Foreign Portfolio
Our foreign credit and trading portfolio is subject to country risk. We define country risk as the risk of loss from unfavorable economic and political developments, currency fluctuations, social instability and changes in government policies. A risk management framework is in place to measure, monitor and manage foreign risk and exposures. Management oversight of country risk including cross-border risk is provided by the Country Risk Committee.
Table 23 presents total foreign exposure broken out by region at December 31, 2006 and 2005. Total foreign exposure includes credit exposure net of local liabilities, securities, and other investments domiciled in countries other than the United States. Credit card exposure is reported on a funded basis. Total foreign exposure can be adjusted for externally guaranteed outstandings and certain collateral types. Outstandings which are assigned external guarantees are reported under the country of the guarantor. Outstandings with tangible collateral are reflected in the country where the collateral is held. For securities received, other than cross-border resale agreements, outstandings are assigned to the domicile of the issuer of the securities. In regulatory reports under Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) guidelines, cross-border resale agreements are presented based on the domicile of the issuer of the securities that are held as collateral. However, for the purpose of the following tables, resale agreements are generally presented based on the domicile of the counterparty because the counterparty has the legal obligation for repayment.
December 31 | ||
---|---|---|
(Dollars in millions) | 2006 | 2005 |
Europe |
$ |
$ |
Asia Pacific (3) | 27,403 | 13,938 |
Latin America (4) | 8,998 | 10,551 |
Middle East | 811 | 616 |
Africa | 317 | 86 |
Other (5) | 7,131 | 4,550 |
Total |
$ |
$ |
Our total foreign exposure was $129.9 billion at December 31, 2006, an increase of $45.1 billion from December 31, 2005. The growth in our foreign exposure during 2006 was concentrated in Europe, which accounted for $85.3 billion, or 66 percent, of total foreign exposure. The European exposure was mostly in Western Europe and was distributed across a variety of industries with the largest concentration in the private sector which accounted for approximately 67 percent of the total exposure in Europe. The growth in Western Europe was due to the organic growth of $20.1 billion primarily driven by our Global Corporate and Investment Banking business, as well as the $10.0 billion addition of MBNA exposures in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Spain.
Asia Pacific was our second largest foreign exposure at $27.4 billion, or 21 percent, of total foreign exposure at December 31, 2006. The growth in Asia Pacific was driven by higher securities trading exposure primarily in Japan, South Korea and Australia. Loans and Leases, loan commitments, and other financing in Australia also contributed to the increase in Asia Pacific.
Latin America accounted for $9.0 billion, or seven percent of total foreign exposure at December 31, 2006, a decline of $1.6 billion, or 15 percent, from December 31, 2005. The decline in exposure in Latin America was primarily due to the sale of our Brazilian operations, partially offset by the equity in Banco Itaú received in exchange for the sale, and a decline in local country exposure in Chile. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in cross-border exposure in Mexico.
For more information on our Asia Pacific and Latin America exposure, see discussion on foreign exposure to selected countries defined as emerging markets beneath Table 25.
As presented in Table 24, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, the United Kingdom had total cross-border exposure of $17.3 billion and $21.2 billion, representing 1.18 percent and 1.64 percent of Total Assets. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the United Kingdom was the only country whose total cross-border outstandings exceeded one percent of our total assets. At December 31, 2006, the largest concentration of the cross-border exposure to the United Kingdom was in the banking sector. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, Germany was the only country whose total cross-border outstandings of $12.6 billion and $10.0 billion were between 0.75 percent and one percent of total assets.
