|
1
|
- Presenters:
- Harold McGraw III
Chairman, President and CEO
- Robert J. Bahash
Executive Vice President and CFO
- Donald S. Rubin
Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- This presentation includes certain forward-looking statements about our
businesses and our prospects, new products, sales, expenses, tax rates,
cash flows, prepublication investments and operating and capital
requirements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to: the strength and sustainability of the U.S. and global
economy; the duration and depth of the current recession; Educational
Publishing’s level of success in 2010 adoptions and in open territories
and enrollment and demographic trends; the level of educational funding;
the strength of School Education including the testing market, Higher
Education, Professional and International publishing markets and the
impact of technology on them; the level of interest rates and the
strength of the economy, profit levels and the capital markets in the
U.S. and abroad; the level of success of new product development and
global expansion and strength of domestic and international markets; the
demand and market for debt ratings, including corporate issuance, CDO’s,
residential and commercial mortgage and asset-backed securities and
related asset classes; the continued difficulties in the credit markets
and their impact on Standard & Poor’s and the economy in general;
the regulatory environment affecting Standard & Poor’s; the level of
merger and acquisition activity in the U.S. and abroad; the strength of
the domestic and international advertising markets; the strength and the
performance of the domestic and international automotive markets; the
volatility of the energy marketplace; the contract value of public
works, manufacturing and single-family unit construction; the level of
political advertising; and the level of future cash flow, debt levels,
manufacturing expenses, distribution expenses, prepublication,
amortization and depreciation expense, income tax rates, capital,
technology, restructuring charges and other expenditures and
prepublication cost investment.
- Actual results may differ materially from those in any forward-looking
statements because any such statements involve risks and uncertainties
and are subject to change based upon various important factors,
including, but not limited to, worldwide economic, financial, political
and regulatory conditions; currency and foreign exchange volatility; the
health of debt and equity markets, including interest rates, credit
quality and spreads, the level of liquidity, future debt issuances
including, corporate issuance, residential and commercial
mortgage-backed securities and CDO’s backed by residential mortgages,
related asset classes and other asset-backed securities; the
implementation of an expanded regulatory scheme affecting Standard &
Poor’s ratings and services; the level of funding in the education
market (both domestically and internationally); the pace of recovery in
advertising; continued investment by the construction, automotive,
computer and aviation industries; the successful marketing of new
products, and the effect of competitive products and pricing.
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- 17.3% increase in 2Q EPS
- 2Q 2010: $0.61
- 2Q 2009: $0.52 (includes $0.06 total for a restructuring charge and a
loss on a divestiture)
- 2Q revenue: $1.5 billion, a 0.6% increase
- Grew 2.7% excluding divestitures of BusinessWeek and Vista Research
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Signing of Dodd-Frank Act a welcomed development
- No surprises in the legislation
- We anticipated key provisions becoming law for some time
- New legislation calls for greater disclosure, accountability and
oversight that we feel will increase confidence in ratings
|
|
8
|
- Standard & Poor’s has been investing in systems, processes and
people to prepare to:
- Operate effectively in the new regulated environment
- Produce ratings that are relevant to investors, issuers, and other
market participants
- Compete effectively
- Comply with regulations in all jurisdictions
- Manage and mitigate risk
|
|
9
|
- S&P’s Quality, Criteria, Compliance, Risk (QCCR) framework is key
- Established control groups independent of the ratings business
- Invested in staffing, training, technology and processes around the
QCCR functions
|
|
10
|
- Quality: Formal procedures to oversee the integrity, quality and
transparency of S&P’s ratings
- Criteria: Oversees development and approval of criteria for our ratings.
