|
1
|
- Presenters:
- Harold McGraw III
Chairman, President and CEO
- Robert J. Bahash
Executive Vice President and CFO
- Donald S. Rubin
Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- This presentation includes certain forward-looking statements about our
businesses and our prospects, new products, sales, expenses, tax rates,
cash flows, prepublication investments and operating and capital
requirements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to: the strength and sustainability of the U.S. and global
economy; the duration and depth of the current recession; Educational
Publishing’s level of success in 2009 adoptions and in open territories
and enrollment and demographic trends; the level of educational funding;
the strength of School Education including the testing market, Higher
Education, Professional and International publishing markets and the
impact of technology on them; the level of interest rates and the
strength of the economy, profit levels and the capital markets in the
U.S. and abroad; the level of success of new product development and
global expansion and strength of domestic and international markets; the
demand and market for debt ratings, including collateralized debt
obligations (“CDO”), residential and commercial mortgage and
asset-backed securities and related asset classes; the continued
difficulties in the credit markets and their impact on Standard &
Poor’s and the economy in general; the regulatory environment affecting
Standard & Poor’s; the level of merger and acquisition activity in
the U.S. and abroad; the strength of the domestic and international
advertising markets; the strength and the performance of the domestic
and international automotive markets; the volatility of the energy
marketplace; the contract value of public works, manufacturing and
single-family unit construction; the level of political advertising; and
the level of future cash flow, debt levels, manufacturing expenses,
distribution expenses, prepublication, amortization and depreciation
expense, income tax rates, capital, technology, restructuring charges
and other expenditures and prepublication cost investment.
- Actual results may differ materially from those in any forward-looking
statements because any such statements involve risks and uncertainties
and are subject to change based upon various important factors,
including, but not limited to, worldwide economic, financial, political
and regulatory conditions; currency and foreign exchange volatility; the
health of debt and equity markets, including interest rates, credit
quality and spreads, the level of liquidity, future debt issuances
including residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and CDOs
backed by residential mortgages and related asset classes; the
implementation of an expanded regulatory scheme affecting Standard &
Poor’s ratings and services; the level of funding in the education market
(both domestically and internationally); the pace of recovery in
advertising; continued investment by the construction, automotive,
computer and aviation industries; the successful marketing of new
products, and the effect of competitive products and pricing.
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- EPS
- Revenue
- 3Q 2009: Declined 8.4% to $1.9 billion compared
to 3Q 2008
- Now expect to achieve the top end of our $2.20 to $2.25 EPS guidance
- Excludes 2Q restructuring charge of $0.03, a $0.03 loss on divestiture
of Vista Research in May, and projected $0.02 gain on sale of BusinessWeek,
which will close in 4Q
|
|
6
|
- Although BusinessWeek has made significant contributions to McGraw-Hill,
we must now focus resources on areas with greatest opportunities:
- Building size and scale globally in essential markets
- Expanding our digital capabilities
|
|
7
|
- Our economists forecast GDP growth of 1.8% in 2010 after 2.7% decline in
2009
- Stimulus funds being spent more slowly than expected in education
- Positive indications that Federal Reserve and Treasury programs are
contributing to improvement in credit markets
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Revenue (2.2%) to $637.0 million
- S&P Credit Market Services:
+0.7% to $426.1 million
- S&P Investment Services:
(7.6%) to $210.9 million
- Operating Profit (10.1%) to $256.2 million
- Operating Margin 40.2%
|
|
10
|
- S&P Credit Market Services had first year-over-year quarterly
revenue increase in two years
- Benefits from growth overseas:
- 3Q’s total new issuance grew faster in Europe
- + 39.2% in Europe
- + 31.4% in U.S.
