapping to bond tables. The allowance for credit losses on
lending-related commitments, included in accrued expenses
and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets,
provides for probable credit losses inherent in lending-related
commitments, including unused commitments to extend credit,
letters of credit and financial guarantees. Lending-related
commitments for which it is probable that the commitment will be
drawn (or sold) are reserved with the same estimated loss rates
as loans, or with specific reserves. In general, the probability
of draw for letters of credit is considered certain once the
credit becomes a watch list credit. Non-watch list letters of
credits and all unfunded commitments have a lower probability of
draw, to which standard loan loss rates are applied.
The total allowance for loan losses was $557 million at
December 31, 2007, compared to $493 million at
December 31, 2006. The increase resulted mostly from an
increase in individual and industry reserves for customers in
the real estate industry, primarily Michigan and California
residential real estate development. This increase was partially
offset by reductions in the industry reserves for customers in
the automotive, air transportation, contractor and entertainment
industries. An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan
losses is presented in Table 8 on page 45 of this financial
review. The allowance for credit losses on lending-related
commitments was $21 million at December 31, 2007,
compared to $26 million at December 31, 2006, a
decrease of $5 million, resulting primarily from a decrease
in specific reserves related to unused commitments extended to
two large customers in the automotive industry that were
previously reserved at quoted prices and now are reserved using
standard unfunded commitment methodology. An analysis of the
changes in the allowance for credit losses on lending-related
commitments is presented on page 45 of this financial
review.
46
TABLE 9:
ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
International
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount allocated allowance
% loans outstanding as a percentage of total loans
Actual loss ratios experienced in the future may vary from those
projected. The uncertainty occurs because factors may exist
which affect the determination of probable losses inherent in
the loan portfolio that are not necessarily captured by the
application of estimated loss ratios or identified
industry-specific risks. A portion of the allowance is
maintained to capture these probable losses and reflects
managements view that the allowance should recognize the
margin for error inherent in the process of estimating expected
loan losses. Factors that were considered in the evaluation of
the adequacy of the Corporations allowance include the
inherent imprecision in the risk rating system and the risk
associated with new customer relationships. The allowance
associated with the margin for inherent imprecision covers
probable loan losses as a result of an inaccuracy in assigning
risk ratings or stale ratings which may not have been updated
for recent negative trends in particular credits. The allowance
due to new business migration risk is based on an evaluation of
the risk of rating downgrades associated with loans that do not
have a full year of payment history.
The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any
segment within the portfolio. Unanticipated economic events,
including political, economic and regulatory instability in
countries where the Corporation has loans, could cause changes
in the credit characteristics of the portfolio and result in an
unanticipated increase in the allowance. Inclusion of other
industry specific portfolio exposures in the allowance, as well
as significant increases in the current portfolio exposures,
could also increase the amount of the allowance. Any of these
events, or some combination thereof, may result in the need for
additional provision for loan losses in order to maintain an
allowance that complies with credit risk and accounting policies.
The allowance as a percentage of total loans, nonperforming
loans and as a multiple of annual net loan charge-offs is
provided in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans at end
of year
|
|
|
1.10
|
%
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total nonperforming
loans at end of year
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a multiple of total net loan
charge-offs for the year
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total
period-end loans increased to 1.10 percent at
December 31, 2007, from 1.04 percent at
December 31, 2006. The allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of nonperforming loans decreased to 138 percent
at December 31, 2007, from 231 percent at
December 31, 2006. The allowance for loan losses as a
multiple of net loan charge-offs decreased to 3.7 times for the
year ended December 31, 2007, compared to 8.2 times for the
prior year, as a result of higher levels of net loan
47
charge-offs in 2007.
While certain ratios declined, the ratios do not reflect a
change in the methodology of developing the allowance based on
the underlying loan portfolios.
TABLE 10:
SUMMARY OF NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND PAST DUE LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Commercial mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
International
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
Reduced-rate loans
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
Foreclosed property
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Nonaccrual debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
339
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
|
|
0.45
|
%
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans, foreclosed
property and nonaccrual debt securities
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total nonperforming
loans
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Nonperforming
Assets
Nonperforming assets include loans and loans held-for-sale on
nonaccrual status, loans which have been renegotiated to less
than market rates due to a serious weakening of the
borrowers financial condition, real estate which has been
acquired through foreclosure and is awaiting disposition and
debt securities on nonaccrual status.
Consumer loans, except for certain large personal purpose
consumer and residential mortgage loans, are charged-off no
later than 180 days past due, and earlier, if deemed
uncollectible. Loans, other than consumer loans, and debt
securities are generally placed on nonaccrual status when
management determines that principal or interest may not be
fully collectible, but no later than 90 days past due on
principal or interest, unless the loan or debt security is fully
collateralized and in the process of collection. Loan amounts in
excess of probable future cash collections are charged-off to an
amount that management ultimately expects to collect. Interest
previously accrued but not collected on nonaccrual loans is
charged against current income at the time the loan is placed on
nonaccrual. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the
extent that cash is received and where the future collection of
principal is probable. Loans that have been restructured to
yield a rate that was equal to or greater
48
than the rate charged for new loans with comparable risk and
have met the requirements for a return to accrual status are not
included in nonperforming assets. However, such loans may be
required to be evaluated for impairment. Refer to Note 4 of
the consolidated financial statements on page 83 for a
further discussion of impaired loans.
Nonperforming assets increased $191 million, or
82 percent, to $423 million at December 31, 2007,
from $232 million at December 31, 2006. Table 10 above
shows changes in individual categories. The $177 million
increase in nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2007 from
year-end 2006 levels resulted primarily from a $147 million
increase in nonaccrual real estate construction loans and a
$69 million increase in nonaccrual commercial mortgage
loans, partially offset by a $22 million decrease in
nonaccrual commercial loans, an $8 million decrease in
nonaccrual international loans and an $8 million decrease
in nonaccrual lease financing loans. An analysis of nonaccrual
loans at December 31, 2007, based primarily on the Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code, is presented on
page 51 of this financial review. Loans past due
90 days or more and still on accrual status increased
$40 million, to $54 million at December 31, 2007,
from $14 million at December 31, 2006. Nonperforming
assets as a percentage of total loans, foreclosed property and
nonaccrual debt securities was 0.83 percent and
0.49 percent at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
The following table presents a summary of changes in nonaccrual
loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Loans transferred to nonaccrual(1)
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Nonaccrual business loan gross charge-offs(2)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Loans transferred to accrual status(1)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual business loans sold(3)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Payments/Other(4)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Based on an analysis of nonaccrual loans with book
balances greater than $2 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Analysis of gross loan charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual business loans
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
Performing watch list loans (as defined below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Consumer and residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loan charge-offs
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Analysis of loans sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual business loans
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Performing watch list loans (as defined below)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans sold
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes net changes related to nonaccrual loans with balances
less than $2 million, other than business loan gross
charge-offs and nonaccrual loans sold, and payments on
nonaccrual loans with book balances greater than $2 million. |
49
The following table presents the number of nonaccrual loan
relationships greater than $2 million and balance by size
of relationship at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual Relationship Size
|
|
Relationships
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
$2 million $5 million
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$5 million $10 million
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
$10 million $25 million
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Greater than $25 million
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan relationships greater than $2 million at
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 58 loan relationships with balances greater than
$2 million, totaling $455 million that were
transferred to nonaccrual status in 2007, an increase of
$279 million, when compared to $176 million in 2006.
Of the transfers to nonaccrual with balances greater than
$2 million in 2007, $286 million were from the Midwest
market and $132 million were from the Western market. There
were 11 loan relationships greater than $10 million
transferred to nonaccrual in 2007. The 11 loan relationships
totaled $236 million and were to companies in the real
estate ($188 million) and retail trade ($48 million)
industries.
The Corporation sold $15 million of nonaccrual business
loans in 2007. These loans were to customers in the real estate,
automotive production and airline transportation industries. In
addition, the Corporation sold $82 million of unused
commitments in 2007, including $60 million with customers
in the automotive industry. The losses associated with the sale
of the unused commitments were charged to the provision
for credit losses on lending-related commitments on the
consolidated statements of income.
Nonaccrual loan payments/other, as shown in the table above,
increased $48 million in 2007, when compared to 2006. The
increase was mostly due to an increase in payments received on
nonaccrual loans greater than $2 million in 2007, compared
to 2006.
The following table presents a summary of total internally
classified watch list loans (generally consistent with
regulatory defined special mention, substandard and doubtful
loans) at December 31, 2007. Of the $3.5 billion of
watch list loans, $1.1 billion, or 31 percent were in
the Commercial Real Estate business line. Consistent with the
increase in nonaccrual loans from December 31, 2006 to
December 31, 2007, total watch list loans increased both in
dollars and as a percentage of the total loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
Total watch list loans
|
|
$
|
3,464
|
|
|
$
|
2,411
|
|
As a percentage of total loans
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
50
The following table presents a summary of nonaccrual loans at
December 31, 2007 and loan relationships transferred to
nonaccrual and net loan charge-offs during the year ended
December 31, 2007, based primarily on the Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) industry categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Net Loan
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
Transferred to
|
|
|
Charge-Offs
|
|
Industry Category
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Nonaccrual(1)
|
|
|
(Recoveries)
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Retail trade
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Services
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Wholesale trade
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Contractors
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Churches
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Entertainment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
455
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on an analysis of nonaccrual loan relationships with book
balances greater than $2 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Consumer nonaccrual loans and net charge-offs are included in
the Other category. |
SNC nonaccrual loans comprised six percent and less than one
percent of total nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. As a percentage of total loans, SNC loans
represented approximately 21 percent and 19 percent at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. SNC loan net
charge-offs were $2 million in both 2007 and 2006. For
further discussion of the Corporations SNC relationships,
refer to the Earning Assets section of this
financial review on page 38.
The following table indicates the percentage of nonaccrual loan
value to contractual value, which exhibits the degree to which
loans reported as nonaccrual have been partially charged-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Carrying value of nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
Contractual value of nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Carrying value as a percentage of contractual value
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
Concentration
of Credit
Loans to borrowers in the automotive industry represented the
largest significant industry concentration at December 31,
2007 and 2006. Loans to automotive dealers and to borrowers
involved with automotive production are reported as automotive,
since management believes these loans have similar economic
characteristics that might cause them to react similarly to
changes in economic conditions. This aggregation involves the
exercise of judgment. Included in automotive production are:
(a) original equipment manufacturers and Tier 1 and
Tier 2 suppliers that produce components used in vehicles
and whose primary revenue source is automotive-related
(primary defined as greater than 50%) and
(b) other manufacturers that produce components used in
vehicles and whose primary revenue source is automotive-related.
Loans less than $1 million and loans recorded in the Small
Business division were excluded from the definition. Foreign
ownership consists of North American affiliates of foreign
automakers and suppliers.
51
A summary of loans outstanding and total exposure from loans,
unused commitments and standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees to companies related to the automotive industry
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Exposure
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Exposure
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,571
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,950
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
4,217
|
|
Dealer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor plan
|
|
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,228
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,312
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,108
|
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dealer
|
|
|
5,384
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
7,336
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
7,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive
|
|
$
|
7,190
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,040
|
|
|
$
|
7,764
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, dealer loans, as shown in the table
above, totaled $5.4 billion, of which approximately
$3.1 billion, or 59 percent, was to foreign
franchises, $1.7 billion, or 31 percent, was to
domestic franchises and $561 million, or 10 percent,
was to other. Other includes obligations where a primary
franchise was indeterminable, such as loans to large public
dealership consolidators, and rental car, leasing, heavy truck
and recreation vehicle companies.
Nonaccrual loans to automotive borrowers comprised approximately
four percent of total nonaccrual loans at December 31,
2007. The largest automotive loan on nonaccrual status at
December 31, 2007 was $5 million. Total automotive net
loan recoveries were $2 million in 2007. The following
table presents a summary of automotive net loan and
credit-related charge-offs for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Dealer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive net loan charge-offs (recoveries)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive charge-offs from the sale of unused commitments*
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Primarily related to domestic-owned production companies. |
All other industry concentrations, as defined by management,
individually represented less than 10 percent of total
loans at year-end 2007.
Commercial
Real Estate Lending
The Corporation takes measures to limit risk inherent in its
commercial real estate lending activities. These measures
include limiting exposure to those borrowers directly involved
in the commercial real estate markets and adherence to policies
requiring conservative loan-to-value ratios for such loans.
Commercial real estate loans, consisting of real estate
construction and commercial mortgage loans, totaled
$14.9 billion at December 31, 2007, of which
$5.5 billion, or 37 percent, were to borrowers in the
Commercial Real Estate business line. Increased
52
nonaccrual loans, reserves and net charge-offs in the Commercial
Real Estate business line reflected challenges in the
residential real estate development industry in Michigan and
California.
The real estate construction loan portfolio contains loans
primarily made to long-time customers with satisfactory
completion experience. The portfolio totaled $4.8 billion
and included approximately 1,650 loans, of which 48 percent
had balances less than $1 million at December 31,
2007. The largest real estate construction loan had a balance of
approximately $43 million at December 31, 2007. The
commercial mortgage loan portfolio totaled $10.1 billion at
December 31, 2007 and included approximately 8,900 loans,
of which 74 percent had balances of less than
$1 million. This total included $8.7 billion of
primarily owner-occupied commercial mortgage loans. The largest
loan within the commercial mortgage loan portfolio had a balance
of approximately $56 million at December 31, 2007.
The geographic distribution of commercial real estate loan
borrowers is an important factor in diversifying credit risk.
The following table indicates, by location of property and by
project type, the diversification of the Corporations real
estate construction and commercial mortgage loans to borrowers
in the Commercial Real Estate business line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Location of Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Type:
|
|
Western
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Family
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Land Development
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Multi-use
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Office
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Land Carry
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,995
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
4,089
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Carry
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
670
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Office
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Multi-use
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Single Family
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $4.1 billion of real estate construction loans in
the Commercial Real Estate business line, $161 million were
on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2007. Substantially
all of the nonaccrual loans were Single Family, Land Development
and Land Carry project types located in California
($84 million), Michigan ($57 million) and Florida
($18 million).
Commercial mortgage loans in the Commercial Real Estate business
line totaled $1.4 billion and included $66 million of
nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2007, primarily Land
Development projects located in Michigan ($55 million).
53
Net charge-offs in the Commercial Real Estate business line were
$52 million in 2007, and included $34 million in the
Midwest market, $16 million in the Western market and
$2 million in the Texas market.
The following table illustrates, by location of lending office,
the diversification of the Corporations real estate
construction and commercial mortgage loan portfolios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Construction
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,160
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
California
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,048
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements
in market rates or prices, which include interest rates, foreign
exchange rates and equity prices; the failure to meet financial
obligations coming due because of an inability to liquidate
assets or obtain adequate funding and the inability to easily
unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly
lowering prices because of inadequate market depth or market
disruptions.
The Asset and Liability Policy Committee (ALPC) establishes and
monitors compliance with the policies and risk limits pertaining
to market risk management activities. The ALPC meets regularly
to discuss and review market risk management strategies and is
comprised of executive and senior management from various areas
of the Corporation, including finance, lending, deposit
gathering and risk management.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest rate risk arises primarily through the
Corporations core business activities of extending loans
and accepting deposits. The Corporations balance sheet is
predominantly characterized by floating rate commercial loans
funded by a combination of core deposits and wholesale
borrowings. This creates a natural imbalance between the
floating rate loan portfolio and the more slowly repricing
deposit products. The result is that growth in our core
businesses will lead to a greater sensitivity to interest rate
movements, without mitigating actions. An example of such an
action is purchasing investment securities, primarily fixed
rate, which provide liquidity to the balance sheet and act to
mitigate the inherent interest sensitivity. The Corporation
actively manages its exposure to interest rate risk, with the
principal objective of optimizing net interest income while
operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate
risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate risk arises in the normal course of business due
to differences in the repricing and cash flow characteristics of
assets and liabilities. Since no single measurement system
satisfies all management objectives, a combination of techniques
is used to manage interest rate risk. These techniques examine
earnings at risk and economic value of equity utilizing multiple
simulation analyses.
The Corporation frequently evaluates net interest income under
various balance sheet and interest rate scenarios, using
simulation modeling analysis as its principal risk management
evaluation technique. The results of these analyses provide the
information needed to assess the balance sheet structure.
Changes in economic activity, different from those management
included in its simulation analyses, whether domestically or
internationally, could translate into a materially different
interest rate environment than currently expected. Management
evaluates base net interest income under an
unchanged interest rate environment and what is believed to be
the most likely balance sheet structure. This base
net interest income is then evaluated against non-parallel
interest rate scenarios that increase and decrease approximately
200 basis points (but no lower than zero percent)
54
from the unchanged interest rate environment. For this analysis,
the rise or decline in interest rates occurs in a linear fashion
over twelve months. In addition, adjustments to asset prepayment
levels, yield curves, and overall balance sheet mix and growth
assumptions are made to be consistent with each interest rate
environment. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as
a result, the model cannot precisely predict the impact of
higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual
results may differ from simulated results due to timing,
magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes and changes in
market conditions and management strategies, among other
factors. However, the model can indicate the likely direction of
change. Derivative instruments entered into for risk management
purposes are included in these analyses. The table below as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 displays the estimated impact on
net interest income during the next 12 months as it relates
the unchanged interest rate scenario results to those from the
200 basis point non-parallel shock described above.
Sensitivity
of Net Interest Income to Changes in Interest
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Change in Interest Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+200 basis points
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
−200 basis points
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Corporate policy limits adverse change to no more than four
percent of managements most likely net interest income
forecast and the Corporation operated within this policy
guideline. The change in interest rate sensitivity from
December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007 was primarily a
result of loan and deposit growth, activities in the Financial
Services Division, competitive deposit pricing, maturity of
swaps and additions to the investment securities portfolio. In
addition, a variety of alternative scenarios are performed to
assist in the portrayal of the Corporations interest rate
risk position, including, but not limited to, flat balance sheet
and most likely rates, 200 basis point parallel rate shocks
and yield curve twists. Interest rate risk will be actively
managed principally through the use of on-balance sheet
financial instruments or interest rate swaps so that the desired
risk profile is achieved.
In addition to the simulation analysis, an economic value of
equity analysis is performed for a longer term view of the
interest rate risk position. The economic value of equity
analysis begins with an estimate of the mark-to-market valuation
of the Corporations balance sheet and then applies the
estimated impact of rate movements upon the market value of
assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments. The
economic value of equity is then calculated as the difference
between the market value of assets and liabilities net of the
impact of off-balance sheet instruments. The market value change
in the economic value of equity is then compared to the
corporate policy guideline limiting such adverse change to
10 percent of the base economic value of equity as a result
of a parallel 200 basis point increase or decrease in
interest rates. The Corporation operated within this policy
parameter. As with net interest income shocks, a variety of
alternative scenarios are performed to measure the impact on
economic value of equity, including changes in the level, slope
and shape of the yield curve.
Sensitivity
of Economic Value of Equity to Changes in Interest
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Change in Interest Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+200 basis points
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
−200 basis points
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
The change in economic value of equity sensitivity from
December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007 was primarily
due to the issuance of $515 million of 6.576% fixed rate
subordinate notes due 2037, which accounted for the majority of
the decline under the 200 basis point parallel decrease in
the interest rates scenario in the table above. Other
contributing factors were changes in loan and funding mix, and a
runoff in interest rate swaps partly offset by additions to the
investment securities portfolio.
55
The Corporation uses investment securities and derivative
instruments, predominantly interest rate swaps, as asset and
liability management tools with the overall objective of
managing the volatility of net interest income from changes in
interest rates. Swaps modify the interest rate characteristics
of certain assets and of liabilities (e.g., from a floating rate
to a fixed rate, from a fixed rate to a floating rate or from
one floating rate index to another). These tools assist
management in achieving the desired interest rate risk
management objectives.
Risk
Management Derivative Instruments
Risk
Management Notional Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
11,455
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
11,866
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5,521
|
|
|
|
5,621
|
|
Maturities/amortizations
|
|
|
(3,102
|
)
|
|
|
(5,377
|
)
|
|
|
(8,479
|
)
|
Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
8,453
|
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
9,004
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
Maturities/amortizations
|
|
|
(3,452
|
)
|
|
|
(4,037
|
)
|
|
|
(7,489
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
5,402
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notional amount of risk management interest rate swaps
totaled $5.4 billion at December 31, 2007, and
$8.5 billion at December 31, 2006. The decrease in
notional amount of $3.1 billion from December 31, 2006
to December 31, 2007 reflects maturities and a current
preference for on-balance sheet risk management utilizing the
investment securities portfolio. The fair value of risk
management interest rate swaps was a net unrealized gain of
$143 million at December 31, 2007, compared to a net
unrealized loss of $19 million at December 31, 2006.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, risk management
interest rate swaps generated $55 million of net interest
expense, compared to $108 million of net expense for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in swap expense
for 2007, compared to 2006, was primarily due to the maturities
of interest rate swaps that carried a negative spread.
Table 11 on page 57 summarizes the expected maturity
distribution of the notional amount of risk management interest
rate swaps and provides the weighted average interest rates
associated with amounts to be received or paid as of
December 31, 2007. Swaps have been grouped by asset and
liability designation.
In addition to interest rate swaps, the Corporation employs
various other types of derivative instruments to mitigate
exposures to interest rate and foreign currency risks associated
with specific assets and liabilities (e.g., loans or deposits
denominated in foreign currencies). Such instruments may include
interest rate caps and floors, purchased put options, foreign
exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange swap agreements.