Includes new and revised economic stress scenarios
- Compliance: Monitors compliance
with regulations through regular compliance examinations; provides
training and guidance on policies and guidelines
- Risk Control: Assesses various risks that could affect the integrity and
quality of the ratings process; assesses feasibility of rating new types
of securities
|
|
11
|
- S&P spending for QCCR-related items:
- 2009: $63 million
- 2010: Expect spending to increase by about $15 million
- Maintaining operating margin forecast for 2010 despite additional costs
- Still expect a decline of 100 basis points
|
|
12
|
- Elimination of statutory references in U.S. laws to credit ratings
- We supported this action
- Ratings should continue to provide investors a common and transparent
language and a fundamental credit risk benchmark
|
|
13
|
- Repeal of rule 436(g)
- S&P will not consent to the inclusion of its ratings in
registration statements and prospectuses
- S&P will explore mechanisms outside of registration statements to
allow ratings to be disseminated
- S&P ratings on new issues and pre-sale reports are always available
online to all market participants
|
|
14
|
- Repeal of the exception to Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Under this exception issuers could share material non-public
information with rating agencies without violating Reg FD
- S&P is evaluating other options to satisfy Reg FD so it can
continue to receive confidential information
|
|
15
|
- Legislation permits lawsuits against a credit rating agency that
knowingly or recklessly failed to conduct a reasonable investigation or
obtain reasonable verification of the data it uses to determine a rating
- The new pleading standard will be tested at some point
- More litigation would be burdensome and motions to dismiss may be more
difficult to achieve
- S&P will be ready to meet this new challenge
|
|
16
|
- Crucial point: Current fraud
liability standard still applies; no change
- New law changes what plaintiffs are required to allege in order to
survive a motion to dismiss at the pleading stage
- The law does not change what plaintiffs must ultimately prove to a
judge or jury in order for the credit rating agency to be held liable
- This is the same federal securities fraud liability standard to which
all market participants are subject
|
|
17
|
- 13 cases have been dismissed outright
- Five cases have been withdrawn
- We believe these constitute meaningful precedent
- Three important legal decisions involving S&P
- Two involve a subprime case
- Third relates to S&P’s index business and a grant of summary
judgment that thwarts an assault on S&P’s intellectual property
rights
|
|
18
|
- Abu Dhabi subprime case
- Significant new ruling by Judge Scheindlin on June 15 that emphatically
denied class action certification to the plaintiffs
- Judge Scheindlin wrote:
“Defendants argue with considerable force against certifying
the proposed class. As
defendants point out, this action is a collection of a relatively small
number of sophisticated institutional investors that acquired one of
three different categories of rated notes, at different times, pursuant
to different internal requirements and after conducting different due
diligence inquires.”
|
|
19
|
- Abu Dhabi subprime case (continued)
- On July 20th, Judge Scheindlin allowed the plaintiffs to reinstate one
of the ten original claims against both the Credit Rating Agencies and
Morgan Stanley
- The Judge concluded that she was mistaken in dismissing the aiding and
abetting fraud claims because they are related to the allegations of
fraud, the one claim that had been allowed to proceed
|
|
20
|
- Three takeaways from latest development on Abu Dhabi subprime case:
- The decision does not affect the dismissal of the nine claims which
were not based on fraud
- The court has made no finding of fraud or aiding and abetting
fraud. At this early stage, the
Court’s ruling must be based on accepting the plaintiffs’ assertions as
true
- Key issue has not changed with restoration of the aiding and abetting
claim. Plaintiffs must still prove fraud. We remain confident that
neither claim can be sustained
|
|
21
|
- Significant victory in Illinois Circuit Court:
- Judge William Maki ruled that index providers are entitled to
protection against misappropriation of their indices
- Judge Maki observed:
“It bears noting that ISE unabashedly admits it attempted to
create a competitive product, the ISE 250, which was an index highly
correlated to the S&P 500. After spending a large sum of money
developing and promoting options on the ISE 250, ISE discontinued the
project which had failed to garner significant trading volume. The
court fails to understand how ISE’s failure somehow entitles it to
profit for free from the efforts, skills and reputation of the index
providers.”
