Fisher Scientific International Inc.Fisher Scientific International Inc.
2002 Annual ReportLetter to ShareholdersFisher At A GlanceQ & ALeadershipCorporate Information
Beyond ServiceBeyond BoundariesBeyond FulfillmentBeyond TechnologyFinancialsbacknext


Supplementary Information
Selected Financial Data
MD&A
Statement of Operations
Balance Sheet
Statement Of Cash Flows
Statement Of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Notes
Auditors' Report


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including among others, those related to product returns, bad debts, inventory obsolescence, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring costs, retirement and insurance costs, and contingencies and litigation. Those estimates and assumptions are based on our historical experience, our observation of trends in the industry, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances and form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We record reductions to revenue for estimated returns. Should a greater amount of products be returned to us, additional reductions to revenue may be required. We also provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. Although our facilities undergo quality assurance and testing procedures throughout the production process and we monitor our suppliers for Fisher branded products, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Although our actual product returns and warranty costs have not historically fluctuated, should actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability may be required.

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We provide for the allowance for doubtful accounts when it becomes likely and known that the financial condition of our customer deteriorated, resulting in the customer’s inability to make payments. If those conditions change, changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be necessary. Historically, our annual provision for doubtful accounts has approximated the related write-offs.

We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about current and future demand and market conditions. For our inventories of distributed products, current demand is generally the last twelve-months sales and future demand is generally forecasted for a twelve-month period. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

We record accruals for environmental liabilities based on current interpretations of environmental laws and regulations when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Our estimates are based upon reports prepared by environmental specialists and management’s knowledge and experiences with these environmental matters. If interpretations of applicable laws and regulations, cleanup methods or the extent of our responsibility change from our current estimates, revisions to our estimated environmental liability may be required.

We annually perform an evaluation of whether goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired or when events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Fair value is determined using a combination of discounted cash flow and multiple of earnings valuation techniques. Our estimates are based upon historical trends, management’s knowledge and experiences, and overall economic factors. To the extent those factors may change and impact the fair value of a reporting unit, measurement and writedowns, if any, of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets may be required.

The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering a significant number of domestic and international employees. Accounting for these plans requires the use of actuarial assumptions including estimates on the expected long-term rate of return on assets and discount rates. In order to make informed assumptions, management relies on outside actuarial experts as well as public market data and general economic information. Our pension cost is based on certain assumptions, including our expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. A majority of our plans benefit obligations and plan assets relate to our U.S.-based plan which returned an approximate 7 percent loss on plan assets for 2002 and a ten-year return on plan assets of approximately 9 percent. As of December 31, 2002, we assumed a long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.75 percent. A 50 basis point change in our long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption would result in a change in our pension cost of approximately $1.0 million. We continually assess these assumptions based on market conditions, and if those conditions change, pension cost may be adjusted accordingly. At December 31, 2002 our pension programs were underfunded by approximately $24 million, the result of underfunded international plans. Our U.S.-based plan was fully funded at December 31, 2002. In addition, our underfunded status includes an additional $20 million for an executive retirement program which has assets approximating this obligation included in other assets on our balance sheet. Each of our plans is in compliance with minimum funding requirements.
backnext   PAGE 7 of 10