The aggregate notional amounts of these risk management
derivative instruments at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were
$549 million and $551 million, respectively.
Further information regarding risk management derivative
instruments is provided in Notes 1, 11, and 20 to the
consolidated financial statements on pages 72, 89 and 107,
respectively.
56
TABLE 11:
REMAINING EXPECTED MATURITY OF RISK MANAGEMENT INTEREST RATE
SWAPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2026
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Variable rate asset designation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic receive fixed swaps
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
Weighted average:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive rate
|
|
|
7.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
7.02
|
%
|
|
|
6.03
|
%
|
Pay rate
|
|
|
7.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.37
|
|
|
|
7.69
|
|
Fixed rate asset designation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed swaps
Amortizing
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Weighted average:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive rate
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
|
Pay rate
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt designation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic receive fixed swaps
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,750
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
$
|
2,250
|
|
Weighted average:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive rate
|
|
|
6.17
|
%
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
Pay rate
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notional amount
|
|
$
|
3,552
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,750
|
|
|
$
|
5,402
|
|
|
$
|
8,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Variable rates paid on receive fixed swaps are based on prime or
LIBOR (with various maturities) rates in effect at
December 31, 2007 |
|
(2) |
|
Variable rates received are based on one-month Canadian Dollar
Offered Rates in effect at December 31, 2007 |
Customer-Initiated
and Other Derivative Instruments
Customer-Initiated
and Other Notional Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
3,804
|
|
|
$
|
979
|
|
|
$
|
5,474
|
|
|
$
|
10,257
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
96,615
|
|
|
|
100,353
|
|
Maturities/amortizations
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(99,196
|
)
|
|
|
(100,629
|
)
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
5,567
|
|
|
$
|
1,105
|
|
|
$
|
2,893
|
|
|
$
|
9,565
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
4,277
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
102,903
|
|
|
|
107,945
|
|
Maturities/amortizations
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(103,081
|
)
|
|
|
(104,280
|
)
|
Terminations
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
8,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,481
|
|
|
$
|
2,715
|
|
|
$
|
12,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation writes and purchases interest rate caps and
enters into foreign exchange contracts, interest rate swaps and
energy derivative contracts to accommodate the needs of
customers requesting such services. Customer-initiated and other
notional activity represented 68 percent of total interest
rate, energy and foreign exchange contracts at December 31,
2007, compared to 52 percent at December 31, 2006.
Refer to Notes 1 and 20 of the consolidated financial
statements on pages 72 and 107, respectively, for further
information regarding customer-initiated and other derivative
instruments.
57
Warrants
The Corporation holds a portfolio of approximately 840 warrants
for generally non-marketable equity securities. These warrants
are primarily from high technology, non-public companies
obtained as part of the loan origination process. As discussed
in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements on
page 72, warrants that have a net exercise provision
embedded in the warrant agreement are required to be accounted
for as derivatives and recorded at fair value (approximately 570
warrants at December 31, 2007). The value of all warrants
that are carried at fair value ($23 million at
December 31, 2007) is at risk to changes in equity
markets, general economic conditions and other factors. For
further information regarding the valuation of warrants
accounted for as derivatives, refer to the Critical
Accounting Policies section of this financial review on
page 62.
Liquidity
Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Liquidity is the ability to meet financial obligations through
the maturity or sale of existing assets or the acquisition of
additional funds. The Corporation has various financial
obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial
commitments, which may require future cash payments. The
following contractual obligations table summarizes the
Corporations noncancelable contractual obligations and
future required minimum payments, and includes unrecognized tax
benefits in other long-term obligations. Refer to
Notes 7, 10, 11 and 17 of the financial statements on pages
86, 88, 89 and 103, respectively, for a further discussion of
these contractual obligations.
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Minimum Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deposits without a stated maturity *
|
|
$
|
28,506
|
|
|
$
|
28,506
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit and other deposits with a stated
maturity *
|
|
|
15,772
|
|
|
|
13,125
|
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Short-term borrowings *
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt *
|
|
|
8,685
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
Commitments to fund low income housing partnerships
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
56,837
|
|
|
$
|
46,640
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
3,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt * (parent company only)
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Deposits and borrowings exclude interest. |
The Corporation has other commercial commitments that impact
liquidity. These commitments include commitments to purchase and
sell earning assets, commitments to fund private equity and
venture capital investments, unused commitments to extend
credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees, and
commercial letters of credit. The following commercial
commitments table summarizes the Corporations commercial
commitments and expected expiration dates by period.
58
Commercial
Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Expected Expiration Dates by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Commitments to purchase investment securities
|
|
$
|
604
|
|
|
$
|
604
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Commitments to sell investment securities
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to fund private equity and venture capital
investments
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Unused commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
33,819
|
|
|
|
12,679
|
|
|
|
10,288
|
|
|
|
8,504
|
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments
|
|
$
|
41,603
|
|
|
$
|
17,819
|
|
|
$
|
11,863
|
|
|
$
|
9,428
|
|
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since many of these commitments expire without being drawn upon,
the total amount of these commercial commitments does not
necessarily represent the future cash requirements of the
Corporation. Refer to the Other Market Risks section
below and Note 20 of the consolidated financial statements
on page 107 for a further discussion of these commercial
commitments.
Liquidity requirements are satisfied with various funding
sources. First, the Corporation accesses the purchased funds
market regularly to meet funding needs. Purchased funds,
comprised of customer certificates of deposit of $100,000 and
over that mature in less than one year, institutional
certificates of deposit, foreign office time deposits and
short-term borrowings, approximated $13.0 billion at
December 31, 2007, compared to $9.3 billion and
$3.5 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Second, a $15 billion medium-term senior note
program allows the principal banking subsidiary to issue debt
with maturities between one and 30 years. At year-end 2007,
unissued debt relating to the medium-term note program totaled
$9.6 billion. A third source, if needed, would be liquid
assets, including cash and due from banks, federal funds sold
and securities purchased under agreements to resell, other
short-term investments and investment securities
available-for-sale, which totaled $8.1 billion at
December 31, 2007. Additionally, the Corporation also had
available $16 billion from a collateralized borrowing
account with the Federal Reserve Bank at December 31, 2007.
In February 2008, Comerica Bank (the Bank), a subsidiary of the
Corporation, became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Dallas, Texas (FHLB), which provides short- and long-term
funding to its members though advances that are collateralized
by mortgage-related assets. The initial required investment by
the Bank in FHLB stock was $25 million. Additional
investment in FHLB stock would be required in relation to the
level of outstanding borrowings. The actual borrowing capacity
is contingent on the amount of collateral available to be
pledged to FHLB. As of December 31, 2007, the Corporation
had no borrowings from FHLB.
The parent company held $1 million of cash and cash
equivalents and $224 million of short-term investments with
a subsidiary bank at December 31, 2007. Another source of
liquidity for the parent company is dividends from its
subsidiaries. As discussed in Note 19 to the consolidated
financial statements on page 106, banking subsidiaries are
subject to regulation and may be limited in their ability to pay
dividends or transfer funds to the holding company. During 2008,
the banking subsidiaries can pay dividends up to
$234 million plus 2008 net profits without prior
regulatory approval. One measure of current parent company
liquidity is investment in subsidiaries as a percentage of
shareholders equity. An amount over 100 percent
represents the reliance on subsidiary dividends to repay
liabilities. As of December 31, 2007, the ratio was
114 percent. The Contractual Obligations table on
page 58 includes information on parent company future
minimum payments on medium- and long-term debt.
The Corporation regularly evaluates its ability to meet funding
needs in unanticipated, stress environments. In conjunction with
the quarterly 200 basis point interest rate shock analyses,
discussed in the Interest Rate Sensitivity section
on page 54 of this financial review, liquidity ratios and
potential funding availability are examined. Each quarter, the
Corporation also evaluates its ability to meet liquidity needs
under a series of broad events, distinguished in terms of
duration and severity. The evaluation projects that sufficient
sources of liquidity are available in each series of events.
59
The Corporation also holds a significant interest in certain
variable interest entities (VIEs), in which it is not the
primary beneficiary and does not consolidate. These
unconsolidated VIEs are principally private equity and
venture capital funds, or low income housing limited
partnerships. The Corporation defines a significant interest in
a VIE as a subordinated interest that exposes it to a
significant portion of the VIEs expected losses or
residual returns. In general, a VIE is an entity that either
(1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its
principal activities without additional subordinated financial
support, (2) has a group of equity owners that are unable
to make significant decisions about its activities, or
(3) has a group of equity owners that do not have the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns
generated by its operations. If any of these characteristics is
present, the entity is subject to a variable interests
consolidation model, and consolidation is based on variable
interests, not on ownership of the entitys outstanding
voting stock. Variable interests are defined as contractual,
ownership, or other monetary interests in an entity that change
with fluctuations in the entitys net asset value. A
company must consolidate an entity depending on whether the
entity is a voting rights entity or a VIE. Refer to the
principles of consolidation section in Note 1
of the consolidated financial statements on page 72 for a
summarization of the Corporations consolidation policy.
Also refer to Note 22 of the consolidated financial
statements on page 114 for a discussion of the
Corporations involvement in VIEs, including those in
which it holds a significant interest but for which it is not
the primary beneficiary.
Other
Market Risks
The Corporations market risk related to trading
instruments is not significant, as trading activities are
limited. Certain components of the Corporations
noninterest income, primarily fiduciary income, are at risk to
fluctuations in the market values of underlying assets,
particularly equity securities. Other components of noninterest
income, primarily brokerage fees, are at risk to changes in the
level of market activity.
Share-based compensation expense recognized by the Corporation
is dependent upon the fair value of stock options and restricted
stock at the date of grant. The fair value of both stock options
and restricted stock is impacted by the market price of the
Corporations stock on the date of grant and is at risk to
changes in equity markets, general economic conditions and other
factors. For further information regarding the valuation of
stock options and restricted stock, refer to the Critical
Accounting Policies section of this financial review on
page 62.
Indirect
Private Equity and Venture Capital Investments
At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had a
$74 million portfolio of indirect (through funds) private
equity and venture capital investments, and had commitments of
$42 million to fund additional investments in future
periods. The value of these investments is at risk to changes in
equity markets, general economic conditions and a variety of
other factors. The majority of these investments are not readily
marketable, and are reported in other assets. The investments
are individually reviewed for impairment on a quarterly basis,
by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value. For
further information regarding the valuation of indirect private
equity and venture capital investments, refer to the
Critical Accounting Policies section of this
financial review on page 62. Approximately $12 million
of the underlying equity and debt (primarily equity) in these
funds are to companies in the automotive industry. The
automotive-related positions do not represent a majority of any
one funds investments, and therefore, the exposure related
to these positions is mitigated by the performance of other
investment interests within the funds portfolio of
companies. Income from unconsolidated indirect private equity
and venture capital investments in 2007 was $27 million,
which was partially offset by $11 million of write-downs
recognized on such investments in 2007. No generic assumption is
applied to all investments when evaluating for impairment. The
uncertainty in the economy and equity markets may affect the
values of the fund investments. The following table provides
information on the Corporations indirect private equity
and venture capital investments portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
(dollar amounts
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
Number of investments
|
|
|
133
|
|
Balance of investments
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
Largest single investment
|
|
|
15
|
|
Commitments to fund additional investments
|
|
|
42
|
|
60
Operational
Risk
Operational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from
inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or
from external events. The definition includes legal risk, which
is the risk of loss resulting from failure to comply with laws
and regulations as well as prudent ethical standards and
contractual obligations. It also includes the exposure to
litigation from all aspects of an institutions activities.
The definition does not include strategic or reputational risks.
Although operational losses are experienced by all companies and
are routinely incurred in business operations, the Corporation
recognizes the need to identify and control operational losses,
and seeks to limit losses to a level deemed appropriate by
management after considering the nature of the
Corporations business and the environment in which it
operates. Operational risk is mitigated through a system of
internal controls that are designed to keep operating risks at
appropriate levels. An Operational Risk Management Committee
ensures appropriate risk management techniques and systems are
maintained. The Corporation has developed a framework that
includes a centralized operational risk management function and
business/support unit risk coordinators responsible for managing
operational risk specific to the respective business lines.
In addition, internal audit and financial staff monitors and
assesses the overall effectiveness of the system of internal
controls on an ongoing basis. Internal Audit reports the results
of reviews on the controls and systems to management and the
Audit Committee of the Board. The internal audit staff
independently supports the Audit Committee oversight process.
The Audit Committee serves as an independent extension of the
Board.
Compliance
Risk
Compliance risk represents the risk of regulatory sanctions,
reputational impact or financial loss resulting from its failure
to comply with regulations and standards of good banking
practice. Activities which may expose the Corporation to
compliance risk include, but are not limited to, those dealing
with the prevention of money laundering, privacy and data
protection, community reinvestment initiatives, fair lending
challenges resulting from the Corporations expansion of
its banking center network and employment and tax matters.
The Enterprise-Wide Compliance Committee, comprised of senior
business unit managers as well as managers responsible for
compliance, audit and overall risk, oversees compliance risk.
This enterprise-wide approach provides a consistent view of
compliance across the organization. The Enterprise-Wide
Compliance Committee also ensures that appropriate actions are
implemented in business units to mitigate risk to an acceptable
level.
Business
Risk
Business risk represents the risk of loss due to impairment of
reputation, failure to fully develop and execute business plans,
failure to assess current and new opportunities in business,
markets and products, and any other event not identified in the
defined risk categories of credit, market and liquidity,
operational or compliance risks. Mitigation of the various risk
elements that represent business risk is achieved through
initiatives to help the Corporation better understand and report
on the various risks. Wherever quantifiable, the Corporation
intends to use situational analysis and other testing techniques
to appreciate the scope and extent of these risks.
61
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the
application of accounting policies, the most significant of
which are described on page 72 in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements. These policies require
numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions, which
may prove inaccurate or subject to variations. Changes in
underlying factors, assumptions or estimates could have a
material impact on the Corporations future financial
condition and results of operations. The most critical of these
significant accounting policies are the policies for allowance
for credit losses, pension plan accounting, income taxes and the
valuation of restricted stock and stock options, nonmarketable
equity securities and warrants. These policies are reviewed with
the Audit Committee of the Board and are discussed more fully
below.
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses (combined allowance for loan
losses and allowance for credit losses on lending-related
commitments) is calculated with the objective of maintaining a
reserve sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses.
Managements determination of the adequacy of the allowance
is based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio,
lending-related commitments, and other relevant factors.
However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires
an estimate of the loss content for each risk rating and for
each impaired loan, an estimate of the amounts and timing of
expected future cash flows, an estimate of the value of
collateral, including the market value of thinly traded or
nonmarketable equity securities, and an estimate of the
probability of drawing on unused commitments.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and
principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Consistent
with this definition, all nonaccrual and reduced-rate loans
(with the exception of residential mortgage and consumer loans)
are impaired. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated
using one of several methods, including collateral value, market
value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and
discounted cash flows. The valuation is reviewed and updated on
a quarterly basis. While the determination of fair value may
involve estimates, each estimate is unique to the individual
loan, and none is individually significant.
The portion of the allowance allocated to the remaining loans is
determined by applying estimated loss ratios to loans in each
risk category. Estimated loss ratios incorporate factors such as
recent charge-off experience, current economic conditions and
trends, and trends with respect to past due and nonaccrual
amounts, and are supported by underlying analysis, including
information on migration and loss given default studies from
each of the three major domestic geographic markets, as well as
mapping to bond tables. Since a loss ratio is applied to a large
portfolio of loans, any variation between actual and assumed
results could be significant. In addition, a portion of the
allowance is allocated to these remaining loans based on
industry specific risks inherent in certain portfolios that have
experienced above average losses, including portfolio exposures
to technology-related industries, Michigan and California
residential real estate development and Small Business
Administration loans. Furthermore, a portion of the allowance is
allocated to these remaining loans based on industry specific
risks inherent in certain portfolios that have not yet
manifested themselves in the risk rating, including portfolio
exposures to the automotive industry and California residential
real estate development.
A portion of the allowance is also maintained to cover factors
affecting the determination of probable losses inherent in the
loan portfolio that are not necessarily captured by the
application of estimated loss ratios or identified industry
specific risks. These factors include the imprecision in the
risk rating system and the risk associated with new customer
relationships.
The principle assumption used in deriving the allowance for loan
losses is the estimate of loss content for each risk rating. To
illustrate, if recent loss experience dictated that the
estimated loss ratios would be changed by five percent (of the
estimate) across all risk ratings, the allocated allowance as of
December 31, 2007 would change by approximately
$14 million.
62
Allowance
for Credit Losses on Lending-Related Commitments
Lending-related commitments for which it is probable that the
commitment will be drawn (or sold) are reserved with the same
estimated loss rates as loans, or with specific reserves. In
general, the probability of draw for letters of credit is
considered certain once the credit becomes a watch list credit.
Non-watch list letters of credits and all unfunded commitments
have a lower probability of draw, to which standard loan loss
rates are applied.
Automotive
Industry Concentration
A concentration in loans to the automotive industry could result
in significant changes to the allowance for credit losses if
assumptions underlying the expected losses differed from actual
results. For example, a bankruptcy by a domestic automotive
manufacturer could adversely affect the risk ratings of its
suppliers, causing actual losses to differ from those expected.
The allowance for loan losses included a component for
automotive suppliers, which assumed that suppliers who derive a
significant portion of their revenue from certain domestic
manufacturers would be downgraded by one or two risk ratings in
the event of bankruptcy of those domestic manufacturers.
For further discussion of the methodology used in the
determination of the allowance for credit losses, refer to the
Allowance for Credit Losses section in this
financial review on page 46, and Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements on page 72. To the extent
actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional
provision for credit losses may be required that would adversely
impact earnings in future periods. A substantial majority of the
allowance is assigned to business segments. Any earnings impact
resulting from actual outcomes differing from management
estimates would primarily affect the Business Bank segment.
Pension
Plan Accounting
The Corporation has defined benefit plans in effect for
substantially all full-time employees hired before
January 1, 2007. Benefits under the plans are based on
years of service, age and compensation. Assumptions are made
concerning future events that will determine the amount and
timing of required benefit payments, funding requirements and
pension expense (income). The three major assumptions are the
discount rate used in determining the current benefit
obligation, the long-term rate of return expected on plan assets
and the rate of compensation increase. The assumed discount rate
is determined by matching the expected cash flows of the pension
plans to a yield curve that is representative of long-term,
high-quality fixed income debt instruments as of the measurement
date, December 31. The second assumption, long-term rate of
return expected on plan assets, is set after considering both
long-term returns in the general market and long-term returns
experienced by the assets in the plan. The current asset
allocation and target asset allocation model for the plans is
detailed in Note 16 on page 97. The expected returns
on these various asset categories are blended to derive one
long-term return assumption. The assets are invested in certain
collective investment funds and mutual investment funds, equity
securities, U.S. Treasury and other Government agency
securities, Government-sponsored enterprise securities and
corporate bonds and notes. The third assumption, rate of
compensation increase, is based on reviewing recent annual
pension-eligible compensation increases as well as the
expectation of future increases. The Corporation reviews its
pension plan assumptions on an annual basis with its actuarial
consultants to determine if the assumptions are reasonable and
adjusts the assumptions to reflect changes in future
expectations.
The key actuarial assumptions that will be used to calculate
2008 expense for the defined benefit pension plans are a
discount rate of 6.47 percent, a long-term rate of return
on assets of 8.25 percent, and a rate of compensation
increase of 4.00 percent. Pension expense in 2008 is
expected to be approximately $21 million, a decrease of
$15 million from the $36 million recorded in 2007,
primarily due to changes in the discount rate.
Changing the 2008 key actuarial assumptions discussed above in
25 basis point increments would have the following impact
on pension expense in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 Basis Point
|
|
Key Actuarial Assumption
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
$
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
Long-term rate of return
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Rate of compensation
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
63
If the assumed long-term return on assets differs from the
actual return on assets, the asset gains and losses are
incorporated in the market-related value, which is used to
determine the expected return on assets, over a five-year
period. The Employee Benefits Committee, which is comprised of
executive and senior managers from various areas of the
Corporation, provides broad asset allocation guidelines to the
asset manager, who reports results and investment strategy
quarterly to the Committee. Actual asset allocations are
compared to target allocations by asset category and investment
returns for each class of investment are compared to expected
results based on broad market indices.
Note 16 on page 97 to the consolidated financial
statements contains a table showing the funded status of the
qualified defined benefit plan at year-end which was
$200 million at December 31, 2007. Due to the
long-term nature of pension plan assumptions, actual results may
differ significantly from the actuarial-based estimates.
Differences between estimates and experience not recovered in
the market or by future assumption changes are required to be
recorded in shareholders equity as part of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) and amortized to pension
expense in future years. For further information, refer to
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements on
page 72. The actuarial net loss in the qualified defined
benefit plan recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) at December 31, 2007 was $48 million,
net of tax. In 2007, the actual return on plan assets was
$89 million, compared to an expected return on plan assets
of $93 million. In 2006, the actual return on plan assets
was $123 million, compared to an expected return on plan
assets of $89 million. The Corporation may make
contributions from time to time to the qualified defined benefit
plan to mitigate the impact of the actuarial losses on future
years. No contributions were made to the plan in 2007. For the
foreseeable future, the Corporation has sufficient liquidity to
make such payments.