|
|
22
|
- Revenue +1.6% to $684.8 million
- S&P Credit Market Services:
+0.1% to $457.9 million
- S&P Investment Services:
+4.9% to $227 million
- Operating Profit (4.2%) to $264.7 million
- 2Q 2009 reflected a pre-tax loss of $13.8 million from divestiture of
Vista Research and a net pre-tax benefit of $0.4 million from
restructuring charges
- Operating Margin 38.7% compared to 41.0% in 2Q 2009
|
|
23
|
- 2Q started strong but softened in May and June
- Growing doubts about the pace of economic recovery
- Uncertainty developed over European sovereigns and bank debt
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- S&P conducted a comprehensive review of credit ratings—corporate,
government, and structured finance debt
- “Default, Transition, and Recovery:
A Global Cross-Asset Report Card of Ratings Performance In Times
of Stress” published in June 2010
- Demonstrated that except for U.S. RMBS and CDOs, ratings issued in the
U.S., Europe, Japan and Australia for most asset classes generally
performed as expected
- In contrast, the performance of ratings for U.S. RMBS and CDOs issued
from 2005 through 2007 had been disappointing and below expectations
- Takeaway: Rated credits withstood
the recent financial crisis with results in line with expectations for
the economic environment
|
|
36
|
- June 2010:
- Licensed Vanguard to launch eight new exchange-traded funds targeting
growth and value segments of the S&P 500 and growth, value and
blend segments of the S&P Midcap 400 and SmallCap 600
- May 2010:
- Licensed seven major European exchange-traded fund sponsors to create
and list S&P 500 ETFs on major European exchanges for real-time
trading
- Spring of 2010:
- Licensed the National Stock Exchange of India to create and list Indian
Rupee-denominated futures contracts based on the S&P 500
|
|
37
|
- S&P will be introducing new indices in:
- Commodities
- Fixed income
- Equities
- Strategy
- Custom
- Goal: An index for every type of
investment
|
|
38
|
- Summary
- New clarity on the regulatory and legal front
- New requirements are manageable
- Mid single-digit revenue growth versus previous estimate of high
single-digit growth
- With improvement at S&P Credit Market Services and S&P
Investment Services:
- Operating profit will grow
- Operating margin will decline approximately 100 basis points
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
- Revenue +1.8% to $565.0 million
- School Education Group:
(4.0%) to $324.9 million
- Higher Education, Professional
and International Group:
+10.8% to $240.1 million
- Operating Profit $51.6 million
- Compares to $21.0 million in 2Q 2009 (included $11.6 million net
pre-tax restructuring charge)
- Operating Margin 9.1% vs. 3.8% in 2Q 2009
|
|
41
|
- Funding concerns drove reduced purchasing in Spring 2010
- California: Fewer districts made new reading, literature, and math
purchases
- South Carolina: Legislature did not provide funding which effectively
cancelled the 9–12 math adoption
- Indiana: Many districts postponed math
- Limited activity in other states, i.e. Georgia and Oklahoma
|
|
42
|
- Now estimate 2010 state new adoption market to grow between $825 million
and $875 million
- Versus earlier forecast of $875 million to $925 million
- Anticipate nearly 70% increase in state new adoption sales
- Expect market to decline in open territory and fall-off in residual
sales
- Expect 4% to 6% growth for overall el-hi market
- Down from previous forecast of 6% to 7%
|
|
43
|
- Opportunities in Texas, Florida, and California
- Texas: Will capture about 40% of
the K–5 reading and about 18% of 6–12 literature
- Some orders deferred; will ship in 3Q
- Florida: Anticipate winning 40%
of the 6–8 math market, about 27% of the 9–12 market, and 5% of K–5
market
- California: Expect to capture
more than 50% of K–5 reading with Treasures and Imagine It! programs
|
|
44
|
- Mississippi: Expect to capture
more than 40% of K–12 science
- West Virginia: Looking to
capture more than 60% of K–12 math adoption
- Indiana and Oklahoma: Winning
substantial share—particularly at the 6–12 grade level—despite math
postponements
- Strong sales in non-academic subjects
- Good capture rates in family and consumer sciences, technical
education, and business and computer education
|
|
45
|
- Gains in the formative testing market were offset by the planned phase