- International revenue increased 3.3%, or $6.7 million, in 3Q despite
$7.7 million impact of foreign exchange
- Foreign source revenue accounted for 49.1% of S&P Credit Market
Services’ 3Q revenue
|
|
11
|
- Growth in U.S. and European corporate industrial debt issuance
- U.S.: +98.9% in 3Q
- Europe: +120.1% in 3Q
- U.S. high-yield issuance: +491.3% in 3Q off a low base
- European speculative-grade issuance: +226.2%
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Companies able to raise cash to fund operations or refinance maturing
debt
- 3Q global volume for high-yield bonds highest in more than a decade
- Speculative-grade companies able to raise dollars as risk premiums fell
dramatically from record levels in late 2008
|
|
14
|
- Increased investor appetite for investment-grade industrial bonds
- Result of aversion to equity and structured
finance risk
- Industrial companies’ efforts to avoid refinance risk
- Lack of new money from bank market
- Investors more comfortable buying lower rated investment-grade bonds
- 54% of corporate issuance has been low BBB, up from 28% earlier in the
year
|
|
15
|
- Banks becoming more comfortable obtaining funds from each other
- The spread between the three-month LIBOR and Fed’s overnight rate—a
gauge of how banks assess riskiness of lending to one another—fell to
0.34%
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Program stimulated issuance in wide array of ABS asset classes
- Including credit cards, auto loans, auto leases and student loans
- Traditional real money investors have returned to market
- Use of TALF leverage has declined sharply
|
|
18
|
- U.S. Treasury preparing to implement the
Public-Private Investment Partnership
- Designed to increase demand for existing legacy residential
mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities
- European Central Bank started purchasing euro-denominated covered bonds
in 3Q to stimulate residential mortgage-backed securities there
|
|
19
|
- Comparisons will be easiest of the year
- 4Q ’08 revenue fell 24.5%, steepest decline of 2008
- Outlook for corporate market is positive
- Tight spreads
- Healthy refinancing calendar
- Low rates
- Investor demand for yield
|
|
20
|
- Outlook for municipal market is positive
- 4Q: State and local governments should be active as economic slow down
increases need for deficit borrowing
- Federal stimulus plans should be a positive
- Asset-backed securities market has benefited from TALF
- Spreads remain tight
- Deal flow looks positive
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Activity will remain light in U.S. mortgage-backed securities market,
particularly commercial mortgage-backed securities
- Main source of ratings activity are re-REMICs— the resecuritization of
existing securities enhanced with additional credit support
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Outlook for transaction revenue
- 4Q: Expect double-digit increase from momentum in corporate issuance
- Structured finance market continues to be challenged
- 2009: Now expect a low single-digit decline versus previous guidance of
mid single-digit decline
- Outlook for non-transaction revenue
- 3Q: Slipped by 1.6%, or $4.9 million, primarily due to reduction in
breakage fees and impact of foreign exchange
- 2009: Expect a slight decline
|
|
25
|
- 3Q revenue declined 7.6%, reflecting:
- Divestitures of Vista Research, CRISIL’s Gas Strategies Group
- Expiration of independent research settlement at end of July
- Some softness in index products and services
- Excluding divestitures, 3Q revenue declined 4.4%
|
|
26
|
- Continued growth of Capital IQ products and services
- Capital IQ now serves over 2,800 clients
- An increase of 7.5% since end of 2008
|
|
27
|
- Softness due to reduction in trading volume of over-the-counter and
exchange-traded derivatives based on S&P indices
|
|
28
|
- Assets under management in exchange-traded funds have increased
sequentially since 1Q 2009
- Now more than $17 billion higher than at year-end 2008
|
|
29
|
- Launched five new exchange-traded funds based on S&P indices in 3Q
2009
- Now 214 exchange-traded funds based on S&P indices
- Up from 189 at end of 3Q 2008
- More in the pipeline
|
|
30
|
- U.S.: Working with SEC on new rules and proposals issued in October
- Europe: Formal approval of legislation is expected shortly: expect
effective date to be in compliance by
mid-2010
- Japan, Australia: Expect additional regulation of rating agencies
- We don’t believe these changes will have a material adverse effect on
S&P’s financial condition or operations
|
|
31
|
- We expect U.S. Congress to pass legislation on rating agencies as part
of omnibus financial reform bill
- Expect to pass in Fall 2009 or early in 2010
- Drafting process is underway and situation is still fluid
|
|
32
|
- We continue to review our concerns with decision makers
- Need beginning-to-end solutions: Regulations to cover all aspects of
capital markets to ensure effective and efficient functioning
- Analytical independence
- Foster competition in ratings industry: Establish fair and level
playing field
- International consistency: Ratings are issued and used globally and