Pension expense is recorded in employee benefits
expense on the consolidated statements of income, and is
allocated to business segments based on the segments share
of salaries expense. Given the salaries expense included in 2007
segment results, pension expense was allocated approximately
38 percent, 34 percent, 23 percent and
5 percent to the Retail Bank, Business Bank,
Wealth & Institutional Management and Finance
segments, respectively, in 2007.
Income
Taxes
The calculation of the Corporations income tax provision
and related tax accruals is complex and requires the use of
estimates and judgments. The provision for income taxes is based
on amounts reported in the consolidated statements of income
(after deducting non-taxable items, principally income on
bank-owned life insurance and deducting tax credits related to
investments in low income housing partnerships) and includes
deferred income taxes on temporary differences between the tax
basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities.
Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due or to be
received from taxing jurisdictions currently or in the future
and are included in accrued income and other assets
or accrued expenses and other liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation assesses the
relative risks and merits of tax positions for various
transactions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial
precedent and other available information, and maintains tax
accruals consistent with these assessments. The Corporation is
subject to audit by taxing authorities that could question
and/or
challenge the tax positions taken by the Corporation. In the
event of such a challenge, the Corporation would pursue any
disallowed taxes through administrative measures, and if
necessary, vigorously defend its position in court in accordance
with its view of the law.
Included in net deferred taxes are deferred tax assets. Deferred
tax assets are evaluated for realization based on available
evidence and assumptions made regarding future events. In the
event that the future taxable income does not occur in the
manner anticipated, other initiatives could be undertaken to
preclude the need to recognize a valuation allowance against the
deferred tax asset. A valuation allowance is provided when it is
more-likely-than-not that some portion of the deferred tax asset
will not be realized. At December 31, 2007, a valuation
allowance of approximately $2 million was established for
certain state deferred tax assets.
Changes in the estimate of accrued taxes occur due to changes in
tax law, interpretations of existing tax laws, new judicial or
regulatory guidance, and the status of examinations conducted by
taxing authorities that impact the relative risks and merits of
tax positions taken by the Corporation. These changes in the
estimate of accrued taxes could be significant to the operating
results of the Corporation. For further information on tax
accruals and related risks, see Note 17 to the consolidated
financial statements on page 103.
64
On January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions
of FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48
provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition of tax
benefits, classification, accounting disclosure and transition
requirements in accounting for uncertain tax positions. For
further discussion of FIN 48, refer to Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements on page 103.
Valuation
Methodologies
Restricted
Stock and Stock Options
The fair value of share-based compensation as of the date of
grant is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period. In 2007, the Corporation
recognized total share-based compensation expense of
$59 million. The Corporation used a binomial model to value
stock options granted subsequent to March 31, 2005.
Substantially all stock options granted in 2005 and thereafter
were valued using a binomial model. The option valuation model
requires several inputs, including the risk-free interest rate,
the expected dividend yield, expected volatility factors of the
market price of the Corporations common stock and the
expected option life. For further discussion on the valuation
model inputs, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements on page 95. Changes in input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimates. The option valuation
model is sensitive to the market price of the Corporations
stock at the grant date, which affects the fair value estimates
and, therefore, the amount of expense recorded on future grants.
Using the number of stock options granted in 2007 and the
Corporations stock price at December 31, 2007, a
$5.00 per share increase in stock price would result in an
increase in pretax expense of approximately $3 million,
from the assumed base, over the options vesting period.
The fair value of restricted stock is based on the market price
of the Corporations stock at the grant date. Using the
number of restricted stock awards issued in 2007, a $5.00 per
share increase in stock price would result in an increase in
pretax expense of approximately $2 million, from the
assumed base, over the awards vesting period. Refer to
Notes 1 and 15 of the consolidated financial statements on
pages 72 and 95, respectively, for further discussion of
share-based compensation expense.
Nonmarketable
Equity Securities
At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had a
$74 million portfolio of indirect (through funds) private
equity and venture capital investments, and had commitments to
fund additional investments of $42 million in future
periods. The majority of these investments are not readily
marketable. The investments are individually reviewed for
impairment, on a quarterly basis, by comparing the carrying
value to the estimated fair value. The Corporation bases its
estimates of fair value for the majority of its indirect private
equity and venture capital investments on the percentage
ownership in the fair value of the entire fund, as reported by
the fund management. In general, the Corporation does not have
the benefit of the same information regarding the funds
underlying investments as does fund management. Therefore, after
indication that fund management adheres to accepted, sound and
recognized valuation techniques, the Corporation generally
utilizes the fair values assigned to the underlying portfolio
investments by fund management. The impact on fair values of
future capital calls and transfer restrictions is not considered
by fund management, and the Corporation assumes it to be
insignificant. For those funds where fair value is not reported
by fund management, the Corporation derives the fair value of
the fund by estimating the fair value of each underlying
investment in the fund. In addition to using qualitative
information about each underlying investment, as provided by
fund management, the Corporation gives consideration to
information pertinent to the specific nature of the debt or
equity investment, such as relevant market conditions, offering
prices, operating results, financial conditions, exit strategy
and other qualitative information, as available. The lack of an
independent source to validate fair value estimates, including
the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is
an inherent limitation in the valuation process. The amount by
which the carrying value exceeds the fair value that is
determined to be other-than-temporary impairment, is charged to
current earnings and the carrying value of the investment is
written down accordingly. While the determination of fair value
involves estimates, no generic assumption is applied to all
investments when evaluating for impairment. As such, each
estimate is unique to the individual investment, and none is
individually significant. The inherent uncertainty in the
process of valuing equity securities for which a ready market is
unavailable may cause our estimated values of these securities
to differ significantly from the values that would have been
derived had a ready market for the securities existed, and those
differences could be material. The value of these investments is
at risk to changes in equity markets, general economic
conditions and a variety of other
65
factors, which could result in an impairment charge in future
periods. The valuation of nonmarketable equity securities may be
impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurement, (SFAS 157). For further discussion
of SFAS 157, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements on page 79.
Warrants
The Corporation holds a portfolio of approximately 840 warrants
for generally non-marketable equity securities. These warrants
are primarily from high technology, non-public companies
obtained as part of the loan origination process. Warrants which
contain a net exercise provision (approximately 570 warrants at
December 31, 2007), are required to be accounted for as
derivatives and recorded at fair value ($23 million at
December 31, 2007) in accordance with the provisions
of Implementation Issue 17a of SFAS 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The
fair value of the derivative warrant portfolio is reviewed
quarterly and adjustments to the fair value are recorded
quarterly in current earnings. Fair value is determined using a
Black-Scholes valuation model, which has five inputs: risk-free
rate, expected life, volatility, exercise price, and the per
share market value of the underlying company. Key assumptions
used in the December 31, 2007 valuation were as follows.
The risk-free rate was estimated using the U.S. treasury
rate, as of the valuation date, corresponding with the expected
life of the warrant. The Corporation used an expected term of
one half of the remaining contractual term of each warrant.
Volatility was estimated using an index of comparable publicly
traded companies, based on the Standard Industrial
Classification codes. Where sufficient financial data exists, a
market approach method was utilized to estimate the current
value of the underlying company. When quoted market values were
not available, an index method was utilized. Under the index
method, the subject companies values were
rolled-forward from the inception date through the
valuation date based on the change in value of an underlying
index of guideline public companies. The liquidity of each
warrant, or the portfolio of warrants, is not considered in
Black-Scholes, and the Corporation historically assumed this
nonmarketability to be insignificant.
The fair value of warrants recorded on the Corporations
consolidated balance sheets represents managements best
estimate of the fair value of these instruments within the
framework of existing accounting standards. Changes in the above
material assumptions could result in significantly different
valuations. For example, the following table demonstrates the
effect of changes in the volatility assumption used, currently
60 percent, on the value of warrants required to be carried
at fair value:
Valuation
of Warrants Held at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Volatility Factor
|
|
|
|
20% Lower
|
|
|
20% Higher
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Value of all warrants required to be carried at fair value
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
Based on
expected average life of 1.7 years
The valuation of warrants is complex and is subject to a certain
degree of management judgment. The inherent uncertainty in the
process of valuing warrants for which a ready market is
unavailable may cause estimated values of these warrant assets
to differ significantly from the values that would have been
derived had a ready market for the warrant assets existed, and
those differences could be material. The use of an alternative
valuation methodology or alternative approaches used to
calculate material assumptions could result in significantly
different estimated values for these assets. In addition, the
value of all warrants required to be carried at fair value is at
risk to changes in equity markets, general economic conditions
and other factors. The valuation of warrants may be impacted by
the adoption of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement, (SFAS 157). For further discussion of
SFAS 157, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements on page 79.
66
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements as defined in
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In
addition, the Corporation may make other written and oral
communication from time to time that contain such statements.
All statements regarding the Corporations expected
financial position, strategies and growth prospects and general
economic conditions expected to exist in the future are
forward-looking statements. The words, anticipates,
believes, feels, expects,
estimates, seeks, strives,
plans, intends, outlook,
forecast, position, target,
mission, assume, achievable,
potential, strategy, goal,
aspiration, outcome,
continue, remain, maintain,
trend, objective, and variations of such
words and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs
such as will, would, should,
could, might, can,
may or similar expressions as they relate to the
Corporation or its management, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.
The Corporation cautions that forward-looking statements are
subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which
change over time. Forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date the statement is made, and the Corporation does not
undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect facts,
circumstances, assumptions or events that occur after the date
the forward-looking statements are made. Actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking
statements and future results could differ materially from
historical performance.
In addition to factors mentioned elsewhere in this report or
previously disclosed in the Corporations SEC reports
(accessible on the SECs website at www.sec.gov or
on the Corporations website at www.comerica.com),
actual results could differ materially from forward-looking
statements and future results could differ materially from
historical performance due to a variety of reasons, including
but not limited to, the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
general political, economic or industry conditions, either
domestically or internationally, may be less favorable than
expected;
|
|
|
|
governmental monetary and fiscal policies may adversely affect
the financial services industry, and therefore impact the
Corporations financial condition and results of operations;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable developments concerning credit quality could affect
the Corporations financial results;
|
|
|
|
recent problems faced by residential real estate developers
could materially impact the Corporation;
|
|
|
|
businesses or industries in which the Corporation has lending
concentrations, including, but not limited to, automotive
production industry and the real estate business, could suffer a
significant decline which could adversely affect the Corporation;
|
|
|
|
the introductions, implementation, withdrawal, success and
timing of business initiatives and strategies, including, but
not limited to, the opening of new banking centers and plans to
grow personal financial services and wealth management, may be
less successful or may be different than anticipated, which
could adversely affect the Corporations business;
|
|
|
|
utilization of technology to efficiently and effectively
develop, market and deliver new products and services;
|
|
|
|
changes in the financial markets, including fluctuations in
interest rates and their impact on deposit pricing, could
adversely affect the Corporations net interest income and
balance sheet;
|
|
|
|
competitive product and pricing pressures among financial
institutions within the Corporations markets may change;
|
|
|
|
customer borrowing, repayment, investment and deposit practices
generally may be different than anticipated;
|
|
|
|
managements ability to maintain and expand customer
relationships may differ from expectations;
|
|
|
|
managements ability to retain key officers and employees
may change;
|
|
|
|
legal and regulatory proceedings and related matters with
respect to the financial services industry, including those
directly involving the Corporation and its subsidiaries, could
adversely affect the Corporation or the financial services
industry in general;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulation or oversight may have a material adverse
impact on the Corporations operations;
|
|
|
|
methods of reducing risk exposures might not be effective;
|
|
|
|
there could be terrorist activities or other hostilities, which
may adversely affect the general economy, financial and capital
markets, specific industries, and the Corporation; and
|
|
|
|
there could be natural disasters, including, but not limited to,
hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, fires, floods and the
disruption of private or public utilities, which may adversely
affect the general economy, financial and capital markets,
specific industries, and the Corporation.
|
67
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,434
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
28,223
|
|
|
|
26,265
|
|
Real estate construction loans
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
10,048
|
|
|
|
9,659
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
International loans
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
50,743
|
|
|
|
47,431
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
50,186
|
|
|
|
46,938
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Customers liability on acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Accrued income and other assets
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
62,331
|
|
|
$
|
58,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
11,920
|
|
|
$
|
13,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market and NOW deposits
|
|
|
15,261
|
|
|
|
15,250
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
Customer certificates of deposit
|
|
|
8,357
|
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
Institutional certificates of deposit
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
5,783
|
|
Foreign office time deposits
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
32,358
|
|
|
|
31,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
44,278
|
|
|
|
44,927
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
Acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
8,821
|
|
|
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
57,214
|
|
|
|
52,848
|
|
Common stock $5 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 325,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 178,735,252 shares at 12/31/07 and
12/31/06
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
5,497
|
|
|
|
5,282
|
|
Less cost of common stock in treasury
28,747,097 shares at 12/31/07 and 21,161,161 shares at
12/31/06
|
|
|
(1,661
|
)
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
5,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
62,331
|
|
|
$
|
58,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
68
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
3,501
|
|
|
$
|
3,216
|
|
|
$
|
2,554
|
|
Interest on investment securities
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Interest on short-term investments
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Interest on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Interest on medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Fiduciary income
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
Commercial lending fees
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Letter of credit fees
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Foreign exchange income
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Brokerage fees
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Card fees
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Net income from principal investing and warrants
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Net securities gains
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sales of businesses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Income from lawsuit settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest income
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
Net occupancy expense
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Equipment expense
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Outside processing fee expense
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Software expense
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Customer services
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Litigation and operational losses
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other noninterest expenses
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
69
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
In Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2005
|
|
|
170.5
|
|
|
$
|
894
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,331
|
|
|
$
|
(472
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,105
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($2.20 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
Net issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Recognition of share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2005
|
|
|
162.9
|
|
|
$
|
894
|
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,796
|
|
|
$
|
(913
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,068
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($2.36 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
Net issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
under employee stock plans
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Recognition of share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Employee deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 158 transition adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006
|
|
|
157.6
|
|
|
$
|
894
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
(324
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,282
|
|
|
$
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,153
|
|
FSP 13-2
transition adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
FIN 48 transition adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2007
|
|
|
157.6
|
|
|
$
|
894
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
(324
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,230
|
|
|
$
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,101
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($2.56 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
Net issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Recognition of share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Employee deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2007
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
$
|
894
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
(177
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,661
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
70
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Depreciation and software amortization
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of securities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Net gain on sale/settlement of investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss on sales of businesses
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Contributions to qualified pension plan fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Net decrease (increase) in trading securities
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net decrease (increase) in accrued income receivable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in federal funds sold and other
short-term investments
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
(1,663
|
)
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(3,519
|
)
|
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
Net increase in loans
|
|
|
(3,561
|
)
|
|
|
(4,324
|
)
|
|
|
(2,618
|
)
|
Net increase in fixed assets
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
Net decrease (increase) in customers liability on
acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of businesses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,811
|
)
|
|
|
(5,292
|
)
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
Net increase in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
3,326
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
Repayments of medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
470
|
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,434
|
|
|
$
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
1,703
|
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Loans transferred to held-for-sale
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Deposits transferred to held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
71
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 1
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
Comerica Incorporated (the Corporation) is a registered
financial holding company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The
Corporations major business segments are the Business
Bank, the Retail Bank and Wealth & Institutional
Management. For further discussion of each business segment,
refer to Note 24 on page 119. The core businesses are
tailored to each of the Corporations four primary
geographic markets: Midwest, Western, Texas and Florida. The
Corporation and its banking subsidiaries are regulated at both
the state and federal levels.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation conform
to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and
prevailing practices within the banking industry. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
these estimates.
The following summarizes the significant accounting policies of
the Corporation applied in the preparation of the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Corporation and its subsidiaries after elimination of all
significant intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain
amounts in the financial statements for prior years have been
reclassified to conform to current financial statement
presentation.
The Corporation consolidates variable interest entities
(VIEs) in which it is the primary beneficiary. In general,
a VIE is an entity that either (1) has an insufficient
amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without
additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group
of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions
about its activities or (3) has a group of equity owners
that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive returns generated by its operations. If any of these
characteristics is present, the entity is subject to a variable
interests consolidation model, and consolidation is based on
variable interests, not on ownership of the entitys
outstanding voting stock. Variable interests are defined as
contractual, ownership or other money interests in an entity
that change with fluctuations in the entitys net asset
value. The primary beneficiary consolidates the VIE; the primary
beneficiary is defined as the enterprise that absorbs a majority
of expected losses or receives a majority of residual returns
(if the losses or returns occur), or both. The Corporation
consolidates entities not determined to be VIEs when it
holds a majority (controlling) interest in the entitys
outstanding voting stock. The minority interest in less than
100% owned consolidated subsidiaries is not material and is
included in accrued expenses and other liabilities
on the consolidated balance sheets. The related minority
interest in earnings which is included in other
noninterest expenses on the consolidated statements of
income was a credit of $1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, not significant for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and an expense of $4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Equity investments in entities that are not VIEs where the
Corporation owns less than a majority (controlling) interest and
equity investments in entities that are VIEs where the
Corporation is not the primary beneficiary are not consolidated.
Rather, such investments are accounted for using either the
equity method or cost method. The equity method is used for
investments in a corporate joint venture and investments where
the Corporation has the ability to exercise significant
influence over the investees operation and financial
policies, which is generally presumed to exist if the
Corporation owns more than 20 percent of the voting
interest of the investee. Equity method investments are included
in accrued income and other assets on the
consolidated balance sheets, with income and losses recorded in
other noninterest income on the consolidated
statements of income. Unconsolidated equity investments that do
not meet the criteria to be accounted for under the equity
method are accounted for under the cost method. Cost method
investments in publicly traded companies are
72
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
included in investment securities available-for-sale
on the consolidated balance sheets, with income (net of
write-downs) recorded in net securities gains
(losses) on the consolidated statements of income. Cost
method investments in non-publicly traded companies are included
in accrued income and other assets on the
consolidated balance sheets, with income (net of write-downs)
recorded in other noninterest income on the
consolidated statements of income.
For further information regarding the Corporations
investments in VIEs, refer to Note 22 on
page 114.
Discontinued
Operations
Components of the Corporation that have been or will be disposed
of by sale, where the Corporation does not have a significant
continuing involvement in the operations after the disposal, are
accounted for as discontinued operations in all periods
presented if significant to the consolidated financial
statements. For further information on discontinued operations,
refer to Note 26 on page 127.
Short-term
Investments
Short-term investments include interest-bearing deposits with
banks, trading securities and loans
held-for-sale.
Trading securities are carried at market value. Realized and
unrealized gains or losses on trading securities are included in
other noninterest income on the consolidated
statements of income.
Loans held-for-sale, typically residential mortgages, student
loans and Small Business Administration loans, are carried at
the lower of cost or market. Market value is determined in the
aggregate for each portfolio.
Investment
Securities
Investment securities held-to-maturity are those securities
which the Corporation has the ability and management has the
positive intent to hold to maturity as of the balance sheet
dates. Investment securities held-to-maturity are stated at
cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of
discount.
Investment securities that are not considered held-to-maturity
are accounted for as securities
available-for-sale,
and stated at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net
of income taxes, reported as a separate component of other
comprehensive income (loss). Unrealized losses on securities
available-for-sale are recognized in earnings if, as of the
balance sheet date, the Corporation does not have the ability or
management does not have the intent to hold the securities until
market recovery or if full collection of the amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the debt is not expected.
Gains or losses on the sale of securities are computed based on
the adjusted cost of the specific security sold.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents managements
assessment of probable losses inherent in the Corporations
loan portfolio. The allowance provides for probable losses that
have been identified with specific customer relationships and
for probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan
portfolio, but that have not been specifically identified.
Internal risk ratings are assigned to each business loan at the
time of approval and are subject to subsequent periodic reviews
by senior management. The Corporation performs a detailed credit
quality review quarterly on both large business and certain
large personal purpose consumer and residential mortgage loans
that have deteriorated below certain levels of credit risk, and
may allocate a specific portion of the allowance to such loans
based upon this review. Business loans are those belonging to
the commercial, real estate construction, commercial mortgage,
lease financing and international loan portfolios. A portion of
the allowance is allocated to the remaining business loans by
applying estimated loss ratios, based on numerous factors
identified below, to the loans within each risk rating. In
addition, a portion of the allowance is allocated to these
73
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
remaining loans based on industry specific risks inherent in
certain portfolios that have experienced above average losses.
Furthermore, a portion of the allowance is allocated to these
remaining loans based on industry specific risks inherent in
certain portfolios that have not yet manifested themselves in
the risk ratings. The portion of the allowance allocated to all
other consumer and residential mortgage loans is determined by
applying estimated loss ratios to various segments of the loan
portfolio. Estimated loss ratios for all portfolios incorporate
factors, such as recent charge-off experience, current economic
conditions and trends, and trends with respect to past due and
nonaccrual amounts, and are supported by underlying analysis,
including information on migration and loss given default
studies from each of the three largest domestic geographic
markets (Midwest, Western and Texas), as well as mapping to bond
tables.
