Notes pg 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  

 
 
$ in millions, except per share amounts
 
Change in Accounting Principles – Goodwill and Vendor Allowances
The adoption of SFAS No. 142 related to goodwill described above has been accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and applied cumulatively as if the change had occurred at March 3, 2002, the beginning of fiscal 2003.

In September 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) released Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor, with final consensus reached in March 2003. EITF No. 02-16 establishes the accounting standards for recording vendor allowances in a retailer’s income statement.

During fiscal 2003, we changed our method of accounting for vendor allowances in accordance with EITF No. 02-16. Based on the new standard, vendor allowances are considered a reduction in the price of a vendor’s products or services and recorded as a component of cost of goods sold when the related product or service is sold, unless the allowance represents a reimbursement of a specific, incremental and identifiable cost incurred to sell a vendor’s products or services. We continue to record vendor allowances that represent a reimbursement of a specific, incremental and identifiable cost incurred to sell a vendor’s products or services as a reduction of the related cost in our statement of earnings. Previously, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we had recognized and classified a majority of vendor allowances as a reduction of advertising costs in SG&A. The cumulative effect of the change in method of accounting for vendor allowances resulted in an after-tax, non-cash charge to net earnings of $50, of which $8 was associated with Musicland. The effect of the change on the fiscal year ended March 1, 2003, was a decrease in net earnings from continuing operations of $1. As described in note 2, we have classified the results of operations of our Musicland subsidiary as discontinued operations, including the related cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle.

Reclassifications
Certain previous year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation. This included classifying the results of operations of Musicland as discontinued operations (see note 2). These reclassifications had no impact on net earnings, financial position or cash flows.

Pending Accounting Standards
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN No. 46), which requires the consolidation of variable interest entities. FIN No. 46 is applicable to financial statements to be issued by us beginning with the second quarter of fiscal 2004. However, disclosures are required currently if we expect to consolidate any variable interest entities. At this time we do not believe that any variable interest entities will be included in our consolidated financial statements as a result of adopting FIN No. 46.

2. Discontinued Operations
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we committed to a plan to sell our interest in Musicland. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we have classified the results of operations of Musicland in discontinued operations. The net assets associated with Musicland are currently considered “held-for-sale.”

During fiscal 2003, we recorded an after-tax, non-cash impairment charge of $308 for the full write-off of goodwill related to our acquisition of Musicland. In addition, we recorded an after-tax, non-cash charge of $8 for the change in our method of accounting for vendor allowances. The charges are classified as cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles in discontinued operations (see note 1).

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, we recorded an impairment charge of $166 before tax related to a reassessment of the carrying value of Musicland’s long-lived assets. We determined fair values utilizing widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows. We based fair values on the then-current expectations for the business in light of the then-existing retail environment and the uncertainty associated with future trends in prerecorded music products. >>

 
back to top