out of statewide custom contracts in Florida and Arizona
|
|
46
|
- Increase in federal funding remains a wildcard in this market
- We are tracking the availability and ultimate use of these funds
|
|
47
|
- 2009: American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
- $11.5 billion available for distribution to the states in 2010 through
Phase 2 of the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund
- Phase 1: Most of the funds were used to save teaching jobs
- Phase 2: Funds may be used similar to Phase 1
|
|
48
|
- 2010: ARRA stimulus is funding:
- $4 billion in Race to the Top grants
- $350 million in Common Core Assessment grants
- $650 million in Investing for Innovation grants
- $3.5 billion in School Improvement Grants to the states
- 32 states and the District of Columbia have been approved for these
grants, which are earmarked for low-performing schools
|
|
49
|
- Race to the Top proposals include formative testing and reporting
- States winning grants will require these products and services
- McGraw-Hill products are aligned with ARRA funding:
- Formative products: Acuity, Yearly ProgressPro, and Writing Roadmap
- Reporting services: The Parent
Network
- Research-based instructional and intervention products: Number Worlds and Reading Mastery
- Some revenue from School Improvement and Investing in Innovation grants
could begin to show up in 4Q
|
|
50
|
- States embracing Common Core Standards for K–12 math, reading, and
language arts
- 23 states have adopted the standards; more expected in August
- More than 40 states expected to sign on by the end of 2010
- Expect an expansion of digital delivery systems for instructional
materials, professional development and classroom-level assessment
|
|
51
|
- Revenue is growing at double-digit pace
- More than 1.8 million registered students and instructors are using McGraw-Hill
Connect™ and other homework management products
- New partnership with Blackboard is increasing access to our suite of
digital products
- Blackboard reaches 70 to 80 percent of the U.S. college and university
market
- Students and faculty will be able to use a single Blackboard log-on to
gain access to our content and tools
- Grades for McGraw-Hill Connect assignments, quizzes and tests will
post directly to the Blackboard grade book
|
|
52
|
- We are off to a solid start this year in the U.S. college and university
market
- Full-year results will be determined by the heavy ordering season we
have just entered
- We expect the U.S. market to grow by 5% to 7%
- Last fall’s surge in enrollments carried into the spring semester
- Don’t expect another enrollment surge in the fall
|
|
53
|
- Digital products are producing double-digit growth in professional
markets
- We now have 5,000 e-books available
- Sales accelerated in April following the Apple’s iPad introduction
- e-book is becoming a staple of the Business-to-Consumer market
|
|
54
|
- In the Business-to-Business market
- Content is accessed on a platform that is augmented with news feeds,
video, and searchable information
- Growing family of Access products offers an array of professional
resources in medicine, engineering, and business
|
|
55
|
- Growth in key education markets in 2010
- 4% to 6% in the elementary-high school market
- 5% to 7% in the U.S. college market
- Segment revenue: Low single-digit growth
- Down from previous guidance of 6% to 7% given more challenging el-hi
market
- Operating margin: Unchanged from 2009
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
- Revenue (5.1%) to $224.2 million
- +7.4% excluding divestiture of BusinessWeek
- Business-to-Business Group:
(7.8%) to $198.9 million (+5.6% excluding BusinessWeek)
- Broadcasting Group:
+24.0% to $25.3 million
- Operating Profit Increased $33.1 million to $47.5 million
- Compared to $14.4 million in 2Q 2009 (which included a $4.0 million net
pre-tax restructuring charge)
- Operating Margin 21.2% vs. 6.1% in 2Q 2009
|
|
58
|
- Platts: Key driver in B2B’s 2Q results
- Growing demand for Platts’ data and information produced strong
domestic and international growth
- Platts’ new price assessments for a changing marketplace:
- World’s first price assessment for crude oil produced from the U.S.
Bakken Shale formation
- Daily price assessments for liquefied natural gas imported to Southwest
and Northwest Europe
|
|
59
|
- 2Q: Revenue increased 24.0% vs.