Actual loss ratios experienced in the future may vary from those
estimated. The uncertainty occurs because factors may exist
which affect the determination of probable losses inherent in
the loan portfolio and are not necessarily captured by the
application of estimated loss ratios or identified
industry-specific risks. A portion of the allowance is
maintained to capture these probable losses and reflects
managements view that the allowance should recognize the
margin for error inherent in the process of estimating expected
loan losses. Factors that were considered in the evaluation of
the adequacy of the Corporations allowance include the
inherent imprecision in the risk rating system and the risk
associated with new customer relationships. The allowance
associated with the margin for inherent imprecision covers
probable loan losses as a result of an inaccuracy in assigning
risk ratings or stale ratings which may not have been updated
for recent negative trends in particular credits. The allowance
due to new business migration risk is based on an evaluation of
the risk of rating downgrades associated with loans that do not
have a full year of payment history.
The total allowance for loan losses is available to absorb
losses from any segment within the portfolio. Unanticipated
economic events, including political, economic and regulatory
instability in countries where the Corporation has loans, could
cause changes in the credit characteristics of the portfolio and
result in an unanticipated increase in the allowance. Inclusion
of other industry specific exposures in the allowance, as well
as significant increases in the current portfolio exposures,
could also increase the amount of the allowance. Any of these
events, or some combination thereof, may result in the need for
additional provision for loan losses in order to maintain an
allowance that complies with credit risk and accounting policies.
Loans deemed uncollectible are charged off and deducted from the
allowance. The provision for loan losses and recoveries on loans
previously charged off are added to the allowance.
Allowance
for Credit Losses on Lending-Related Commitments
The allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments
covers managements assessment of probable credit losses
inherent in lending-related commitments, including unused
commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and financial
guarantees. Lending-related commitments for which it is probable
that the commitment will be drawn (or sold) are reserved with
the same estimated loss rates as loans, or with specific
reserves. In general, the probability of draw for letters of
credit is considered certain once the credit becomes a watch
list credit (generally consistent with regulatory defined
special mention, substandard and doubtful accounts). Non-watch
list letters of credits and all unfunded commitments have a
lower probability of draw, to which standard loan loss rates are
applied. The allowance for credit losses on lending-related
commitments is included in accrued expenses and other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, with the
corresponding charge reflected in provision for credit
losses on lending-related commitments in the noninterest
expenses section on the consolidated statements of income.
Nonperforming
Assets
Nonperforming assets are comprised of loans and debt securities
for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued, loans
for which the terms have been renegotiated to less than market
rates due to a serious
74
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
weakening of the borrowers financial condition, and real
estate which has been acquired through foreclosure and is
awaiting disposition.
Loans that have been restructured but yield a rate equal to or
greater than the rate charged for new loans with comparable risk
and have met the requirements for accrual status are not
reported as nonperforming assets. Such loans continue to be
evaluated for impairment for the remainder of the calendar year
of the restructuring. These loans may be excluded from the
impairment assessment in the calendar years subsequent to the
restructuring, if not impaired based on the modified terms. See
Note 4 on page 83 for additional information on loan
impairment.
Residential mortgage loans are generally placed on nonaccrual
status during the foreclosure process, normally no later than
150 days past due. Other consumer loans are generally not
placed on nonaccrual status and are charged off no later than
180 days past due, and earlier, if deemed uncollectible.
Loans, other than consumer loans, and debt securities are
generally placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest
is past due 90 days or more
and/or when,
in the opinion of management, full collection of principal or
interest is unlikely. At the time a loan or debt security is
placed on nonaccrual status, interest previously accrued but not
collected is charged against current income. Income on such
loans and debt securities is then recognized only to the extent
that cash is received and where future collection of principal
is probable. Generally, a loan or debt security may be returned
to accrual status when all delinquent principal and interest
have been received and the Corporation expects repayment of the
remaining contractual principal and interest, or when the loan
or debt security is both well secured and in the process of
collection.
A nonaccrual loan that is restructured will generally remain on
nonaccrual after the restructuring for a period of six months to
demonstrate that the borrower can meet the restructured terms.
However, sustained payment performance prior to the
restructuring or significant events that coincide with the
restructuring are included in assessing whether the borrower can
meet the restructured terms. These factors may result in the
loan being returned to an accrual status at the time of
restructuring or upon satisfaction of a shorter performance
period. If management is uncertain whether the borrower has the
ability to meet the revised payment schedule, the loan remains
classified as nonaccrual. Other real estate acquired is carried
at the lower of cost or fair value, minus estimated costs to
sell. When the property is acquired through foreclosure, any
excess of the related loan balance over fair value is charged to
the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent write-downs, operating
expenses and losses upon sale, if any, are charged to
noninterest expenses.
Premises
and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation, computed on the
straight-line method, is charged to operations over the
estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives
are generally
10-33 years
for premises that the Corporation owns and three to eight years
for furniture and equipment. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the terms of their respective leases, or
10 years, whichever is shorter.
Software
Capitalized software is stated at cost, less accumulated
amortization. Capitalized software includes purchased software
and capitalizable application development costs associated with
internally-developed software. Amortization, computed on the
straight-line method, is charged to operations over the
estimated useful life of the software, which is generally five
years. Capitalized software is included in accrued income
and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
75
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and identified intangible assets that have an
indefinite useful life are subject to impairment testing, which
is conducted annually, or on an interim basis if events or
changes in circumstances between annual tests indicate the
assets might be impaired. The Corporation performs its annual
impairment test for goodwill as of July 1 of each year. The
impairment test involves assigning tangible assets and
liabilities, identified intangible assets and goodwill to
reporting units, which are a subset of the Corporations
operating segments, and comparing the fair value of each
reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value is less
than the carrying value, a further test is required to measure
the amount of impairment.
The Corporation reviews finite-lived intangible assets and other
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may
not be recoverable from projected undiscounted net operating
cash flows. If the projected undiscounted net operating cash
flows are less than the carrying amount, a loss is recognized to
reduce the carrying amount to fair value.
Additional information regarding goodwill, other intangible
assets and impairment policies can be found in Note 8 on
page 86.
Share-based
Compensation
In 2006, the Corporation adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123(R)),
Share-Based Payment, using the modified-prospective
transition method. Compensation expense is recognized under
SFAS 123(R) using the straight-line method over the
requisite service period. Measurement and attribution of
compensation cost for awards that were granted prior to the date
SFAS 123(R) was adopted continue to be based on the
estimate of the grant-date fair value and attribution method
used under prior accounting guidance. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123(R), the benefit of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation costs was reported in net cash provided
by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash
flows. SFAS 123(R) requires such excess tax benefits be
reported as a cash inflow from financing activities, rather than
a cash flow from operating activities; therefore, these amounts
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, are
reported in net cash provided by financing activities in the
consolidated statements of cash flows.
In 2002, the Corporation adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123) (as amended by
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure), which
the Corporation applied prospectively to new share-based
compensation awards granted to employees after December 31,
2001. Options granted prior to January 1, 2002 were
accounted for under the intrinsic value method, as outlined in
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Net income and earnings per share for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 fully reflect the impact
of applying the fair value recognition method to all outstanding
and unvested awards. There would have been no effect on reported
net income and earnings per share if the fair value method
required by SFAS 123 (as amended by SFAS 148) had
been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in 2005.
SFAS 123(R) requires that the expense associated with
share-based compensation awards be recorded over the requisite
service period. The requisite service period is the period an
employee is required to provide service in order to vest in the
award, which cannot extend beyond the retirement eligible date
(the date at which the employee is no longer required to perform
any service to receive the share-based compensation). Prior to
the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Corporation recorded the
expense associated with share-based compensation awards over the
explicit service period (vesting period). Upon retirement, any
remaining unrecognized costs related to share-based compensation
awards retained after retirement were expensed.
The Corporation elected to adopt the alternative transition
method provided in the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects
of Share-Based Payment Awards, for calculating the tax
effects of share-based compensation under SFAS 123(R). The
alternative transition method included simplified methods to
establish the beginning balance
76
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
of the additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to
the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, and to
determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and
consolidated statements of cash flows of the tax effects of
employee share-based compensation awards that were outstanding
and fully or partially unvested upon adoption of
SFAS 123(R).
Further information on the Corporations share-based
compensation plans is included in Note 15 on page 95.
Pension
and Other Postretirement Costs
On December 31, 2006, the Corporation adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R), (SFAS 158), and recognized in its
consolidated balance sheet the funded status of its defined
benefit pension and postretirement plans, measured as the
difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit
obligation. For a pension plan, the benefit obligation is the
projected benefit obligation; for any other postretirement plan,
the benefit obligation is the accumulated benefit obligation.
The Corporation also recorded prior service costs, net actuarial
losses and remaining transition obligations as components of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, at
December 31, 2006. Actuarial gains or losses and prior
service costs or credits that arise subsequent to
December 31, 2006 are recognized as increases or decreases
in other comprehensive income (loss).
Pension costs are charged to employee benefits
expense on the consolidated statements of income and are funded
consistent with the requirements of federal laws and
regulations. Inherent in the determination of pension costs are
assumptions concerning future events that will affect the amount
and timing of required benefit payments under the plans. These
assumptions include demographic assumptions such as retirement
age and death, a compensation rate increase, a discount rate
used to determine the current benefit obligation and a long-term
expected return on plan assets. Net periodic pension expense
includes service cost, interest cost based on the assumed
discount rate, an expected return on plan assets based on an
actuarially derived market-related value of assets, amortization
of prior service cost and amortization of net actuarial gains or
losses. The market-related value used to determine the expected
return on plan assets is based on fair value adjusted for the
difference between expected returns and actual asset
performance. The asset gains and losses are incorporated in the
market-related value over a five-year period. Prior service
costs include the impact of plan amendments on the liabilities
and are amortized over the future service periods of active
employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. Actuarial
gains and losses result from experience different from that
assumed and from changes in assumptions (excluding asset gains
and losses not yet reflected in market-related value).
Amortization of actuarial gains and losses is included as a
component of net periodic pension cost for a year if the
actuarial net gain or loss exceeds 10 percent of the
greater of the projected benefit obligation or the
market-related value of plan assets. If amortization is
required, the excess is amortized over the average remaining
service period of participating employees expected to receive
benefits under the plan.
Postretirement benefits are recognized in employee
benefits expense on the consolidated statements of income
during the average remaining service period of participating
employees expected to receive benefits under the plan or the
average remaining future lifetime of retired participants
currently receiving benefits under the plan.
For further information regarding SFAS 158 and the
Corporations pension and other postretirement plans refer
to Note 16 on page 97.
Derivative
Instruments
Derivative instruments are carried at fair value in either,
accrued income and other assets or accrued
expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance
sheets. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e.,
gains or losses) of a derivative instrument is determined by
whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a
hedging relationship and, further, on the type of hedging
relationship. For those derivative instruments
77
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the
Corporation designates the hedging instrument, based upon the
exposure being hedged, as either a fair value hedge, cash flow
hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. For
derivative instruments designated and qualifying as a fair value
hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value
of an asset or a liability or an identified portion thereof that
is attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on
the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized
in current earnings during the period of the change in fair
values. For derivative instruments that are designated and
qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to
variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable
to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss
on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative
instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present
value of future cash flows of the hedged item (i.e., the
ineffective portion), if any, is recognized in current earnings
during the period of change. For derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as a hedge of a net foreign currency
investment in a foreign subsidiary, the gain or loss is reported
in other comprehensive income as part of the cumulative
translation adjustment to the extent it is effective. For
derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments,
the gain or loss is recognized in current earnings during the
period of change.
If the Corporation determines that a derivative instrument has
not been or will not continue to be highly effective as a fair
value or cash flow hedge, or that the hedge designation is no
longer appropriate, hedge accounting is discontinued. The
derivative instrument will continue to be recorded in the
consolidated balance sheets at its fair value, with future
changes in fair value recognized in noninterest income.
Foreign exchange futures and forward contracts, foreign currency
options, interest rate caps, interest rate swap agreements and
energy derivative contracts executed as a service to customers
are not designated as hedging instruments and both the realized
and unrealized gains and losses on these instruments are
recognized in noninterest income.
The Corporation holds a portfolio of warrants for non-marketable
equity securities. Most of these warrants are from high
technology, non-public companies obtained as part of the loan
origination process. Warrants that have a net exercise provision
embedded in the warrant agreement (primarily those obtained
prior to 2006) are required to be accounted for as
derivatives and recorded at fair value. The initial fair value
of warrants obtained as part of the loan origination process is
deferred and amortized into interest and fees on
loans on the consolidated statements of income over the
life of the loan. The fair value of these warrants is
subsequently adjusted on a quarterly basis, with any changes in
fair value recorded in net income from principal investing
and warrants on the consolidated statements of income.
Prior to 2005, the Corporation recognized income related to
these warrants approximately 30 days prior to the warrant
issuers publicly traded stock becoming free of
restrictions, when a publicly traded company acquired the
warrant issuer, or when cash was received. The cumulative
adjustment to record the fair value was not material to 2005 or
any other prior reporting period.
Further information on the Corporations derivative
instruments is included in Note 20 on page 107.
Standby
and Commercial Letters of Credit and Financial
Guarantees
A liability related to certain guarantee contracts or
indemnification agreements that contingently require the
guarantor to make payments to the guaranteed party is recognized
and initially measured at fair value by the guarantor. The
initial recognition and measurement provisions were applied by
the Corporation on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or
modified subsequent to December 31, 2002. Further
information on the Corporations obligations under
guarantees is included in Note 20 on page 107.
78
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Income
Taxes
The provision for income taxes is based on amounts reported in
the consolidated statements of income (after deducting
non-taxable items, principally income on bank-owned life
insurance, and deducting tax credits related to investments on
low income housing partnerships) and includes deferred income
taxes on temporary differences between the tax basis and
financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred
tax assets are evaluated for realization based on available
evidence and assumptions made regarding future events. This
evaluation includes assumptions of future taxable income and
other likely initiatives that could be undertaken. A valuation
allowance is provided when it is more-likely-than-not that some
portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The
provision for income taxes assigned to discontinued operations
is based on statutory rates, adjusted for permanent differences
generated by those operations.
On January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions
of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes- an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48 permits the
Corporation to elect to change its accounting policy as to where
interest and penalties on tax liabilities is classified in the
consolidated statements of income. Effective January 1,
2007, the Corporation prospectively changed its accounting
policy to classify interest and penalties on tax liabilities in
the provision for income taxes on the consolidated
statements of income. For all prior periods presented, interest
and penalties on tax liabilities remained classified in
other noninterest expenses on the consolidated
statements of income. For a further discussion of FIN 48
refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements
on page 103.
Statements
of Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as those amounts included
in cash and due from banks on the consolidated
balance sheets. Cash flows from discontinued operations are
reported as separate line items within cash flows from
operating, investing and financing activities in the
consolidated statements of cash flows.
Deferred
Distribution Costs
Certain mutual fund distribution costs, principally commissions
paid to brokers, are capitalized when paid and amortized over
six years. Fees that contractually recoup the deferred costs,
primarily
12b-1 fees,
are received over a 6-8 year period. The net of these fees
and amortization is recorded on the consolidated statements of
income. Early redemption fees collected are generally recorded
as a reduction to the capitalized costs, unless there is
evidence that, on an ongoing basis, amounts collected will
exceed the unamortized deferred fee asset.
Loan
Origination Fees and Costs
Business loan origination and commitment fees greater than $10
thousand and all Small Business Administration loan, residential
mortgage and consumer loan origination fees and costs are
deferred and recognized over the life of the related loan or
over the commitment period as a yield adjustment. Loan fees on
unused commitments and net origination fees related to loans
sold are recognized currently as noninterest income.
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Corporation has elected to present information on
comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of changes
in shareholders equity on page 70 and in Note 13
on page 92.
|
|
Note 2
|
Pending
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies
whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value, and therefore, does
not expand the use of fair value in any new
79
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
circumstances. Fair value refers to the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants in the market in
which the Corporation transacts. SFAS 157 clarifies that
fair value should be based on the assumptions market
participants would use when pricing an asset or liability
and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value
hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active
markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, for
example, the Corporations own data. SFAS 157 requires
fair value measurements to be separately disclosed by level
within the fair value hierarchy. While not expanding the use of
fair value, SFAS 157 may change the measurement of fair
value. Any change in the measurement of fair value would be
considered a change in estimate and included in the results of
operations in the period of adoption. SFAS 157 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
Accordingly, the Corporation will adopt the provisions of
SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008. The Corporation does
not expect the adoption of the provisions of SFAS 157 to
have a material effect on the Corporations financial
condition and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 provides
entities with the irrevocable option to account for selected
financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a
contract-by-contract
basis. The Corporation can elect to apply the standard
prospectively and measure certain financial instruments at fair
value beginning January 1, 2008. At adoption, the
difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of
existing eligible assets and liabilities selected (if any) would
be recognized via a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained
earnings on January 1, 2008. After adoption, all changes in
fair value would be included in the results of operations. The
Corporation has evaluated the guidance contained in
SFAS 159, and has decided not to elect the fair value
option for any financial assets or liabilities at this time.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised
2007), Business Combinations, (SFAS 141(R)),
which replaces SFAS 141. SFAS 141(R) establishes
principles and requirements for recognition and measurement of
assets, liabilities and any noncontrolling interest acquired due
to a business combination. SFAS 141(R) expands the
definitions of a business and a business combination, resulting
in an increased number of transactions or other events that will
qualify as business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R) the
entity that acquires the business (the acquirer)
will record 100% of all assets and liabilities of the acquired
business, including goodwill, generally at their fair values.
SFAS 141(R) requires the acquirer to recognize goodwill as
of the acquisition date, measured as a residual. In most
business combinations, goodwill will be recognized to the extent
that the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any
noncontrolling interests in the acquiree at the acquisition date
exceeds the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired.
Under SFAS 141(R) acquisition-related transaction and
restructuring costs will be expensed as incurred rather than
treated as part of the cost of the acquisition and included in
the amount recorded for assets acquired. SFAS 141(R) is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Accordingly, for acquisitions completed after
December 31, 2008, the Corporation will apply the
provisions of SFAS 141(R).
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB 51, (SFAS 160), which
defines noncontrolling interest as the portion of equity in a
subsidiary not attributable, direct or indirectly, to the
parent. SFAS 160 requires the ownership interests in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent (previously
referred to as minority interest) to be clearly presented in the
consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but
separate from the parents equity. The amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to any
noncontrolling interest must be clearly presented on the face of
the consolidated statement of income. Changes in the
parents ownership interest while the parent retains its
controlling financial interest (greater than 50 percent
ownership) are to be accounted for as equity transactions. Upon
a loss of control, any gain or loss on the interest sold will be
recognized in earnings. Additionally, any ownership interest
retained will be remeasured at fair value on the date control is
lost, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Corporation will adopt
the provisions of SFAS 160 in the first quarter 2009. The
80
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Corporation does not expect the adoption of the provisions of
SFAS 160 to have a material effect on the
Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
Note 3
|
Investment
Securities
|
A summary of the Corporations investment securities
available-for-sale follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government agency securities
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
|
6,178
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
6,309
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government agency securities
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
3,755
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the Corporations temporarily impaired
investment securities available-for-sale follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
Over 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government agency securities
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2,127
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
2,344
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and other Government agency securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2,832
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
3,236
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Unrealized losses less than $0.5 million.
|
81
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had 122 securities in
an unrealized loss position, including 120 Government-sponsored
enterprise securities (i.e., FMNA, FHLMC). The unrealized losses
resulted from changes in market interest rates, not credit
quality. The Corporation has the ability and intent to hold
these available-for-sale investment securities until maturity or
market price recovery, and full collection of the amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the debt is expected;
therefore, the Corporation does not consider these investments
to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2007.
The table below summarizes the amortized cost and fair values of
debt securities, by contractual maturity (securities with
multiple maturity dates are classified in the period of final
maturity). Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Contractual maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
After five years through ten years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After ten years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
6,168
|
|
Equity and other nondebt securities
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
6,309
|
|
|
$
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, calls and write-downs of investment securities
available-for-sale resulted in realized gains and losses as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Securities gains
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Securities losses
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net securities gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, investment securities having a
carrying value of $1.8 billion were pledged where permitted
or required by law to secure $1.7 billion of liabilities,
including public and other deposits, and derivative instruments.
This included securities of $917 million pledged with the
Federal Reserve Bank to secure actual treasury tax and loan
borrowings of $850 million at December 31, 2007. The
remaining pledged securities of $891 million are primarily
with state and local government agencies to secure
$836 million of deposits and other liabilities, including
deposits of the State of Michigan of $187 million at
December 31, 2007.
82
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 4
|
Nonperforming
Assets
|
The following table summarizes nonperforming assets and loans,
which generally are contractually past due 90 days or more
as to interest or principal payments. Nonperforming assets
consist of nonaccrual loans, reduced-rate loans and real estate
acquired through foreclosure. Nonaccrual loans are those on
which interest is not being recognized. Reduced-rate loans are
those on which interest has been renegotiated to lower than
market rates because of the weakened financial condition of the
borrower.
Nonaccrual and reduced-rate loans are included in loans on the
consolidated balance sheets and real estate acquired through
foreclosure is included in accrued income and other
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Commercial mortgage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
International
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Reduced-rate loans
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Foreclosed property
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross interest income that would have been recorded had the
nonaccrual and reduced-rate loans performed in accordance with
original terms
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A loan is impaired when it is probable that payment of interest
and principal will not be made in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Consistent with this
definition, all nonaccrual and reduced-rate loans (with the
exception of residential mortgage and consumer loans) are
impaired.
83
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Impaired loans at December 31, 2007 were $404 million.
