Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
5. Joint Ownership of Generating Facilities

Joint Ownership of Catawba Nuclear Station
Owner Ownership Interest
North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1 (NCMPA) 37 .5%
North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation (NCEMC) 28 .125%
Duke Energy Corporation 12 .5%
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency (PMPA) 12 .5%
Saluda River Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Saluda River) 9 .375%
100 %

As of December 31, 1998, $516 million of Property, Plant and Equipment, net of $219 million of accumulated depreciation and amortization, represented Duke Energy's investment in Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2. Duke Energy's share of operating costs is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Duke Energy entered into contractual interconnection agreements with the other joint owners of Catawba Nuclear Station to purchase declining percentages of the generating capacity and energy from the station. These purchased power agreements were effective beginning with the commercial operation of each unit. Units 1 and 2 began commercial operation in June 1985 and August 1986, respectively. The purchased power agreements were established for fifteen years for NCMPA and PMPA and ten years for NCEMC and Saluda River. While the purchased power agreements with NCMPA and PMPA extend for fifteen years, a significant decrease in the percentage of capacity and energy Duke Energy is obligated to purchase occurs in the eleventh calendar year of operation for each unit. This significant decrease occurred in 1995 for Unit 1 and 1996 for Unit 2.

The interconnection agreements also provide for supplemental power sales by Duke Energy to the other joint owners of Catawba Nuclear Station to satisfy their capacity and energy needs beyond the capacity and energy which they retain from the station or potentially acquire in the form of other resources. The agreements further provide the other joint owners the ability to secure such supplemental requirements outside of these contractual agreements following an appropriate notice period. NCEMC and Saluda River have given such appropriate notice effective January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2002, respectively. In addition, as a result of the merger, the other joint owners have the right to end their supplemental capacity requirements as of January 1, 2001 upon notice to Duke Energy by December 31, 1999. As the other joint owners retain more capacity and energy from the station, or obtain additional capacity and energy from a third party, supplemental power sales are expected to decline. Management believes this will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations or financial position.

The interconnection agreements with the other joint owners include provisions that Duke Energy will provide generating reserves to backstand the other joint owners' retained capacity in the station at the system average cost of installed capacity. Additionally, the agreements include certain reliability exchanges designed to manage outage-related risks by exchanging energy entitlements between the Catawba and McGuire Nuclear Stations, impacting Duke Energy as well as all the other joint owners. The agreements also provide the other joint owners the ability to terminate the interconnection agreements in their entirety upon eight years written notice to Duke Energy. Such notice was submitted by PMPA in December 1997, and by Saluda River in May 1998. Both PMPA and Saluda River will provide the reserves associated with their respective retained capacity. Management believes this will not have a material adverse effect on consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Purchased energy cost payments are based on variable operating costs and are a function of the generation output of the station. Purchased capacity payments are based on the fixed costs of the station and include capital costs and fixed operating and maintenance costs. Actual purchased capacity costs for 1998 and projected obligations through 2000, the last year of the purchase buy-backs, are approximately $73 million, $53 million and $7 million, respectively.

The portion of purchased capacity subject to levelization not currently recovered in rates is being deferred, and a deferred return is recorded on the accumulated balance. Duke Energy is recovering the accumulated balance, including the deferred return, when the sum of the declining purchased capacity payments and accrual of deferred returns for the current period drops below the levelized revenues. Jurisdictional levelizations are intended to recover total costs, including deferred returns, and are subject to adjustments, including final true-ups. The costs of purchased energy and the non-levelized portion of purchased capacity is recorded on a current basis.

The current levelized revenues approved in the last general rate proceedings are approximately $211 million, $94 million and $7 million for North Carolina retail, South Carolina retail and Other Wholesale (FERC), respectively. Purchased power costs, subject to levelization, are deferred based on allocation factors of approximately 62%, 26% and 2% for North Carolina retail, South Carolina retail and Other Wholesale (FERC), respectively. The PSCSC, on May 7, 1996, ordered a rate reduction in the form of a decrement rider for an interim true-up adjustment. Deferred amounts related to two former wholesale customers have been recovered separately and are no longer collected through wholesale rates. An allocated amount of purchased power costs in the pricing of supplemental sales made to the other joint owners is also recovered on a current basis.

For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, purchased capacity and energy costs from the other joint owners was approximately $88 million, $120 million and $151 million, respectively. These amounts, after adjustments for the costs of capacity purchased not reflected in current rates, are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Net Interchange and Purchased Power. As of December 31, 1998 and 1997, $747 million and $836 million, respectively, associated with the cost of capacity purchased but not reflected in current rates have been accumulated in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Purchased Capacity Costs and Current Portion of Purchased Capacity Costs.