10-K 1 c75546e10vk.htm ANNUAL REPORT Annual Report for CNA Financial Corporation
Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to           

Commission File Number 1-5823

CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   36-6169860
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
CNA Plaza    
Chicago, Illinois   60685
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(312) 822-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     

Title of each class
  Name of each exchange on
which registered

 
Common Stock
with a par value
of $2.50 per share
  New York Stock Exchange
Chicago Stock Exchange
Pacific Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     Yes ü No....

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S–K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10–K or any amendment to this Form 10–K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

     Yes ü No....

As of March 14, 2003, 223,608,868 shares of common stock were outstanding. The aggregate market value of the common stock of CNA Financial Corporation held by non–affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2002 was approximately $592 million based on the closing price of $26.50 per share of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 28, 2002.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE:

     Portions of the CNA Financial Corporation Proxy Statement prepared for the 2003 annual meeting of shareholders, pursuant to Regulation 14A, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.



 


PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART IV
ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES, EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATIONS


Table of Contents

         
Item       Page
Number       Number

     
    PART I    
1.   Business   3
2.   Properties   11
3.   Legal Proceedings   11
4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   11
    PART II    
5.   Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters   12
6.   Selected Financial Data   14
7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   15
7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk   90
8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   96
9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   182
    PART III    
10.   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant   183
11.   Executive Compensation   184
12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management   184
13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions   184
14.   Controls and Procedures   184
    PART IV    
15.   Financial Statements, Schedules, Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K   185

 


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

CNA Financial Corporation (CNAF) was incorporated in 1967 and is an insurance holding company whose primary subsidiaries consist of property and casualty and life and group insurance companies. Collectively, CNAF and its subsidiaries are referred to as CNA or the Company. CNA’s property and casualty insurance operations are conducted by Continental Casualty Company (CCC), incorporated in 1897, and its affiliates, and The Continental Insurance Company (CIC), organized in 1853, and its affiliates. Life and group insurance operations are conducted by Continental Assurance Company (CAC), incorporated in 1911, and its affiliates, Valley Forge Life Insurance Company (VFL), incorporated in 1956, and CNA Group Life Assurance Company (CNAGLA), incorporated in 2000. CIC became an affiliate of the Company in 1995 as a result of the acquisition of The Continental Corporation (Continental). The principal business of Continental is the ownership of a group of property and casualty insurance companies, mainly CIC and its affiliates.

CNA serves a wide variety of customers, including small, medium and large businesses; insurance companies; associations; professionals; and groups and individuals with a broad range of insurance and risk management products and services.

Insurance products include property and casualty coverages; life, accident and health insurance; retirement products and annuities; and property and casualty reinsurance. CNA services include risk management, information services, healthcare claims management, and claims administration. CNA products and services are marketed through independent agents, brokers, managing general agents and direct sales.

Competition

The property and casualty and life and health insurance industry is highly competitive both as to rate and service. CNAF’s consolidated property and casualty subsidiaries compete not only with other stock insurance companies, but also with mutual insurance companies, reinsurance companies and other entities for both producers and customers. CNAF must continuously allocate resources to refine and improve its insurance and reinsurance products and services.

Rates among insurers vary according to the types of insurers and methods of operation. CNAF competes for business not only on the basis of rate, but also on the basis of availability of coverage desired by customers and quality of service, including claim adjustment services.

There are approximately 2,400 individual companies that sell property and casualty insurance in the United States. CNAF’s consolidated property and casualty subsidiaries ranked as the ninth largest property and casualty insurance organization in the United States based upon 2001 statutory net written premiums. CNA Re, the Company’s principal property and casualty assumed reinsurance operation, ranked as the 14th largest property and casualty reinsurance organization in the United States based upon 2001 statutory net written premiums.

There are approximately 990 companies selling life and heath insurance in the United States. CNA’s consolidated life insurance companies are ranked as the 51st largest life-health insurance organization in the United States based on 2001 statutory net written premiums.

3


Table of Contents

The commercial property and casualty markets continue to realize significant rate increases while simultaneously using stricter underwriting criteria and requiring higher retention amounts for policyholders to further mitigate risk. The markets focus on underwriting profitability and the heightened perception of risk indicate the hard market will likely continue well into 2003. The reinsurance markets are also experiencing rate increases, however, not to the extent experienced by the direct commercial markets.

Regulation

The insurance industry is subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation and supervision throughout the United States. Each state has established supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relative to licensing insurers and agents, approving policy forms, establishing reserve requirements, fixing minimum interest rates for accumulation of surrender values and maximum interest rates of policy loans, prescribing the form and content of statutory financial reports and regulating solvency and the type and amount of investments permitted. Such regulatory powers also extend to premium rate regulations, which require that rates not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. In addition to regulation of dividends by insurance subsidiaries, intercompany transfers of assets may be subject to prior notice or approval by the state insurance regulators, depending on the size of such transfers and payments in relation to the financial position of the insurance affiliates making the transfer or payments.

