[Financial and Operating Highlights]
[IPSCO Product At-a-Glance]
[Features]
[Letter to our Shareholders]
[Letter from our Chairman]
[Governance at IPSCO]
[Our Responsibilities]
[Financial and Operating Review]
[Shareholder and Corporate Information]
[Shaping Their Future]
[Form 10-K]
[Printed Version]
Form 10K - Note 3 page 2/2
Print Section (PDF)    backPrevious | Nextnext

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has a deferred share unit plan as described in Note 15. Compensation expense equal to the amount deferred is recorded. The liability relating to the deferred share units is revalued quarterly based on the market value of the Company’s common shares and the resulting adjustment recorded in income.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Sales and related costs are recognized upon transfer of ownership which coincides with shipment of products to customers, where standard shipping terms are FOB shipping point, or based upon specific terms included in customer contracts. Products are shipped without right of return. Returns are accepted in limited circumstances, which historically, have been insignificant. Sales are recognized when collectibility is reasonably assured.

FREIGHT COSTS

Amounts billed to customers in a sales transaction related to shipping and handling are recorded as revenue. The Company reflects freight costs associated with shipping its products to customers as a component of cost of goods sold.

CREDIT RISK

Credit is extended by the Company based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial position, and generally, advance payment is not required. The Company provides for doubtful accounts equal to estimated collection losses that will be incurred in the collection of receivables. Estimated losses are based on a review by management of the current status of receivables, as well as historical collection experience.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

From time to time, the Company enters into hedging transactions in order to manage its exposure to changes in energy commodity prices and the relationship between the Canadian and U.S. dollars. For these cash flow hedge transactions, the Company records the fair value of the derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The derivative transactions are evaluated as effective or ineffective at inception and quarterly thereafter based on various factors including the creditworthiness of the counterparty and expectation of achieving forecast activity. The effective portions of the changes in the fair values of these derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive income and are reclassified to income in the period in which earnings are impacted by the hedged items. Any ineffectiveness is recorded in income as identified in the same financial statement line item as the underlying. Premiums paid with respect to derivatives are deferred and amortized to income over the term of the hedge. Assuming market prices remain constant with the prices at December 31, 2006 and 2005, $2,589 of the $4,602 loss and $4,630 of the $7,495 gain, respectively included in other comprehensive income is expected to be recognized in earnings over the next 12 months.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

The impact on the Company of accounting standards adopted in 2006 and accounting standards which have not been adopted due to delayed effective dates follow:

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (“Statement 158”). Statement 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively, “postretirement benefit plans”) to recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in the statement of financial positions, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year-end statement of financial position, and provide additional disclosures. On December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement 158. The effect of adopting Statement 158 on the Company’s financial condition at December 31, 2006 has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Statement 158 did not have an effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition at December 31, 2005 or 2004. Statement 158’s provisions regarding the change in the measurement date of postretirement benefit plans are not applicable as the Company already uses a measurement date of December 31 for its pension plans. See Note 10 for further discussion of the effect of adopting Statement 158 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)) using the modified prospective approach. Prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for share-based awards in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Under the modified prospective approach, SFAS 123(R) applies to new awards and to awards outstanding on January 1, 2006 that are subsequently modified, repurchased or cancelled. Under the modified prospective approach, compensation cost recognized in the first quarter 2006 included compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with provisions of SFAS 123(R). The impact of adopting SFAS 123(R) was not material to the financial statements of the Company.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company will adopt FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007, as required. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 will be recorded in retained earnings. However, the Company does not expect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have a significant impact, if any, on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its financial position and results of operations.

RECLASSIFICATION

Certain of the prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted for the current year.

Print Section (PDF)    backPrevious | Top | Nextnext
This is an interactive electronic version of IPSCO's 2006 Annual Report, and it is intended to be complete and accurate. The contents of this version are qualified in their entirety by reference to the printed version. A reproduction of the printed version is available in PDF format on this Web site.