Restructured loans which are performing in accordance with their
modified terms must be disclosed as impaired for the remainder
of the calendar year of the restructuring, in accordance with
impaired loan disclosure requirements. Loans restructured during
the year which met the requirements to be on accrual status at
December 31, 2007, totaled $4 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Average impaired loans for the year
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total year-end nonaccrual business loans
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
Total year-end reduced-rate business loans
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans restructured during the year on accrual status at year-end
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total year-end impaired loans
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-end impaired loans requiring an allowance
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance allocated to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans
for which the fair value of expected repayments or collateral
exceeded the recorded investments in such loans. At
December 31, 2007, substantially all of the total impaired
loans were evaluated based on fair value of related collateral.
Remaining loan impairment is based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate or observable market value.
|
|
Note 5
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
An analysis of changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
Loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge-offs
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total loans
|
|
|
1.10
|
%
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6
|
Significant
Group Concentrations of Credit Risk
|
Concentrations of both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet
credit risk are controlled and monitored as part of credit
policies. The Corporation is a regional financial services
holding company with a geographic concentration of its
on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet activities in Michigan,
California and Texas.
The Corporation has an industry concentration with the
automotive industry. Loans to automotive dealers and to
borrowers involved with automotive production are reported as
automotive, since management believes these loans have similar
economic characteristics that might cause them to react
similarly to changes in economic conditions. This aggregation
involves the exercise of judgment. Included in automotive
production are: (a) original equipment manufacturers and
Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers that produce components
used in vehicles and
84
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
whose primary revenue source is automotive-related
(primary defined as greater than 50%) and
(b) other manufacturers that produce components used in
vehicles and whose primary revenue source is automotive-related.
Loans less than $1 million and loans recorded in the Small
Business division were excluded from the definition. Outstanding
loans and total exposure from loans, unused commitments and
standby letters of credit and financial guarantees to companies
related to the automotive industry were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Automotive loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
1,806
|
|
|
$
|
2,206
|
|
Dealer
|
|
|
5,384
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive loans
|
|
$
|
7,190
|
|
|
$
|
7,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive exposure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
$
|
3,704
|
|
|
$
|
4,217
|
|
Dealer
|
|
|
7,336
|
|
|
|
7,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total automotive exposure
|
|
$
|
11,040
|
|
|
$
|
11,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further, the Corporations portfolio of commercial real
estate loans, which includes real estate construction and
commercial mortgage loans, was as shown in the following table.
Unused commitments on commercial real estate loans were
$5.2 billion and $4.1 billion at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
$
|
4,089
|
|
|
$
|
3,449
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate construction loans
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate business line
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
Other business lines
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
8,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
10,048
|
|
|
|
9,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
14,864
|
|
|
$
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 7
|
Premises
and Equipment
|
A summary of premises and equipment by major category follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation conducts a portion of its business from leased
facilities and leases certain equipment. Rental expense of
continuing operations for leased properties and equipment
amounted to $65 million, $58 million and
$56 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of
December 31, 2007, future minimum payments under operating
leases and other long-term obligations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
2009
|
|
|
80
|
|
2010
|
|
|
65
|
|
2011
|
|
|
63
|
|
2012
|
|
|
53
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill and identified intangible assets that have an
indefinite useful life are subject to impairment testing, which
the Corporation conducts annually, or on an interim basis if
events or changes in circumstances between annual tests indicate
the assets might be impaired. The annual test of goodwill and
intangible assets that have an indefinite life, performed as of
July 1, 2007 and 2006, did not indicate that an impairment
charge was required.
In the fourth quarter 2006, the Corporation sold its ownership
interest in Munder, a consolidated subsidiary that was part of
the Corporations asset management reporting unit. Goodwill
of $63 million was allocated to the sale in accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142). Following the sale of Munder, the
remaining components of the asset management reporting unit,
which were not significant, were combined with another reporting
unit and tested for impairment. The test did not indicate an
impairment charge was required. The Corporation has accounted
for Munder as a discontinued operation in all periods presented,
which is included in the Other category for business
segment reporting purposes. For additional information regarding
discontinued operations, refer to Note 26 on page 127.
86
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are shown in the following
table. Amounts in all periods are based on business segments in
effect at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Institutional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Goodwill allocated to the sale of Munder Capital Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, the scheduled maturities of
certificates of deposit and other deposits with a stated
maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
13,125
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
2010
|
|
|
264
|
|
2011
|
|
|
52
|
|
2012
|
|
|
34
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A maturity distribution of domestic customer and institutional
certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
4,509
|
|
|
$
|
2,576
|
|
Over three months to six months
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Over six months to twelve months
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
3,654
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
2,275
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,207
|
|
|
$
|
9,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All foreign office time deposits of $1.3 billion and
$1.4 billion at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, were in denominations of $100,000 or more.
87
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 10
|
Short-Term
Borrowings
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase generally mature within one to four days from the
transaction date. Other short-term borrowings, consisting of
commercial paper, borrowed securities, term federal funds
purchased, short-term notes and treasury tax and loan deposits,
generally mature within one to 120 days from the
transaction date. The following table provides a summary of
short-term borrowings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Purchased
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and Securities Sold Under
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
Agreements to Repurchase
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount outstanding at year-end
|
|
$
|
1,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,058
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at year-end
|
|
|
1.84
|
%
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
Maximum month-end balance during the year
|
|
$
|
1,985
|
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
Average balance outstanding during the year
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
5.04
|
%
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount outstanding at year-end
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at year-end
|
|
|
5.04
|
%
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
Maximum month-end balance during the year
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
1,306
|
|
Average balance outstanding during the year
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
At December 31, 2007, Comerica Bank, a subsidiary of the
Corporation had pledged loans totaling $20 billion to
secure a $16 billion collateralized borrowing account with
the Federal Reserve Bank.
88
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 11
|
Medium-
and Long-Term Debt
|
Medium- and long-term debt are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Parent company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% subordinated note due 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
4.80% subordinated note due 2015
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
6.576% subordinated notes due 2037
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.60% subordinated note due 2050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subordinated notes
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Medium-term note:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate based on LIBOR indices due 2010
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent company
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% subordinated note due 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
9.98% subordinated note due 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
6.00% subordinated note due 2008
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
6.875% subordinated note due 2008
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
8.50% subordinated note due 2009
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
7.125% subordinated note due 2013
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
5.70% subordinated note due 2014
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
5.75% subordinated notes due 2016
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
5.20% subordinated notes due 2017
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
8.375% subordinated note due 2024
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
7.875% subordinated note due 2026
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subordinated notes
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
Medium-term notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate based on LIBOR indices due 2007 to 2012
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
Floating rate based on PRIME indices due 2007 to 2008
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
2.85% fixed rate note due 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Floating rate based on Federal Funds indices due 2009
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate note payable due 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total subsidiaries
|
|
|
7,853
|
|
|
|
5,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total medium- and long-term debt
|
|
$
|
8,821
|
|
|
$
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The carrying value of medium- and long-term debt has been
adjusted to reflect the gain or loss attributable to the risk
hedged. Concurrent with or subsequent to the issuance of certain
of the medium- and long-term debt presented above, the
Corporation entered into interest rate swap agreements to
convert the stated rate of the debt to a rate based on the
indices identified in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
of Debt
|
|
|
|
Rate at
|
|
|
Converted
|
|
Base Rate
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
Parent company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.80% subordinated note due 2015
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
%
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% subordinated note due 2008
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
6.875% subordinated note due 2008
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
8.50% subordinated note due 2009
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
7.125% subordinated note due 2013
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
5.70% subordinated note due 2014
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
5.75% subordinated note due 2016
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
5.20% subordinated note due 2017
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
8.375% subordinated note due 2024
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
7.875% subordinated note due 2026
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
6-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
4.72
|
|
In July 2007, the Corporation issued $150 million of
floating rate medium-term senior notes due July 27, 2010.
The notes pay interest quarterly, beginning October 27,
2007. The notes bear interest at a variable rate reset each
interest period based on three-month LIBOR plus 0.17%. The
Corporation used the proceeds to repay the $150 million
7.25% subordinated note due 2007. These medium-term notes
do not qualify as Tier 2 capital and are not insured by the
FDIC.
In June 2007, the Corporation exercised its option to redeem a
$55 million, 9.98% subordinated note, which had an
original maturity date of 2026.
In March 2007, Comerica Bank (the Bank), a subsidiary of the
Corporation, issued an additional $250 million of
5.75% subordinated notes under a series initiated in
November 2006. The notes pay interest semiannually, beginning
May 21, 2007, and mature November 21, 2016. The Bank
used the net proceeds for general corporate purposes.
In February 2007, the Corporation issued $515 million of
6.576% subordinated notes that relate to trust preferred
securities issued by an unconsolidated subsidiary. The notes pay
interest semiannually, beginning August 20, 2007 through
February 20, 2032. Beginning February 20, 2032, the
notes will bear interest at an annual rate based on LIBOR,
payable monthly until the scheduled maturity date of
February 20, 2037. The Corporation used the proceeds for
the redemption of a $350 million, 7.60% subordinated
note due 2050 and to repurchase additional shares. The
6.576% subordinated notes qualify as Tier 1 capital.
All other subordinated notes with maturities greater than one
year qualify as Tier 2 capital.
In November 2006, the Bank issued $400 million of
5.75% subordinated notes. The notes pay interest
semiannually, beginning May 21, 2007, and mature
November 21, 2016. The Bank used the net proceeds for
general corporate purposes.
In February 2006, the Bank issued an additional
$250 million of 5.20% subordinated notes under a
series initiated in August 2005. The notes pay interest
semiannually, beginning August 22, 2006, and mature
August 22, 2017. The Bank used the net proceeds for general
corporate purposes.
90
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The Corporation currently has a $15 billion medium-term
senior note program. This program allows the principal banking
subsidiary to issue fixed or floating rate notes with maturities
between one and 30 years. The Bank issued a total of
$3.4 billion and $2.7 billion of floating rate bank
notes during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, under the senior note program, using the proceeds
for general corporate purposes. The interest rate on the
floating rate medium-term notes based on LIBOR at
December 31, 2007 ranged from one-month LIBOR less 0.01% to
three-month LIBOR plus 0.19%. The interest rate on the floating
rate medium-term notes based on PRIME at December 31, 2007
ranged from PRIME less 2.91% to PRIME less 2.38%. The interest
rate on the floating rate medium-term note based on the Federal
Funds rate at December 31, 2007 was Federal Funds plus
0.21%. The medium-term notes outstanding at December 31,
2007 are due from 2008 to 2012. The medium-term notes do not
qualify as Tier 2 capital and are not insured by the FDIC.
In February 2008, the Bank became a member of the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Dallas, Texas (FHLB), which provides short-and
long-term funding to its members though advances that are
collateralized by mortgage-related assets. The initial required
investment by the bank in FHLB stock was $25 million.
Additional investment in FHLB stock would be required in
relation to the level of outstanding borrowings. The actual
borrowing capacity is contingent on the amount of collateral
available to be pledged to FHLB.
At December 31, 2007, the principal maturities of medium-
and long-term debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
2011
|
|
|
875
|
|
2012
|
|
|
370
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12
|
Shareholders
Equity
|
The Board of Directors of the Corporation authorized the
purchase up to 10 million shares of Comerica Incorporated
outstanding common stock on November 13, 2007, in addition
to the remaining unfilled portion of November 14, 2006
authorization. There is no expiration date for the
Corporations share repurchase program. Substantially all
shares purchased as part of the Corporations publicly
announced repurchase program were transacted in the open market
and were within the scope of
Rule 10b-18,
which provides a safe harbor for purchases in a given day if an
issuer of equity securities satisfies the manner, timing, price
and volume conditions of the rule when purchasing its own common
shares in the open market. Open market repurchases totaled
10.0 million shares, 6.6 million shares and
9.0 million shares in the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and
91
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
2005, respectively. The following table summarizes the
Corporations share repurchase activity for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Remaining Share
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Repurchase
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Paid Per Share
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Authorization(2)
|
|
|
|
(shares in thousands)
|
|
|
Total first quarter 2007
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
$
|
60.29
|
|
|
|
3,441
|
|
|
|
9,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total second quarter 2007
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
|
|
62.15
|
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total third quarter 2007
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
53.88
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
3,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2007
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
46.42
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
November 2007(3)
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
43.64
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
December 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fourth quarter 2007
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
45.36
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2007
|
|
|
10,044
|
|
|
$
|
58.11
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares purchased as part of publicly announced
repurchase plans or programs, shares purchased pursuant to
deferred compensation plans and shares purchased from employees
to pay for grant prices and/or taxes related to stock option
exercises and restricted stock vesting under the terms of an
employee share-based compensation plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the
publicly announced plans or programs. |
|
(3) |
|
Remaining share repurchase authorization includes the
November 13, 2007 Board of Directors resolution for the
repurchase of an additional 10 million shares. |
At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had 30.1 million
shares of common stock reserved for issuance and
1.3 million shares of restricted stock outstanding to
employees and directors under share-based compensation plans.
|
|
Note 13
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes the change in net
unrealized gains and losses on investment securities
available-for-sale, the change in accumulated net gains and
losses on cash flow hedges, the change in the accumulated
foreign currency translation adjustment and the change in the
accumulated defined benefit and other postretirement plans
adjustment. The consolidated statements of changes in
shareholders equity on page 70 include only combined
other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. The following
table presents reconciliations of the components of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. Total comprehensive
income totaled $833 million, $948 million and
$760 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. The $115 million decrease in
total comprehensive income in the year ended December 31,
2007, when compared to 2006, resulted principally from a
decrease in net income ($207 million), partially offset by
a decrease in net unrealized losses on investment securities
available-for-sale ($44 million) due to changes in the
interest rate environment, an increase in net gains on cash flow
hedges ($7 million) and the change in the defined benefit
and other postretirement benefit plans adjustment
($45 million). Accumulated other comprehensive income at
December 31, 2006 was impacted by a $209 million
after-tax transition adjustment to apply the provisions of
SFAS 158.
92
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
For a further discussion of the effect of derivative instruments
and the effects of SFAS 158 on other comprehensive income
(loss) refer to Notes 1, 16 and 20 on pages 72, 97 and 107,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on investment
securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in
net income
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) before income taxes
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
available-for-sale,
net of tax
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
Accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
Net cash flow hedges gains (losses) arising during the period
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in
net income
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash flow hedges before income taxes
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period, net of tax
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
Net translation gains (losses) arising during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in
net income,
due to sale of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
Accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans adjustment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment arising during the period
before income taxes
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in minimum pension liability, net of tax
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 158 transition adjustment before income taxes
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 158 transition adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net defined benefit pension and other postretirement adjustment
arising
during the period
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Less: Adjustment for amounts recognized as components of net
periodic
benefit cost during the period
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in defined benefit and other postretirement plans
adjustment
before income taxes
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in defined benefit and other postretirement plans
adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of period,
net of tax
|
|
$
|
(177
|
)
|
|
$
|
(324
|
)
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A Not Applicable
93
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 14
|
Net
Income Per Common Share
|
Basic income from continuing operations and net income per
common share are computed by dividing income from continuing
operations and net income applicable to common stock,
respectively, by the weighted-average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during the period. Diluted income from
continuing operations and net income per common share are
computed by dividing income from continuing operations and net
income applicable to common stock, respectively, by the
weighted-average number of shares, nonvested restricted stock
and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the
period. Common stock equivalents consist of common stock
issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options granted
under the Corporations stock plans, using the treasury
stock method. A computation of basic and diluted income from
continuing operations and net income per common share are
presented in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per
|
|
|
|
share data)
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
682
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
816
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income from continuing operations per common share
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
682
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
816
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Nonvested stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of the assumed exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average common shares
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income from continuing operations per common share
|
|
$
|
4.40
|
|
|
$
|
4.81
|
|
|
$
|
4.84
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
The following average outstanding options to purchase shares of
common stock were not included in the computation of diluted net
income per common share because the options exercise
prices were greater than the average market price of common
shares for the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(options in millions)
|
|
Average outstanding options
|
|
10.3
|
|
6.0
|
|
6.1
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
$56.00 $71.58
|
|
$56.80 $71.58
|
|
$57.99 $71.58
|
94
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 15
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Share-based compensation expense is charged to
salaries expense, except for the Corporations
Munder subsidiary, which was sold in 2006, whose share-based
compensation expense was charged to income from
discontinued operations, net of tax, on the consolidated
statements of income. The components of share-based compensation
expense for all share-based compensation plans and related tax
benefits are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comerica Incorporated share-based plans
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
Munder share-based plans*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related tax benefits recognized in net income
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes $9 million and $7 million of long-term
incentive plan expense triggered by the 2006 sale of Munder and
the 2005 sale of Framlington, respectively |
The following table summarizes unrecognized compensation expense
for all share-based plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollar amounts
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
Total unrecognized share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected recognition period (in years)
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation has share-based compensation plans under which
it awards both shares of restricted stock to key executive
officers and key personnel, and stock options to executive
officers, directors and key personnel of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries. Restricted stock vests over periods ranging from
three to five years. Stock options vest over periods ranging
from one to four years. The maturity of each option is
determined at the date of grant; however, no options may be
exercised later than ten years and one month from the date of
grant. The options may have restrictions regarding
exercisability. The plans originally provided for a grant of up
to 13.2 million common shares, plus shares under certain
plans that are forfeited, expire or are cancelled. At
December 31, 2007, 10.9 million shares were available
for grant.
The Corporation used a binomial model to value substantially all
stock options granted in the periods presented. Previously, a
Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used. Option valuation
models require several inputs, including the expected stock
price volatility, and changes in input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimates. The model used may
not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair
value of employee and director stock options. The risk-free
interest rate assumption used in the binomial option-pricing
model as outlined in the table below was based on the federal
ten-year treasury interest rate. The expected dividend yield was
based on the historical and projected dividend yield patterns of
the Corporations common shares. Expected volatility
assumptions during 2007 and 2006 considered both the historical
volatility of the Corporations common stock over a
ten-year period and implied volatility based on actively traded
options on the Corporations common stock with pricing
terms and trade dates similar to the stock options granted. In
2005, only historical volatility was considered under the
binomial model. The expected life of employee and director stock
options, which is an output of the binomial model, considered
the percentage of vested shares estimated to be cancelled over
the life of the grant and was based on the historical exercise
behavior of the option holders.
95
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The fair value of options granted subsequent to March 31,
2005 was estimated using the binomial option-pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
April 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
to December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
Expected volatility factors of the market price of Comerica
common stock
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Expected option life (in years)
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair values per option share
granted, based on the assumptions above, were $12.47, $12.25,
and $13.56 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
A summary of the Corporations stock option activity and
related information for the year ended December 31, 2007
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Outstanding January 1, 2007
|
|
|
19,191
|
|
|
$
|
55.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
|
|
58.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
57.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,013
|
)
|
|
|
44.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding December 31, 2007
|
|
|
19,172
|
|
|
$
|
56.56
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, net of expected forfeitures
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
18,851
|
|
|
$
|
56.55
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13,160
|
|
|
$
|
56.48
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options shown in
the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value at
December 31, 2007, based on the Corporations closing
stock price of $43.53 as of December 31, 2007. The total
intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $33 million,
$26 million and $31 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Cash received from the exercise of stock options during 2007,
2006 and 2005 totaled $89 million, $45 million and
$42 million, respectively. The net excess income tax
benefit realized for the tax deductions from the exercise of
these options during the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005 totaled $8 million, $8 million and
$9 million, respectively.
96
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
A summary of the Corporations restricted stock activity
and related information for 2007 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding-January 1, 2007
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
$
|
54.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
58.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
56.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
56.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding-December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
$
|
55.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock awards that fully
vested during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 was $10 million, $8 million and $1 million,
respectively.
The Corporation expects to satisfy the exercise of stock options
and future grants of restricted stock by issuing shares of
common stock out of treasury. At December 31, 2007, the
Corporation held 28.7 million shares in treasury.
For further information on the Corporations share-based
compensation plans, refer to Note 1 on page 72.
|
|
Note 16
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Corporation has a qualified and a non-qualified defined
benefit pension plan, which together, provide benefits for
substantially all full-time employees hired before
January 1, 2007. Employee benefits expense included pension
expense of $36 million, $39 million and
$31 million in the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively, for the plans. Benefits under the
defined benefit plans are based primarily on years of service,
age and compensation during the five highest paid consecutive
calendar years occurring during the last ten years before
retirement. The defined benefit plans assets primarily
consist of units of certain collective investment funds and
mutual investment funds administered by Munder Capital
Management, equity securities, U.S. Treasury and other
Government agency securities, Government-sponsored enterprise
securities, and corporate bonds and notes. The majority of these
assets have publicly quoted prices, which is the basis for
determining fair value of plan assets.
On January 1, 2007, the Corporation added a defined
contribution feature to its principal defined contribution plan
for the benefit of substantially all full-time employees hired
on or after January 1, 2007. Under the defined contribution
feature, the Corporation will make an annual contribution to the
individual account of each eligible employee ranging from three
to eight percent of annual compensation, determined based on
combined age and years of service. The contributions will be
invested based on employee investment elections. The employee
fully vests in the defined contribution account after three
years of service. The plan feature, effective January 1,
2007, requires one year of service before an employee is
eligible to participate. As a result, no pension expense was
incurred for this plan feature for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
The Corporations postretirement benefit plan continues to
provide postretirement health care and life insurance benefits
for retirees as of December 31, 1992. The plan also
provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance
benefits for a limited number of retirees who retired prior to
January 1, 2000. For all other employees hired prior to
January 1, 2000, a nominal benefit is provided. Employees
hired on or after January 1, 2000 are not eligible to
participate in the plan. The Corporation has funded the plan
with bank-owned life insurance.
