back next

FLEETWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(2) Supplemental Financial Information

Earnings per share:

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The effect of convertible securities was anti-dilutive in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, and was, therefore, not considered when determining diluted earnings (loss). The effect of stock options was anti-dilutive in fiscal 2006 and 2005 and dilutive in 2004.

The table below shows the calculation components of both basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended April 30, 2006:

  2006   2005   2004
  (Amounts in thousands)
Income (loss) from continuing operations  $ (6,065 )    $ (72,577 )    $ 17,358   
Loss from discontinued operations   (22,372   (88,882   (39,619
Net loss $ (28,437 $ (161,459 $ (22,261
Weighted average shares outstanding used for basic earnings
    (loss) per share
  59,506     55,332     38,357  
Effect of dilutive employee stock options           985  
Weighted average shares outstanding used for dilutive earnings
    (loss) per share
  59,506     55,332     39,342  

Anti-dilutive securities outstanding as of the fiscal years ended April 30, 2006, April 24, 2005 and April 25, 2004 are as follows:

  2006   2005   2004
  (Amounts in thousands)
Options and warrants     4,546          5,753          5,963     
Convertible subordinated debentures   4,131     4,131     8,975  
Convertible senior subordinated debentures   8,503     8,503     8,503  

Common stock reserved for future issuance at April 30, 2006 was 17,180 shares.

Stock-based incentive compensation:

The Company accounts for stock-based incentive compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 18, using the intrinsic method under which no compensation cost is recognized for stock option grants because the options are granted at fair market value at the date of grant. Had compensation costs for these plans been determined using the fair value method, under which a compensation cost is recognized straight-line over the vesting period of the stock option based on its fair value at the date of grant, the Company’s net loss and loss per share would have been affected as indicated by the following table:

  Years Ended April
  2006   2005   2004
  (Amounts in thousands, except per
share data)
Net loss, as reported    $ (28,437 )        $ (161,459 )        $ (22,261 )    
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
    determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
    related tax effects
  (3,198   (4,020   (4,071
Pro forma net loss $ (31,635 $ (165,479 $ (26,332
Basic loss per share, as reported $ (.48 $ (2.92 $ (.58
Basic loss per share, pro forma $ (.53 $ (2.99 $ (.69
Diluted loss per share, as reported $ (.48 $ (2.92 $ (.57
Diluted loss per share, pro forma $ (.53 $ (2.99 $ (.67

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively: risk-free interest rates were 4.35 percent in 2006 and 4.0 percent in 2005 and 2004, expected dividend yields of 0.0 percent for all periods presented; expected lives of 4.22 years for 2006 and 4 years for 2005 and 2004, and an expected volatility of 44 percent for fiscal 2006 and 47 percent for fiscal 2005 and 79 percent for fiscal 2004.

Investment income:

Investment income for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the following:

  2006   2005   2004
  (Amounts in thousands)
Interest income    $ 5,461         $ 2,394         $ 2,632     
Gross realized gains on investments   28     34     35  
Gross realized losses on investments   2         (1
Investment management fees   (54   (43   (40
  $ 5,437   $ 2,385   $ 2,626  

Inventories:

Inventories at April 30, 2006 and April 24, 2005, consisted of the following:

  2006   2005
  (Amounts in thousands)
Manufacturing inventory
   Raw materials
   $ 126,060         $ 139,520     
   Work in process   38,989     40,736  
   Finished goods   12,783     53,335  
  $ 177,832   $ 233,591  

Most recreational vehicle and manufactured home components are readily available from a variety of sources. However, a few components are produced by only a small group of quality suppliers that have the capacity to supply large quantities on a national basis. Primarily, this occurs in the case of motor home chassis, where Spartan and Freightliner supply diesel-powered chassis, and Workhorse Custom Chassis and Ford Motor Company are the dominant suppliers of Class A gas chassis and Ford Motor Company is the dominant supplier of Class C chassis. Shortages, production delays or work stoppages by the employees of such suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our sales. If we cannot obtain an adequate chassis supply, this could result in a decrease in our sales and earnings.

continued >>
backnext