|
notes to consolidated financial statements
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company
and all majority-owned subsidiaries. Prior to November 30, 2001,
the company accounted for its investment in Henkel-Ecolab under the
equity method of accounting. As discussed further in Note 5, on
November 30, 2001, the company acquired the remaining 50 percent
interest of the European joint venture that it did not previously own, and
Henkel-Ecolab became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company.
Because the company consolidates its international operations on the
basis of their November 30 fiscal year ends, the balance sheet of the
European operations was consolidated with the company's balance
sheet beginning with year-end 2001. The income statement for the
European operations was consolidated with the company's operations
beginning in 2002. International subsidiaries are included in the financial
statements on the basis of their November 30 fiscal year-ends to
facilitate the timely inclusion of such entities in the company's consolidated
financial reporting. All intercompany transactions and profits are
eliminated in consolidation.
Financial position and results of operations of the company's international
subsidiaries generally are measured using local currencies as the
functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated
at the exchange rates in effect at each fiscal year end. The translation
adjustments related to assets and liabilities that arise from the
use of differing exchange rates from period to period are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders' equity.
The cumulative translation gain as of year-end 2003 was $16,064,000.
The cumulative translation loss as of year-end 2002 and 2001 was
$74,537,000 and $95,037,000, respectively. Income statement
accounts are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing
during the year. The different exchange rates from period to period
impact the amount of reported income from the company's international
operations.
Cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of
three months or less when purchased.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Domestic chemical
inventory costs are determined on a last-in, first-out (lifo) basis. Lifo
inventories represented 29 percent, 30 percent and 29 percent of consolidated
inventories at year-end 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. All
other inventory costs are determined on a first-in, first-out (fifo) basis.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Merchandising
equipment consists principally of various systems that dispense the
company's cleaning and sanitizing products and dishwashing machines.
The dispensing systems are accounted for on a mass asset basis,
whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and
written off when fully depreciated. Depreciation is charged to operations
using the straight-line method over the assets' estimated useful lives
ranging from 5 to 50 years for buildings, 3 to 7 years for merchandising
equipment and 3 to 11 years for machinery and equipment.
Goodwill and other intangible assets arise principally from business
acquisitions. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Other intangible assets
include primarily customer relationships, trademarks, patents and other
technology. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated economic lives. The weighted-average useful
life of other intangible assets was 12 years as of December 31, 2003.
The straight-line method of amortization reflects an appropriate
allocation of the cost of the intangible assets to earnings in proportion
to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each
reporting period. Total amortization expense related to other intangible
assets during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was
approximately $21.2 million, $16.9 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2003, future estimated amortization expense
related to amortizable other identifiable intangible assets for each of the
next five years will be:
| |
 |
| 2004 |
$21,341 |
| 2005 |
19,696 |
| 2006 |
19,236 |
| 2007 |
18,692 |
| 2008 |
17,266 |
 |
The company periodically reviews its long-lived assets for impairment
and assesses whether significant events or changes in business
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying
amount of an asset exceeds the anticipated future undiscounted cash
flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded, if any, is
calculated by the excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value.
The company recognizes revenue as services are performed or on
product sales at the time title transfers to the customer. The company
records estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and
incentive offerings, including pricing arrangements, promotions and
other volume-based incentives at the time of sale.
The computations of the basic and diluted income from continuing
operations per share amounts were as follows:
| 2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
 |
Income from continuing operations before change in accounting |
$277,348 |
$211,890 |
$188,170 |
 |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Basic |
259,454 |
258,147 |
254,832 |
Effect of dilutive stock options and awards |
3,283 |
3,427 |
5,023 |
 |
| Diluted |
262,737 |
261,574 |
259,855 |
 |
Income from continuing operations before change in accounting per common share Basic |
$ 1.07 |
$ 0.82 |
$ 0.74 |
| Diluted |
$ 1.06 |
$ 0.81 |
$ 0.72 |
 |
All number of share and per share data for all periods presented
have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split described in
Note 9.
Restricted stock awards of approximately 52,800 shares for 2003,
203,550 shares for 2002 and 347,100 shares for 2001 were excluded
from the computation of basic weighted-average shares outstanding
because such shares were not yet vested at those dates.