contribute to global flow of capital
- We think our concerns are being heard
|
|
33
|
- Lawsuits grouped into three general categories:
- Lawsuits alleging S&P is an underwriter or seller of securities
- Lawsuits alleging corporate statements on earnings and ratings were
misleading (stock drop suits)
- Lawsuits based on state law claims
- We continue to believe our legal risk is low
|
|
34
|
- S&P has achieved worldwide recognition for the value and quality of
its credit ratings
- Created common basis for analyzing credit risk
- Developed common vocabulary for describing credit risk
- Provided simple, one-dimensional scale for measuring credit risk
|
|
35
|
- Taken important steps to:
- Improve ratings stability
- Add value to ratings through more analysis and features
- Increase comparability of ratings
- Increase transparency of its processes
- Add more checks and balances to the process
- Continue to educate the market about ratings and the ratings scale
|
|
36
|
- Strong analytics underlying S&P ratings definitions and ratings
criteria
- Key to enhancing comparability of ratings across sectors
- Ratings provide a common vocabulary to describe credit risk
- Our goal: Make S&P benchmarks more consistent and comparable
- A rating symbol should aim to represent approximately the same general
degree of credit worthiness
|
|
37
|
- New stability measures added to ratings criteria
- Accounts for gradual decay in credit quality versus sudden
deterioration
- Also considers other factors, such as payment priority of an obligation
following default and potential payment after default
|
|
38
|
- To increase transparency, S&P provides more information about:
- The assumptions in models
- Use of “what if” scenarios
- Stress tests
- S&P has published specific economic scenarios for each rating
category to illustrate level of stress an instrument might withstand
without defaulting
|
|
39
|
- S&P has expanded compliance efforts
- Chief compliance officer and team of independent compliance
professionals oversee compliance with regulatory requirements, S&P
policies, and policies related to managing potential conflicts of
interest
|
|
40
|
- S&P established a Risk Assessment Oversight Committee
- Assesses risk that could impact ratings process
- Operates independently of the ratings business
- Separated quality and criteria functions from the ratings groups
- Independent criteria group performs a number of
key functions
|
|
41
|
- Educating market participants about ratings, what ratings represent and
how to use them
- Publications include S&P’s “Guide to Credit Rating Essentials”
|
|
42
|
- Summary
- Slight decline in revenue
- Operating margin decline of 175 to 200 basis points versus earlier
guidance of 225 to 275 basis points, excluding 2008 and 2009
restructuring charges and the loss on Vista Research
- Implied operating margin of approximately 39.5%
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- 2009:
- U.S. college and university market:
Counter-cyclical growth fueled by a surge in enrollments
- Elementary-high school market:
Declining sales; budget pressures and only a modest benefit
from federal stimulus funding
|
|
45
|
- Revenue (11.6%) to $1.0 billion
- School Education Group:
(19.6%) to $501.3 million
- Higher Education, Professional
and International Group:
(1.8%) to $498.7 million
- Operating Profit (15.9%) to $298.1 million
- Operating Margin 29.8%
|
|
46
|
- Key factors in elementary-high school market
- Reduced potential
- Postponed spending
- Still expect to win more than 30% of the total available dollars in the
2009 state new adoption market
- Capture rate will probably match 2008 performance
- State new adoption market:
- 2008: Estimated at $980 million
- 2009: Expect $500 million to $510 million, down from original forecast
of $550 million to $600 million
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Industry sales declined 0.7% in August versus same month last year
- Market down 21.4% year-to-date after eight months, according to
Association of American Publishers
- We now expect el-hi market to decline by 20% to 25% this year, down from
15% to 20% decline originally projected
|
|
49
|
- Postponements in adoption states:
- California
- Florida
- Kentucky
- Oregon
- Georgia
- Harder to track in the open territory, but postponements had a negative
impact
- Open territory sales declined 12.7% through August year-to-date,
according to AAP
|
|
50
|
- California originally offered this year’s biggest industry sales
potential
- Postponements severely reduced purchasing
- Number of deferrals increased sharply in July following passage of
austerity budget
- State legislature also suspended requirement that districts buy new K-8
core curriculum programs within two years
- Resulted in 10% implementation rate for K-8 reading compared to 40%
projected in January and the more typical 60% to 70% realized in
better economic times
|
|
51
|
- California: Opportunity for new spending
- Last reading adoption in 2002 for only two programs, including Open
Court
- State approved broader K-5 list for 2009 adoption
- New edition of Open Court, now called Imagine It!