Insurers are also required by the states to provide coverage to insureds who would not otherwise be considered eligible by the insurers. Each state dictates the types of insurance and the level of coverage that must be provided to such involuntary risks. CNA’s share of these involuntary risks is mandatory and generally a function of its respective share of the voluntary market by line of insurance in each state.

Insurance companies are subject to state guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments. Guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments are levied by the state departments of insurance to cover claims of insolvent insurers.

Reform of the U.S. tort liability system is another issue facing the insurance industry. Over the last decade, many states have passed some type of reform, but more recently, a number of state courts have modified or overturned these reforms. Additionally, new causes of action and theories of damages continue to be proposed in state court actions or by legislatures. Continued unpredictability in the law means that insurance underwriting and rating is expected to continue to be difficult in commercial lines, professional liability and some specialty coverages.

Although the Federal Government and its regulatory agencies do not directly regulate the business of insurance, federal legislative and regulatory initiatives can impact the insurance business in a variety of ways. These initiatives and legislation include tort reform proposals; proposals to overhaul the Superfund hazardous waste removal and liability statutes and various tax proposals affecting insurance companies. In 1999, Congress passed the Financial Services Modernization or “Gramm-Leach-Bliley” Act (GLB Act), which repealed portions of the Glass-Steagall Act and enabled closer relationships between banks and insurers. Although “functional regulation” was preserved by the GLB Act for state oversight of insurance, additional financial services modernization legislation could include provisions for an alternate federal system of regulation for insurance companies.

4


Table of Contents

CNA and the insurance industry incurred substantial losses related to the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center disaster and related events. For the most part, the Company believes the industry was able to absorb the loss of capital from these losses, but the capacity to withstand the effect of any additional terrorism events was significantly diminished.

CNAF’s domestic insurance subsidiaries are subject to risk-based capital requirements. Risk-based capital is a method developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to determine the minimum amount of statutory capital appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations in consideration of its size and risk profile. The formula for determining the amount of risk-based capital specifies various factors, weighted based on the perceived degree of risk, which are applied to certain financial balances and financial activity. The adequacy of a company’s actual capital is evaluated by a comparison to the risk-based capital results, as determined by the formula. Companies below minimum risk-based capital requirements are classified within certain levels, each of which determines a specified level of regulatory attention applicable to a company. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, all of CNAF’s domestic insurance subsidiaries exceeded the minimum risk-based capital requirements.

Subsidiaries with insurance operations outside the United States are also subject to regulation in the countries in which they operate. CNA has operations in the United Kingdom, Canada, and other countries.

Terrorism

On November 26, 2002, the President of the United States of America, George W. Bush, signed into law the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (the Act), which establishes a program within the Department of the Treasury under which the Federal Government will share the risk of loss from future terrorist attacks with the insurance industry. The Act terminates on December 31, 2005. Each participating insurance company must pay a deductible before Federal Government assistance becomes available. This deductible is based on a percentage of direct earned premiums for commercial insurance lines from the previous calendar year, and rises from 1% from date of enactment to December 31, 2002 (the Transition Period) to 7% during the first subsequent calendar year, 10% in year two and 15% in year three. For losses in excess of a company’s deductible, the Federal Government will cover 90% of the excess losses, while companies retain the remaining 10%. Losses covered by the program will be capped annually at $100 billion; above this amount, insurers are not liable for covered losses and Congress is to determine the procedures for and the source of any payments. Amounts paid by the Federal Government under the program over certain phased limits are to be recouped by the Department of the Treasury through policy surcharges, which cannot exceed 3% of annual premium.

Insurance companies providing commercial property and casualty insurance are required to participate in the program, but it does not cover life or health insurance products. State law limitations applying to premiums and policies for terrorism coverage are not generally affected under the program, but they are pre-empted in relation to prior approval requirements for rates and forms. The Act has policyholder notice requirements in order for insurers to be reimbursed for terrorism-related losses and, from the date of enactment until December 31, 2004, a mandatory offer requirement for terrorism coverage, although it may be rejected by insureds. The Secretary of the Department of the Treasury has discretion to extend this offer requirement until December 31, 2005.

5


Table of Contents

While the Act provides the property and casualty industry with an increased ability to withstand the effect of a terrorist event during the next three years, given the unpredictability of the nature, targets, severity or frequency of potential terrorist events, the Company’s results of operations or equity could nevertheless be materially adversely impacted by them. The Company is attempting to mitigate this exposure through its underwriting practices, policy terms and conditions (where applicable) and the use of reinsurance. In addition, under state laws, the Company is generally prohibited from excluding terrorism exposure from its primary workers compensation, individual life and group life and health policies, and is also prohibited from excluding coverage for fire losses following a terrorist event in a number of states.

