Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
9. Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations consisted of:
Net deferred tax assets from continuing operations, inclusive of valuation allowances for certain deferred tax assets from continuing operations, were reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 as follows:
Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences
between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company's
assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets result principally from
the recording of certain accruals and reserves, which currently are not
deductible for tax purposes. Deferred tax liabilities result principally
from the use of accelerated depreciation for tax purposes and timing
differences of equity investments.
Valuation allowances have been established for certain
deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards and portions
of other deferred tax assets as the Company determined that it was more
likely than not that these benefits will not be realized. During 2000
and 1999, the valuation allowance decreased by $100,256,000 and $97,642,000,
respectively. The decrease of the valuation allowance in 2000 related
to a reduction in net operating loss carryforwards as a result of the
deconsolidation of Immunex (see Note 2). The 1999
valuation allowance decrease was due primarily to the utilization of net
operating loss carryforwards.
Including the effect of the termination fee and the gain on the
sale of Immunex common stock in 2000, which had tax provisions
of 35.0% and 31.4%, respectively, and the 28.3% tax benefit associated
with the 2000 litigation charge, the overall effective tax rate from
continuing operations in 2000 was an 18.2% tax benefit. Including
the effect of the 1999 litigation charge, which had a 30.8% tax benefit,
the overall effective tax rate from continuing operations in 1999 was
a 36.7% tax benefit. The difference in the tax benefit related to the
2000 and 1999 litigation charges versus the statutory rate of 35.0%
was caused by provisions of $500,000,000 and $200,000,000
in 2000 and 1999, respectively, for additional federal income taxes,
net of tax credits, that will be paid as the Company plans to remit certain
overseas earnings, taxed at a lower rate than in the United States,
to the United States for diet drug litigation settlement payments. |
|