Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is assessed at the location level, considering the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the asset’s remaining life. If estimated cash flows are insufficient to recover the investment, an impairment loss is recognized based on the fair value of the asset less any costs of disposition. An impairment loss of $19.3 million was recognized in 2001 relating to certain under-performing retail stores. Impairment charges of $63.0 million were also recognized in 2000.

Facility Closure Costs: The Company regularly reviews store performance against expectations and closes stores not meeting investment standards. Costs associated with closures resulting from such on-going performance reviews, principally lease cancellation costs, are accrued when the decision to close is made and, in 2001, $5.7 million, net was included in store and warehouse operating and selling expenses for closures and asset dispositions.

As part of a comprehensive business review conducted in 2000, a commitment to close 70 stores was made. A charge of $110.0 million related to those closures was reported on a separate line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, because of its significance. This estimate was increased in 2001 by $8.4 million, reflecting an increase in estimated lease termination costs resulting from a softening in the market for real estate subleases. An accelerated store closure program in 1999 resulted in a charge of $40.4 million and is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings similar to the 2000 closures.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The estimated fair values of financial instruments recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets or disclosed within these Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements have been determined using available market information, information from unrelated third party financial institutions and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange.

Short-term assets and liabilities: The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.

Notes Payable: The fair values of the zero coupon, convertible subordinated notes and senior subordinated notes were determined based on quoted market prices.

Interest Rate Swaps and Foreign Currency Contracts: The fair values of our interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts are the amounts receivable or payable to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current interest and exchange rates. These amounts were provided by an unrelated third party financial institution and were immaterial at year end 2001 and 2000.

There were no significant differences as of December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000 between the carrying values and fair values of the financial instruments except as disclosed below:


(1) We own 944,446 warrants to purchase shares of PurchasePro.com. Because the warrants have not been registered under the rules of the Securities Act of 1933, they are not publicly traded on a market exchange. In 2000, we determined the fair value of these warrants using an option model with the assistance of our investment banker. At December 29, 2001, the fair value of the warrants was minimal.