Reinsurers’ obligations for terrorism-related losses under reinsurance agreements are not covered by the Act. The Company’s current reinsurance arrangements either exclude terrorism coverage or significantly limit the level of coverage.

Reinsurance

Information on CNA’s reinsurance activities is set forth in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) included under Item 7 and in Note H of the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Employee Relations

As of December 31, 2002, CNA had approximately 15,500 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees and has experienced satisfactory labor relations. CNA has never had work stoppages due to labor disputes. During 2001, CNA announced two restructuring plans, which included FTE reductions of approximately 1,650 positions. See the MD&A included under Item 7 and Note O of the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for further discussion regarding the restructuring plans.

CNA has comprehensive benefit plans for substantially all of its employees, including retirement plans, savings plans, disability programs, group life programs and group healthcare programs. See Note J of the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for further discussion of CNA’s benefit plans.

Business Segments

CNA conducts its operations through five operating segments: Standard Lines, Specialty Lines, CNA Re, Group Operations and Life Operations. These segments are managed separately because of differences in their product lines and markets. In addition to these five operating segments, certain other activities are managed and reported in the Corporate and Other segment. Discussions of each segment including the products offered, the customers served and the distribution channels used are set forth in the MD&A included under Item 7 and in Note N of the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

6


Table of Contents

Supplementary Insurance Data

The following table sets forth supplementary insurance data:

Supplementary Insurance Data

                           
      2002   2001   2000
Years ended December 31  
 
 
(In millions, except ratio information)           Restated (a)   Restated (a)
Trade Ratios – GAAP basis (b)
                       
 
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
    79.4 %     125.2 %     81.1 %
 
Expense ratio
    29.3       36.7       30.4  
 
Dividend ratio
    0.9       1.5       0.9  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
Combined ratio
    109.6 %     163.4 %     112.4 %
 
 
   
     
     
 
Trade Ratios – Statutory basis (b)
                       
 
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio
    79.2 %     126.2 %     80.4 %
 
Expense ratio
    30.1       32.3       33.3  
 
Dividend ratio
    1.0       1.7       1.2  
 
 
   
     
     
 
 
Combined Ratio
    110.3 %     160.2 %     114.9 %
 
 
   
     
     
 
Individual Life and Group Life Insurance Inforce
                       
 
Individual life (c)
  $ 345,272     $ 426,822     $ 462,799  
 
Group life
    92,479       70,910       71,982  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Total
  $ 437,751     $ 497,732     $ 534,781  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Other Data – Statutory basis (d)
                       
 
Property and casualty companies’ capital and surplus (e)
  $ 6,836     $ 6,241     $ 8,373  
 
Life and group companies’ capital and surplus
    1,645       1,752       1,274  
 
Property and casualty companies’ written premiums to surplus ratio
    1.3       1.3       1.1  
 
Life and group companies’ capital and surplus-percent to total liabilities
    21.0 %     25.3 %     24.5 %
 
Participating policyholders-percent of gross life insurance inforce
    0.5 %     0.4 %     0.4 %

(a)   Restated to reflect an adjustment to the Company’s historical accounting for CNA’s investment in life settlement contracts and the related revenue recognition. See Note T of the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for further discussion.
 
(b)   Trade ratios reflect the results of CNA’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries. Trade ratios are industry measures of property and casualty underwriting results. The loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is the percentage of net incurred loss and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The primary difference in this ratio between accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and statutory accounting principles (SAP) is related to the treatment of active life reserves (ALR) related to long term care insurance products written in property and casualty insurance subsidiaries. For GAAP, ALR is classified as claim and claim adjustment expense reserves whereas for SAP, ALR is classified as unearned premium reserves. The expense ratio, using amounts determined in accordance with GAAP, is the percentage of underwriting and acquisition expenses, including the amortization of deferred acquisition expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio, using amounts determined in accordance with SAP, is the percentage of acquisition and underwriting expenses (with no deferral of acquisition expenses) to net written premiums. The dividend ratio, using amounts determined in accordance with GAAP, is the ratio of dividends incurred to net earned premiums. The dividend ratio, using amounts determined in accordance with SAP, is the ratio of dividends paid to net earned premiums. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss adjustment expense, expense and dividend ratios.
 
(c)   Lapse ratios for individual life insurance, as measured by surrenders and withdrawals as a percentage of average ordinary life insurance inforce, were 34.7%, 8.7% and 12.7% in 2002, 2001 and 2000. (The 2002 lapse ratio includes the novation of CNA's individual life reinsurance business. Excluding the novation, the 2002 lapse ratio was 7.6%. See Note P of the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for further discussion.)
 
(d)   Other data is determined in accordance with SAP. Life and group statutory capital and surplus as a percent of total liabilities is determined after excluding separate account liabilities and reclassifying the statutorily required Asset Valuation Reserve to surplus.
 
