|
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
California Water Service Group:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that
California Water Service Group and subsidiaries maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based
on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). Management of California Water Service
Group is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
internal control over financial reporting of California Water Service
Group and subsidiaries based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial
reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that California Water Service
Group and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control
– Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. Also, in our opinion,
California Water Service Group and subsidiaries maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated
balance sheets of California Water Service Group and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
income, common stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2005, and our report dated March 9, 2006, expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. |
 |
|
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
|