|
|
|
On March 17, 2000, BJ Services Company filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court in Houston, Texas. The lawsuit alleges that a well fracturing fluid system used by Halliburton Energy Services infringes a patent issued to BJ in January 2000 for a method of well fracturing using a specific fracturing fluid. A jury trial is scheduled for March 2002. We expect BJ will seek several hundred million dollars of damages and an injunction to prevent us from using one of our competing fracturing fluids. We also expect BJ to allege that we intentionally infringed its patent and to seek treble damages. We do not believe we have infringed BJs patent and we have filed a counterclaim that the patent is invalid and unenforceable. We also believe that BJs large damage claims are unsupportable. We believe that we have no liability for infringement of the BJ patent. However, if the patent is found to be enforceable and we are found to have infringed it, we could be held liable for damages in an amount that has a material adverse effect on our financial position and the results of our operations.
We are subject to numerous environmental legal and regulatory requirements related to our operations worldwide. We take a proactive approach to evaluating and addressing the environmental impact of our operations. Each year we assess and remediate contaminated properties in order to avoid future liabilities and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. On occasion we are involved in specific environmental litigation and claims, including the clean-up of properties we own or have operated as well as efforts to meet or correct compliance-related matters.
We also incur costs related to compliance with ever-changing environmental, legal and regulatory requirements in the jurisdictions where we operate. It is very difficult to quantify the potential liabilities. We do not expect these expenditures to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.
During the second quarter of 2001, we accrued $15 million for environmental matters related to liabilities retained on properties included in the sale of Dresser Equipment Group. Our accrued liabilities for environmental matters were $49 million as of December 31, 2001 and $31 million as of December 31, 2000.
We are a party to various other legal proceedings. We expense the cost of legal fees related to these proceedings. We believe any liabilities we may have arising from these proceedings will not be material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In the normal course of business, we have agreements with banks under which approximately $1.4 billion of letters of credit or bank guarantees were issued, including $241 million which relate to our joint ventures operations. In addition, $320 million of these financial instruments include provisions that allow the banks to require cash collateralization if debt ratings of either rating agency fall below the rating of BBB by Standard & Poors or Baa2 by Moodys and $149 million where banks may require cash collateralization if either debt rating falls below investment grade. These letters of credit and bank guarantees relate to our guaranteed performance or retention payments under our long-term contracts and self-insurance. In the past, no significant claims have been made against these financial instruments. We do not anticipate material losses to occur as a result of these financial instruments.
Basic income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share includes additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potential common shares with a dilutive effect had been issued. Included in the computation of diluted income per share are rights we issued in connection with the PES acquisition for between 850,000 and 2.1 million shares of Halliburton common stock. Excluded from the computation of diluted income per share are options to purchase 10 million shares of common stock in 2001, 1 million shares in 2000 and 2 million shares in 1999. These options were outstanding during these years, but were excluded because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.
|
|
|