(Dollars in millions) | December 31 | Public Sector | Banks | Private Sector | Cross- border Exposure |
Exposure as a Percentage of Total Assets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2006 |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
1.18 % |
2005 | 298 | 7,272 | 13,616 | 21,186 | 1.64 | |
2005 | 74 | 1,585 | 8,481 | 10,140 | 0.91 |
As presented in Table 25, foreign exposure to borrowers or counterparties in emerging markets increased $3.0 billion to $20.9 billion at December 31, 2006, compared to $17.9 billion at December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher sovereign and corporate securities trading exposures in Asia Pacific. Foreign exposure to borrowers or counterparties in emerging markets represented 16 percent and 21 percent of total foreign exposure at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
(Dollars in millions) | Loans and Leases, and Loan Commitments |
Other Financing (2) |
Derivative Assets (3) |
Securities/ Other Investments (4) |
Total Cross- border Exposure (5) |
Local Country Exposure Net of Local Liabilities (6) |
Total Foreign Exposure December 31 2006 |
Increase (Decrease) From December 31 2005 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region/Country | ||||||||
Asia Pacific | ||||||||
China |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
South Korea | 254 | 546 | 84 | 2,493 | 3,377 | | 3,377 | 2,222 |
India | 560 | 423 | 313 | 739 | 2,035 | | 2,035 | 444 |
Singapore | 226 | 9 | 116 | 521 | 872 | | 872 | 402 |
Hong Kong | 345 | 36 | 56 | 427 | 864 | | 864 | 305 |
Taiwan | 305 | 52 | 52 | 40 | 449 | 293 | 742 | (176) |
Other Asia Pacific | 77 | 22 | 10 | 482 | 591 | | 591 | (4) |
Total Asia
Pacific |
2,003 | 1,136 | 719 | 7,895 | 11,753 | 342 | 12,095 | 3,403 |
Latin America | ||||||||
Mexico | 924 | 195 | 204 | 2,608 | 3,931 | | 3,931 | 607 |
Brazil | 153 | 84 | 26 | 1,986 | 2,249 | 402 | 2,651 | (820) |
Chile | 221 | 13 | | 9 | 243 | 83 | 326 | (654) |
Argentina | 32 | 17 | | 76 | 125 | 127 | 252 | 58 |
Other Latin America | 108 | 131 | 10 | 18 | 267 | 15 | 282 | (77) |
Total Latin
America |
1,438 | 440 | 240 | 4,697 | 6,815 | 627 | 7,442 | (886) |
Middle East
and Africa |
484 | 261 | 140 | 231 | 1,116 | | 1,116 | 414 |
Central
and Eastern Europe |
| 68 | 21 | 126 | 215 | | 215 | 73 |
Total
|
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
At December 31, 2006, 58 percent of the emerging markets exposure was in Asia Pacific, compared to 49 percent at December 31, 2005. Asia Pacific emerging markets exposure increased by $3.4 billion. Growth was driven by higher cross-border sovereign and corporate securities trading exposure, primarily in South Korea, India and Singapore, as well as higher other financing exposure in India. Our exposure in China was primarily related to our investment in CCB at both December 31, 2006 and 2005.
In December 2006, the Corporation completed the sale of its Asia Commercial Banking business to CCB. Our corporate banking and wholesale franchises are not impacted by this sale.
At December 31, 2006, 36 percent of the emerging markets exposure was in Latin America compared to 47 percent at December 31, 2005. Lower exposures in Brazil and Chile were partially offset by an increase in Mexico. The decline in Brazil was related to the sale of our Brazilian operations in September 2006 in exchange principally for equity in Banco Itaú. As of December 31, 2006, our investment in Banco Itaú accounted for $1.9 billion of exposure in Brazil. The decline in Chile was due to higher local liabilities which reduced our local exposure.
In August 2006, we announced a definitive agreement to sell our operations in Chile and Uruguay for equity in Banco Itaú. These transactions are expected to close in early 2007. Subsequent to the sale of our Brazilian operations and the closing of the Chile and Uruguay transactions, the Corporation will hold approximately seven percent of the equity of Banco Itaú through voting and non-voting shares.
The increased exposures in Mexico were attributable to higher cross-border corporate securities trading exposure. Our 24.9 percent investment in Santander accounted for $2.3 billion and $2.1 billion of exposure in Mexico at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
In December 2005, we announced a definitive agreement with a consortium led by Johannesburg-based Standard Bank Group Limited for the sale of our assets and the assumption of our liabilities in Argentina. This transaction is expected to close in early 2007.