2Q 2009
- Improved national, local and political time sales
- Pick up in automotive advertising a key factor in national and local
- Benefitted from June 8th primary in California and the governor’s
contest in that state
- 3Q: Political advertising should
be strong
- Key drivers:
- August 10th Senate primary in Colorado
- Spending on propositions
|
|
60
|
- Summary for 2010:
- 2009 sale of BusinessWeek having an impact on revenue and operating
margin in 2010
- Revenue: Expect mid single-digit decline
- Excluding BusinessWeek divestiture, revenue will increase in the mid
single-digit range
- Operating margin: Expect to rebound into the mid-teens
|
|
61
|
- Previous earnings per diluted share guidance for 2010 was $2.55 to $2.65
- Due to choppiness in some of our key markets, we now expect to finish
the year at the low end of that range
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
- Free cash flow is building
- There is no short-term debt outstanding
- Long-term debt does not come due until 2012
- Started repurchasing shares in 2Q 2010
|
|
64
|
- Repurchased 6.5 million shares for a total cost of $186.9 million
- Average price of $28.76 per share
- First share repurchases since 3Q 2008
- 10.6 million shares remain in the 2007 program authorized by the Board
of Directors
|
|
65
|
- 2Q 2010: 313.2 million shares
- Relatively flat compared to 2Q 2009
- Repurchases offset by issuance related to employee plans and stock
price appreciation
- 3.1 million share decline from 1Q
- Reflects weighted impact of 2Q share repurchases
- Fully-diluted shares at end of 2Q 2010: Approximately 310 million shares
|
|
66
|
- MHP is well capitalized
- Net debt of $53 million as of June 30
- Shifted to a net debt position in 2Q, primarily driven by funding for
share repurchases
- Cash and short-term investments at end of 2Q: $1.145 billion
- Gross debt: $1.198 billion
- Comprised of long-term unsecured senior notes
- No commercial paper outstanding
|
|
67
|
- First half 2010: $98 million
- $61 million increase from first half 2009
- Primarily due to improved operating results and a focus on asset
management
- 2010: Now expect free cash flow in the range of $600 million to $650
million
- Versus previous estimate of $550 million to $600 million
- Improvement driven by reduced capital investment projections and more
favorable working capital
- 2009 full-year free cash flow was $770 million
|
|
68
|
- Majority of free cash flow is generated in the second half of the year
- Due to the seasonality of education business
- Guidance implies second half cash flow will roughly be $500 million to
$550 million
- Lower than the prior year due to increased investment and more
challenging working capital comparisons
|
|
69
|
- 2010: We do not anticipate any funding requirements for U.S. pension
plan
- Pension expense is expected to increase roughly $15 million in 2010
versus previous estimate of
$20 million
|
|
70
|
- 2Q 2010: Adjusted expenses declined 1.8%
- First half 2010: Adjusted expenses declined 2.1%
- 3.1% decline at constant currencies
- Benefited from:
- 2Q 2009 merging of publishing operations
- Reduced expenses due to planned phase out of custom contracts in
California, Florida and Arizona
- Savings partially offset by increases in selling and marketing costs
in 2Q for robust state new adoption opportunities and continued
digital investment
|
|
71
|
- Unchanged operating margin and low single-digit increase in expenses for
2010
- Versus previous guidance of a 6% to 7% increase in expenses
- Implies a mid single-digit increase in expenses in the second half
- Higher selling and marketing expenses associated with robust state
new adoption opportunities
- Cycling through phase-out of statewide custom contracts
- Increase in investments in technology and personnel to support
digital initiatives
|
|
72
|
- 2Q 2010: Adjusted expenses increased 9.4%
- Increased 10.8%, at constant currencies
- First half 2010: Adjusted expenses increased 8.5%
- Driven by increased salaries and occupancy costs, primarily due to
international hires, and increased incentive compensation
|
|
73
|
- Expect 7% to 8% increase
- Compared to previous guidance of roughly 9% to 10% increase versus 2009 adjusted expense
- Driven by:
- Continued investment in fast growing businesses