- State-specific K-5 edition of Treasures
- With school year under way, a number of districts are considering using
state textbook fund for its intended purpose
- Districts eligible for Title I stimulus funds can use them for new
reading purchases
- Fear of mid-year cuts in educational funding could drive purchasing in
first half of 2010
|
|
52
|
- Florida: Mixed outlook for spending
- Little opportunity for late ordering in 6-12 literature market
- Better outlook for second year K-12 music
- Non-core subject can be implemented during school year and can be
phased in a few grades at a time
- Kentucky: 2010 promising for K-12 math
- Had first-year postponements
- Still did brisk business in 2009 and should do well next year
|
|
53
|
- Oregon: Good outlook
- Many first-year postponements
- Captured solid share in 2009; anticipate doing well in 2010 and 2011
- Pent up demand very real in some markets
- Extent to which it can drive revenue may depend on improving economic
conditions
- Decision to retain older programs could result in increased replacement
sales
|
|
54
|
- We still expect the state new adoption market to top
$950 million, but probably won’t reach $1 billion
- Texas is back on the adoption calendar in 2010
- Florida is preparing to buy K-12 math
- We expect to have a solid lineup of products and services
- Texas: All grades of our 6-12 literature program were recommended for
state’s list
- Reviews of our Imagine It! and Treasures K-5 reading programs continue
to go well
- Florida: Our math programs are being well received in districts
reviewing programs for 2010
|
|
55
|
- Funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)
have been moving slowly into the pipeline
- Following money down to district level is not easy
- Most of stimulus dollars in 3Q appear to be from IDEA special education
distributions
- Title I funds reaching market more slowly
- Could stimulate some 4Q purchasing with more activity in spring 2010
|
|
56
|
- $39.5 billion State Fiscal Stabilization Fund is intended to help states
fill deficits created in education budgets
- Some states have received grants
- All distributions expected to be made by end of 2009
- Greatest impact on el-hi market will probably occur in 2010
|
|
57
|
- Other U.S. Department of Education programs could offer new
opportunities for providers of
el-hi instructional materials and assessments
- “Race to the Top” fund: $4.3 billion in competitive grants to encourage
state-level initiatives
- “Investing in Innovation” fund: $650 million in competitive grants to
local districts and non-profit educational groups
|
|
58
|
- As proposed by the Administration in May, budget would provide an
increase of $1.3 billion, or 2.8%, over current fiscal year
- Does not include ARRA stimulus appropriations
- New budget includes new programs that represent renewed federal support
for reading
- Curtailed in recent years because of perceived problems with Reading
First program
|
|
59
|
- Federal dollars had an indirect effect with stimulus coming from:
- Higher Pell Grants scholarships
- Higher tax credit: Up to $2,500 a year for tuition and other
college-related costs, including course materials
- Post 9/11 GI Bill helps veterans enrolled in college:
- Helps with tuition, housing and course materials
- More than 24,000 veterans approved for stipends at end of September
2009
|
|
60
|
- Higher education market tends to be counter-cyclical
- More people return to school to gain new skills or remain due to
limited employment opportunities
- Enrollment surged this fall with confluence of federal stimulus funds
and counter-cyclical trend
- Could be a 10% increase in overall post-secondary enrollments this
fall; official statistics not yet available
|
|
61
|
- Market up 11.0% through August, according to AAP reports
- McGraw-Hill Higher Education experienced growth in 3Q in all four major
