| |
2002 was an exceptionally challenging year. The U.S. economy remained mired
in weakness, resulting in softer conditions in the country’s
office markets. Job growth remained negative, vacancies were high,
leasing activity was lackluster and rents fell. As managers, we were
confronted with myriad challenges. While the results were disappointing
relative to our own expectations entering 2002, we continued to achieve
earnings growth for our shareholders, outperformed our competitors
in maintaining occupancy in our portfolio and expanded our important
services business, among many accomplishments.
This is not the first time we have faced a challenging environment. We
are celebrating our 40th year as a company and our 10th year on the New
York Stock Exchange. We‘ve seen a lot of changing conditions. One
of our strengths has been our success at managing these changes and rising
to these challenges. Throughout our history, the company has grown and
prospered, holding to our core values in a variety of economic cycles and
environments across a number of different markets.
| |
 |
 |
|
CarrAmerica has a history of strong performance. We have a passion for
service that builds tremendous customer loyalty and depth of experience
in each of our markets, giving us the ability to make sound judgements.
Our financial strength provides enormous resilience and enables us to take
a long-term view. The result was a commendable performance in light of
the tremendous challenges presented in 2002.
In this letter, we will review some of the key challenges of 2002 and the
ways in which our team at CarrAmerica has addressed them. In addition,
throughout this annual report, we’ll describe some of the wonderful
accomplishments of individuals in the company during the year. While it’s
difficult to look back on the year 2002 with genuine fondness, we have
much to celebrate.
Financial Performance
Funds from Operations (FFO) for 2002, including an $8.7 million charge
related to HQ Global lease guarantees, were $196.9 million or $3.31 per
adjusted share. That compares to $182.5 million or $2.64 per adjusted share
for 2001, which included an impairment loss of $42.2 million on our investment
in HQ Global. FFO for 2002, excluding the $8.7 million HQ Global lease
guarantee charge, would have been $205.6 million or $3.45 per adjusted
share, compared to FFO for 2001 which, excluding the $42.2 million HQ Global
investment impairment loss, would have been $224.7 million or $3.27 per
adjusted share, an increase of 5.5% per adjusted share.
Diluted earnings per share for 2002, including the $8.7 million HQ Global
lease guarantee charge, were $1.47 on net income of $109.3 million, compared
to diluted earnings per share of $0.71 on net income of $79.1 million for
2001, including the $42.2 million HQ Global investment impairment loss.
Diluted earnings per share for 2002, excluding the $8.7 million HQ Global
lease guarantee charge, would have been $1.64 on net income of $118.0 million,
compared to diluted earnings per share for 2001 which, excluding the $42.2
million HQ Global investment impairment loss, would have been $1.39 on
net income of $121.3 million.
We exited the year with a strong balance sheet, and as we look ahead to
2003, one of our primary goals will be to maintain that sound position.
Our financial strategy, particularly in this economic environment, is to
keep our debt level relatively flat as a percentage of total market capitalization.
We manage our balance sheet conservatively with an emphasis on financial
flexibility. Similar to most of our peers, we maintain 20% to 25% variable
rate debt relative to all of our borrowings to properly balance our exposure
to interest rates. This provided a meaningful amount of interest savings
over the course of the year. We maintain a $500 million line of credit
and keep substantial funds available in that vehicle to maintain strong
liquidity.
Although 2002 was a challenging year, we maintained strong dividend coverage
and a low dividend payout ratio. While we increased our dividend by 8.1%
in 2002, the percentage of FFO that we paid as dividends was 60%, which
is conservative compared to that of other REITs.
The Office Market
The operating environment in 2002 was an extremely difficult one. To make
matters worse, it came on the heels of 2001—a year when the industry
experienced the largest decline in occupancies across all markets in recent
history. As the economy continued to soften in 2002, we experienced an
environment characterized by high vacancies and low tenant demand for the
second consecutive year.
Companies reacted to the softness and uncertainty in their own businesses
by lowering their square footage requirements or delaying decisions to
lease office space for as long as possible. At year-end, market vacancies
were running in the 12% to 25% range across our 12 national markets, except
in a few key submarkets such as downtown Washington, D.C.
These soft market conditions lasted longer than we had anticipated. At
the beginning of 2002, we had expected vacancies to peak mid-year; however,
leasing activity during the second half of the year was lower than anticipated.
As rents continued to drop and demand remained low in most markets, the
leasing environment remained highly competitive.
