| BSkyB is committed to high
standards of corporate governance and, except as noted
below, has complied throughout the year with the best
practice provisions of Section 1 of the Combined Code
on Corporate Governance (“the Code”) appended
to the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority.
The
Board
The Board currently comprises fifteen Directors, made
up of two Executive Directors and thirteen Non-Executive
Directors, eight of whom are Independent Non-Executive
Directors. The Non-Executive Directors of the Company
bring a wide range of experience and expertise to the
Company’s affairs and they carry significant weight
in the Board’s decisions. Short biographies of
each of the Directors are set out on page 22, which
also clearly identify those Directors who are, in the
view of the Board, independent within the meaning of
the Code. In the previous year’s Annual Report,
the Board noted that there was not a majority of Independent
Non-Executive Directors, as required by the Code, and
expressed its intention to remedy this situation. Following
the appointments of Gail Rebuck and Jacques Nasser at
the Annual General Meeting on 8 November 2002 the Company has been compliant with the Code.The roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
are separate and have been so since the Company obtained
its listing in 1994. In prior years the Board did not
deem it necessary to appoint a Senior Non-Executive
Director and as such was not compliant with the Code.
However, in last year’s Annual Report the Board
confirmed its commitment to make an appointment and
on 7 November 2002, Lord St John of Fawsley was appointed
as the Senior Non-Executive Director of the Company.
The Board is scheduled to meet at least six times a
year to review appropriate strategic, operational and
financial matters as required. A schedule of items reserved
for the full Board’s approval is in place, which
includes, inter alia, the approval of annual and interim
results, significant transactions, agreements or arrangements
between the Group and members of The News Corporation
Limited group (“News Corporation”) and other
related parties, major capital expenditure and the yearly
budget and business plan.
The Board has also delegated specific responsibilities
to Board committees, notably the Audit, Remuneration
and Nomination Committees. Directors receive Board and
Committee papers several days in advance of Board and
Committee meetings and also have access to the advice
and services of the Company Secretary. In addition,
the Board members have access to external professional
advice at the Company’s expense.
Appointments of Independent Non-Executive Directors
are for an initial term of three years, subject to election
by shareholders following appointment, subsequent re-election
by shareholders, and Companies Act provisions relating
to the removal of Directors. In addition, re-appointment
for a further term is not automatic but may be made
by mutual agreement.
In previous years the Articles of Association of the
Company permitted News Corporation or a subsidiary of
News Corporation to appoint a number of Directors dependent
on its shareholding in the Company. BSkyB Holdco, Inc.
(“Holdco”), a subsidiary of News Corporation,
had the right to appoint five Directors to the Board.
The Directors so appointed were not subject to election
by shareholders, nor were they required to retire by
rotation as required by the Code.
At the Company’s Annual General Meeting held
on 8 November 2002, resolutions were put to the shareholders
of the Company whereby new Articles of Association would
be adopted, cancelling News Corporation’s special
right to appoint Directors to the Board and the five
Directors so appointed by News Corporation would be
put forward for appointment by shareholders. These Directors
would then be subject to the normal retirement by rotation
provisions that are applicable to all other Directors.
These resolutions were also conditional on another three
Independent Non-Executive Directors being appointed
to the Board. The resolutions were passed by the shareholders
of the Company and became effective on 13 February 2003,
when Lord Wilson of Dinton was appointed as the eighth
Independent Non-Executive Director of the Board.
All the Directors of the Company now comply with the
requirement for Directors to retire and offer themselves
for re-election at least once every three years.
The Group Executive Committee generally meets on a
weekly basis to allow prompt decision making and discussion
of relevant business issues. It is chaired by the Chief
Executive Officer and comprises the Chief Financial
Officer and other senior executives from within the
Group.
Board Committees The Articles of Association formerly contained certain
rights for Holdco, dependent on its shareholding in
the Company, to appoint and remove members of any standing
Committee established by the Board. Holdco had the right
to appoint two members to any such Committee. These
rights were also cancelled upon the adoption of the
new Articles of Association by a Special Resolution
of the Company at the Annual General Meeting, which
was effective from 13 February 2003.
Remuneration
Committee The Remuneration
Committee, on behalf of the Board, is responsible for
recommending to the Board the framework and policy for
Executive Directors’ remuneration and remuneration
for any Executive of the Company earning a basic salary
in excess of £250,000 per annum. The Remuneration
Committee has clearly defined terms of reference, meets
not less than once a year and takes advice from the
Chief Executive Officer and independent consultants
as appropriate in carrying out its work. The Remuneration
Committee currently comprises five Non-Executive Directors,
three of whom are independent.
The Remuneration Committee is chaired by John Thornton,
and its members are David Evans, Jacques Nasser, Rupert
Murdoch and David DeVoe. The Company notes that the
composition of the Remuneration Committee does not comply
with the Code. The Board considers that Messrs Murdoch
and DeVoe, along with the other members of the Committee,
have provided a valuable contribution to the Remuneration
Committee, and believes that they will continue to do
so in the future. Accordingly, the Company does not
propose to alter the current membership of the Remuneration
Committee.
The Board also notes that the terms of the Executive
Directors’ service contracts do not comply with
the Code and this is more specifically discussed within
the Report on Directors’ Remuneration which can
be found on pages 26 to 31. In accordance with the Directors’
Remuneration Report Regulations 2002, the Report on
Directors’ Remuneration will be put forward for
an advisory shareholder vote.