Stock options to purchase approximately 4.3 million shares for
2003, 8.4 million shares for 2002 and 7.9 million shares for 2001 were
not dilutive and, therefore, were not included in the computations of
diluted common shares outstanding.
The company measures compensation cost for its stock incentive and
option plans using the intrinsic value-based method of accounting.
Had the company used the fair value-based method of accounting
to measure compensation expense for its stock incentive and option
plans and charged compensation cost against income, over the vesting
periods, based on the fair value of options at the date of grant, net
income and the related basic and diluted per common share amounts
for 2003, 2002 and 2001 would have been reduced to the pro forma
amounts in the following table:
| 2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
 |
| Net income, as reported |
$277,348 |
$209,770 |
$188,170 |
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax |
941 |
1,688 |
2,542 |
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under fair value-based method, net of tax |
(17,699) |
(15,145) |
(13,172) |
 |
| Pro forma net income |
$260,590 |
$196,313 |
$177,540 |
 |
Basic net income per common share As reported |
$ 1.07 |
$ 0.81 |
$ 0.74 |
| Pro forma |
1.00 |
0.76 |
0.70 |
Diluted net income per common share As reported |
1.06 |
0.80 |
0.72 |
| Pro forma |
$ 0.99 |
$ 0.75 |
$ 0.68 |
 |
Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements contains the significant
assumptions used in determining the underlying fair value of
options.
For the company, comprehensive income includes net income, foreign
currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liabilities, gains and
losses on derivative instruments designated and effective as cash flow
hedges and nonderivative instruments designated and effective as foreign
currency net investment hedges that are charged or credited to the
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account in shareholders'
equity.
The company uses foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate
swaps and foreign currency debt to manage risks generally associated
with foreign exchange rates, interest rates and net investments in foreign
operations. The company does not hold derivative financial instruments
of a speculative nature. On the date that the company enters into
a derivative contract, it designates the derivative as (1) a hedge of (a)
the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or (b) an unrecognized
firm commitment (a “fair value” hedge), (2) a hedge of (a) a forecasted
transaction or (b) the variability of cash flows that are to be received or
paid in connection with a recognized asset or liability (a “cash flow” hedge); or (3) a foreign-currency fair-value or cash flow hedge (a “foreign
currency” hedge). The company formally documents all relationships
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge
transactions. The company also formally assesses (both at the hedge's
inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are
used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting
changes in the fair value or cash flows of hedged items and whether
those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future
periods. When it is determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to
be) highly effective as a hedge, the company will discontinue hedge
accounting prospectively. The company believes that on an ongoing
basis its portfolio of derivative instruments will generally be highly
effective as hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness during the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was not significant.
All of the company's derivatives are recognized on the balance
sheet at their fair value. The earnings impact resulting from the change
in fair value of the derivative instruments is recorded in the same line
item in the consolidated statement of income as the underlying exposure
being hedged.
The preparation of the company's financial statements requires management
to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 was subsequently revised in December 2003
by the issuance of FIN 46R to provide additional guidance on the application
and scope of FIN 46. FIN 46 and FIN 46R provide accounting
requirements for a business enterprise to consolidate related entities in
which it is determined to be the primary beneficiary as a result of its
variable economic interests. The interpretation provides guidance in
judging multiple economic interests in an entity and in determining the
primary beneficiary.
The interpretations outline consolidation and disclosure requirements
for variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The company has reviewed
the consolidation and disclosure requirements of FIN 46 and FIN 46R
and determined that they have no current impact on the company.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends
and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
and for hedging activities under SFAS No.133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The company has
reviewed the requirements of this standard and it has no current impact
on the company.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for
Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and
Equity. This statement established standards for how an issuer classifies
and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of
both liabilities and equity. The company does not have any financial
instruments subject to SFAS No. 150 as of December 31, 2003.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to SFAS 132, Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits, which requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations,
cash flows, and periodic benefit costs of defined benefit pension
plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. Note 15 presents
the new disclosure requirements for the company's domestic plans.
Disclosure of additional information about foreign plans is not required
until the company's next fiscal year.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 includes a
reclassification of $12,522,000 of accumulated amortization to a longlived
asset that was previously classified as an other current liability to
be consistent with the current period presentation.
|