97
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The following table sets forth reconciliations of the projected
benefit obligation and plan assets of the Corporations
qualified defined benefit pension plan, non-qualified defined
benefit pension plan and postretirement benefit plan. The
Corporation used a measurement date of December 31, 2007
for these plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Benefit Plan
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at January 1
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
|
$
|
1,066
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Plan change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at December 31
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
|
$
|
1,044
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at January 1
|
|
$
|
1,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,184
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
909
|
|
|
$
|
909
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at December 31*
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Based on projected benefit obligation for pension plans and
accumulated benefit obligation for postretirement benefit plan. |
The 2006 postretirement benefit plan change of $9 million
reflects an adjustment to include certain participant groups not
previously included in plan valuations. The non-qualified
defined benefit pension plan was the only pension plan with an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
98
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The following table details the amounts recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 for the qualified defined
benefit pension plan, non-qualified defined benefit pension plan
and postretirement benefit plan and the changes for 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Service
|
|
|
Net Transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Service
|
|
|
Net Transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(Cost) Credit
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(Cost) Credit
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
Adjustment arising during the year
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Less: Adjustment for amounts recognized as components of net
periodic benefit cost during the year
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in amounts recognized in other comprehensive income
before income taxes
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in amounts recognized in other comprehensive income, net
of tax
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(90
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Service
|
|
|
Net Transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Service
|
|
|
Net Transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(Cost) Credit
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(Cost) Credit
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(177
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
Adjustment arising during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Less: Adjustment for amounts recognized as components of net
periodic benefit cost during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in amounts recognized in other comprehensive income
before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in amounts recognized in other comprehensive income, net
of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan
|
|
|
Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated portion of balances remaining in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) that are expected to be recognized
as a component of net periodic benefit cost in the year ended
December 31, 2008 are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Benefit Plan
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Actuarial assumptions are reflected below. The discount rate and
rate of compensation increase used to determine the benefit
obligation for each year shown is as of the end of the year. The
discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of
compensation increase used to determine net cost for each year
shown is as of the beginning of the year.
100
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine year end benefit
obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
Qualified and Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate used in determining benefit obligation
|
|
|
6.47
|
%
|
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
Qualified and Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
|
|
|
Postretirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate used in determining net cost
|
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
8.75
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The long-term rate of return expected on plan assets is set
after considering both long-term returns in the general market
and long-term returns experienced by the assets in the plan. The
returns on the various asset categories are blended to derive
one long-term rate of return. The Corporation reviews its
pension plan assumptions on an annual basis with its actuarial
consultants to determine if assumptions are reasonable and
adjusts the assumptions to reflect changes in future
expectations.
Assumed healthcare and prescription drug cost trend rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
|
Prescription Drug
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Year that the rate reaches the rate at which it is assumed to
remain
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Assumed healthcare and prescription drug cost trend rates have a
significant effect on the amounts reported for the healthcare
plans. A one-percentage point change in 2006 assumed healthcare
and prescription drug cost trend rates would have the following
effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Percentage-Point
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Effect on total service and interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Plan
Assets
The Corporations qualified defined benefit pension plan
asset allocations at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and target
allocation for 2008 are shown in the table below. There were no
assets in the non-qualified defined benefit pension plan. The
postretirement benefit plan is fully invested in bank-owned life
insurance policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Percentage of Plan Assets at
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
December 31
|
Asset Category
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
55
|
65%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
Fixed income, including cash
|
|
|
30
|
40
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Alternative assets
|
|
|
0
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment goal for the qualified defined benefit pension
plan is to achieve a real rate of return (nominal rate minus
consumer price index change) consistent with that received on
investment grade corporate bonds. The Corporations 2008
target allocation percentages by asset category are noted in the
table above. Given the mix of equity securities and fixed income
(including cash), management believes that by targeting the
benchmark return to an investment grade quality
return, an appropriate degree of risk is maintained. Within the
asset classes, the degree of
non-U.S. based
assets is limited to 15 percent of the total, to be
allocated within both equity securities and fixed income. The
investment manager has discretion to make investment decisions
within the target allocation parameters. The Corporations
Employee Benefits Committee must approve exceptions to this
policy. Securities issued by the Corporation and its
subsidiaries are not eligible for use within this plan.
Cash
Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
Estimated Future Employer Contributions
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Benefit Plan*
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Estimated employer contributions in the postretirement benefit
plan do not include settlements on death claims. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
Benefit Plan*
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
2009
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2010
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2011
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2012
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2013 2017
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Estimated benefit payments in the postretirement benefit plan
are net of estimated Medicare subsidies. |
102
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The Corporation also maintains other defined contribution plans
(including 401(k) plans) for various groups of its employees.
Substantially all of the Corporations employees are
eligible to participate in one or more of the plans. Under the
Corporations principal defined contribution plan, the
Corporation makes matching cash contributions. Effective
January 1, 2007, the Corporation prospectively changed its
core matching contribution to 100 percent of the first four
percent of qualified earnings contributed (up to the current IRS
compensation limit), invested based on employee investment
elections. Previously, the Corporations matches were based
on a declining percentage of employee contributions as well as a
performance-based matching contribution. Under the prior plan,
the matching contributions were made in the stock of the
Corporation and were restricted until the end of the calendar
year. Employee benefits expense included expense for the plans
of $20 million, $13 million and $15 million in
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
Note 17
|
Income
Taxes and Tax-Related Items
|
The provision for federal income taxes is computed by applying
the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income
taxes as reported in the consolidated financial statements after
deducting non-taxable items, principally income on bank-owned
life insurance, and deducting tax credits related to investments
in low income housing partnerships. State and foreign taxes are
then added to the federal tax provision. In addition, beginning
January 1, 2007, interest and penalties on tax liabilities
are classified in the provision for income taxes.
The Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
(FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result, the
Corporation recognized an increase in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $18 million at
January 1, 2007, accounted for as a change in accounting
principle via a decrease to the opening balance of retained
earnings ($13 million, net of tax). At January 1,
2007, the Corporation had unrecognized tax benefits of
approximately $85 million. After consideration of the
effect of the federal tax benefit available on unrecognized
state tax benefits, the total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits that, if recognized, would affect the
Corporations effective tax rate was approximately
$75 million at January 1, 2007, and $77 million
at December 31, 2007.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefit follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized
|
|
|
|
Tax Benefits
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Increases as a result of tax positions taken during a prior
period
|
|
|
3
|
|
Increases as a result of tax positions taken during a current
period
|
|
|
4
|
|
Decreases as a result of tax positions taken during a current
period
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases related to settlements with tax authorities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation recognized approximately $5 million in
interest and penalties on tax liabilities included in the
provision for income taxes on the consolidated
statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to $38 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and $11 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, included in other noninterest
expenses on the consolidated statements of income. The
2007 interest and penalties on tax liabilities are net of a
$9 million reduction of interest resulting from a
settlement with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on a refund
claim. The Corporation had approximately $76 million and
$71 million accrued for the payment of interest and
penalties at December 31, 2007 and January 1, 2007,
respectively. Upon adoption of FIN 48, the Corporation
recorded a $7 million (net of tax) decrease to interest and
penalties on tax liabilities as an increase to the opening
balance of retained earnings.
103
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into
certain transactions that have tax consequences. From time to
time, the IRS questions
and/or
challenges the tax position taken by the Corporation with
respect to those transactions. The Corporation engaged in
certain types of structured leasing transactions that the IRS
disallowed in its examination of the Corporations federal
tax returns for the years 1996 through 2000. The Corporation
continues to exchange information with the IRS Appeals Office
related to the structured leasing transactions. The IRS also
disallowed foreign tax credits associated with the interest on a
series of loans to foreign borrowers. The Corporation has had
ongoing discussions with the IRS Appeals Office related to the
disallowance of the foreign tax credits associated with the
loans and adjusted tax and related interest and penalties
reserves based on settlements discussed. Also, the Corporation
has had discussions with various state tax authorities regarding
prior year tax filings. The Corporation anticipates that it is
reasonably possible that the foreign tax credits and state tax
return issues will be settled within the next 12 months
resulting in additional payments in the range of $35 to
$45 million in 2008.
Based on current knowledge and probability assessment of various
potential outcomes, the Corporation believes that current tax
reserves, determined in accordance with FIN 48, are
adequate to cover the matters outlined above, and the amount of
any incremental liability arising from these matters is not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations consolidated financial condition or results
of operations. Probabilities and outcomes are reviewed as events
unfold, and adjustments to the reserves are made when necessary.
The Corporation believes that its tax returns were filed based
upon applicable statutes, regulations and case law in effect at
the time of the transactions. The Corporation intends to
vigorously defend its positions taken in those returns in
accordance with its view of the law controlling these
activities. However, as noted above, the IRS, an administrative
authority or a court, if presented with the transactions, could
disagree with the Corporations interpretation of the tax
law. After evaluating the risks and opportunities, the best
outcome may result in a settlement. The ultimate outcome for
each position is not known.
The following tax years for significant jurisdictions remain
subject to examination as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
Tax Years
|
Federal
|
|
2001-2006
|
California
|
|
2002-2006
|
On January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions
of FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 13-2,
Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing
of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged
Lease Transaction,
(FSP 13-2).
FSP 13-2
requires a recalculation of the lease income from the inception
of a leveraged lease if, during the lease term, the expected
timing of the income tax cash flows generated from a leveraged
lease is revised. The Corporation recorded a one-time non-cash
after-tax charge to beginning retained earnings of
$46 million to reflect changes in expected timing of the
income tax cash flows generated from affected leveraged leases,
which is expected to be recognized as income over periods
ranging from 4 years to 20 years.
104
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The current and deferred components of the provision for income
taxes for continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, included a
provision for income taxes on discontinued operations of
$2 million, $73 million and $25 million for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
There was an income tax provision on securities transactions in
2007 of $2 million, compared to nominal tax provisions in
both 2006 and 2005.
The principal components of deferred tax assets and liabilities
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
Deferred loan origination fees and costs
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Foreign tax credit
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Tax interest
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Other temporary differences, net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease financing transactions
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
Allowance for depreciation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had undistributed
earnings of approximately $146 million related to a foreign
subsidiary. The Corporation intends to reinvest theses earnings
indefinitely and has not recorded any related federal or state
income tax expense. If these earnings were repatriated to the
United States, the Corporation would record additional income
tax expense of approximately $53 million.
A reconciliation of expected income tax expense at the federal
statutory rate of 35 percent to the Corporations
provision for income taxes for continuing operations and
effective tax rate follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Tax based on federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Affordable housing and historic credits
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Disallowance of foreign tax credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of
1996-2000
IRS audit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 18
|
Transactions
with Related Parties
|
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have had, and expect
to have in the future, transactions with the Corporations
directors and executive officers, and companies with which these
individuals are associated. Such transactions were made in the
ordinary course of business and included extensions of credit,
leases and professional services. With respect to extensions of
credit, all were made on substantially the same terms, including
interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same
time for comparable transactions with other customers and did
not, in managements opinion, involve more than normal risk
of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. The
aggregate amount of loans attributable to persons who were
related parties at December 31, 2007, totaled
$210 million at the beginning and $294 million at the
end of 2007. During 2007, new loans to related parties
aggregated $620 million and repayments totaled
$536 million.
|
|
Note 19
|
Regulatory
Capital and Reserve Requirements
|
Cash and due from banks includes reserves required to be
maintained
and/or
deposited with the Federal Reserve Bank. These reserve balances
vary, depending on the level of customer deposits in the
Corporations banking subsidiaries. The average required
reserve balances were $267 million and $298 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of
dividends, loans or advances from the bank subsidiaries to the
parent company. Under the most restrictive of these regulations,
the aggregate amount of dividends which can be paid to the
parent company without obtaining prior approval from bank
regulatory agencies approximated $234 million at
January 1, 2008, plus 2008 net profits. Substantially
all the assets of the Corporations banking subsidiaries
are restricted from transfer to the parent company of the
Corporation in the form of loans or advances.
Dividends declared to the parent company of the Corporation by
its banking subsidiaries amounted to $614 million,
$746 million and $793 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
106
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The Corporation and its U.S. banking subsidiaries are
subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by federal and state banking agencies. Quantitative measures
established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the
maintenance of minimum amounts and ratios of Tier 1 and
total capital (as defined in the regulations) to average and
risk-weighted assets. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly
additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if
undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the
Corporations financial statements. At December 31,
2007 and 2006, the Corporation and its U.S. banking
subsidiaries exceeded the ratios required for an institution to
be considered well capitalized (total risk-based
capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and leverage ratios
greater than 10 percent, six percent and five percent,
respectively). The following is a summary of the capital
position of the Corporation and Comerica Bank, its significant
banking subsidiary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comerica Incorporated
|
|
|
Comerica
|
|
|
|
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common capital
|
|
$
|
5,145
|
|
|
$
|
5,408
|
|
Tier 1 capital (minimum-$3.0 billion (Consolidated))
|
|
|
5,640
|
|
|
|
5,728
|
|
Total capital (minimum-$6.0 billion (Consolidated))
|
|
|
8,410
|
|
|
|
8,185
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
75,102
|
|
|
|
74,919
|
|
Average assets (fourth quarter)
|
|
|
60,878
|
|
|
|
60,660
|
|
Tier 1 common capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
6.85
|
%
|
|
|
7.22
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (minimum-4.0%)
|
|
|
7.51
|
|
|
|
7.65
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets (minimum-8.0%)
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
10.92
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets (minimum-3.0%)
|
|
|
9.26
|
|
|
|
9.44
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common capital
|
|
$
|
5,318
|
|
|
$
|
5,373
|
|
Tier 1 capital (minimum-$2.8 billion (Consolidated))
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
Total capital (minimum-$5.6 billion (Consolidated))
|
|
|
8,202
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
70,486
|
|
|
|
70,343
|
|
Average assets (fourth quarter)
|
|
|
57,884
|
|
|
|
57,663
|
|
Tier 1 common capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
7.54
|
%
|
|
|
7.64
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (minimum-4.0%)
|
|
|
8.03
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets (minimum-8.0%)
|
|
|
11.64
|
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets (minimum-3.0%)
|
|
|
9.77
|
|
|
|
9.87
|
|
|
|
Note 20
|
Derivative
and Credit-Related Financial Instruments
|
In the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into
various transactions involving derivative and credit-related
financial instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in
interest rate, foreign currency and other market risks and to
meet the financing needs of customers. These financial
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
market risk.
Credit risk is the possible loss that may occur in the event of
nonperformance by the counterparty to a financial instrument.
The Corporation attempts to minimize credit risk arising from
financial instruments by evaluating the creditworthiness of each
counterparty, adhering to the same credit approval process used
for traditional lending activities. Counterparty risk limits and
monitoring procedures have also been established to facilitate
the management of credit risk. Collateral is obtained, if deemed
necessary, based on the results of
107
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
managements credit evaluation. Collateral varies, but may
include cash, investment securities, accounts receivable,
equipment or real estate.
Derivative instruments are traded over an organized exchange or
negotiated over-the-counter. Credit risk associated with
exchange-traded contracts is typically assumed by the organized
exchange. Over-the-counter contracts are tailored to meet the
needs of the counterparties involved and, therefore, contain a
greater degree of credit risk and liquidity risk than
exchange-traded contracts, which have standardized terms and
readily available price information. The Corporation reduces
exposure to credit and liquidity risks from over-the-counter
derivative instruments entered into for risk management
purposes, and transactions entered into to mitigate the market
risk associated with customer-initiated transactions, by
conducting such transactions with investment grade domestic and
foreign financial institutions and subjecting counterparties to
credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures similar to
those used in making other extensions of credit.
Market risk is the potential loss that may result from movements
in interest or foreign currency rates and energy prices, which
cause an unfavorable change in the value of a financial
instrument. The Corporation manages this risk by establishing
monetary exposure limits and monitoring compliance with those
limits. Market risk arising from derivative instruments entered
into on behalf of customers is reflected in the consolidated
financial statements and may be mitigated by entering into
offsetting transactions. Market risk inherent in derivative
instruments held or issued for risk management purposes is
generally offset by changes in the value of rate sensitive
assets or liabilities.
Derivative
Instruments
The Corporation, as an end-user, employs a variety of financial
instruments for risk management purposes. Activity related to
these instruments is centered predominantly in the interest rate
markets and mainly involves interest rate swaps. Various other
types of instruments also may be used to manage exposures to
market risks, including interest rate caps and floors, total
return swaps, foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign
exchange swap agreements.
For hedge relationships accounted for under SFAS 133 at
inception of the hedge, the Corporation uses either the
short-cut method if it qualifies, or applies dollar offset or
statistical regression analysis to assess effectiveness. The
short-cut method is used for fair value hedges of medium-and
long-term debt. This method allows for the assumption of zero
hedge ineffectiveness and eliminates the requirement to further
assess hedge effectiveness on these transactions. For
SFAS 133 hedge relationships to which the Corporation does
not apply the short-cut method either the dollar offset or
statistical regression analysis is used at inception and for
each reporting period thereafter to assess whether the
derivative used has been and is expected to be highly effective
in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the
hedged item. All components of each derivative instruments
gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge
effectiveness. Net hedge ineffectiveness is recorded in
other noninterest income on the consolidated
statements of income.
The following table presents net hedge ineffectiveness gains
(losses) by risk management hedge type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Fair value hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of a fair value hedging strategy, the Corporation has
entered into interest rate swap agreements for interest rate
risk management purposes. These interest rate swap agreements
effectively modify the Corporations
108
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
exposure to interest rate risk by converting fixed rate deposits
and debt to a floating rate. These agreements involve the
receipt of fixed rate interest amounts in exchange for floating
rate interest payments over the life of the agreement, without
an exchange of the underlying principal amount.
As part of a cash flow hedging strategy, the Corporation entered
into predominantly three-year interest rate swap agreements
(weighted average original maturity of 3.0 years) that
effectively convert a portion of its existing and forecasted
floating rate loans to a fixed rate basis, thus reducing the
impact of interest rate changes on future interest income over
the next 10 months. Approximately six percent
($3.2 billion) of the Corporations outstanding loans
were designated as hedged items to interest rate swap agreements
at December 31, 2007. For the year ended December 31,
2007, interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow
hedges decreased interest and fees on loans by $67 million,
compared with a decrease of $124 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. If interest rates, interest yield curves
and notional amounts remain at their current levels, the
Corporation expects to reclassify $2 million of net gains,
net of tax, on derivative instruments that are designated as
cash flow hedges from accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) to earnings during the next 12 months due to receipt of
variable interest associated with the existing and forecasted
floating rate loans.
Foreign exchange rate risk arises from changes in the value of
certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies. The Corporation employs cash instruments, such as
investment securities, as well as derivative instruments, to
manage exposure to these and other risks. In addition, the
Corporation uses foreign exchange forward and option contracts
to protect the value of its foreign currency investment in
foreign subsidiaries. Realized and unrealized gains and losses
from foreign exchange forward and option contracts used to
protect the value of investments in foreign subsidiaries are not
included in the statement of income, but are shown in the
accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment account
included in other comprehensive income (loss), with the related
amounts due to or from counterparties included in other
liabilities or other assets. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, the Corporation recognized net gains of
less than $0.5 million in accumulated foreign currency
translation adjustment, related to the foreign exchange forward
and option contracts. The Corporation did not hold any forward
foreign exchange contracts recognized in accumulated foreign
currency translation adjustment during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Management believes these hedging strategies achieve the desired
relationship between the rate maturities of assets and funding
sources which, in turn, reduce the overall exposure of net
interest income to interest rate risk, although, there can be no
assurance that such strategies will be successful. The
Corporation also may use various other types of financial
instruments to mitigate interest rate and foreign currency risks
associated with specific assets or liabilities. Such instruments
include interest rate caps and floors, foreign exchange forward
contracts, investment securities, foreign exchange option
contracts and foreign exchange cross-currency swaps.
109
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The following table presents the composition of derivative
instruments held or issued for risk management purposes,
excluding commitments, at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The
fair values of all derivative instruments are reflected in the
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps cash flow
|
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Swaps fair value
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate contracts
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot and forwards
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk management
|
|
$
|
5,951
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps cash flow
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
Swaps fair value
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate contracts
|
|
|
8,453
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot and forwards
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk management
|
|
$
|
9,004
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amounts, which represent the extent of involvement in
the derivatives market, are generally used to determine the
contractual cash flows required in accordance with the terms of
the agreement. These amounts are typically not exchanged,
significantly exceed amounts subject to credit or market risk,
and are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets.
Credit risk, which excludes the effects of any collateral or
netting arrangements, is measured as the cost to replace, at
current market rates, contracts in a profitable position. The
amount of this exposure is represented by the gross unrealized
gains on derivative instruments.
Bilateral collateral agreements with counterparties covered
63 percent and 76 percent of the notional amount of
interest rate derivative contracts at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. These agreements reduce credit risk by
providing for the exchange of marketable investment securities
to secure amounts due on contracts in an unrealized gain
position. In addition, at December 31, 2007, master netting
arrangements had been established with all interest rate swap
counterparties and certain foreign exchange counterparties.