Audit Committee The Audit Committee, which consists exclusively of Non-Executive
Directors, has clearly defined terms of reference as
laid out by the Board. The Audit Committee is chaired
by Philip Bowman and its members are Allan Leighton,
Gail Rebuck, David DeVoe and Arthur Siskind. It meets
not fewer than four times a year to review all significant
judgements made in the preparation of the quarterly,
half yearly and annual financial results before they
are submitted to the Board. It reviews with the external
auditors the nature, scope and cost of their work, discusses
with them the results thereof, reviews the audit plans
and findings of the Group's internal audit function
and any related party transactions entered into by the
Group. The Audit Committee has the power to seek external
advice as and when required.
Nomination Committee On 17 September 2002, the Company established a Nomination
Committee of the Board following the Board’s confirmation
in the previous year’s Annual Report that it intended
to establish a Nomination Committee. On 17 September
2003, the Company appointed Lord St John of Fawsley
and John Thornton as the Committee members. Since there
are only two members there is no Chairman. During the
year Jacques Nasser, Gail Rebuck, Lord Wilson of Dinton,
James Murdoch and Chase Carey were all nominated by
the Nomination Committee for appointment to the Board.
The Company has from time to time engaged executive
search consultants to assist with the recruitment of
Independent Non-Executive Directors.
Appointment of Directors Jacques Nasser and Gail Rebuck were appointed to the Board on 8 November 2002.
Lord Wilson of Dinton was appointed to the Board on
13 February 2003.
Martin Pompadur and Leslie
Hinton resigned from the Board on 13 February 2003 and
were replaced by Chase Carey and James Murdoch.
Communication
with Shareholders
The Company is keen to maintain a dialogue with institutional
shareholders in order to ensure that the objectives
of both the Company and the shareholders are understood.
A programme of meetings with institutional shareholders,
fund managers and analysts takes place each year. The
Company also makes presentations to analysts and fund
managers following the half year and full year results
of the Company.
The Board views the Annual General Meeting as an opportunity
to communicate with private investors and sets aside
time at these meetings for shareholders to ask questions
of the Board. All members of the Board are encouraged
to attend the meeting. The Chairman provides a brief
resume of the Company’s activities for the previous
year to the shareholders.
The Company, in accordance with the Code, announces
the number of proxy votes cast on resolutions at the
Annual General Meeting. Directors’
responsibilities
The responsibilities of the Directors are set out on
page 31.
Internal control The Directors have overall responsibility for establishing
and maintaining the Group's systems of internal
control and risk management and for reviewing their
effectiveness. These systems are designed to manage,
and where possible eliminate, the risk of failure to
achieve business objectives and to provide reasonable
but not absolute assurance against material misstatement
or loss. An ongoing process for identifying, evaluating
and managing the significant risks faced by the Group
has been established, in accordance with the guidance
of the Turnbull Committee on internal control issued
in September 1999. This process has been in place for
the whole of the year ended 30 June 2003 and up to the
date the financial statements were approved. The Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board, considers the effectiveness of the operation of the Group’s
systems of internal control and risk management during
the year and this review has been carried out for the
year ended 30 June 2003 and up to the date the financial
statements were approved. This review relates to the
Company and its subsidiaries and does not extend to
joint ventures. The Audit Committee meets on at least
a quarterly basis with the Group’s internal audit
team and the external auditors.
There is a comprehensive budgeting process and the
annual budget, which is regularly reviewed and updated,
is approved by the Board. Risk assessment and evaluation
take place as an integral part of this process. Performance
is monitored against budget through weekly and monthly
reporting cycles. Monthly reports on performance are
provided to the Board and the Group reports to shareholders
each quarter.
Each area of the business carries out risk assessments
of its operations and ensures that the key risks are
addressed. A Risk Management Committee, chaired by the
Chief Financial Officer and comprising senior executives,
reviews the management of risks in all areas of the
business on a cyclical basis. The results of the Risk
Management Committee’s review are integral to
the budgeting and forecasting process and are integrated
into the internal audit planning.
The internal audit team provides objective assurance
as to the effectiveness of the Group’s systems
of internal control and risk management to the Group’s
operating management and to the Audit Committee.
Use of external auditors The Group has a policy on the provision by the external
auditors of audit and non-audit services, which categorises
such services between:
– those services which the auditors are prohibited
from providing;
– those services which are acceptable for the
auditors to provide and the provision
of which has been pre-approved by the Audit Committee;
and
– those services for which the specific approval
of the Audit Committee is required before the auditors
are permitted to provide the service.
The policy defines the types of services falling under
each category and sets out the criteria which need to
be met and the internal approval mechanisms required
to be completed prior to any engagement. An analysis
of all services provided by the external auditors is
reviewed by the Audit Committee at each meeting.
For the year ended 30 June 2003, the Audit Committee
has discussed the matter of audit independence with
Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Group’s external
auditors, and has received and reviewed confirmation
in writing that, in Deloitte & Touche LLP’s
professional judgement, Deloitte & Touche LLP is
independent within the meaning of regulatory and professional
requirements and the objectivity of the audit engagement
partner and audit staff is not impaired.
|