Our people reacted to these conditions extremely well, due in large measure
to their experience and dedication, the quality of our portfolio and our
ability to respond aggressively to economic conditions. To minimize the
impact on occupancies, we took a realistic view of lease economics, emphasizing
occupancy above rental rates. To minimize the impact of potential credit
losses, we focused aggressively on getting ahead of credit issues, actively
managing and monitoring our receivables and the financial condition of
our tenants. Focusing on lease renewals well ahead of their scheduled lease
expirations and maintaining our strong local broker relationships were
fundamental to our aggressive pursuit of tenants. Never forgetting the
importance of work environments to our customers, we maintained our exacting
standards for the appearance of our properties and continued to improve
our responsiveness to customer needs through the use of our web-based InfoCentre
resource.
We are pleased with our performance given the difficult economic environment.
For the year, our average vacancy for the portfolio was 8%, compared to
17% for the industry as a whole. In an environment where there was little
leasing velocity, we leased more than 2.1 million square feet of space,
consistent with our average volume over the last three years of 2.4 million
square feet.
This year, our performance is unquestionably due to the sheer will, experience
and skills of CarrAmerica’s people. Our 780 employees were able to
call on their local knowledge and outstanding customer relationships to
outperform in our markets, find new growth opportunities in our services
businesses and continue to build shareholder value.
Investment and Development
With the poor performance of the broader equity markets along with low
interest rates, 2002 proved to be a competitive environment for real estate
investment. In fact, we were surprised by the strength of the investment
markets. With rents continuing to fall in many markets, we would have expected
a drop in office building values. On the contrary, in Washington, D.C.
and Southern California the price of office buildings went up by as much
as 20%.
| |
 |
 |
|
We entered the year
expecting to see some excellent values in the office real estate market.
Instead, the market was flooded with capital that kept
prices very high for quality, well-leased assets. As a result, we elected
to capitalize on very favorable pricing by selling three assets located
in Salt Lake City, Austin and Dallas. In each case, these sales were made
at a substantial gain to CarrAmerica. In Salt Lake City, we were able to
capitalize on eBay’s interest in purchasing a building they had leased
from us. That transaction resulted in a $10.7 million property sale to
eBay, representing a $3.3 million gain. In Texas, we sold a three-building,
600,000-square-foot complex—developed by CarrAmerica as a headquarters
facility for Nokia in Dallas—for $118.7 million, and we sold the
Harcourt Building in Austin for $38.5 million. In combination, the two
sales yielded a gain to CarrAmerica of more than $26 million.
In Washington, D.C., which remains the strongest commercial market in the
country, we sold a building in which CarrAmerica had invested $3 million
as a joint venture partner and achieved a gain of $5 million.
Combined, these sales resulted in net proceeds to CarrAmerica of $176.1
million and total gains of $34.7 million, which are not included in FFO.
The proceeds were used to invest in high-quality properties with the potential
for building value and generating strong returns. The largest of these
acquisitions was Canal Center in Alexandria, Virginia, a Class A multi-tenant
project consisting of five adjacent buildings totaling approximately 589,000
square feet, acquired at a price of $141.5 million. We also acquired three
properties in key West Coast markets. They include 3075 Hansen Way, a two-building
property in Stanford Research Park in Palo Alto for $31 million, and two
San Diego properties—Carroll Vista Center, an approximately 108,000-square-foot
property consisting of one biotech building and two office buildings for
$25 million and, for $19 million, 11119 North Torrey Pines Road, a 77,000-square-foot
building. All three properties are 100% occupied and situated in markets
with strong, long-term growth potential.
On the development side, construction on Terrell Place, a 534,000-square-foot
office, retail and residential project in downtown Washington, D.C., owned
in a joint venture with JPMorgan Fleming Asset Management, continued and
construction on several other projects was completed. We have continued
to focus on development management projects for customers, utilizing the
strength of our development team for the benefit of our customers. We have
a number of major projects underway including the Freedom Forum/Newseum
building on Pennsylvania Avenue; a building for the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) at 1900 Pennsylvania Avenue adjacent to its existing headquarters
at 700 19th Street in Washington, D.C.; an office building for Network
Associates in Plano, Texas; and the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center in the
dynamic biotech community of La Jolla, California. Through such projects,
we’re able to provide challenges for our talented development professionals
during down times, build relationships with important clients, generate
revenues and continue to build our reputation in key markets.
The Organization and Corporate Governance
We made several senior management appointments in 2002—appointments
that spotlight the talent we have within the company. As you can see by
the joint signature on this letter, Philip L. Hawkins was promoted to the
position of President and Chief Operating Officer and appointed to the
company’s Board of Directors in March 2002. With this appointment,
we recognized the exceptional leadership role Phil has played since 1998
as Chief Operating Officer of CarrAmerica. This is also an important milestone
in that it is the first time in our history that the company’s president
has not been a member of the Carr family.