imprints
- Use of technology is expanding opportunities
- Our digital products growing at a double-digit rate
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
- Strong demand for higher education products
- Offset by:
- Softness in school and professional sales
- Unfavorable foreign exchange rates
|
|
64
|
- A bright spot: Digital subscription products
- Science
- Medicine
- Technology
- Challenging retail environment as booksellers reduce inventory and limit
new orders
|
|
65
|
- Now expect segment’s revenue to decrease
10% to 11% due to decline in el-hi school market
- Previous forecast of an 8.5% to 9.5% decline
- With tight cost controls, now expect margin to decline 300 to 350 basis points,
excluding 2008 and 2009 restructuring charges
- Previous estimate called for a 300 to 400 basis point decline
|
|
66
|
|
|
67
|
- Revenue (10.1%) to $238.9 million
- Broadcasting Group:
(23.6%) to $19.1 million
- Business-to-Business Group:
(8.7%) to $219.8 million
- Operating Profit +29.3% to $29.5 million
- Includes a pre-tax restructuring charge in 3Q 2008 that reduced
operating profit by $13.9 million
- Operating Margin 12.4%
|
|
68
|
- Decreases in advertising
- Declines in automotive industry
- Softness in construction market
- BusinessWeek global ad pages down 29.3% in third quarter, according to
Publishers Information Bureau
|
|
69
|
- Platts continues to be a stand out performer
- Volatility in crude prices and other commodities continue to create
demand for our data and information services
- Oil prices are approximately half compared to last year
- Strength in data and information products for business-to-business
markets will be a key to our future development
|
|
70
|
- Summary:
- Revenue: Now expect 9% to 10% decline
- Versus previous guidance of 8% to 9% decline
- Operating margin: Now expect 200 to 250 basis point decline, excluding
2008 and 2009 restructuring charges and gain on the sale of BusinessWeek
- Versus previous guidance of 300 to 400 basis point decline
|
|
71
|
- Summary:
- Revenue to decline approximately 7% because of continued weakness in
school education and advertising
- Versus previous guidance of 5.5% to 6.5% decline
- With stringent cost controls, we now expect to achieve top end of $2.20
to $2.25 diluted EPS guidance for 2009
- Previously had guided to low end of range
- New guidance excludes second quarter restructuring charge of $0.03, a
$0.03 loss on divestiture of Vista Research, and projected $0.02 gain
on sale of BusinessWeek in 4Q
|
|
72
|
|
|
73
|
- The decrease in consolidated costs and expenses
- Down 5.4% in 3Q, or 3.8% excluding last year’s restructuring charge
- Decrease achieved despite $68.3 million increase in 3Q incentive
compensation
- Influence of foreign exchange on our results
- Pending BusinessWeek divestiture
- Improved outlook for free cash flow in 2009
|
|
74
|
- 3Q 2009: Declined 9.0%, excluding 2008 restructuring charge
- Declined 8.2% at constant currencies
- Higher incentive compensation was more than offset by:
- Stringent expense controls
- Savings from previous restructuring actions
- Lower sales and marketing costs
- Lower cost of goods sold due to reduction in revenue
- Full-Year ’09 Guidance: Now expect high single-digit decline versus
previous guidance of mid single-digit decline in expenses, excluding
2008 and 2009 restructuring charges
|
|
75
|
- 3Q 2009: Increased 5.1%, excluding 2008 restructuring charge
- Increased 7.0% at constant currencies
- Excluding impact of increased incentive compensation, expenses would
have declined slightly due to tight cost controls and restructuring
savings, as well as benefits from divestitures of Vista Research and
CRISIL’s Gas Strategies Group
- Full-Year ’09 Guidance: Now expect margin to decline 175 to 200 basis
points
- Implies roughly flat expenses year-over-year versus previous guidance
