![]() |
|
|||
| |
|
|
||
| |
||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Management's Discussion and Analysis Net revenue for our Industrial Group in 2001 was $47.3 million, an increase of $12.8 million, or 37.5%, from $34.5 million in 2000. During May 2001, we entered into a new long-term contract with Dana, including the acquisition of certain manufacturing assets and inventory from Dana for approximately $11.5 million in cash. The assets are used to produce fully machined, medium and heavy-duty truck axle shafts and other drive train components for integration into subassemblies produced for leading truck manufacturers. This business generated outsourced services revenue of $17.7 million during 2001. Excluding the acquisition, the Industrial Group's net revenue declined $4.9 million in 2001 from the prior year. The decrease in net revenue was primarily due to a decline in outsourced services provided to customers in the heavy-duty truck market. Unfavorable market conditions that arose during the second half of 2000 for heavy-duty truck production resulted in an industry-wide market decrease of approximately 40% by the second half of 2001 and reduced the volume of axles we supplied to that market. Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2001 was $43.5 million, an increase of $3.2 million, or 8.0%, from $40.3 million in 2000. Gross margin in 2001 declined to 17.1% from 18.6% in 2000. Gross profit for our Electronics Group in 2001 was $37.4 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 3.1%, from $36.3 million in 2000. The increase in manufacturing services revenue generated an increase in gross profit of $3.8 million, while gross profit from other outsourced services decreased $0.6 million. Gross margin in 2001 declined to 18.0% from 19.9% in 2000. Manufacturing services comprised approximately 59% of our Electronics Group's revenue in 2001 as compared to approximately 51% in 2000. Gross margin from manufacturing services improved slightly over the prior year; however, since gross margin on manufacturing services is lower than other outsourced services, the change in revenue mix contributed to the decrease in gross margin. Another factor in the gross margin decline was a slight decrease in gross margin on other outsourced services, primarily due to adverse economic conditions impacting demand and pricing for certain services provided to our customers. Gross profit from product sales decreased $2.1 million during 2001, primarily due to reduced demand for certain product offerings. Gross profit for our Industrial Group in 2001 was $6.1 million, an increase of $2.1 million or 52.5% from $4.0 million in 2000. Excluding the new contract with Dana, gross profit declined $0.9 million in 2001 primarily due to the downturn of the heavy-duty truck market. The reduction in demand and corresponding impact on shipments occurred as our organizational infrastructure to support future growth plans was being developed. The increased cost structure associated with the additional people and systems required to meet future contractual requirements and the underabsorption of overhead due to the volume decline resulted in a decline in our gross margin, excluding the impact of the new contract with Dana, to 10.6% in 2001, as compared to 11.7% for the prior year. Gross margin for our Industrial Group during 2001, including the new contract with Dana, was 13.0%. Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense in 2001 was $26.1 million, or 10.3% of net revenue, as compared to $26.9 million, or 12.4% of net revenue in 2000. Although net revenue increased 17.6% from 2000 to 2001 and the new contract with Dana added approximately $1.0 million to selling, general and administrative expense during 2001, our total selling, general and administrative spending decreased by $0.8 million, or 2.8%. The decline in selling, general and administrative expense was primarily attributable to decreased selling expenses and commissions related to lower product sales for our Electronics Group, decreased marketing costs and cost reductions in both our Electronics Group and Industrial Group in response to the general weakness in the U.S. economy.
|
||||||||||||
| PAGE 30 |
xXXXXX
|
|||||||||||