Stephen E. Riffee was named Chief Financial Officer in March 2002, overseeing
all financial and capital operations. Steve has been with CarrAmerica since
1999, serving as Senior Vice President, Controller and Treasurer. Steve’s
extensive experience and leadership provide a significant contribution
to CarrAmerica. Over the past two years, he has been instrumental in strengthening
the company’s infrastructure, a process that included the establishment
of a Shared Service Center in 2001, which services all of our customers
and properties, facilitating the flow of information and accounting processes.
Our investments in infrastructure and technology are paying off in smoother
internal operations and operating efficiencies. The Shared Service Center
alone has saved us almost $3 million over the past year. These infrastructure
investments also improve our ability to serve a wide range of customers
and build third-party business. That business is particularly valuable
in this economic environment.
In addition, those infrastructure and technology improvements made it far
easier for us to manage the administrative and accounting changes brought
on by the new Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and new listing
standards proposed by the New York Stock Exchange.
These changes, of course, sprang from the call for corporate reforms that
surfaced in 2002 in the wake of highly publicized unethical conduct among
several high-profile executives and companies. We welcome the scrutiny
brought on by these events. We have always set high standards for our company
and our employees, and our commitment to ethical behavior extends beyond
regulatory compliance. Since our beginnings, doing the right thing on behalf
of our shareholders, employees and customers has been very much a part
of our culture as an organization. We feel strongly that promoting integrity
depends on creating such an environment, and we are committed to continuing
to do so.
To further our commitment to maintaining an environment where integrity
and ethics are woven into the fabric of our corporate culture, we implemented
several important corporate governance initiatives during 2002. Under the
leadership of our Board of Directors, we conducted an extensive review
of all of our corporate governance policies and processes. Following this
review, we took a number of steps, starting with expanding the mandate
of the Board’s Nominating Committee to include overseeing corporate
governance issues. Shortly thereafter, we approved Corporate Governance
Guidelines for the Board of Directors that covered a wide range of issues.
In addition, we reconstituted our Board committees to ensure that only
independent directors serve on the Audit, Executive Compensation, and Nominating
and Corporate Governance committees. Additionally, each of these committees
now has a charter that clearly defines its responsibilities. We also revised
our existing Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, extending it to the members
of the Board of Directors. Early in 2003, we developed and approved a Code
of Ethics for the CEO and senior financial officers. We believe that these
changes will have a positive and lasting impact on our corporate environment.
Looking Ahead to 2003
It is always difficult to predict the future, but particularly so in the
current environment. As we enter the new year, vacancies appear to have
peaked and we are seeing positive indicators in some of our markets. However,
the real estate industry tends to lag the overall economy, and we do not
expect a turnaround to have a significant positive impact on our industry
in 2003. Given that, in the year ahead, we will continue to manage our
balance sheet conservatively and continue to put a real emphasis on financial
flexibility and dividend coverage. We will continue to focus on our overriding
goal: to build long-term value for our shareholders.
We remain confident that we can continue to successfully compete and find
opportunity in our markets with the support of the most experienced and
knowledgeable employees in the business.
| |
|

Thomas A. Carr
Chairman of the Board |

Philip L. Hawkins
President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
| |

 |
(In thousands) |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
 |
 |
| |
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Real Estate Property
Operations |
$ |
523,601 |
$ |
494,749 |
$ |
503,191 |
| |
Real Estate Services |
$ |
26,172 |
$ |
31,037 |
$ |
24,538 |
| |
Net Income |
$ |
179,467 |
$ |
79,061 |
$ |
109,305 |
| |
Funds from Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Including HQ Global
Charges |
$ |
220,430 |
$ |
182,492 |
$ |
196,896 |
| |
Excluding HQ Global
Charges |
|
N/A |
$ |
224,741 |
$ |
205,589 |
| |
Rental Property (at cost) |
$ |
2,813,320 |
$ |
2,872,047 |
$ |
3,007,882 |
| |
Portfolio (consolidated square feet) |
|
20,439 |
|
20,293 |
|
20,303 |
| |
Total Market Capitalization(1) |
$ |
3,852,695 |
$ |
3,551,724 |
$ |
3,300,120 |
| |
Debt/Total Market Capitalization |
|
31.4% |
|
39.6% |
|
48.7% |
| |
(1)
Based on closing price of common stock on the last trading day
of the year. |
|
|