of slight increase, excluding restructuring charges in 2008 and 2009
and loss on divestiture of Vista Research in 2Q 2009
|
|
76
|
- Financial Services expenses
- Year-to-date, margin down 240 basis points
- 4Q margin should improve given expected double-digit increase in
transaction revenue
- Compares to 4Q 2008 which had lowest margin of the year because revenue was
depressed by low debt issuance
- Improvement will be mitigated by increased incentive compensation
|
|
77
|
- Information & Media expenses
- 3Q 2009: Decreased 8.6%, excluding 2008 restructuring charges
- Restructuring savings and lower cost of goods sold were key drivers,
partially offset by increased incentive compensation
- Full Year ’09 Guidance: New margin guidance implies a high single-digit
decline in expenses versus previous guidance of a mid single-digit
decline, excluding restructuring charges in 2008 and 2009 and gain on
the divestiture of BusinessWeek in 4Q 2009
|
|
78
|
- 2009 results adversely impacted by non-cash accounting, a result of
converting J.D. Power’s studies onto Compass, a new online reporting and
analytical tool
- Revenue previously recognized at the time of the syndicated studies’
release will now be recognized ratably over the 12 month life of the
subscription
- FY 2009: Continue to expect a $12 million decrease in revenue and a $7
million decrease in profit due to impact of Compass
- 3Q 2009: $5.4 million decrease in revenue and a
$2.6 million decrease in profit
- 4Q 2009: Impact is expected to be minimal
|
|
79
|
- 3Q 2009: $27.9 million, an $18.2 million increase compared to same
period last year
- Largely due to higher stock-based and short-term incentive compensation
- 2009: Now expect an increase of $20 million to $25 million, excluding
2008 restructuring charge
- Down from previous estimate of a $25 million to
$30 million increase
- Implies 4Q corporate expense of $36 million to
$41 million
- Growth is largely due to increased incentive compensation
|
|
80
|
- Significant reduction in long- and short-term incentive compensation
accruals in 3Q ‘08 made 3Q ‘09 comparisons challenging
- 3Q 2009 incentive compensation increased
$68.3 million, including a $34.7 million increase to
stock-based compensation. Impact by segment:
- McGraw-Hill Education: $13.0 million
- Financial Services: $32.1 million
- Information & Media: $5.7 million
- Corporate: $17.5 million
|
|
81
|
- Now expect full-year incentive compensation to increase closer to $75
million compared to 2008
- Previously forecasted $90 million increase
- Decrease primarily due to reductions in stock-based compensation
accruals and reductions in short-term accruals at McGraw-Hill Education
|
|
82
|
- Year-to-date: Increased approximately $40 million
- Comprised of $68 million increase, partially offset by $29 million
decrease in first half of 2009
- 4Q 2009: We expect approximately $35 million increase
- Expected increase primarily due to difficult comparison against 4Q ’08
which benefited from reduced incentive compensation accruals
|
|
83
|
- Reduced revenue significantly in 1H ‘09
- Dramatic strengthening of U.S. dollar in 2H 2008 reduced year-over-year
revenue growth by $74.6 million and expenses by $82 million in first
half of 2009
- 3Q 2009 had less of an impact:
- Currency reduced revenue by $21.6 million and expenses by $15.3 million
- Operating profit reduced by $6.3 million
- 4Q 2009: Based on current foreign exchange rates, we expect:
- Revenue comparisons will benefit
- Expense comparisons will be negatively impacted
|
|
84
|
- Agreement to sell BusinessWeek to Bloomberg was signed on October 13
- MHP will receive $5 million in cash
- Bloomberg will assume certain liabilities, including unfulfilled
subscription liabilities
- Transaction is expected to close in 4Q 2009
- $9.3 million pre-tax ($5.9 million post-tax) gain, or approximately
$0.02 per diluted share
