MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(continued)
INCOME TAXES
We account for income taxes in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")
No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," as amended.
This statement establishes financial accounting and
reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that
result from an enterprise's activities during the current
and preceding years. It requires an asset and liability
approach for financial accounting and reporting of
income taxes.
As of June 30, 2007, we have current net deferred tax
assets of $124.0 million and non-current net deferred
tax liabilities of $16.6 million. The net deferred tax assets
assume sufficient future earnings for their realization, as
well as the continued application of currently anticipated
tax rates. Included in net deferred tax assets is a valuation
allowance of approximately $5.5 million for deferred tax
assets, where management believes it is more likely than
not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the
relevant jurisdiction. Based on our assessments, no additional
valuation allowance is required. If we determine
that a deferred tax asset will not be realizable, an adjustment
to the deferred tax asset will result in a reduction of
earnings at that time.
We provide tax reserves for Federal, state, local and
international exposures relating to periods subject to
audit. The development of reserves for these exposures
requires judgments about tax issues, potential outcomes
and timing, and is a subjective critical estimate. Although
the outcome relating to these exposures is uncertain, in
management's opinion adequate provisions for income
taxes have been made for estimable potential liabilities
emanating from these exposures. In certain circumstances,
the ultimate outcome of exposures and risks
involves significant uncertainties which render them
inestimable. If actual outcomes differ materially from
these estimates, including those that cannot be quantified, they could have a material impact on our results of
operations, as we experienced in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2006 (see "Results of Operations, Fiscal 2006 as
Compared with Fiscal 2005-Provision for Income Taxes").
DERIVATIVES
We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance
with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended, which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments
embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities.
This statement also requires the recognition of all derivative
instruments as either assets or liabilities on the
balance sheet and that they be measured at fair value.
We currently use derivative financial instruments to
hedge certain anticipated transactions and interest rates,
as well as receivables and payables denominated in
foreign currencies. We do not utilize derivatives for
trading or speculative purposes. Hedge effectiveness is
documented, assessed and monitored by employees who
are qualified to make such assessments and monitor the
instruments. Variables that are external to us such as
social, political and economic risks may have an impact
on our hedging program and the results thereof. For a
discussion on the quantitative impact of market risks
related to our derivative financial instruments, refer to
"Liquidity and Capital Resources-Market Risk."
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We are required to record the fair value of stock-based
compensation awards as an expense in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," as amended. In
order to determine the fair value of stock options on the
date of grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. Inherent in this model are assumptions related to
expected stock-price volatility, option life, risk-free interest
rate and dividend yield. While the risk-free interest rate
and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions that
are based on factual data derived from public sources, the
expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions
require a greater level of judgment which makes them
critical accounting estimates.
We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption
that is a combination of both current and historical implied
volatilities of the underlying stock which are obtained
from public data sources. This approach is used as a predictor
of future realized and implied volatilities and is
directly related to stock option valuation. For stock option
grants issued during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007,
we used a weighted-average expected stock-price
volatility of 24% based upon the implied volatility at the
time of issuance.
With regard to the weighted-average option life
assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past
grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises.
Patterns are determined based on specific criteria of the
aggregate pool of optionees including the reaction to
vesting, realizable value, long-run exercise propensity,
pent-up demand, stock run-up effect and short-time-tomaturity
effect. For stock option grants issued during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, we used a weightedaverage
expected option life assumption of approximately
8 years.
While we believe the above critical estimates are based
on outcomes that are reasonably likely to occur, if we
were to increase or decrease the expected option life by
one year and simultaneously increase or decrease the
expected volatility by 100 basis points, recognized
compensation expense would have changed approximately
$2.0 million in either direction for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2007.
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
During the three-year period ended June 30, 2007, there
have not been material changes in the assumptions underlying
these critical accounting policies, nor to the related
significant estimates. With the exception of our tax
settlement with the Internal Revenue Service in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006, which finalized the ultimate liability
for exposures which were previously inestimable (see
"Results of Operations, Fiscal 2006 as Compared with
Fiscal 2005-Provision for Income Taxes"), the results of our
business underlying these assumptions have not differed
significantly from our expectations.
While we believe that the estimates that we have made
are proper and the related results of operations for the
period are presented fairly in all material respects, other
assumptions could reasonably be justified that would
change the amount of reported net sales, cost of sales,
operating expenses or our provision for income taxes as
they relate to the provisions for anticipated sales returns,
allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence
reserve and income taxes. For fiscal 2007, had these
estimates been changed simultaneously by 2.5% in either
direction, our reported gross profit would have increased
or decreased by approximately $4.7 million, operating
expenses would have changed by approximately $0.6
million and the provision for income taxes would have
increased or decreased by approximately $1.4 million.