These arrangements effectively reduce credit risk by permitting
settlement, on a net basis, of contracts entered into with the
same counterparty. The Corporation has not experienced any
material credit losses associated with derivative instruments.
Fee income is earned from entering into various transactions,
principally foreign exchange contracts, interest rate contracts,
and energy derivative contracts at the request of customers. The
Corporation mitigates market risk inherent in customer-initiated
interest rate and energy contracts by taking offsetting
positions, except in those circumstances when the amount, tenor
and/or
contracted rate level results in negligible economic risk,
whereby
110
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
the cost of purchasing an offsetting contract is not
economically justifiable. For customer-initiated foreign
exchange contracts, the Corporation mitigates most of the
inherent market risk by taking offsetting positions and manages
the remainder through individual foreign currency position
limits and aggregate
value-at-risk
limits. These limits are established annually and reviewed
quarterly.
For those customer-initiated derivative contracts which were not
offset or where the Corporation holds a speculative position
within the limits described above, the Corporation recognized
$1 million of net gains in 2007, 2006 and 2005, which were
included in other noninterest income in the
consolidated statements of income. The fair value of derivative
instruments held or issued in connection with customer-initiated
activities, including those customer-initiated derivative
contracts where the Corporation does not enter into an
offsetting derivative contract position, is included in the
following table.
The following table presents the composition of derivative
instruments held or issued in connection with customer-initiated
and other activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-initiated and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps and floors written
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Caps and floors purchased
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
6,806
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate contracts
|
|
|
8,508
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Energy derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps and floors written
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Caps and floors purchased
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy derivative contracts
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot, forwards, futures and options
|
|
|
2,707
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer-initiated and other
|
|
$
|
12,704
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-initiated and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps and floors written
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Caps and floors purchased
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
4,480
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate contracts
|
|
|
5,567
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Energy derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caps and floors written
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Caps and floors purchased
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy derivative contracts
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot, forwards, futures and options
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer-initiated and other
|
|
$
|
9,565
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Fair values for customer-initiated and other derivative
instruments represent the net unrealized gains or losses on such
contracts and are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets.
Changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated income
statements. The following table provides the average unrealized
gains and unrealized losses and noninterest income generated on
customer-initiated and other interest rate contracts, energy
derivative contracts and foreign exchange contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Average unrealized gains
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
Average unrealized losses
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Detailed discussions of each class of derivative instruments
held or issued by the Corporation for both risk management and
customer-initiated and other activities are as follows.
Interest
Rate Swaps
Interest rate swaps are agreements in which two parties
periodically exchange fixed cash payments for variable payments
based on a designated market rate or index (or variable payments
based on two different rates or indices for basis swaps),
applied to a specified notional amount until a stated maturity.
The Corporations swap agreements are structured such that
variable payments are primarily based on prime, one-month LIBOR
or three-month LIBOR. These instruments are principally
negotiated over-the-counter and are subject to credit risk,
market risk and liquidity risk.
Interest
Rate Options, Including Caps and Floors
Option contracts grant the option holder the right to buy or
sell an underlying financial instrument for a predetermined
price before the contract expires. Interest rate caps and floors
are option-based contracts which entitle the buyer to receive
cash payments based on the difference between a designated
reference rate and the strike price, applied to a notional
amount. Written options, primarily caps, expose the Corporation
to market risk but not credit risk. A fee is received at
inception for assuming the risk of unfavorable changes in
interest rates. Purchased options contain both credit and market
risk. All interest rate caps and floors entered into by the
Corporation are over-the-counter agreements.
Foreign
Exchange Contracts
Foreign exchange contracts such as futures, forwards and options
are primarily entered into as a service to customers and to
offset market risk arising from such positions. Futures and
forward contracts require the delivery or receipt of foreign
currency at a specified date and exchange rate. Foreign currency
options allow the owner to purchase or sell a foreign currency
at a specified date and price. Foreign exchange futures are
exchange-traded, while forwards, swaps and most options are
negotiated over-the-counter. Foreign exchange contracts expose
the Corporation to both market risk and credit risk. The
Corporation also uses foreign exchange rate swaps and
cross-currency swaps for risk management purposes.
Energy
Derivative Contracts
The Corporation offers energy derivative contracts, including
over-the-counter and NYMEX based natural gas and crude oil fixed
rate swaps and options as a service to customers seeking to
hedge market risk in the underlying products. Contract tenors
are typically limited to three years to accommodate hedge
requirements and are further limited to products that are liquid
and available on demand. Energy derivative swaps are
over-the-counter agreements in which the Corporation and the
counterparty periodically exchange fixed cash payments for
variable
112
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
payments based upon a designated market price or index. Energy
derivative option contracts grant the option owner the right to
buy or sell the underlying commodity for a predetermined price
at settlement date. Energy caps, floors and collars are
option-based contracts that result in the buyer and seller of
the contract receiving or making cash payments based on the
difference between a designated reference price and the
contracted strike price, applied to a notional amount. An option
fee or premium is received by the Corporation at inception for
assuming the risk of unfavorable changes in energy commodity
prices. Purchased options contain both credit and market risk.
Commodity options entered into by the Corporation are
over-the-counter agreements.
Warrants
The Corporation holds a portfolio of approximately 840 warrants
for generally non-marketable equity securities. These warrants
are primarily from high technology, non-public companies
obtained as part of the loan origination process. As discussed
in Note 1 on page 72, warrants that have a net
exercise provision embedded in the warrant agreement are
required to be recorded at fair value. Fair value for these
warrants (approximately 570 warrants at December 31, 2007
and 680 warrants at December 31, 2006) was
approximately $23 million at December 31, 2007 and
$26 million at December 31, 2006, as estimated using a
Black-Scholes valuation model.
Commitments
The Corporation also enters into commitments to purchase or sell
earning assets for risk management and trading purposes. These
transactions are similar in nature to forward contracts. The
Corporation had commitments to purchase investment securities
for its trading account and available-for-sale portfolios
totaling $604 million at December 31, 2007, and
commitments to purchase investment securities for its trading
account totaling $20 million at December 31, 2006.
Commitments to sell investment securities related to the trading
account totaled $4 million at December 31, 2007 and
$16 million at December 31, 2006. Outstanding
commitments expose the Corporation to both credit and market
risk.
Credit-Related
Financial Instruments
The Corporation issues off-balance sheet financial instruments
in connection with commercial and consumer lending activities.
The Corporations credit risk associated with these
instruments is represented by the contractual amounts indicated
in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Unused commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and other
|
|
$
|
31,603
|
|
|
$
|
30,410
|
|
Bankcard, revolving check credit and equity access loan
commitments
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unused commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
33,819
|
|
|
$
|
32,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing within one year
|
|
$
|
4,344
|
|
|
$
|
4,385
|
|
Maturing after one year
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total standby letters of credit and financial guarantees
|
|
$
|
6,900
|
|
|
$
|
6,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation maintains an allowance to cover probable credit
losses inherent in lending-related commitments, including unused
commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and financial
guarantees. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the allowance
for credit losses on lending-related commitments, which is
recorded
113
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets, was $21 million and
$26 million, respectively.
Unused
Commitments to Extend Credit
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to
lend to a customer, provided there is no violation of any
condition established in the contract. These commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination
clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments
expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amount of
commitments does not necessarily represent future cash
requirements of the Corporation. Commercial and other unused
commitments are primarily variable rate commitments.
Standby
and Commercial Letters of Credit and Financial
Guarantees
Standby and commercial letters of credit and financial
guarantees represent conditional obligations of the Corporation,
which guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees are primarily
issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements,
including commercial paper, bond financing and similar
transactions. Long-term standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees are defined as those maturing beyond one year and
expire in decreasing amounts through the year 2016.
Commercial letters of credit are issued to finance foreign or
domestic trade transactions and are short-term in nature. The
Corporation may enter into participation arrangements with third
parties, which effectively reduce the maximum amount of future
payments, which may be required under standby letters of credit.
These risk participations covered $664 million of the
$6.9 billion standby letters of credit outstanding at
December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, the carrying
value of the Corporations standby and commercial letters
of credit and financial guarantees, which is included in
accrued expenses and other liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet, totaled $100 million.
|
|
Note 21
|
Contingent
Liabilities
|
Legal
Proceedings
The Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to
various pending and threatened legal proceedings arising out of
the normal course of business or operations. In view of the
inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters,
the Corporation cannot state what the eventual outcome of these
matters will be. However, based on current knowledge and after
consultation with legal counsel, management believes that
current reserves, determined in accordance with SFAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, (SFAS 5), are
adequate and the amount of any incremental liability arising
from these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations consolidated financial
condition or results of operations. For information regarding
income tax contingencies, refer to Note 17 on page 103.
|
|
Note 22
|
Variable
Interest Entities (VIEs)
|
The Corporation evaluates its interest in certain entities to
determine if these entities meet the definition of a VIE, and
whether the Corporation was the primary beneficiary and should
consolidate the entity based on the variable interests it held.
The following provides a summary of the VIEs in which the
Corporation has a significant interest.
The Corporation owns 100% of the common stock of an entity
formed in 2007 to issue trust preferred securities. This entity
meets the definition of a VIE, but the Corporation is not the
primary beneficiary. The trust preferred securities held by this
entity ($500 million at December 31, 2007) are
classified as subordinated debt and qualify as Tier 1
capital. The Corporation is not exposed to loss related to this
VIE.
114
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The Corporation has a significant limited partnership interest
in The Peninsula Fund Limited Partnership (PFLP), a venture
capital fund, which was acquired in 1995. The PFLPs
general partner (an employee of the Corporation) is considered a
related party to the Corporation. This entity meets the
definition of a VIE, and the Corporation is the primary
beneficiary of the entity. As such, the Corporation consolidates
PFLP. Creditors of the partnership do not have recourse against
the Corporation, and exposure to loss as a result of involvement
with PFLP was limited to the book basis in the entity, which was
insignificant at December 31, 2007, and approximately
$2 million of commitments for future investments.
The Corporation has limited partnership interests in three other
venture capital funds, which were acquired in 1998, 1999 and
2001, where the general partner (an employee of the Corporation)
in these three partnerships is considered a related party to the
Corporation. These three entities meet the definition of a VIE,
however, the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of the
entities. As such, the Corporation accounts for its interest in
these partnerships on the cost method. These three entities had
approximately $157 million in assets at December 31,
2007. Exposure to loss as a result of involvement with these
three entities at December 31, 2007 was limited to
approximately $5 million of book basis of the
Corporations investments and approximately $2 million
of commitments for future investments.
The Corporation, as a limited partner, also holds an
insignificant ownership percentage interest in 129 other venture
capital and private equity investment partnerships where the
Corporation is not related to the general partner. While these
entities may meet the definition of a VIE, the Corporation is
not the primary beneficiary of any of these entities as a result
of its insignificant ownership percentage interest. The
Corporation accounts for its interests in these partnerships on
the cost method, and exposure to loss as a result of involvement
with these entities at December 31, 2007 was limited to
approximately $69 million of book basis of the
Corporations investments and approximately
$38 million of commitments for future investments.
Two limited liability subsidiaries of the Corporation are the
general partners in two investment fund partnerships, formed in
1999 and 2003. These subsidiaries manage the investments held by
these funds. These two investment partnerships meet the
definition of a VIE. In the investment fund partnership formed
in 1999, the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of the
entity. As such, the Corporation accounts for its indirect
interests in this partnership on the cost method. This
investment partnership had approximately $157 million in
assets at December 31, 2007 and was structured so that the
Corporations exposure to loss as a result of its interest
should be limited to the book basis of the Corporations
investment in the limited liability subsidiary, which was
insignificant at December 31, 2007. In the investment fund
partnership formed in 2003, the Corporation is the primary
beneficiary and consolidates the entity. This investment
partnership had assets of approximately $10 million at
December 31, 2007 and was structured so that the
Corporations exposure to loss as a result of its interest
should be limited to the book basis of the Corporations
investment in the limited liability subsidiary, which was
insignificant at December 31, 2007.
The Corporation has a significant limited partner interest in 20
low income housing tax credit/historic rehabilitation tax credit
partnerships, acquired at various times from 1992 to 2007. These
entities meet the definition of a VIE. However, the Corporation
is not the primary beneficiary of the entities and, as such,
accounts for its interest in these partnerships on the cost or
equity method. These entities had approximately
$137 million in assets at December 31, 2007. Exposure
to loss as a result of its involvement with these entities at
December 31, 2007 was limited to approximately
$16 million of book basis of the Corporations
investment, which includes unused commitments for future
investments.
The Corporation, as a limited partner, also holds an
insignificant ownership percentage interest in 106 other low
income housing tax credit/historic rehabilitation tax credit
partnerships. While these entities may meet the definition of a
VIE, the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of any of
these entities as a result of its insignificant ownership
percentage interest. As such, the Corporation accounts for its
interest in these partnerships on the cost or equity method.
Exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these
entities at
115
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
December 31, 2007 was limited to approximately
$328 million of book basis of the Corporations
investment, which includes unused commitments for future
investments.
For further information on the companys consolidation
policy, see Note 1 on page 72.
|
|
Note 23
|
Estimated
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial
instruments, which differ from carrying values, often requires
the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values are
not available, the Corporation uses present value techniques and
other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of its
financial instruments. These valuation methods require
considerable judgment, and the resulting estimates of fair value
can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and
methods used. Accordingly, the estimates provided herein do not
necessarily indicate amounts which could be realized in a
current exchange. Furthermore, as the Corporation typically
holds the majority of its financial instruments until maturity,
it does not expect to realize many of the estimated amounts
disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair
value amounts for items which are not defined as financial
instruments, but which have significant value. These include
such items as core deposit intangibles, the future earnings
potential of significant customer relationships and the value of
trust operations and other fee generating businesses. The
Corporation believes the imprecision of an estimate could be
significant.
The Corporation used the following methods and assumptions in
estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell, and interest-bearing
deposits with banks: The carrying amount
approximates the estimated fair value of these instruments.
Trading securities: These securities are
carried at quoted market value or the market value for
comparable securities, which represents estimated fair value.
Loans held-for-sale: The market value of these
loans represents estimated fair value or estimated net selling
price. The market value is determined on the basis of existing
forward commitments or the current market values of similar
loans.
Investment securities: Investment securities
are carried at quoted market value, if available. The market
value for comparable securities is used to estimate fair value
if quoted market values are not available.
Domestic business loans: These consist of
commercial, real estate construction, commercial mortgage and
equipment lease financing loans. The estimated fair value of the
Corporations variable rate commercial loans is represented
by their carrying value, adjusted by an amount which estimates
the change in fair value caused by changes in the credit quality
of borrowers since the loans were originated. The estimated fair
value of fixed rate commercial loans is calculated using a
discounted cash flow model. The resulting amounts are adjusted
to estimate the effect of changes in the credit quality of
borrowers since the loans were originated.
International loans: These consist primarily
of short-term trade-related loans, variable rate loans or loans
which have no cross-border risk due to the existence of domestic
guarantors or liquid collateral. The estimated fair value of the
Corporations international loan portfolio is represented
by their carrying value, adjusted by an amount which estimates
the effect on fair value of changes in the credit quality of
borrowers or guarantors.
Retail loans: This category consists of
residential mortgage, home equity and other consumer loans. The
estimated fair value of residential mortgage loans is based on
discounted contractual cash flows adjusted for expected
prepayments. For home equity and other consumer loans, the
estimated fair values are calculated using a discounted cash
flow model. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the
effect of changes in the credit quality of borrowers since the
loans were originated.
Customers liability on acceptances outstanding and
acceptances outstanding: The carrying amount
approximates the estimated fair value.
116
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Loan servicing rights: The estimated fair
value is representative of a discounted cash flow analysis,
using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently
quoted for comparable instruments.
Deposit liabilities: The estimated fair value
of demand deposits, consisting of checking, savings and certain
money market deposit accounts, is represented by the amounts
payable on demand. The carrying amount of deposits in foreign
offices approximates their estimated fair value, while the
estimated fair value of term deposits is calculated by
discounting the scheduled cash flows using the year-end rates
offered on these instruments.
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amount of
federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and other short-term borrowings approximates
estimated fair value.
Medium- and long-term debt: The estimated fair
value of the Corporations variable rate medium- and
long-term debt is represented by its carrying value. The
estimated fair value of the fixed rate medium- and long-term
debt is based on quoted market values. If quoted market values
are not available, the estimated fair value is based on the
market values of debt with similar characteristics.
Derivative instruments: The estimated fair
value of interest rate and energy commodity swaps represents the
amount the Corporation would receive or pay to terminate or
otherwise settle the contracts at the balance sheet date, taking
into consideration current unrealized gains and losses on open
contracts. The estimated fair value of foreign exchange futures
and forward contracts and commitments to purchase or sell
financial instruments is based on quoted market prices. The
estimated fair value of interest rate, energy commodity and
foreign currency options (including caps, floors and collars) is
determined using option pricing models. The estimated fair value
of warrants that are accounted for as derivatives are valued
using a Black-Scholes valuation model. All derivative
instruments are carried at fair value on the balance sheet.
Credit-related financial instruments: The
estimated fair value of unused commitments to extend credit and
standby and commercial letters of credit is represented by the
estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations
with the counterparties. This amount is approximated by the fees
currently charged to enter into similar arrangements,
considering the remaining terms of the agreements and any
changes in the credit quality of counterparties since the
agreements were entered into. This estimate of fair value does
not take into account the significant value of the customer
relationships and the future earnings potential involved in such
arrangements as the Corporation does not believe that it would
be practicable to estimate a representational fair value for
these items.
117
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The estimated fair values of the Corporations financial
instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,434
|
|
|
$
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other short-term investments
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
28,223
|
|
|
|
28,048
|
|
|
|
26,265
|
|
|
|
26,050
|
|
Real estate construction loans
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
10,048
|
|
|
|
10,308
|
|
|
|
9,659
|
|
|
|
9,796
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
2,477
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
International loans
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
50,743
|
|
|
|
50,681
|
|
|
|
47,431
|
|
|
|
47,263
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
50,186
|
|
|
|
50,681
|
|
|
|
46,938
|
|
|
|
47,263
|
|
Customers liability on acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Loan servicing rights
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits (noninterest-bearing)
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
13,901
|
|
|
|
13,901
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
32,358
|
|
|
|
32,357
|
|
|
|
31,026
|
|
|
|
30,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
44,278
|
|
|
|
44,277
|
|
|
|
44,927
|
|
|
|
44,899
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
Acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
8,821
|
|
|
|
8,492
|
|
|
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Customer-initiated and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Warrants
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Credit-related financial instruments
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
118
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 24
|
Business
Segment Information
|
The Corporation has strategically aligned its operations into
three major business segments: the Business Bank, the Retail
Bank, and Wealth & Institutional Management. These
business segments are differentiated based on the type of
customer and the related products and services provided. In
addition to the three major business segments, the Finance
Division is also reported as a segment. Business segment results
are produced by the Corporations internal management
accounting system. This system measures financial results based
on the internal business unit structure of the Corporation.
Information presented is not necessarily comparable with similar
information for any other financial institution. The management
accounting system assigns balance sheet and income statement
items to each business segment using certain methodologies,
which are regularly reviewed and refined. For comparability
purposes, amounts in all periods are based on business segments
and methodologies in effect at December 31, 2007. These
methodologies, which are briefly summarized in the following
paragraph, may be modified as management accounting systems are
enhanced and changes occur in the organizational structure or
product lines.
The Corporations internal funds transfer pricing system
records cost of funds or credit for funds using a combination of
matched maturity funding for certain assets and liabilities and
a blended rate based on various maturities for the remaining
assets and liabilities. The allowance for loan losses is
allocated to both large business and certain large personal
purpose consumer and residential mortgage loans that have
deteriorated below certain levels of credit risk based on a
non-standard, specifically calculated amount. Additional loan
loss reserves are allocated based on industry-specific risk and
are maintained to capture probable losses due to the inherent
imprecision in the risk rating system and new business migration
risk not captured in the credit scores of individual loans. For
other business loans, the allowance for loan losses is recorded
in business units based on the credit score of each loan
outstanding. For other consumer and residential mortgage loans,
it is allocated based on applying estimated loss ratios to
various segments of the loan portfolio. The related loan loss
provision is assigned based on the amount necessary to maintain
an allowance for loan losses adequate for each product category.
Noninterest income and expenses directly attributable to a line
of business are assigned to that business segment. Direct
expenses incurred by areas whose services support the overall
Corporation are allocated to the business segments as follows:
product processing expenditures are allocated based on standard
unit costs applied to actual volume measurements; administrative
expenses are allocated based on estimated time expended; and
corporate overhead is assigned 50 percent based on the
ratio of the business segments noninterest expenses to
total noninterest expenses incurred by all business segments and
50 percent based on the ratio of the business
segments attributed equity to total attributed equity of
all business segments. Equity is attributed based on credit,
operational and interest rate risks. Most of the equity
attributed relates to credit risk, which is determined based on
the credit score and expected remaining life of each loan,
letter of credit and unused commitment recorded in the business
units. Operational risk is allocated based on deposit balances,
non-earning assets, trust assets under management, and the
nature and extent of expenses incurred by business units.
