Performance-Based Cash Compensation

Performance-Based Cash Compensation

 

Annual Incentive Cash Payments.

Net income is the key financial component of Intel's incentive cash programs, and in 2007 net income increased 38% compared to 2006. Primarily because of this result, total cash compensation to listed officers increased 57% overall.

Annual incentive cash payments are made under the Executive Officer Incentive Plan. This plan mirrors the broad-based plan for employees, with the added feature of an individual performance adjustment. The three core elements of the program, which are multiplied together to determine the annual incentive cash payment, are as follows:

  • a formula based on earnings growth and operational performance, which results in a bonus multiplier;
  • an incentive cash baseline for each executive officer; and
  • an individual performance adjustment.

The annual incentive cash payment cannot be increased beyond the maximum limits calculated each year under the formula and cannot in any event exceed $10 million for any individual. The following illustration shows the Executive Officer Incentive Plan formula.

EIOP Multiplier

As shown above, the sum of the three corporate performance components determines the Executive Officer Incentive Plan multiplier. We expect the multiplier calculated under the plan to typically range between 2 and 4 (but it may be higher or lower depending on the output of the formula), with a target multiplier of 3. The Executive Officer Incentive Plan provides that the individual performance adjustment could range between 90% and 110%. The committee has the ability to apply subjective, discretionary criteria to determine the individual performance adjustment percentage.

Each corporate performance component is targeted around a score of 100%, with a minimum score of zero. The committee elected to use net income as the financial performance metric to reward executive officers for growing earnings. Diluted earnings per share was considered, but the committee preferred net income to evaluate both absolute and relative financial performance, as it is independent of factors such as stock price movements and stock buybacks that affect earnings per share. The committee may adjust Intel's net income based on qualifying criteria selected by the committee in its sole discretion as described in the plan. The methodology used to calculate Intel's net income for both absolute and relative financial performance is the same. Further details on each component follow:

  • Relative Financial Component. To determine relative financial performance, the committee compares Intel's annual net income growth relative to the market, which for this purpose we define as the 15 technology peer companies plus the companies that make up the S&P 100. To determine Intel's performance relative to the market, Intel's net income percentage growth (plus one) is divided by the simple average (with each group weighted equally) of the annual net income percentage growth for the S&P 100 and the 15 technology peer companies (plus one). There is some overlap in the S&P 100 and the 15 technology peer companies that we have identified. We have done this intentionally to provide slightly more weighting to our relative performance compared to the technology peer companies that are also in the S&P 100. Through this component, the committee rewards executive officers for how well Intel performs compared to a broader market. In 2007, Intel's net income grew significantly faster than the market average (38.3% vs. 5%).
  • Absolute Financial Component. To determine absolute financial performance, Intel's current-year net income is divided by Intel's average net income over the previous three years. Due to historical volatility in earnings, the committee decided to use a rolling three-year average in the denominator so that Intel does not over- or under-compensate executive officers based on volatility in earnings. Through this component, the committee rewards executive officers for sustained performance. In 2007, Intel's net income was 10% higher than the trailing three-year average.
  • Operational Component. Each year, the committee approves operational goals and their respective success criteria for measuring operational performance. The operational goals typically link to performance in several key areas, including financial performance, product design/development roadmaps, manufacturing/cost/productivity improvements, and customer satisfaction. For 2007, the committee approved 23 operational goals, allocated and grouped into the categories described in the following tables, with weightings that total 100 points. The goals and success measures are defined within the first 90 days of the performance period. The scoring for each goal ranges from 0 to 1.25 based on the level of achievement reflected in Intel's confidential internal annual business plan. The results are summed and divided by 100, such that the final operational score is between 0 and 1.25. The operational goals selected by the committee are also used in the broad-based employee annual incentive cash plan and are prepared each year as part of the annual planning process for the company, so that all employees are focused on achieving the same company-wide operational results. These operational goals are derived from a rigorous process for tracking and evaluating performance; however, some goals have non-quantitative measures that require some degree of subjective evaluation. Over the past five years, operational goals have scored between 88% and 108%, with an average result of 99%. The operational goals are intended to be a practical and realistic estimate of the coming year based on the data, projections, and analyses that Intel uses in its planning processes. The scores for the year, representing Intel's achievement of the year's operational goals, are calculated by senior management and are reviewed and approved by the committee. The company scored 107% on its operational goals in 2007, up from 88% in 2006.

2007 Operational Goal Categories

Architecture/Platforms – 25 points   Customer Orientation – 25 points
  • Next-generation product development
  • Graphics leadership
 
  • Improved roadmap flexibility, delivery performance, and response rates
  • Reinvigoration of brand leadership
     
Manufacturing/Technology – 25 points   Growth and Execution – 25 points
  • Factory performance and costs
  • Process technology milestones
 
  • Revenue and product roadmap ramps/execution
  • Headcount and spending metrics and execution

Executive Officer Incentive Plan Formula Results for 2007

Following the end of fiscal year 2007, the committee determined the annual incentive cash payments in accordance with the plan's formula. The 2007 financial results yielded a multiplier of 3.49, calculated as follows:

Relative Financial Component   Absolute Financial Component
(In millions)($)
  Operational Component   Points   EOIP Multiplier
                 
(1 + 38.3%)     6,976     Architecture/Platforms   24.0    
(1 + 5.0%)   6,314(1)   Manufacturing/Technology   30.5    
        Customer Orientation   24.6    
        Growth and Execution   28.0    

 
  Total   107.1/100  

 

1.32   1.10   1.07   3.49
(1) With the requirement in 2006 to include the impact of stock-based compensation in generally accepted accounting principles financial statements, the 2004 and 2005 net income numbers include the impact of stock-based compensation to ensure consistency in measuring net income growth. Additionally, the 2005 net income number excludes the additional tax expense of $250 million related to the decision to repatriate non-U.S. earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

In addition, for fiscal 2007 the committee elected to provide each listed officer with a positive individual performance adjustment in light of the totality of Intel's strong performance in 2007.

The following graph illustrates how the amount of the average annual incentive cash payment to listed officers has varied with changes to Intel's net income.

Listed Officer Average

Semiannual Incentive Cash Payments.

Intel's executive officers participate in a company-wide, semiannual cash incentive plan that calculates payouts based on Intel's corporate profitability to link compensation to financial performance. Payouts are communicated as a number of extra days of compensation, with executive officers receiving the same number of extra days as other employees. Two formulas compute a payout, with the actual payout based on the formula that delivers the higher value:

  • 0.65 days of compensation (calculated based on eligible earnings for the six-month period, including one-half of incentive baseline amounts) for every two percentage points of Intel's pretax profit as a percentage of revenue; or
  • a payment expressed as days of compensation based on 4.5% of net income divided by the current value of a worldwide day of compensation (essentially, Intel's daily payroll cost).

An additional two days of compensation are awarded annually if Intel achieves customer satisfaction goals. Payouts occur in the first and third quarters of each year based on corporate performance for the preceding two quarters.

Plan payments earned in 2007 totaled 17.3 days of compensation per employee, up from 15.1 days in 2006. This total included two days of compensation resulting from Intel's achievement of its customer satisfaction goals in 2007. In 2007, 2006, and 2005, semiannual incentive cash payments represented 5% or less of listed officers' total performance-based cash compensation.

© 2008 Intel Corporation