- Carry over impact of 2009 hires and planned hires in 2010
- Additional investments to support regulatory and compliance efforts
- Expense guidance assumes approximately $15 million in additional
regulatory and compliance initiatives, which will occur primarily in
second half of 2010
|
|
74
|
- 2Q 2010: Adjusted expenses declined 18.9%
- First half 2010: Adjusted expenses declined 19.4%
- Factors influencing decline:
- 2Q 2010: Divestiture of BusinessWeek reduced 2Q revenue and expenses by
$27.5 million and $38.5 million, respectively, for a positive profit
impact of approximately $11 million
- First half 2010: BusinessWeek divestiture reduced revenue by $55
million and expenses by $78 million, for a positive profit impact of
roughly $23 million
- Benefited from 2009 restructuring actions
|
|
75
|
- 2010: Expect expenses to decline in the low teens versus 2009
- Primarily reflects the $38 million in savings from the divestiture of BusinessWeek
|
|
76
|
- 2Q 2010: $37.6 million
- $8.3 million increase compared to 2Q 2009
- Largely due to increased excess space, increased incentive
compensation, and growth in selected support functions
- First half 2010: $73.4 million
- $10.6 million increase versus first half 2009
- 2010: Expect $25 million to $30 million increase
- Primarily due to increase in vacant space in New York resulting from BusinessWeek
divestiture and restructuring actions at McGraw-Hill Education
|
|
77
|
- 2Q 2010: $30.1 million
- $12.2 million decrease versus 2Q 2009
- First half 2010: $60 million
- $25.1 million decrease versus first half 2009
- Decline is largely due to timing; we expect increased investments in
second half
|
|
78
|
- 2010: Now expect $195 million to $205 million
- Increase of $18 million to $28 million versus 2009
- $30 million less than previous estimate of
$225 million to $235 million
- Reflects:
- Changes in many state adoption call schedules
- Delayed investments to better align with projected opportunities
- Continued savings from combining core basal publishing operations with
alternative basal and supplemental publishing operations
|
|
79
|
- 2Q 2010: $14.5 million
- $5.6 million increase versus 2Q 2009
- First half 2010: $22.1 million
- 2010: Expect $90 million to $100 million
- Expect increased investment in second half
- Full year compares to $68.5 million in 2009
- Largely reflects increase in technology spending
|
|
80
|
- 2Q 2010: $69.4 million
- $1.7 million decrease versus 2Q 2009
- 2010: Continue to expect $260 million to $265 million
- Compared to $270 million in 2009
- Reflects lower level of investment in 2009
|
|
81
|
- 2Q 2010: $26.2 million
- Compared to $28.8 million in 2Q 2009
- 2010: Continue to expect approximately $115 million
- Compared to $113 million in 2009
|
|
82
|
- 2Q 2010: $13 million
- First half 2010: $23 million
- 2010: Continue to expect approximately $40 million
|
|
83
|
- 2Q 2010: $20.8 million
- Compared to $18.5 million in 2Q 2009 and $22.0 million in 1Q 2010
- 2010: Expect net interest expense to be roughly comparable to 2009,
which was $76.9 million
|
|
84
|
- 2Q 2010: 36.4%
- 2010: Expect a comparable rate
|
|
85
|
- 2Q 2010: $1.1 billion
- 4.2% increase compared to 2Q 2009
- 7.0% increase, at constant foreign currency exchange rates and
excluding impact of BusinessWeek divestiture, compared to 2Q 2009
- Excluding the impact of a deferral of revenue at McGraw-Hill School
Education Group, unearned revenue would have grown at approximately
3.5%
|
|
86
|
- Financial Services represents approximately 73% of MHP’s unearned
revenue
- 2Q 2010: Low single-digit growth
- Strong growth in ratings-related information, S&P Indices and
Capital IQ
- Offset by declines at credit ratings and equity research products
- 2010: Expect mid single-digit growth
|
|
87
|
- Presenters:
Harold McGraw III
Chairman, President and CEO
- Robert J. Bahash
Executive Vice President and CFO
- Donald S. Rubin
Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
|
|
88
|
- Replay Options
- Internet replay available for one year
- Go to www.mcgraw-hill.com/investor_relations
- Click on the Earnings Announcement link under
Investor Presentation Webcasts
- Telephone replay available through August 23, 2010
- Domestic: 866-422-7922
- International: +1-203-369-0827
- No password required
|