Virtually all interest rate risk is assigned to Finance, as are
the Corporations hedging activities.
The following discussion provides information about the
activities of each business segment. A discussion of the
financial results and the factors impacting 2007 performance can
be found in the section entitled Business Segments
in the financial review on page 33.
The Business Bank is primarily comprised of the following
businesses: middle market, commercial real estate, national
dealer services, international finance, global corporate,
leasing, financial services, and technology and life sciences.
This business segment meets the needs of medium-size businesses,
multinational corporations and governmental entities by offering
various products and services, including commercial loans and
lines of credit, deposits, cash management, capital market
products, international trade finance, letters of credit,
foreign exchange management services and loan syndication
services.
The Retail Bank includes small business banking and personal
financial services, consisting of consumer lending, consumer
deposit gathering and mortgage loan origination. In addition to
a full range of financial
119
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
services provided to small business customers, this business
segment offers a variety of consumer products, including deposit
accounts, installment loans, credit cards, student loans, home
equity lines of credit and residential mortgage loans.
Wealth & Institutional Management offers products and
services consisting of fiduciary services, private banking,
retirement services, investment management and advisory
services, investment banking and discount securities brokerage
services. This business segment also offers the sale of annuity
products, as well as life, disability and long-term care
insurance products.
The Finance segment includes the Corporations securities
portfolio and asset and liability management activities. This
segment is responsible for managing the Corporations
funding, liquidity and capital needs, performing interest
sensitivity analysis and executing various strategies to manage
the Corporations exposure to liquidity, interest rate risk
and foreign exchange risk.
The Other category includes discontinued operations, the income
and expense impact of equity and cash, tax benefits not assigned
to specific business segments and miscellaneous other expenses
of a corporate nature.
Business segment financial results are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Institutional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Earnings summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
|
|
$
|
1,326
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,006
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
212
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit-related charge-offs
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
Selected average balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
40,762
|
|
|
$
|
6,880
|
|
|
$
|
4,096
|
|
|
$
|
5,669
|
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
|
$
|
58,574
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
39,721
|
|
|
|
6,134
|
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
49,821
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
16,253
|
|
|
|
17,156
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
41,934
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
17,091
|
|
|
|
17,169
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
16,531
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
53,504
|
|
Attributed equity
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
Statistical data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Return on average attributed equity
|
|
|
17.11
|
|
|
|
11.68
|
|
|
|
21.03
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
13.52
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
|
|
3.65
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
44.10
|
|
|
|
77.29
|
|
|
|
75.29
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
58.58
|
|
120
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Institutional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Earnings summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
|
|
$
|
1,315
|
|
|
$
|
637
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,986
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit-related charge-offs
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
Selected average balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
39,263
|
|
|
$
|
6,786
|
|
|
$
|
3,677
|
|
|
$
|
5,271
|
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
|
$
|
56,579
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
6,084
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
47,750
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
16,807
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
|
5,186
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
42,074
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
18,677
|
|
|
|
16,810
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
13,198
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
51,403
|
|
Attributed equity
|
|
|
2,639
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
Statistical data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
Return on average attributed equity
|
|
|
22.30
|
|
|
|
17.30
|
|
|
|
20.49
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
17.24
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
45.78
|
|
|
|
71.75
|
|
|
|
77.10
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
58.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Institutional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Earnings summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
|
|
$
|
1,395
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
(183
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
397
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit-related charge-offs
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Selected average balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
35,708
|
|
|
$
|
6,554
|
|
|
$
|
3,487
|
|
|
$
|
5,218
|
|
|
$
|
1,539
|
|
|
$
|
52,506
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
34,561
|
|
|
|
5,882
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
43,816
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
20,424
|
|
|
|
16,841
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
40,640
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
21,160
|
|
|
|
16,832
|
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
|
|
6,510
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
47,409
|
|
Attributed equity
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
5,097
|
|
Statistical data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.84
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
Return on average attributed equity
|
|
|
26.02
|
|
|
|
21.64
|
|
|
|
21.07
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
16.90
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
43.37
|
|
|
|
66.54
|
|
|
|
76.13
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
58.01
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Return on average assets is calculated based on the greater of
average assets or average liabilities and attributed equity.
|
(2)
|
Net interest margin is calculated based on the greater of
average earning assets or average deposits and purchased funds.
|
FTE-Fully Taxable Equivalent
N/M-Not Meaningful
121
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
The Corporations management accounting system also
produces market segment results for the Corporations four
primary geographic markets: Midwest, Western, Texas, and
Florida. In addition to the four primary geographic markets,
Other Markets and International are also reported as market
segments. Market segment results are provided as supplemental
information to the business segment results and may not meet all
operating segment criteria as set forth in SFAS 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, (SFAS 131). The following discussion
provides information about the activities of each market
segment. A discussion of the financial results and the factors
impacting 2007 performance can be found in the section entitled
Geographic Market Segments in the financial review
on page 34.
The Midwest market consists of operations located in the states
of Michigan, Ohio and Illinois. Currently, Michigan operations
represent the significant majority of this geographic market.
The Western market consists of the states of California,
Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Washington. Currently, California
operations represent the significant majority of the Western
market.
The Texas and Florida markets consist of operations located in
the states of Texas and Florida, respectively.
Other Markets include businesses with a national perspective,
the Corporations investment management and trust alliance
businesses as well as activities in all other markets in which
the Corporation has operations, except for the International
market, as described below.
The International market represents the activity of the
Corporations international finance division, which
provides banking services primarily to foreign-owned, North
American-based companies and secondarily to international
operations of North American-based companies.
The Finance & Other Businesses segment includes the
Corporations securities portfolio, asset and liability
management activities, discontinued operations, the income and
expense impact of equity and cash not assigned to specific
business/market segments, tax benefits not assigned to specific
business/market segments and miscellaneous other expenses of a
corporate nature. This segment includes responsibility for
managing the Corporations funding, liquidity and capital
needs, performing interest sensitivity analysis and executing
various strategies to manage the Corporations exposure to
liquidity, interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.
The Corporations total revenues from customers and
long-lived assets (excluding certain intangible assets) located
in foreign countries in which the Corporation holds assets were
less than five percent of the Corporations consolidated
revenues and long-lived assets (excluding certain intangible
assets) in each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005.
122
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Market segment financial results are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest
|
|
|
Western
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
Earnings summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
$
|
706
|
|
|
$
|
279
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit-related charge-offs
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected average balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
19,189
|
|
|
$
|
17,069
|
|
|
$
|
7,106
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
$
|
4,435
|
|
|
$
|
2,252
|
|
|
$
|
6,836
|
|
|
$
|
58,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
18,598
|
|
|
|
16,530
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
4,041
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
49,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
15,819
|
|
|
|
13,325
|
|
|
|
3,884
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
6,139
|
|
|
|
41,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
13,361
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
16,852
|
|
|
|
53,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributed equity
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statistical data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
|
1.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average attributed equity
|
|
|
16.02
|
|
|
|
13.99
|
|
|
|
13.40
|
|
|
|
7.51
|
|
|
|
26.61
|
|
|
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
13.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
61.76
|
|
|
|
54.45
|
|
|
|
64.32
|
|
|
|
63.65
|
|
|
|
48.42
|
|
|
|
43.12
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
58.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest
|
|
|
Western
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit-related charge-offs
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected average balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
19,407
|
|
|
$
|
16,445
|
|
|
$
|
6,174
|
|
|
$
|
1,528
|
|
|
$
|
3,971
|
|
|
$
|
2,201
|
|
|
$
|
6,853
|
|
|
$
|
56,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
18,737
|
|
|
|
15,882
|
|
|
|
5,911
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
47,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
16,061
|
|
|
|
14,592
|
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
5,098
|
|
|
|
42,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
16,734
|
|
|
|
14,658
|
|
|
|
3,709
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
13,524
|
|
|
|
51,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributed equity
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statistical data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average attributed equity
|
|
|
19.67
|
|
|
|
24.79
|
|
|
|
15.56
|
|
|
|
16.81
|
|
|
|
25.81
|
|
|
|
21.37
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
17.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
59.57
|
|
|
|
52.29
|
|
|
|
64.14
|
|
|
|
60.34
|
|
|
|
59.32
|
|
|
|
57.73
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
58.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest
|
|
|
Western
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) (FTE)
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
(194
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (FTE)
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit-related charge-offs
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected average balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
19,502
|
|
|
$
|
14,219
|
|
|
$
|
5,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,301
|
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
2,724
|
|
|
$
|
6,757
|
|
|
$
|
52,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
|
|
13,638
|
|
|
|
4,998
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
43,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
16,781
|
|
|
|
16,852
|
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
40,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
17,396
|
|
|
|
16,865
|
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
6,964
|
|
|
|
47,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributed equity
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
5,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statistical data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
|
|
2.18
|
%
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average attributed equity
|
|
|
21.39
|
|
|
|
32.30
|
|
|
|
18.87
|
|
|
|
22.72
|
|
|
|
29.89
|
|
|
|
20.11
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
16.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
57.40
|
|
|
|
47.92
|
|
|
|
59.76
|
|
|
|
54.77
|
|
|
|
57.72
|
|
|
|
51.74
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
58.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Return on average assets is
calculated based on the greater of average assets or average
liabilities and attributed equity.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Net interest margin is calculated
based on the greater of average earning assets or average
deposits and purchased funds.
|
FTE-Fully Taxable Equivalent
N/M-Not Meaningful
124
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
Note 25
|
Parent
Company Financial Statements
|
Balance
Sheets Comerica Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from subsidiary bank
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
Short-term investments with subsidiary bank
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries, principally banks
|
|
|
5,840
|
|
|
|
5,586
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,337
|
|
|
$
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
806
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Common stock $5 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 325,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 178,735,252 shares at 12/31/07 and
12/31/06
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
5,497
|
|
|
|
5,282
|
|
Less cost of common stock in treasury
28,747,097 shares at 12/31/07 and 21,161,161 shares at
12/31/06
|
|
|
(1,661
|
)
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
5,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
6,337
|
|
|
$
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Statements
of Income Comerica Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
614
|
|
|
$
|
746
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
Other interest income
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Intercompany management fees
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Other noninterest income
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Net occupancy expense
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equipment expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other noninterest expenses
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes and equity in
undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries, principally
banks (including discontinued operations)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Statements
of Cash Flows Comerica Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries, principally banks
(including discontinued operations)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Depreciation and software amortization
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in short-term investments with subsidiary bank
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Net proceeds from private equity and venture capital investments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Capital transactions with subsidiaries
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Net increase in fixed assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash on deposit at bank subsidiary
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Cash on deposit at bank subsidiary at beginning of year
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on deposit at bank subsidiary at end of year
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (recovered) paid
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 26
|
Sales of
Businesses/Discontinued Operations
|
In December 2006, the Corporation sold its ownership interest in
Munder to an investor group. The sale, including associated
costs and assigned goodwill, resulted in a net after-tax gain of
$108 million, or $0.67 per average annual diluted share, in
2006. The sale agreement included an interest-bearing contingent
note with an initial principal amount of $70 million, which
will be realized if the Corporations client-related
revenues earned by Munder remain consistent with 2006 levels of
approximately $17 million per year for the five years
following
127
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
the closing of the transaction
(2007-2011).
The principal amount of the note may be increased to a maximum
of $80 million or decreased to as low as zero, depending on
the level of such revenues earned in the five years following
the closing. Repayment of the principal is scheduled to begin
after the sixth anniversary of the closing of the transaction
from Munders excess cash flows, as defined in the sale
agreement. The note matures in December 2013. Future gains
related to the contingent note are expected to be recognized
periodically as targets for the Corporations
client-related revenues earned by Munder are achieved.
Recognition of the potential gains related to the contingent
note will begin when cumulative client-related revenues exceed
approximately $26 million, $18 million of which
accumulated in 2007. The potential future gains are expected to
be recorded between 2008 and the fourth quarter of 2011, unless
fully earned prior to that time.
As a result of the sale transaction, the Corporation reported
Munder as a discontinued operation in all periods presented. The
assets and liabilities related to the discontinued operations of
Munder are not material and have not been reclassified on the
consolidated balance sheets.
The income from discontinued operations recorded in 2007
reflected adjustments to the initial gain recorded at the
closing of the Munder sale transaction. The components of net
income from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Other comprehensive income from discontinued operations, net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
During the third quarter 2006, the Corporation completed the
sale of its Mexican bank charter. Included in net gain
(loss) on sales of businesses on the consolidated
statements of income is a net loss on the sale of
$12 million, which is reflected in the Corporations
Business Bank business segment and International geographic
market segment. As part of the sale transaction, the Corporation
transferred $24 million of loans and $18 million of
liabilities to the buyer.
In the fourth quarter 2006, the Corporation decided to sell a
portfolio of loans related to manufactured housing, located
primarily in Michigan and Ohio. In accordance with
SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets, approximately $74 million of
loans were classified as held-for-sale, which were included in
other short-term investments on the consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2006. The Corporation
recorded a $9 million charge-off to adjust the loans
classified as held-for-sale to fair value. During the
128
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
first quarter 2007, the Corporation completed the sale and
transferred the $74 million of loans to the buyer for
substantially the fair value recorded at December 31, 2006.
During the fourth quarter 2005, HCM Holdings Limited (formerly
Framlington Holdings Limited), which is a 49 percent owned
subsidiary of Munder, sold its 90.8 percent interest in
London, England based Framlington Group Limited. The sale
resulted in a net after-tax gain of $32 million, or $0.19
per diluted share, which is included in income from
discontinued operations, net of tax on the consolidated
statements of income.
|
|
Note 27
|
Summary
of Quarterly Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
The following quarterly information is unaudited. However, in
the opinion of management, the information reflects all
adjustments, which are necessary for the fair presentation of
the results of operations, for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Net securities gains
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income (excluding net securities gains)
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
129
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
845
|
|
|
$
|
772
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Net securities gains (losses)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Noninterest income (excluding net securities gains (losses))
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
130
REPORT OF
MANAGEMENT
The management of Comerica Incorporated (the Corporation) is
responsible for the accompanying consolidated financial
statements and all other financial information in this Annual
Report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles and include amounts which of necessity are based on
managements best estimates and judgments and give due
consideration to materiality. The other financial information
herein is consistent with that in the consolidated financial
statements.
In meeting its responsibility for the reliability of the
consolidated financial statements, management develops and
maintains effective internal controls, including those over
financial reporting, as defined in the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. The Corporations internal control
over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated
financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Corporation are made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the Corporations assets that could have a
material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Management assessed, with participation of the
Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, internal control over financial reporting as it relates
to the Corporations consolidated financial statements
presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles as of December 31, 2007. The
assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control
over financial reporting described in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on this assessment, management determined that internal
control over financial reporting is effective as it relates to
the Corporations consolidated financial statements
presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles as of December 31, 2007.
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with
the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31,
2007 were audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm. The audit was conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), which required the independent
public accountants to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting is maintained in all material respects.
The Corporations Board of Directors oversees
managements internal control over financial reporting and
financial reporting responsibilities through its Audit Committee
as well as various other committees. The Audit Committee, which
consists of directors who are not officers or employees of the
Corporation, meets regularly with management, internal audit and
the independent public accountants to assure that the Audit
Committee, management, internal auditors and the independent
public accountants are carrying out their responsibilities, and
to review auditing, internal control and financial reporting
matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph W. Babb Jr.
|
|
Elizabeth S. Acton
|
|
Marvin J. Elenbaas
|
|
|
Chairman, President and
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
131
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Comerica Incorporated
We have audited Comerica Incorporateds internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Comerica
Incorporateds management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Corporations internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
Corporation; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Corporation are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the Corporations assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Comerica Incorporated maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
2007 consolidated financial statements of Comerica Incorporated
and subsidiaries and our report dated February 20, 2008
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Detroit, Michigan
February 20, 2008
132
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Comerica Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Comerica Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Corporations management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Comerica Incorporated and subsidiaries at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2006 Comerica Incorporated and subsidiaries
changed its method of accounting for pension and other
postretirement plans.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Comerica Incorporateds internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 20, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Detroit, Michigan
February 20, 2008
133
HISTORICAL
REVIEW AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
1,352
|
|
|
$
|
1,557
|
|
|
$
|
1,721
|
|
|
$
|
1,685
|
|
|
$
|
1,811
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
4,447
|
|
|
|
3,992
|
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
28,132
|
|
|
|
27,341
|
|
|
|
24,575
|
|
|
|
22,139
|
|
|
|
23,764
|
|
Real estate construction loans
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
3,905
|
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
9,771
|
|
|
|
9,278
|
|
|
|
8,566
|
|
|
|
7,991
|
|
|
|
7,521
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
International loans
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
49,821
|
|
|
|
47,750
|
|
|
|
43,816
|
|
|
|
40,733
|
|
|
|
42,370
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(787
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
49,301
|
|
|
|
47,251
|
|
|
|
43,193
|
|
|
|
39,946
|
|
|
|
41,539
|
|
Accrued income and other assets
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
3,230
|
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
3,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
58,574
|
|
|
$
|
56,579
|
|
|
$
|
52,506
|
|
|
$
|
50,948
|
|
|
$
|
52,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
11,287
|
|
|
$
|
13,135
|
|
|
$
|
15,007
|
|
|
$
|
14,122
|
|
|
$
|
13,910
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
30,647
|
|
|
|
28,939
|
|
|
|
25,633
|
|
|
|
26,023
|
|
|
|
27,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
41,934
|
|
|
|
42,074
|
|
|
|
40,640
|
|
|
|
40,145
|
|
|
|
41,519
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
8,197
|
|
|
|
5,407
|
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
53,504
|
|
|
|
51,403
|
|
|
|
47,409
|
|
|
|
45,907
|
|
|
|
47,947
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
5,097
|
|
|
|
5,041
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
58,574
|
|
|
$
|
56,579
|
|
|
$
|
52,506
|
|
|
$
|
50,948
|
|
|
$
|
52,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
HISTORICAL
REVIEW STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
3,501
|
|
|
$
|
3,216
|
|
|
$
|
2,554
|
|
|
$
|
2,055
|
|
|
$
|
2,213
|
|
Interest on investment securities
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Interest on short-term investments
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Interest on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Interest on medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Fiduciary income
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Commercial lending fees
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Letter of credit fees
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Foreign exchange income
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Brokerage fees
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Card fees
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Net income (loss) from principal investing and warrants
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net securities gains
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sales of businesses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from lawsuit settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest income
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
Net occupancy expense
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Equipment expense
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Outside processing fee expense
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Software expense
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Customer services
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Litigation and operational losses
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Provision for credit losses on lending-related commitments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other noninterest expenses
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
$
|
757
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
$
|
4.36
|
|
|
$
|
3.76
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
135
HISTORICAL
REVIEW-STATISTICAL DATA
Comerica
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
AVERAGE RATES (FULLY TAXABLE EQUIVALENT BASIS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
5.28
|
%
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
1.11
|
%
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
|
6.69
|
|
|
|
7.22
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
4.56
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
3.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
7.25
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Real estate construction loans
|
|
|
8.21
|
|
|
|
8.61
|
|
|
|
7.23
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
7.27
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
5.19
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
7.13
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
|
|
4.73
|
|
|
|
4.94
|
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
|
International loans
|
|
|
7.06
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income as a percentage of earning assets
|
|
|
6.82
|
|
|
|
6.53
|
|
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
|
|
|
4.94
|
|
Domestic deposits
|
|
|
3.77
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
Deposits in foreign offices
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
3.47
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
Medium- and long-term debt
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense as a percentage of interest- bearing sources
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
|
Impact of net noninterest-bearing sources of funds
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin as a percentage of earning assets
|
|
|
3.66
|
%
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
|
3.86
|
%
|
|
|
3.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average common shareholders equity from
continuing operations
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
|
15.11
|
%
|
|
|
16.02
|
%
|
|
|
14.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
13.07
|
%
|
Return on average common shareholders equity
|
|
|
13.52
|
|
|
|
17.24
|
|
|
|
16.90
|
|
|
|
15.03
|
|
|
|
13.12
|
|
Return on average assets from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
58.58
|
|
|
|
58.92
|
|
|
|
58.01
|
|
|
|
55.60
|
|
|
|
53.19
|
|
Tier 1 common capital as a percentage of risk- weighted
assets
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
7.54
|
|
|
|
7.78
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
Tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk- weighted assets
|
|
|
7.51
|
|
|
|
8.03
|
|
|
|
8.38
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8.72
|
|
Total capital as a percentage of risk- weighted assets
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
11.64
|
|
|
|
11.65
|
|
|
|
12.75
|
|
|
|
12.71
|
|
PER SHARE DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value at year-end
|
|
$
|
34.12
|
|
|
$
|
32.70
|
|
|
$
|
31.11
|
|
|
$
|
29.94
|
|
|
$
|
29.20
|
|
Market value at year-end
|
|
|
43.53
|
|
|
|
58.68
|
|
|
|
56.76
|
|
|
|
61.02
|
|
|
|
56.06
|
|
Market value for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
63.89
|
|
|
|
60.10
|
|
|
|
63.38
|
|
|
|
63.80
|
|
|
|
56.34
|
|
Low
|
|
|
39.62
|
|
|
|
50.12
|
|
|
|
53.17
|
|
|
|
50.45
|
|
|
|
37.10
|
|
OTHER DATA (share data in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Number of banking centers
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
10,782
|
|
|
|
10,700
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
10,720
|
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
136