|
Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets are reviewed for possible impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is assessed at
the location level, considering the estimated undiscounted cash flows
over the assets remaining life. If estimated cash flows are insufficient
to recover the investment, an impairment loss is recognized based on the
fair value of the asset less any costs of disposition. An impairment loss
of $19.3 million was recognized in 2001 relating to certain under-performing
retail stores. Impairment charges of $63.0 million were also recognized
in 2000.
Facility Closure
Costs: The Company regularly reviews store performance against expectations
and closes stores not meeting investment standards. Costs associated with
closures resulting from such on-going performance reviews, principally
lease cancellation costs, are accrued when the decision to close is made
and, in 2001, $5.7 million, net was included in store and warehouse operating
and selling expenses for closures and asset dispositions.
As part of a comprehensive
business review conducted in 2000, a commitment to close 70 stores was
made. A charge of $110.0 million related to those closures was reported
on a separate line in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, because
of its significance. This estimate was increased in 2001 by $8.4 million,
reflecting an increase in estimated lease termination costs resulting
from a softening in the market for real estate subleases. An accelerated
store closure program in 1999 resulted in a charge of $40.4 million and
is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings similar to the
2000 closures.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments: The estimated fair values of financial instruments
recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets or disclosed within these
Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements have been determined using
available market information, information from unrelated third party financial
institutions and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable
judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates
of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange.
Short-term assets
and liabilities: The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables
and accounts payable approximate their carrying values because of their
short-term nature.
Notes Payable:
The fair values of the zero coupon, convertible subordinated notes
and senior subordinated notes were determined based on quoted market prices.
Interest Rate
Swaps and Foreign Currency Contracts: The fair values of our interest
rate swaps and foreign currency contracts are the amounts receivable or
payable to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into
account current interest and exchange rates. These amounts were provided
by an unrelated third party financial institution and were immaterial
at year end 2001 and 2000.
There were no significant
differences as of December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000 between the
carrying values and fair values of the financial instruments except as
disclosed below:

| (1)
|
We
own 944,446 warrants to purchase shares of PurchasePro.com.
Because the warrants have not been registered under the rules of the
Securities Act of 1933, they are not publicly traded on a market exchange.
In 2000, we determined the fair value of these warrants using an option
model with the assistance of our investment banker. At December 29,
2001, the fair value of the warrants was minimal. |
|