- Expect minimal financial impact in 2009 due to timing of transaction
|
|
85
|
- 2010: Reduces year-over-year revenue growth by about $100 million
- Expect savings of $20 million to $25 million pre-tax, or $0.04 to $0.05
per diluted share, net a portion of allocated expenses such as shared
services and rent
- Savings will vary depending on length of transition services and
ability to consolidate space
- Following divestiture, advertising will represent about 2% of pro forma
total revenue
|
|
86
|
- 3Q 2009: Free cash flow is ahead of last year by $323 million, despite
planned pension contribution of $20.5 million and lower operating
results
- Increase driven mainly by significant reduction in incentive
compensation payments, prudent investments, and focus on working
capital improvements and cost containment
- 4Q 2009: Will be negatively impacted by lower anticipated receipts
- 2009: Now expect free cash flow to be in excess of $500 million, up from
previous guidance of $430 million to $450 million range
|
|
87
|
- Net debt: $240.5 million at end of 3Q
- Down $490.7 million versus 2Q and down $555.5 million versus year-end
2008
- Reflects strong free cash flow generation in 3Q 2009
- Gross debt: $1.2 billion at the end of 3Q
- Comprised of long-term unsecured senior notes
- Offset by $957.3 million in cash
- No commercial paper outstanding at end of 3Q
|
|
88
|
- 3Q 2009: $17.8 million net interest expense
- A $4.2 million decline from 3Q 2008, largely driven by reduction in
interest accruals related to uncertain income tax positions
- 2009: Still expect interest expense to be roughly comparable to 2008
|
|
89
|
- 3Q 2009: 36.4% versus 37.1% in 3Q 2008
- 2009: Expect 36.4% for the full-year
|
|
90
|
- 3Q 2009: 313.6 million shares
- 3.6 million share decrease compared to 3Q 2008
- Primarily due to 2008 share repurchases and to lesser extent, decline
in our stock price
- Roughly flat compared to 2Q 2009
- Fully-diluted shares at end of 3Q 2009: Approximately 314 million shares
|
|
91
|
- 3Q 2009: $44.7 million, down $20.6 million compared to 3Q 2008
- 2009: Still expect approximately $200 million
|
|
92
|
- 3Q 2009: $15.7 million, compared to $17.7 million in same period last
year
- 4Q 2009: Expect an uptick primarily related to technology spending and
international expansion
- 2009: Still expect $75 million to $80 million for the full year
|
|
93
|
- Amortization of prepublication costs
- 3Q 2009: $127.2 million,
compared to $124.6 million in same period last year
- 2009: Still expect $275 million to $280 million
- Compares to $270 million in 2008
|
|
94
|
- Depreciation
- 3Q 2009: $26.0 million, $3.9
million lower than same period last year
- 2009: Now expect approximately $120 million, compared to previous
forecast of approximately $130 million
|
|
95
|
- Amortization of intangibles
- 3Q 2009: $11.1 million, compared
to $13.6 million for same period last year
- 2009: Still expect approximately $50 million
|
|
96
|
- End of 3Q 2009: $1.1 billion
- Roughly flat year-over-year and with 2Q 2009
- In constant currency, grew 1.9% versus prior year
- Financial Services represents approximately 73% of MHP’s unearned
revenue
- Financial Services is roughly flat versus prior year
- 2009: Still expect to grow slightly, excluding impact of BusinessWeek
divestiture
- Including divestiture, we expect a slight decline for the full year
|
|
97
|
- Presenters:
Harold McGraw III
Chairman, President and CEO
- Robert J. Bahash
Executive Vice President and CFO
- Donald S. Rubin
Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
|
|
98
|
- Replay Options
- Internet replay available for one year
- Go to www.mcgraw-hill.com/investor_relations
- Click on the Earnings Announcement link under
Investor Presentation Webcasts
- Telephone replay available through November 25, 2009
- Domestic: 800-925-3897
- International: +1-203-369-3964
- No password required
|