Environmental Matters

     General
We currently hold all federal and state environmental approvals required for the operation of all of our generating units. We believe we are currently in substantial compliance with all air quality regulations (including those pertaining to particulate matter, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx)) promulgated by the State of Kansas and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The JEC and LaCygne 2 units have met: (1) the federal SO2 standards through the use of low-sulfur coal; (2) the federal particulate matter standards through the use of electrostatic precipitators; and (3) the federal NOx standards through boiler design and operating procedures. The JEC units are also equipped with flue gas scrubbers providing additional SO2 and particulate matter emission reduction capability when needed to meet permit limits.

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment regulations applicable to our other generating facilities prohibit the emission of more than 3.0 pounds of SO2 per MMBtu of heat input. We meet these standards through the use of low-sulfur coal and by all coalburning facilities being equipped with flue gas scrubbers and/or electrostatic precipitators.

Because of the strong demand for generation in 2002, we consumed more SO2 allowances than were allocated to us by the EPA. We made up the shortfall by utilizing allowances we had previously procured in the open market. In anticipation of another strong year in generation, we will be actively pursuing the purchase of additional SO2 allowances for 2003, which could approximate $3.0 million in additional costs.

We must comply, and are currently in compliance, with the provisions of The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 that require a two-phase reduction in some emissions. We have installed continuous monitoring and reporting equipment to meet the acid rain requirements. We have not had to make any material capital expenditures to meet Phase II SO2 and NOx requirements.

All of our generating facilities are in substantial compliance with the Best Practicable Technology and Best Available Technology regulations issued by the EPA pursuant to the Clean Water Act of 1977.

     EPA New Source Review
The EPA is conducting an enforcement initiative at a number of coalfired power plants in an effort to determine whether modifications at those facilities were subject to New Source Review requirements or New Source Performance Standards under the Clean Air Act. The EPA has requested information from us under Section 114(a) of the Clean Air Act (Section 114). A Section 114 information request requires us to provide responses to specific EPA questions regarding certain projects and maintenance activities that the EPA believes may have violated the New Source Performance Standard and New Source Review requirements of the Clean Air Act. The EPA contends that power plants are required to update emission controls at the time of major maintenance or capital activity. We believe that maintenance and capital activities performed at our power plants are generally routine in nature and are typical for the industry. We are complying with this information request, but cannot predict the outcome of this investigation at this time. Should the EPA determine to take
 

action, the resulting additional costs to comply could be material. We would expect to seek recovery through rates of any settlement amounts.

The EPA has initiated civil enforcement actions against other unaffiliated utilities as part of its initiative. Settlement agreements entered into in connection with some of these actions have provided for expenditures to be made over extended time periods.

Additional information with respect to Environmental Matters is discussed in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies,” and such information is incorporated herein by reference.

MONITORED SERVICES OPERATIONS

General
We provide property monitoring services through Protection One and Protection One Europe to approximately 1.1 million customers in the United States and approximately 55,000 customers in continental Europe. Revenues are generated primarily from recurring monthly payments for monitoring and maintaining the alarm systems that are installed in customers’ homes and businesses. Services are provided to residential (both single-family and multifamily residences), commercial and wholesale customers. Currently, the United States customers are primarily in the residential market and the European customers are primarily in the commercial market.

Proposed Dispositions
The Debt Reduction Plan contemplates the sale of our interests in Protection One Europe with a targeted closing of mid-2003 and the sale of our interest in Protection One with a targeted closing by late 2003 or early 2004. Consistent with the Debt Reduction Plan, our board of directors has authorized management to explore alternatives for disposing of our investments in Protection One and Protection One Europe and we have retained financial advisors to assist with the possible sales. A special committee composed of independent directors of Protection One’s board of directors has been formed and the committee has also retained a financial advisor. As a result of these decisions, these operations were classified as discontinued operations during the first quarter of 2003 under the provisions of SFAS No. 144.

As discontinued operations, we will be required to determine the fair value of our investment, which will be the net amount we expect to realize from the sale of the investment. The investment must be reported at the lesser of our recorded basis or the estimated fair value. If the fair value is less than our recorded basis, we will be required to record an expense equal to the amount, which could be material, by which our basis exceeds the estimated fair value.

We solicited and received indications of value for Protection One Europe from potential buyers. These indications of value are within a range we would be willing to accept. They indicated the recorded goodwill for Protection One Europe had no value. Accordingly, we recorded a $36 million impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2002 to reflect the impairment of all remaining goodwill at Protection One Europe. We are willing to accept offers in the indicated range due to our ability to use the tax loss on this sale to offset the taxes that would otherwise be due from our sale of other investments. We will recognize a $58 million tax benefit in the first quarter of 2003 when Protection One Europe is classified as a discontinued operation.

 

 

    19