Change in Accounting
Principles – Goodwill and Vendor Allowances
The adoption of SFAS No. 142 related to goodwill described above has
been accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle and applied cumulatively as if the change had occurred at
March 3, 2002, the beginning of fiscal 2003.
In September 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) released
Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration
Received from a Vendor, with final consensus reached in March
2003. EITF No. 02-16 establishes the accounting standards for
recording vendor allowances in a retailer’s income statement.
During fiscal 2003, we changed our
method of accounting for vendor allowances in accordance with EITF No.
02-16. Based on the new standard, vendor allowances are considered a
reduction in the price of a vendor’s products or services and recorded
as a component of cost of goods sold when the related product or
service is sold, unless the allowance represents a reimbursement of a
specific, incremental and identifiable cost incurred to sell a
vendor’s products or services. We continue to record vendor allowances
that represent a reimbursement of a specific, incremental and
identifiable cost incurred to sell a vendor’s products or services as
a reduction of the related cost in our statement of earnings.
Previously, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), we had recognized and classified a majority of
vendor allowances as a reduction of advertising costs in SG&A. The
cumulative effect of the change in method of accounting for vendor
allowances resulted in an after-tax, non-cash charge to net earnings
of $50, of which $8 was associated with Musicland. The effect of the
change on the fiscal year ended March 1, 2003, was a decrease in net
earnings from continuing operations of $1. As described in note
2, we
have classified the results of operations of our Musicland subsidiary
as discontinued operations, including the related cumulative effect of
the change in accounting principle.
Reclassifications
Certain previous year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current-year presentation. This included classifying the results of
operations of Musicland as discontinued operations (see note
2). These
reclassifications had no impact on net earnings, financial position or
cash flows.
Pending Accounting Standards
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities (FIN No. 46), which requires the
consolidation of variable interest entities. FIN No. 46 is applicable
to financial statements to be issued by us beginning with the second
quarter of fiscal 2004. However, disclosures are required currently if
we expect to consolidate any variable interest entities. At this time
we do not believe that any variable interest entities will be included
in our consolidated financial statements as a result of adopting FIN
No. 46.
2. Discontinued Operations
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we committed to a plan to
sell our interest in Musicland. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we
have classified the results of operations of Musicland in discontinued
operations. The net assets associated with Musicland are currently
considered “held-for-sale.”
During fiscal 2003, we recorded an after-tax, non-cash impairment
charge of $308 for the full write-off of goodwill related to our
acquisition of Musicland. In addition, we recorded an after-tax,
non-cash charge of $8 for the change in our method of accounting for
vendor allowances. The charges are classified as cumulative effects of
changes in accounting principles in discontinued operations (see note
1).
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, in accordance with SFAS No.
144, we recorded an impairment charge of $166 before tax related to a
reassessment of the carrying value of Musicland’s long-lived assets.
We determined fair values utilizing widely accepted valuation
techniques, including discounted cash flows. We based fair values on
the then-current expectations for the business in light of the
then-existing retail environment and the uncertainty associated with
future trends in prerecorded music products. >> |