(e)   Surplus includes the property and casualty companies’ equity ownership of the life and group insurance subsidiaries.

7


Table of Contents

The following table displays the distribution of gross written premiums for CNA’s operations by geographic concentration:

Gross Written Premiums

                         
    Percent of Total
   
Years ended December 31   2002   2001   2000
   
 
 
Illinois
    9.1 %     8.3 %     9.2 %
California
    7.7       6.8       6.0  
New York
    7.2       7.9       7.3  
Florida
    6.7       6.2       4.8  
Texas
    6.2       5.8       4.7  
New Jersey
    4.6       4.4       3.4  
Pennsylvania
    4.5       4.3       3.8  
Maryland
    2.3       2.4       5.6  
United Kingdom
    1.7       3.3       5.3  
All other states, countries or political subdivisions (a)
    50.0       50.6       49.9  
 
   
     
     
 
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
   
     
     
 

(a)   No other individual state, country or political subdivision accounts for more than 3.0% of gross written premiums.

Approximately 3.5%, 4.8% and 8.2% of CNA’s gross written premiums were derived from outside of the United States for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. Premiums from any individual foreign country excluding the United Kingdom, which is stated in the table above, were not significant.

Property and Casualty Claim and Claim Adjustment Expenses

The following loss reserve development table illustrates the change over time of reserves established for property and casualty claim and claim adjustment expenses at the end of the preceding ten calendar years for CNA’s property and casualty insurance operations. The first section shows the reserves as originally reported at the end of the stated year. The second section, reading down, shows the cumulative amounts paid as of the end of successive years with respect to the originally reported reserve liability. The third section, reading down, shows re-estimates of the originally recorded reserves as of the end of each successive year, which is the result of the Company’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries’ expanded awareness of additional facts and circumstances that pertain to the unsettled claims. The last section compares the latest re-estimated reserves to the reserves originally established, and indicates whether the original reserves were adequate or inadequate to cover the estimated costs of unsettled claims.

The loss reserve development table for property and casualty companies is cumulative and, therefore, ending balances should not be added since the amount at the end of each calendar year includes activity for both the current and prior years.

8


Table of Contents

Schedule of Loss Reserve Development

                                                                                           
      1992 (a)   1993 (a)   1994 (a)   1995 (b)   1996   1997   1998   1999 (c)   2000   2001 (d)   2002 (e)
Calendar Year Ended  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In millions)                                                                                        
Originally reported gross reserves for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
          $ 20,812     $ 21,639     $ 31,044     $ 29,357     $ 28,533     $ 28,317     $ 26,631     $ 26,408     $ 29,551     $ 25,648  
Originally reported ceded recoverable
            2,491       2,705       6,089       5,660       5,326       5,424       6,273       7,568       11,798       10,583  
 
           
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Originally reported net reserves for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses
  $ 17,167     $ 18,321     $ 18,934     $ 24,955     $ 23,697     $ 23,207     $ 22,893     $ 20,358     $ 18,840     $ 17,753     $ 15,065  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Cumulative net paid as of:
                                                                                       
 
One year later
  $ 3,706     $ 3,629     $ 3,656     $ 6,510     $ 5,851     $ 5,954     $ 7,321     $ 6,546     $ 7,686     $ 5,981     $  
 
Two years later
    6,354       6,143       7,087       10,485       9,796       11,394       12,241       11,935       11,988              
 
Three years later
    8,121       8,764       9,195       13,363       13,602       14,423       16,020       15,247                    
 
Four years later
    10,241       10,318       10,624       16,271       15,793       17,042       18,271                          
 
Five years later
    11,461       11,378       12,577       17,947       17,736       18,568                                
 
Six years later
    12,308       13,100       13,472       19,465       18,878                                      
 
Seven years later
    13,974       13,848       14,394       20,410                                            
 
Eight years later
    14,640       14,615       15,024                                                  
 
Nine years later
    15,319       15,161                                                        
 
Ten years later
    15,805                                                              
Net reserves re-estimated as of:
                                                                                       
 
End of initial year
  $ 17,167     $ 18,321     $ 18,934     $ 24,955     $ 23,697     $ 23,207     $ 22,893     $ 20,358     $ 18,840     $ 17,753     $ 15,065  
 
One year later
    17,757       18,250       18,922       24,864       23,441       23,470       23,920       20,785       21,306       17,805        
 
Two years later
    17,728       18,125       18,500       24,294       23,102       23,717       23,774       22,903       21,377              
 
Three years later
    17,823       17,868       18,088       23,814       23,270       23,414       25,724       22,780                    
 
Four years later
    17,765       17,511       17,354       24,092       22,977       24,751       25,407                          
 
Five years later
    17,560       17,082       17,506       23,854       24,105       24,330