The collective impact of these changes on operating
income, net earnings and net earnings per diluted common
share would be an increase or decrease of approximately
$5.3 million, $6.7 million and $.03, respectively.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
We manufacture, market and sell skin care, makeup,
fragrance and hair care products which are distributed in
over 135 countries and territories. We believe that the
best way to increase stockholder value is to provide our
customers and consumers with the products and services
that they have come to expect from us in the most
efficient and profitable manner. With this goal in mind,
we have developed a long-term strategy based on the
following five imperatives:
- Optimize brand portfolio
- Strengthen product categories
- Strengthen and expand geographic presence
- Diversify and strengthen distribution channels
- Achieve operational and cost excellence
In fiscal 2007, we continued to find ways to strengthen
our core brands and product categories, maximize highgrowth
brands, incubate and develop next generation
brands and divest non-strategic brands. Net sales from
Estée Lauder and Clinique grew on a global basis, fueled
by strong demand overseas. Our faster growing M·A·C,
Bobbi Brown, La Mer, Jo Malone and Aveda brands continued
to grow in virtually all regions and we acquired the
remaining equity interest in Bumble and bumble. Sean
John Unforgivable continued to be a success at retail in
North America and we rolled out the brand in certain
international markets during fiscal 2007. We launched
products under the Tom Ford brand name in North
America and Europe and entered into a license agreement
with Ford Motor Company to create a fragrance using the
name Mustang. In July 2007, we acquired the Ojon
Corporation, a privately held hair care and skin care
company based in Canada. In August 2007, we sold
Rodan + Fields back to its founders.
The majority of our net sales continue to be generated
outside the United States. Around the globe, we generated
growth in sales and profits in our travel retail business
and increased our presence in China and Russia. We also
acquired a distributor in Turkey and established an affiliate
in Brazil.
In alternative distribution channels, we continued to
grow our online business in North America, where
products from most of our brands are available at
Company-owned websites. However, in order to streamline
this business, we terminated our majority-owned
Gloss.com joint venture. In addition, we recently
expanded the online business into the United Kingdom,
Australia and France. Certain of our products are now
available at specialty retailers such as Sephora, ULTA, and
Shoppers Drug Mart. We made strategic investments to
establish the platform upon which we intend to build our
pharmacy channel business in Europe. Origins has
recently expanded into the French pharmacy channel. We
also began to expand the number of Company-owned
Jo Malone retail stores in Europe, including the brand's
first French store in Cannes.
We continued to make progress on our Strategic
Modernization Initiative ("SMI"). In May 2007, our Aveda
operating unit began using SAP software, a critical part of
SMI. We anticipate SMI implementation will continue at
additional locations in fiscal 2008, with the majority of our
locations to be implemented through fiscal 2010.
Despite the rise in energy and raw material costs, we
were able to improve our overall cost of goods margin by
negotiating new contracts with suppliers and achieving
significant savings by sourcing from Asia. We also reduced
the number of our global manufacturing and distribution
facilities by increasing the use of third-parties to control
shipping and warehousing costs. In addition, we improved
speed to market of new SKUs and expanded our hub
warehouse concept, which allows us to take components
on a just-in-time basis.
During fiscal 2007, we also faced challenges, many of
which we expect to be ongoing in fiscal 2008. For
instance, we continue to see challenges for certain of our
core brands due in part to the consolidation and changes
taking place among retailers and the decline in effectiveness
of gift-with-purchase promotions. In addition, the
fragrance business model continues to be a challenge,
with even the most successful launches having difficulty
becoming profitable. Efforts to expand geographically
are complicated by increasing regulatory issues and
cultural barriers.
As we continue to implement our strategic imperatives,
we expect to make selective investments, embark on new
business endeavors, and pursue initiatives that we believe
will have long-term benefits. The timing, impact and
magnitude of any particular actions, such as an acquisition
to strengthen our product categories and/or diversify
our distribution channels, are subject to numerous factors
and cannot be predicted.
The following table is a comparative summary of
operating results from continuing operations for fiscal
2007, 2006 and 2005 and reflects the basis of presentation
described in Note 2 and Note 17 to the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods
presented. Products and services that do not meet our
definition of skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care
have been included in the "other" category.
The following table presents certain consolidated earnings data as a percentage of net sales:
In order to meet the demands of consumers, we continually
introduce new products, support new and established
products through advertising, sampling and merchandising
and phase out existing products that no longer meet
the needs of our consumers. The economics of developing,
producing, launching and supporting products
influence our sales and operating performance each
period. The introduction of new products may have some
cannibalizing effect on sales of existing products, which
we take into account in our business planning.
|