|
Pursuant
to Delaware law and certain indemnification agreements between
the Company and each of its current and former officers and
directors, the Company is obligated to indemnify its current
and former officers and directors for certain liabilities
arising from their employment with or service to the Company.
This includes the costs of defending against the claims asserted
in the above-referenced actions and any amounts paid in settlement
or other disposition of such actions on behalf of these individuals.
The Company’s obligations do not permit or require it to provide
such indemnification to any such individual who is adjudicated
to be liable for fraudulent or criminal conduct. Although
the Company has purchased directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance to reimburse it for the costs of indemnification
for its directors and officers, the coverage under its policies
is limited. Moreover, although the directors’ and officers’
insurance coverage presumes that 100 percent of the costs
incurred in defending claims asserted jointly against the
Company and its current and former directors and officers
are allocable to the individuals’ defense, the Company does
not have insurance to cover the costs of its own defense or
to cover any liability for any claims asserted against it.
The Company has not set aside any financial reserves relating
to any of the above-referenced actions.
On May
26, 1999, the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding
regarding the settlement of pending private securities and
related litigation against the Company. The settlement will
resolve all material litigation arising out of the restatement
of the Company’s financial statements that was publicly announced
in November, 1997. In accordance with the terms of the memorandum
of understanding, the Company paid approximately $3.2 million
in cash during the second quarter of 1999 and an additional
amount of approximately $13.8 million of insurance proceeds
was contributed directly by certain insurance carriers on
behalf of certain of the Company’s current and former officers
and directors. The Company will also contribute a minimum
of 9 million shares of the Company’s common stock, which will
have a guaranteed value of $91 million for a maximum term
of one year from the date of the final approval of the settlement
by the courts.
The
Company’s former independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP,
will pay $34 million in cash. The total amount of the settlement,
which has received final approval from both the federal and
state courts will be $142 million.
In July
1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued
a formal order of private investigation of the Company and
certain unidentified other entities and persons with respect
to non-specified accounting matters, public disclosures and
trading activity in the Company’s securities. During the course
of the investigation, the Company learned that the investigation
concerned the events leading to the restatement of the Company’s
financial statements, including fiscal years 1994, 1995 and
1996, that was publicly announced in November 1997. The Company
and the SEC have entered into a settlement of the investigation
as to the Company. Pursuant to the settlement, the Company
consented to the entry by the SEC of an Order Instituting
Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease
and Desist Order (the “Order”). The Order was issued by the
SEC on January 11, 2000. Pursuant to the Order, the Company
neither admitted nor denied the findings, except as to jurisdiction,
contained in the Order. The Order directs the Company to cease
and desist from committing or causing any violation, and any
future violation, of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933 (“Securities Act”), and Sections 10(b), 13(a) and 13(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and
Rules 10b-5, 12b-20 13a-1, 13a-13 and 13b2-1 under the Exchange
Act. Pursuant to the Order, the Company also is required to
cooperate in the SEC’s continuing investigation of other entities
and persons. As a consequence of the issuance of the Order,
the Company is statutorily disqualified, pursuant to Section
27A(G)(1)(A)(ii) of the Securities Act and Section 21E(b)(1)(A)(ii)
of the Exchange Act, for a period of three years from the
date of the issuance of the Order, from relying on the protections
of the “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements set forth
in Section 27(A)(c) of the Securities Act and Section 21(E)(c)
of the Exchange Act.
|